Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP14-0201
Parcel: 12914004A

Address:
714 E 36TH ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP14-0201
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/06/2014 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
11/13/2014 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Approved
11/26/2014 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Tucson Iron & Metal Company
Development Package (1st Review)
DP14-0201

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 2, 2014

DUE DATE: December 05, 2014

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 04, 2015.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.1.1 PURPOSE
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property.

This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes.

2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY
This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review.

2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided.
The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application:

2-06.2.1 Application Form
A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee;

2-06.2.2 Development Package
A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein;

2-06.2.3 Related Reviews
In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the;

2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and,

2-06.2.5 Fees
Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

1. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP14-0201, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

2-06.4.2.A - Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area;

2. COMMENT: The subject property is not correct on the location map. The proposed project address is south of 36th and the location map shows a site north of 36th.

2-06.4.2.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

3. COMMENT: Show the sections lines on the location map and label the section corners.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____."

4. COMMENT: The existing zoning shown on sheet 1 is not correct, the zoning for this site is I-1

2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

5. COMMENT: The "Site area" listed on sheet 1 should include the entire site for Tucson Iron & Metal.

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

6. COMMENT: Add the applicable Use Specific Standards, "4.9.5.G.2 & .4 and 4.9.13.Q" to the proposed use listed on sheet 1.

2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

7. COMMENT: Remove the reference to "sec 5.5, gateway corridor zone (gcz)" from General Note 3 as it is not applicable.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

8. COMMENT: As a note provide the floor area for all buildings on site.

2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and,

9. COMMENT: There is a storage building shown on parcel 129-14-004B and a residence shown on parcel 129-14-004A. As the building shown on parcel 129-14-004B was not shown on any approved site plan and parcel 129-14-004B will be combined with the remaining Tucson Iron & Metal Company parcels the structures constitute an expansion of building area. Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

10. COMMENT: Provide the site boundary perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot.

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

11. COMMENT: If applicable show all easements on the plan along with the recordation information.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements.

12. COMMENT: As this site is comprised of four parcels, 119-01-006A, 119-01-006K, 129-14-004A, and 129-14-004B, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combo Request form with the next submittal.

2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

13. COMMENT: Per UDC Section 7.4.6.F.4.c A minimum distance of three (feet must be provided between the back of spur and any wall, screen, or other obstruction over six inches in height. That said provide the required 3'-0" from the back of spur to the property line or existing fence, not shown on the plan, which ever is more restrictive.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

14. COMMENT: The vehicle parking space calculation shows the office square footage as 2,383 and on sheet 2 it is listed as 2,384 clarify the difference.

15. COMMENT: Provide a standard vehicle parking space detail on the plan.

16. COMMENT: At the north end of the existing 18 vehicle parking spaces the northern most parking space dashed line indicates that the 18th is to be removed, clarify.

2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4.

17. COMMENT: Provide a loading space calculation on the plan,

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

18. COMMENT: Per TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B Provide a continuous sidewalk, pedestrian circulation that connects the "Residence and Storage" buildings to the other buildings on site.

19. COMMENT: Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.C A sidewalk is required adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no other parking spaces or PAALs intervene. That said provide a sidewalk between the "Residence" building and the proposed vehicle parking area.

2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

20. COMMENT: Show the existing sign on the plan.

Additional comments;

21. COMMENT: The last approved use for parcel 129-14-004A appears to be residential, non-conforming in the I-1 zone. As the proposed parking is a change of use for this site the residential use is no longer allowed.

22. COMMENT: There is a metal canopy shown at the northwest corner of the main building that is not shown on the last approved site plans. Provide permitting documentation for this canopy.

23. COMMENT: There is a fabric canopy shown to the northeast of the main building that is not shown on the last approved site plans. Provide permitting documentation for this canopy.

24. COMMENT: Per UDC Section 4.9.5.G.2 All Salvaging and Recycling activities and storage shall occur within an enclosed building. That said it appears that there are areas of activity and storage not shown on the site plan approved in January of 2007 that are now shown on this plan. Provide written documentation form the Zoning Administration that these proposed outdoor use areas are allowed.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package, Approved Pima County Combo form.
12/02/2014 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change If all property owner lots are combined, the accessible parking requirements are ok. If lots are not combined, 2 accessible parking spaces must be added to the new parking lot with one being van accessible. An accessible route must be added to connect these spaces to the public right of way.
Please clarify.
END OF REVIEW
12/04/2014 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change 1) Revise the plans to remove the storage building from the street landscape border as applicable. UDC 7.6.4-C

2) An unpaved planting area, which must be a minimum of 34 square feet in area and four feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. 7.6.4.B.3
Revise the planters at the southern end of the proposed parking lot to meet the standard.

3) Provide screening for any new development adjacent to the existing R-2 zoned properties. UDC Table 7.6.4-I

4) Submit copies of any approved plans for the site and the proposed expansion calculations per UDC 7.6.2.B.

5) If at this time no landscaping is proposed in areas of existing plant material, it is not necessary to show future landscaping on the same drawing. Show any existing landscaping and any addition necessary to document code compliance. UDC 7.6.2.B

In addition if the MS&R right of way is temporarily used per UDC 5.4.5, the required screening and landscaping, as specified on the site/landscape plan required by Section 5.4.5.F, shall be moved to the location specified on the site plan at no cost to the City. Contact Zoning for an MS&R Covenant.

6) Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. UDC 7.6.4.H
12/04/2014 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Reqs Change Submit an NPP Plan or Exception request.
12/05/2014 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change Provide 3 feet of clear space behind the proposed back-up spurs to the property line or to any perimeter walls or fences.
Provide curb openings to allow stormwater to flow into new landscaping areas to maximize water harvesting.
12/09/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Passed

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/06/2015 AROMERO4 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed