Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP14-0212
Parcel: 134234130

Address:
245 S WILMOT RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP14-0212
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/19/2014 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
11/24/2014 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Denied Please indicate any fire hydrants on Wilmot.
The existing fire hydrant shown on sheet 4 is too far away.
12/09/2014 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: December 09, 2014
DUE DATE: December 17, 2014
SUBJECT: 245 S Wilmot Shops Development Plan Package- Engineering Review
TO: Metro TED; Attn: Lisa Bowers
LOCATION: 245 S Wilmot Rd
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP14-0212


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package, Drainage Statement (Cypress Civil Development, 04NOV14) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Cypress Civil Development, 02DEC14). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the following link for further clarification:
http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az


The following items need to be addressed:

SITE PLAN:

1) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant Development Plan Package case number (DP14-0212) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets.

2) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.B: Revise the development plan package to provide the recordation information for any existing easements to be abandoned onsite. If an easement is to be abandoned provide the recordation information on the plan. Per Sheet 4 there is a 10-foot public electrical easement that is existing under the proposed building foot print; this easement must be vacated prior to the approval of the development plan package or a Building CoO if allowed by Zoning.

3) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.A: Revise the development plan package to provide a lot combination approval through Zoning. It appears that the northern lot line has been revised and a Lot Split application has been applied for, S14-037, however the application has not been finalized. Provide final Zoning approval with recordation information prior to development plan package approval.

4) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Revise the development plan package label and dimension the existing far side pedestrian SVT for the access PAAL to the Arterial MS&R Street.

5) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to label the minimum dimensions for the proposed back-up spur at the end of the PAAL per UDC Sec.7.4.6.F.4. Specifically the 3-foot radii and the minimum 3-foot depth.

6) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.J: Revise the development plan package and the associated detail on Sheet 6 to label and dimension the future far side pedestrian SVT for the access PAAL to the Arterial MS&R Street.

7) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development plan package to provide the SEQ # for the required temporary construction easement and long term maintenance easement for all work that is located offsite and on the property located to the north of the subject property. Provide the notarized written agreement form the adjacent property owner for the use of the adjacent property.

8) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development plan package to provide the SEQ # for the required cross access and cross parking agreement for the proposed parking spaces and vehicular maneuverability (cars and refuse vehicles) between the 2 lots.

9) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the pedestrian access lane adjacent to the new long term bicycle parking space (Keynote #27) to verify the minimum 4-foot width requirement.

10) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project.

11) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the required 14'x40' clear approach for each container, etc.


SWPPP:

12) The proposed SWPPP meets the minimum requirements of the AzPDES 2013 Construction General Permit (CGP). However the SWPPP and Exhibits can not be stamped approved until approval of the development plan package. Provide both copies with resubmittal for stamp approval.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
12/09/2014 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Michael St Paul
Planning Technician

PROJECT: DP14-0212
245 South Wilmot Road
Retail & Food Service C-1 zone

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 9, 2014


COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code, The Administrative and Technical Manuals were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is .

2. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.1.1 PURPOSE
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property.

This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes.

2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY
This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review.

2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided.
The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application:

2-06.2.1 Application Form
A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee;

2-06.2.2 Development Package
A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein;

2-06.2.3 Related Reviews
In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the;

2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and,

2-06.2.5 Fees
Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.1 - Each sheet shall measure 24 inches by 36 inches and include a minimum one inch margin on left side and one-half inch margin on all other sides to facilitate efficient record keeping. A larger sheet format may be used with the approval of the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD).

2-06.3.2 - All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for record-keeping purposes. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. Smaller scales (60:1 or greater) may be used for some or all of the sheets with the prior approval of PDSD when it is determined legibility and the ability to be digitized and/or reduced for archiving will not be affected.
2-06.3.3 - All lettering and text (upper or lower case), and numbering, shall be a minimum of three-thirty-seconds inches in height to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for archiving.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

1) COMMENT: Provide the email address for all of the consultants.

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2) COMMENT: Provide the Development Package number (DP14-0212) near the title block on each sheet.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met.

3) COMMENT: What is the use for the north parcel? What are the calculations? What about the lot split?

2-06.4.7.C - Streets and Roads Notes

2-06.4.7.D - Utilities Note
All development package documents are to include the following note: "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public."

4) COMMENT: Provide the above note as quoted on the plans.

2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

5) COMMENT: Provide the above information for both lots effected by the lot reconfiguration.

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

6) COMMENT: Provide the easement information as described above on both parcels.

2-06.4.8.H - Conditions on adjacent land significantly affecting the design of the project will be shown, such as the approximate direction and gradients of ground slope; character and location of adjacent development; and drainage-ways, arroyos, ditches, and channels, including their existing conditions.

7) COMMENT: Provide the information above for the north parcel.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements.

8) COMMENT: There is a lot split (S14-037) that was approved to record. Is this lot split related to this project or do you plan on doing a lot split specific to this development?

2-06.4.9.E - Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) Land splits require a separate permit and review.

9) COMMENT: There is a lot split (S14-037) that was approved to record. Is this lot split related to this project or do you plan on doing a lot split specific to this development?

2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation

2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

10) COMMENT: Provide the above information, fully dimensioned, for the north parcel.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

11) COMMENT: Provide the above information, fully dimensioned, for the north parcel.

2-06.4.9.H.5.b - If any of the required parking is located off-site as permitted by the UDC, a drawing of that parking area is to be provided, together with the city's required parking agreement (include a copy of the lease agreement if applicable) must be provided. Please remember that in these situations, if the off-site parking location is a new parking area, it must comply with all parking area requirements and must be allowed as a principal use by the zoning classification of that property. If the off-site parking area location is an existing parking lot, the parking spaces utilized for the proposed land use must be non-required parking for the existing use for which the parking area was established.

12) COMMENT: Provide the cross access and parking documents.

2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

13) COMMENT: Clearly delineate and dimension any proposed easements. Identify the type and use with recording information as described above.

2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

14) COMMENT: All signs are under separate review and permits.

2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.

15) COMMENT: See comments by the landscape review section.

2-06.5.3.G.2 - Provide two copies of the protective covenants or common use agreements for any shared areas being established by easements over individually-owned property.

16) COMMENT: Provide copies of any cross-access and cross-paring agreements.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Michael St. Paul, (520) 837-4959.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents.

Provide all the lot-split information and plans for the residual parcel to the north. If this plan is related to S14-037, provide the "approved to record" plans.
12/10/2014 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Approved
12/16/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2586.06') is less than 12" below the first floor elevation (2587.00'). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
12/17/2014 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS

Identification and Descriptive Data

All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:

Rezoning case;

Subdivision case;

Board of Adjustment case;

Design Development Option case;

Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or,
Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the
site.

SECTION 4-01.0.0: COMMERCIAL RAINWATER HARVESTING

1.3 Applicability:

This standard applies to all new commercial development plans submitted after June 1, 2010.

3.1 Site Water Budget

The Site Water Budget shall detail the landscape water demand and the harvested water supply needed to meet 50% of landscape demand. The Site Water Budget and the Water Harvesting Implementation Plan shall be consistent with one another.

CITY OF TUCSON CODE
ARTICLE VIII. RAINWATER COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS

Sec. 6-182. Rainwater harvesting plan.

The director of the development services department may authorize
alternative compliance with development standards when conditions of
topography, site soils or ratio of landscape area to total site area would make
strict adherence to standard provisions unreasonable and the alternative
compliance advances the spirit of this article.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

Additional comments may apply
12/17/2014 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/27/2015 AROMERO4 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed