Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP15-0012
Review Name: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/18/2015 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: May 19, 2015 DUE DATE: June 02, 2015 SUBJECT: Hedrick Commons Apartments Development Plan Package- 2nd Engineering Review TO: 2x2 Construction Inc.; Attn: Noah Sensibar LOCATION: 1548 E Hedrick Dr REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP15-0012 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the links for further clarification: http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN: 12) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the existing SVTs for the driveway entrances, refer to TSM Sec.10-01.5.3 for line of sight matrix. The 45 degree angle as shown does not meet the matrix. Also after drawing on the correct SVTs for the driveways to the local street and the local streets Hedrick to Cherry Ave it appears that the proposed wall and one parking space falls within the SVT and needs to be revised to be either removed or designed to meet TSM Sec.10-01.5.1.A.1. Per the Matrix a driveway to local street has a near side dimension of 185'x20' and 110'x20' and the far side dimension for a local to local street is 110'x20' 14) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.6: Revise the development plan package to provide the water surface elevation for the FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) as per FIRM Panel #04019C1689L that goes through the subject property. The plan, Sheet DP-02a has the WSEL labeled as 2378 feet which is incorrect. Per the FIRM Panel the correct water surface elevation is 2379 feet NAVD88, revise. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comment provided above. For expedite purposes the development plan package can be reviewed over the counter (PDSD Engineering Division comment only) for stamp approval once all items have been addressed. Please call to schedule an appointment when ready. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 05/29/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The International Plumbing Code, 2012, is the controlling code for this structure, not the International Residential Code. Verify that the water service piping material that will be located beneath a building conforms to one of the standards listed in Table 605.4, IPC 2012. Reference: Section 605.3, IPC 2012. [Initial comment: Verify that the piping materials used for the water service and are shown having buildings constructed over them comply with the requirements of Sections 605, IPC 2012.] 2. Note that all water service and building sewer separations shall conform to the requirements of Section 603.2, IPC 2012. 3. Based on the plumbing fixtures shown on the site drawings, the water demand for the site, not including any irrigation demand, is 42 GPM which is more than the capacity of the existing 1" water meter. |
| 06/08/2015 | SSHIELD1 | HC SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. It does not appear that this comment has been addressed. As per the 2012 IBC, Chapter 11, Sections 3403 and 1107.6.2, all remodeled apartment units with additions are to meet the requirements of a type "B" accessible apartment units as per the 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 1004. Building design consideration for this requirements needs to be completed prior to a building permit submittal. 2. Provide a detail for the proposed van accessible space that demonstrates maximum grade slopes of 2% in all directions at the accessible parking and accessible aisle spaces Show the required accessible route to one of the Type "B" apartment units. As per the 2012 IBC, Table 1106.1, with 20 provided public parking spaces, 1 of those is required to be a van accessible parking space with an accessible aisle. Please provide 1 van accessible parking space with an accessible route to one of the Type "B" apartment units. END OF REVIEW |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/10/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 06/10/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/10/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |