Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP14-0201
Review Name: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/13/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ```CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Tucson Iron & Metal Company Development Package (2nd Review) DP14-0201 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 13, 2015 DUE DATE: June 04, 2015 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 04, 2015. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 2-06.2.1 Application Form A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee; 2-06.2.2 Development Package A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein; 2-06.2.3 Related Reviews In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the; 2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and, 2-06.2.5 Fees Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. 1) COMMENT: The sheet index shows sheet 7 as "6 of 7", this should be 7 of 7. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 2-06.4.2.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 2) This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: Show the sections lines on the location map and label the section corners. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 3) COMMENT: The use specific standard listed for Construction Material Sales is not correct. Per UDC TABLE 4.8-5: PERMITTED USES - INDUSTRIAL ZONES, Retail Trade Land Use Group With Land Use Class/Type: Construction Material Sales the use specific standard should be 4.9.13.Q. 4) COMMENT: As this project is proposing two (2) primary uses list both. Add Salvaging and Recycling Along with the applicable Use Specific Standards, "4.9.5.G.2 & .4 and 4.9.13.Q" 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building; 5) COMMENT: As outdoor sales area is proposed for construction materials provide the outdoor sales area gross square footage proposed. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. 6) This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: As this site is comprised of four parcels, 119-01-006A, 119-01-006K, 129-14-004A, and 129-14-004B, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combo Request form with the next submittal. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 7) COMMENT: Per UDC Section 7.4.3.4 Based on Gross Floor Area (GFA). Use the total GFA of all applicable land uses within the development site, plus the area of any outdoor areas necessary to provide the service to the public or conduct the activity, such as outdoor eating areas or outdoor areas used for sale of merchandise, to calculate the requirement. That said it does not appear that the vehicle parking space calculation includes the construction material sales area. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4. 8) This comment was not addressed correctly. As there are two (2) primary uses proposed the calculation show include both. Per UDC Section 7.5.3.B Calculations for Loading Areas. The calculation for the required number of loading areas is based on the proposed land use and the size of the project as provided in Section 7.5.5, Required Loading Areas. The size of the project is the gross floor area of the use, including any outdoor area dedicated to the use, but excluding vehicular use areas. That said once comment 5 is addressed above an additional loading space may be required for the Construction Material Sales area. COMMENT: Provide a loading space calculation on the plan, Additional comments; 9) This comment was not addressed. Sheet 1 still lists a "Residence". COMMENT: The last approved use for parcel 129-14-004A appears to be residential, non-conforming in the I-1 zone. As the proposed parking is a change of use for this site the residential use is no longer allowed. 10) This comment was not addressed. There is existing outdoor storage shown on this plan that is not shown on the last approved plan. If this outdoor storage is for the Salvaging and Recycling activities it does not meet the requirement of UDC Section 4.9.5.G.2. COMMENT: Per UDC Section 4.9.5.G.2 All Salvaging and Recycling activities and storage shall occur within an enclosed building. That said it appears that there are areas of activity and storage not shown on the site plan approved in January of 2007 that are now shown on this plan. Provide written documentation form the Zoning Administration that these proposed outdoor use areas are allowed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package, Approved Pima County Combo form. . |
| 06/02/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Relevant case number for reviews or modifications such as zoning determinations that affect the site Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 06/02/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Relevant case number for reviews or modifications such as zoning determinations that affect the site Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 06/04/2015 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/08/2015 | SSHIELD1 | HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved |