Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP15-0002
Parcel: 126042730

Address:
1034 N JERRIE AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP15-0002
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/16/2015 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
04/17/2015 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
04/29/2015 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: May 04, 2015
DUE DATE: May 13, 2015
SUBJECT: Jerrie Plaza Development Plan Package- Engineering Review
TO: Frank Redon
LOCATION: 1034 N Jerrie Ave
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP15-0002

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package and Hydrology Report (Sturm Wasser Engineering, LLC; 12FEB15). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the following link for further clarification:
http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

The following items need to be addressed:

SITE PLAN:

1) AM Sec.2-06.3.8: Revise the development plan package to provide the north arrow on all sheets placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet with the scale and contour interval.

2) AM Sec.2-06.4.1: Revise the development plan package to provide the email addresses of the primary property owners, developers, registrants and other person's, firms, or organizations that prepared the development plan package documents.

3) AM Sec.2-06.4.1: Revise the development plan package to remove the Electrical and Mechanical Engineer information. These sheets are not part of the development plan package therefore the contact information for them is not required.

4) AM Sec.2-06.4.2.B: Revise the development plan package to include a brief legal description of the subject property within the Title Block.

5) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.C.2: Revise the development plan package and General Note C to read per the referenced section; "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual." Revise the package to remove all references to the old Development Standards. All notes should reflect the new Technical Standard Manual with correct corresponding code reference.

6) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.A: Revise the development plan package to provide the site boundary perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, together with distances in feet for the subject parcel.

7) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.B: Revise the development plan package to draw on the plan all existing easements with location, width and purpose. Specifically clarify the Walker Docket 8194 Page 744 which is shown adjacent to the proposed bicycle racks. If this is an easement it needs to be delineated in plan view to verify it does not conflict with the proposed building location.

8) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.C: Revise the development plan package to dimension the existing width of existing right-of-way, sidewalks, curbs and curb cuts within the public right-of-ways. Label the right-of-way as existing and Public.

9) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Revise the development plan package to correctly label and dimension the existing SVTs for the driveway entrance, refer to TSM Sec.10-01.5.3 for line of sight matrix.

10) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a Revise the development plan package to label and dimension.

11) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to provide a standard parking space detail for both handicap accessible and standard parking stalls. Verify that the wheel stops are placed to allow for the required 2.5 foot over hang to prevent vehicles from encroaching into pedestrian access path, landscape areas, existing or proposed walls, etc.

12) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development plan package, specifically Sheet C5, to correctly reference the Sheet that the details are located on. Currently the Keynotes reference Sheet 4, but it appears that all of the details are on Sheet 6, revise.

13) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development plan package and all applicable cross sections to label and dimension the required minimum 2-foot setback from the top and toe of all proposed fill slopes located along all property lines per TSM Sec.2-01.9.2&3.

14) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N: Revise the development plan package and Site Note #8 on Sheet C.2 to correctly label the FEMA FIRM Panel for the subject property.

15) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.2: Revise the development plan package, Keynotes #4, 12, 13 and 14 and Details 2 and 4 on Sheet C6 to remove the reference to retention basins. The areas as proposed should be keynoted as water harvesting areas and depressed a maximum of 6-inches. If the water harvesting areas are depressed 12-inches as called out (Keynote #12) then a geotechnical report with infiltration rates will be required to ensure that Stormwater runoff does not pond longer than 12 hours.

16) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project.

17) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan to label and dimension all areas of the required pedestrian circulation throughout the development. Provide the 4-foot width dimensions at all areas to ensure the minimum width requirements and to verify that signs, vehicular over hangs, etc. do not encroach into this area. The sidewalk along the south side of the building needs to be revised to meet the minimum 4-foot width or a TSMR will be required to modify the width to 3-feet.

18) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package to provide a detail for all proposed sidewalks onsite. Either provide a Keynote reference to the Pima County/City of Tucson Standard Detail for Public Improvement for sidewalk or provide a separate detail for construction purposes. This keynote can be located on both the site plan and grading plan sheets but at a minimum it has to be on the grading plan sheet which acts as the construction document.

19) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development plan package to verify conformance with handicap accessibility for the existing sidewalk within the right-of-way. Provide existing longitudinal and cross slopes to ensure maximum 2% or provide written approval from TDOT Permits and Codes that the existing sidewalk meets accessibility requirements.

20) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension all existing and new sidewalks located within the public right-of-way.

21) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development plan package to label the new handicap access ramps within the right-of-way for the driveway entrance. The keynote or detail needs to match the Pima County/City of Tucson Standard Detail for Public Improvement.

22) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Revise the development plan package to provide for centralized onsite solid waste and recycle collection service pick up per TSM Sec.8-01.5.1.A. The plan set must clearly show both solid waste and recycle collection and be clearly delineated on the site plan. If APC are to be used a waste stream calculation needs to be provided on the plan set and prior approval from ES will be required. For the use of APC onsite the containers must be screened.

DRAINAGE STATEMENT:

23) TSM Sec.4-04.2.3.1.2.A: Revise the Hydrology Report and Section 3.1 to correctly reference the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel that the subject parcel falls on. Per the FIRM Panel the correct reference is 04019C2282L (not K).

24) TSM Sec.4-04.2.3.1.2.A.4: Revise the Hydrology Report and Section 4.2 with a discussion to state that the project watershed has been designated as a non-designated Basin per the Alvernon Wash Watershed Basin Management Plan and since the parcel is less than an acre in size it is not subject to retention requirements. The content of the report is acceptable however the discussion must be clearly written for the subject property.

GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Due to the numerous comments and formatting requirements further comments may be generated upon the 2nd submittal.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
05/11/2015 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to the building, building sewer, site lighting, or electrical service to the building). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for constructing the building or as a separate permit.
2. Revise the site drawing to include the following information:
a. The location fire hydrants.
b. The pipe diameter of sanitary sewers and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number.
c. The proposed point of connection to the existing public sewer.
d. Any existing or proposed utility easements
e. The first floor elevations for the buildings
Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual No. 2-06.0.0, Section 4.8 and Section 107.2.13, IBC 2012.
05/13/2015 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS

Identification and Descriptive Data

All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:

Any relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site

Landscape Borders

All Landscape Borders

The following apply to all landscape borders.

One canopy tree is required for every 33 linear feet of landscape border or fraction thereof, excluding vehicular ingress or egress points.

Verify that trees within street landscape border are planted the appropriate distance apart.

Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1. Verify the correct zoning of adjacent properties and provide the appropriate screening and landscape coverage.

Sight Visibility Triangle

The maximum permitted height of a screen is 30 inches within a sight visibility triangle (see Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual). Verify pant material chosen meets height requirement. Include Sight Visibility Triangle's on landscape plan.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

Additional comments may apply
05/13/2015 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
05/13/2015 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change SHEET 2 OF 7
1. Provide a 3'-0": wide crossing at the top of each drive entrance to the spaces with slopes as required by 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% maximum running slope and 2% maximum cross slopes.
2. Add note 24: "All accessible route slopes are to comply with 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 403.3. Reference comment 1 for slope requirements.
3. Provide a large scale detail of the following showing all accessible requirements:
a. Accessible Parking Layout: Include dimensions, markings, signage, grade slopes, access to the accessible route from the accessible parking aisle and the accessible route.
b. Accessible Parking Sign: Include a van accessible sign.
END OF REVIEW
05/14/2015 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Michael St Paul
Planning Technician

PROJECT: DP15-0002
1034 North Jerrie Avenue
Retail. and Office

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 14, 2015


1) COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code, The Administrative and Technical Manuals were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is .

2. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.1.1 PURPOSE
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property.

This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes.

2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY
This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review.

2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided.
The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application:

2-06.2.1 Application Form
A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee;

2-06.2.2 Development Package
A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein;

2-06.2.3 Related Reviews
In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the;

2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and,

2-06.2.5 Fees
Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.4 - A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet.

2) COMMENT: See additional comments concerning the title block.

2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet.

3) COMMENT: North arrow, scale and contour intervals on each sheet as described above (2-06.3.8).

2-06.3.10 - A legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing is to be provided, preferably on the first sheet.

4) COMMENT: Provide a legend on the cover sheet.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

5) COMMENT: Provide the email address for all of the above on the cover sheet.

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

6) COMMENT: Place the legal description in the title block.

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

7) COMMENT: Place the address adjacent to the title block.

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

2-06.4.4.A - Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area;

8) COMMENT: Adjust the projection map so that the subject property ins approximately in the center.

2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and,

9) COMMENT: Provide the watercourses. Columbus Wash and Midway Wash should be in the map.


2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

10) COMMENT: The existing use is "vacant." Provide the proposed uses with the Specific Use Standards. See below.

The proposed uses are:

Administrative and Professional Office with Specific Use Standards 4.9.13.P

P. C-2 Commercial Zone - General Restrictions
1. Outdoor display of finished products for rent or sale at retail or wholesale is permitted, unless prohibited by a use-specific standard.
2. The land uses in the Commercial Services (except Automotive Service and Repair, Day Care Use; Medical Service, Extended Health Care; Transportation Services, Land Carrier; and Travelers' Accommodation, Lodging) Industrial, Restricted Adult Activities, and Wholesaling Use Groups shall be conducted entirely within an enclosed building unless modified by Use Specific Standards.

Retail; General Merchandise with Specific Use Standards 4.9.9.B.1

B. General Merchandise Sales
1. Outdoor display or storage of fertilizer, manure, or other odorous material shall be located at least 30 feet from any interior lot line.

Commercial Storage with Specific Use Standards 4.9.10.A

A. Commercial Storage
1. Adjacent to a residential use or zone, outdoor storage shall comply with the following.
a. Storage material shall not be visible from outside the screen.
b. Outdoor lighting shall be directed away from adjacent residential uses and zones.
2. Outdoor storage, when permitted, shall not be located in the street perimeter yard.


2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

11) COMMENT: Provide all the site conditions as describe above (2-06.4.8).

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is/are provided.

12) COMMENT: Depict all existing easements, as described above (2-06.4.8.B), on the plan.

2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

13) COMMENT: Provide with dimensions all the ROW information on the plan (2-06.4.8.C).

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

14) COMMENT: Provide the correct zoning for the adjacent properties.

2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation

2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

15) COMMENT: Depict all the above information on the plans for the street (2-06.4.9.H.4).

2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

16) COMMENT: Parking calculations are required. State the number required and the number provided. The building is identified as having 4,628 square feet. [4,628 / 300 = 15.43] It appears that fifteen (15) are required and fifteen (15) are provided. If this criterion can continue to be met, it is not necessary to breakout the parking calculation into all the sites uses.

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

17) COMMENT: The bicycle parking required for both the administrative office use and retail is two (2) short term and two (2) long term spaces. Provide the dimensioned plan as described above (2-06.4.9.H.5.d) and in UDC 7.4.9 Bicycle Parking Design Criteria.

2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

18) COMMENT: Provide any proposed easements, if any, as described above (2-06.4.9.L).

2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

19) COMMENT: The required front street setback in an established area is the greater of twenty (20) feet or one and one-half the height of each of the building's wall facing the street, measured from design grad to the top. Provide the structure's wall height UDC Section 6.4.5.C.1.a). The minimum setback is twenty (20) feet, and may be greater.

2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

20) COMMENT: Provide the information for the building, as described above (2-06.4.9.Q).

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

21) COMMENT: Continuous pedestrian circulation paths are required with all development (TS 7.01.3.3).

A) The pedestrian path must be connected to all public access areas of the development and to any adjacent streets (TS 7-01.3.3.A).

B) "Within this pedestrian circulation path, an accessible route is also required in compliance with the city's adopted building codes" (TS 7-01.3.2). "Pedestrian circulation paths designed for barrier-free accessibility for the physically disabled and located within any development are regulated by the adopted building codes" (TS 7-01.3.3.C).

C) "Sidewalks associated with PAALs must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation (minimum six inches, barriers, railings or other means" (TS 7.01.4.2.A).

D) "All sidewalks must be a minimum of four feet wide and installed to avoid any obstruction which decreases the minimum width to less than four feet" (TS 7-01.4.3).

2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual.

22) COMMENT: Clearly depict the sidewalk, fully dimensioned, as described above (2-06.4.9.S).

2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

23) COMMENT: All proposed signs are to be done with a separate permit.

2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.

24) COMMENT: See comments by the Landscaping Review Section.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Michael St. Paul, (520) 837-4959.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/19/2015 KROBLES1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed