Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP14-0208
Parcel: 10704002F

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP14-0208
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/10/2014 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
11/17/2014 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Completed
12/02/2014 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change Because of the lack of detail, a meaningful accessibility review could not be conducted. Please provide the following:
1. A large scale detail of both offices and parking
a. Provide grade elevations of both offices from finished grade.
2. Provide further large scale details:
a. The accessible parking layout. Provide all accessible requirements such as dimensions, grade slopes, markings, signage, ramps and or flush access to the accessible route, show the accessible route and provide a van accessible space.
b. The accessible ramp, show all dimensions, slopes, landings and handrails. Provide a handrail elevation. Is this a new or existing tramp.
c. The accessible route to both offices from the accessible parking layout. Provide grade slopes.
d. The accessible parking sign, provide a van accessible sign
3. Please further define all existing and new elements of the site plan.

After these changes have been made, further comments may be forth coming.
END OF REVIEW
12/02/2014 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Headlee Roofing Company
Development Package (1st Review)
DP14-0208

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 3, 2014

DUE DATE: December 09, 2014

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 06, 2015.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.1.1 PURPOSE
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property.

This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes.

2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY
This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review.

2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided.
The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application:

2-06.2.1 Application Form
A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee;

2-06.2.2 Development Package
A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein;

2-06.2.3 Related Reviews
In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the;

2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and,

2-06.2.5 Fees
Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

1. COMMENT: Provide the PDSD Development Package approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of all sheets. The required stamp can be found at http://pdsd.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/development-permits under Development Package.

2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet.

2. COMMENT: Provide a drawing index on sheet 1.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

3. COMMENT: Provide the name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project on the right half of sheet 1.

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

4. COMMENT: Remove the address from the title block and provide it adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

5. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP14-0208, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

6. COMMENT: As this plan is full code due to a building expansion greater than 25% remove the "TD" number and "DSMR" number from the plan as they are no longer applicable.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

7. COMMENT: Provide the individual parking plan case number adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2-06.4.7.A.7 - If the property is part of a subdivision plat that is being reviewed or has been recorded, provide the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note, indicate whether the project is part of a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), condominium, or another similar type project.

8. COMMENT: Provide the lot split case number, S14-051" adjacent to the title block on each sheet. The lot split will need to be approved prior to approval of the development package.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

9. COMMENT: There are two (2) existing electrical easements that run under building 3. As it appears that this building was built without permits provided documentation that allows this structure within the easement from the electrical companies that have rights to these easements.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

10. COMMENT: Provide the zoning for the "Mobile Mini Lease Property" shown to the south and west.

2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

11. COMMENT: Provide a width dimension for the entrance gate shown near the northeast corner of the site. It does not appear that the full width of the gate meets the requirements of UDC Section 7.4.6.I.

12. COMMENT: Per UDC Section 7.4.6.F.2.a.(1) Access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least one foot from: An open structure, such as a carport or covered pedestrian access path as measured from the closest part of the structure or roof overhang. That said provide a one (1) setback dimension from the overhangs located on building 3, not shown on the plan, to the PAAL and access lane to the west.

13. COMMENT: Per UDC Section 7.4.6.F.2.b Access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least two feet from a wall, screen, or other obstruction over six inches. That said provide a two (2) setback dimension from the cooler located on building 3, not shown on the plan, to the PAAL and access lane to the west.

14. COMMENT: As vehicle access is required to the dumpster the area shown as "2"crushed concrete tiles" will need to meet the requirements of UDC Section 7.4.6.I.

15. COMMENT: Per UDC Section 7.4.6.F.4.a A back-up spur must be provided at the end of a row of parking if no ingress or egress is provided at that end. That said provide a fully dimensioned backup spur at the west end of the northern parking area.

16. COMMENT: Per UDC Section 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said show the required barriers;
a. Along the north and west side of the northern most vehicle use area.
b. North of building 3 along the "Existing Dirt" area.
c. Between the southwest corner of building 1 and the northeast corner of building 2.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

17. COMMENT: Provide a typical parking space detail for both a standard and physically disabled space. Show the wheel stop along with a location dimension, see UDC Section 7.4.6.H.3.

18. COMMENT: Until the IPP has been approved the development package cannot be approved. Once approved provide a note stating the IPP case number, date of approval, what was approved and any conditions of approval.

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

19. COMMENT: The bicycle parking calculation should show the required number for both short and long term and the provided number for both short and long term.

20. COMMENT: Provide a short term bicycle detail that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Sections 7.4.9.B.1.a, .d, .e, 7.4.9.C.f, .g & .h are met.

21. COMMENT: Provide written documentation that the in lieu fees for the long term bicycle parking have been paid.

2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

22. COMMENT: Provide the building height of all storage sheds on the plan.

23. COMMENT: Show the awnings and cooler that are located on building 3.

24. COMMENT: Based on the most current Pictometry Photos there is a structure located directly west of building 2 that is not shown on this plan.

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

25. COMMENT: Per TSM 7-01.3.3.B Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required as follows: The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas. Show the required pedestrian circulation path to all buildings, and the dumpster area on the plan.

26. COMMENT: Per TSM 7-01.4.1.C A sidewalk is required adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no other parking spaces or PAALs intervene. That said provide a sidewalk between building 1 and the vehicle parking spaces to the north and east.

27. COMMENT: Per TSM 7-01.4.1.B A sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located. That said show the required sidewalk along the west side of building 3.

28. COMMENT: Per TSM 7-01.4.3.B All sidewalks must have a minimum unobstructed vertical clearance of 84 inches. That said demonstrate on the plan that this requirement is met to the awnings and cooler that are located on building 3, not shown on the plan.

Addition comments;

29. COMMENT: The area shown as "Mobil Mini Lease Property" either needs to be shown as all storage containers to be removed prior to final zoning inspections of Headlee Roofing Company site plan or provide an approved development package for the Mini Mobil site.

30. COMMENT: Remove the reference to "Pre-Submittal Plan" as it is not relevant to this plan.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
.
12/08/2014 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied The DP must meet the format and content requirements of TS 2-06. The following comments are representative and not exhaustive.
Provide the necessary contact information on the cover sheet (TS 2-06.4.1)
Show drainage pattern. For new surfaces ensure the patterns match existing.
12/09/2014 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
12/09/2014 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approv-Cond Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.
12/09/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Revise the site drawing to include the following information:
a. The location and size of water wells, water lines, and fire hydrants.
b. The pipe diameter of the public sanitary sewer, the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number.
c. If water mains and sewers are not located on or adjacent to the tract, indicate the direction, distance to, and sizes of those nearest the property.
d. The first floor elevation for any buildings having plumbing facilities.
Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual No. 2-06.0.0, Section 4.8 and Section 107.2.13, IBC 2012.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/12/2014 KROBLES1 APPROVAL SHELF Completed
12/12/2014 KROBLES1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
12/12/2014 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed