Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP14-0202
Parcel: 13216600A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP14-0202
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/03/2014 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Passed
11/04/2014 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change FROM: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT: DP14-0202
4004 S. Park Avenue
Development Package - COT Compressed Natural Gas Plant Replacement

TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 13, 2014

DUE DATE: November 17, 2014

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. The following zoning comments are related to the civil and or landscape plan sheets.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 15, 2015.


2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.2 - All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for record-keeping purposes. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. Smaller scales (60:1 or greater) may be used for some or all of the sheets with the prior approval of PDSD when it is determined legibility and the ability to be digitized and/or reduced for archiving will not be affected.
2-06.3.3 - All lettering and text (upper or lower case), and numbering, shall be a minimum of three-thirty-seconds inches in height to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for archiving.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.3.6 - Provide a blank three-inch by five-inch block in the lower right corner of the plan adjacent to the title block on the first sheet of the development package for use by Pima County Addressing.

01. COMMENT: Add the PDSD digital approval stamp on the civil and landscape plan sheets only. The following link will take you to the page where you can download the digital copy of the PDSD digital signature stamp which is in a PDF, JPEG, or DWG format. Add the stamp as requested.

The development package sheets and the building plan sheets must be separated. They can travel together for concurrent review purposes but are two separate applications. The sheet index on the cover sheet shall only list the building plan sheets and a separate cover sheet for the development package shall be added and include the sheet index for the development package sheets only, separate DP notes, calculations, etc as noted in the Administrative Manual section 2-06.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet.

02. COMMENT: Label the contour interval under the north arrow on sheet C2.0
******************************************************************************************

2-06.3.10 - A legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing is to be provided, preferably on the first sheet.

.03 COMMENT: Add the legend with the symbols applicable to the site plan on sheet C1.0
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

04. COMMENT: Label on the DP cover sheet, the email addresses of the property owner and professionals that prepared the development package (site/Grading/landscape sheets).
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

05. COMMENT: The development package sheets must be paginated, i.e., 1 of 20, 2 of 20, 3 of 20 etc. A sheet index on the DP cover sheet must be added to include the pagination numbers and all sheets must have the sheet numbers listed in the lower right corner. (The same cover sheet can be used for the DP as long as the applicable DP notes and calculations are added.)
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

06. COMMENT: Revise the location map on the cover sheet to comply with the standard as noted above.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.4.A - Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area;

07. COMMENT: Revise the location map on the cover sheet to comply with the standard as noted above.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and,

08. COMMENT: Ensure that the major streets that bound the one mile location map and major washes like the Tucson Diversion Channel are labeled.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

09. COMMENT: Label the Section corners based on how the location map drawn.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.5 - When the development package documents consists of more than one sheet, a sheet index (a legible drawing of the site showing the area represented on each sheet) is to be placed on the cover sheet or the second sheet.

10. COMMENT: Include a sheet index on the cover sheet of the DP, the same as noted in comment five (5) above.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____."

11. COMMENT: List on the cover sheet of the DP the existing zoning of the property.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

12. COMMENT: List on the cover sheet of the DP the site area in square feet and acreage.
******************************************************************************************
2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

13. COMMENT: List on the cover sheet of the DP, the use as noted by the standard above and include any Use Specific Standard sections applicable to the principal uses(s).
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

14. COMMENT: List on the cover sheet of the DP, the square footage of any new enclosed structure that is related to the new CNG replacement.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.7.B.1 - List the following notes on all plans/plats:
"The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall."

15. COMMENT: List the note as noted above on the DP cover sheet.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.7.B.2 - If applicable, list the following notes and complete the blanks.

2-06.4.7.B.3 - List the following note on all development package documents:
"Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan."

16. COMMENT: List the note as noted above on the DP cover sheet.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.7.D - Utilities Note
All development package documents are to include the following note: "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public."

17. COMMENT: List the note as noted above on the DP cover sheet.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

18. COMMENT: If applicable add the information as noted above on the site plan sheet. Label the easement and recordation information for the drainage way along the west side of the subject site.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.8.H - Conditions on adjacent land significantly affecting the design of the project will be shown, such as the approximate direction and gradients of ground slope; character and location of adjacent development; and drainage-ways, arroyos, ditches, and channels, including their existing conditions.

19. COMMENT: Draw and label the drainage way along the west side of the subject area, as noted by the standard above.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

20. COMMENT: Label the zoning classification adjacent to the west of the subject site.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

21. COMMENT: If applicable draw, dimension and label the information as noted by the standard above.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan

2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan.

2-06.4.9.M.2 - Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently.

22. COMMENT: The grading plan will be approved as part of the DP package review.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

23. COMMENT: Label the building setback from the new CNG building to the property line along the west.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

COMMENT: Label the building footprint on the DP site plan sheet the square footage and height of the new building.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents.
11/13/2014 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed The addition to this facility, as shown on the drawings, is exempt from accessibility requirements as per the 2010 ADASAD IBC, Section 205.5 Utility Facilities.
END OF REVIEW
11/14/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Clarify the position of the existing domestic water line shown running along the east side of the new CNG enclosure with respect to the location of the proposed foundation for the CNG enclosure (detail 3/C3.0). Reference: Section 307.5, IPC 2012.
11/17/2014 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approved
11/17/2014 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Approved
11/17/2014 ELIZABETH LEIBOLD ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: November 14, 2014
SUBJECT: Engineering Review Development Package (SP/GP/SWPP) 1st submittal Engineering Review
ADDRESS: 4004 S Park Av T14S R13E Sec36
PROJECT: COT CNG Plant & Associated Drainage Improvements and Pavement Maintenance
FLOODPLAIN: Local jurisdictional floodplain, FEMA zone X-unshaded, 2287L
WATERSHED: Julian Wash Watershed (BW) Balanced Basin Management area
REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, P.E.
PROJECT: DP14-0202

SUMMARY: Engineering has reviewed Development Package for site plan and grading review including Drainage Report review. Although the ERR Report is acceptable for this project, Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Package at this time until the following comments are addressed.

MASTER COVER SHEETS/ GENERAL NOTES:
1) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.7.6.a,B.2.b: Address the following Development Package general note comments:
a) List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.
b) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.7.B.1 Add the following as a note to the plans: The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall.
c) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.7.B.3: Add note to plans: Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan.
d) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.7.A.2: Add as a note the total disturbance area in square footage for the project including replacement area of pavement.
e) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.4.B: Label Tucson Diversion Channel on a location map on cover sheet and on SWPP sheet.

BASE LAYER SHEET COMMENTS:
2) Admin Man Sec.2-06.3: Add DP14-0202 case number to Development Package sheets.
3) Admin Man Sec.2-06.3.10: Provide delineations for floodplain limits in legend.
4) Admin Man Sec.2-06.3.5: A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for Development Package approval stamp, using the following link: http://pdsd.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/cdrc/acad-cot_stamp_model_1_0.jpg or see website for other file versions: http://pdsd.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/development-permits

SITE PLAN SHEET COMMENTS:
5) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.8.H: Provide recordation info and label existing western drainageway.

DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS:
6) Tech Man Sec.4-04.2.3: Address the following drainage related comments:
a) Revise plan sheet C2.0 to show clean-outs at all bends (keynote 12) of the proposed drainage system.
b) Add section in drainage report that provides guidance for annual drainage maintenance activities. Specify how and what to look for when maintaining the OWS, drainage pipes, outlet structure, and other drainage features.
c) Explain who currently maintains the proposed outlet area and who is proposed to maintain the proposed outlet improvements.
7) Tucson Code 26-4(2): The ERR Report is acceptable for Engineering for this project.

GRADING, PAVING, DETAIL SHEET COMMENTS:
8) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9.M.1, Tech Man Secs.2-01.4.1.C, 8-01.5.2.G: Address the following grading comments:
a) Label and depict on planview the local Basis of Elevation location on grading plan.
b) Clarify limits of disturbance on planviews.
c) Add cut/fill quantities to plan as a note (notes may be on notes sheet or on cover or on grading sheet C2.0).
d) Clarify/revise, delineate, and label disturbance / grading limits on grading plan that matches SWPPP.

UTILITIES / EASEMENTS COMMENTS:
9) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.8.B, 2-06.4.9.L: All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. Assure complete information is provided for easements on the site. All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. Depict and label any drainage maintenance easement at downstream end and label as public or private. The easements should be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN COMMENTS:
10) Tucson Code Chap.26 Art.2: If total disturbance exceeds one acre, submit a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that meets the minimum requirements of AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP) or other permit, and City of Tucson code Chap.26 Art.2. Otherwise, provide interim SWPP controls at site.
11) For resubmittal package, provide 2 copies of revised SWPPP exhibit, report. Copy of NOI, and general permit will be required at Pre-con but may be submitted with resubmittal.

SOILS/GEOTECHNICAL REPORT COMMENTS:
12) Tech Man Sec.4-03.III.3.5.1.3.a: Provide associated soils report in next submittal.

Please provide a revised Development Package plan sheets, revised Drainage Report, SWPPP, Soils Report, and comprehensive response letter that address the comments provided above. If you have questions, call me at 837-4934.

Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM
Civil Engineer
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
11/19/2014 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Approved Waiting for resubmittal for building plans that will indicate compliance with the 2012 IFC.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/09/2014 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed