Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP14-0197
Review Name: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/21/2015 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | DATE: February 04, 2015 DUE DATE: February 17, 2015 SUBJECT: Alamo Crossing Grading Plan Development Plan Package- 2nd Engineering Review TO: Rick Engineering Co., Attn: Dan Castro LOCATION: 6105 E Pima St; T14S R14E Sec01 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP14-0197 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package, Drainage Report (Rick Engineering Co, 30MAY14 revised 25AUG14 and 15OCT14), Geotechnical Evaluation (Western Technologies Inc., 17NOV14) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Rick Engineering Co, 17NOV14). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the following link for further clarification: http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN: 1) Complied. 2) Complied. The Private Paving Plans will be re-reviewed for conformance with all details and cross section for the areas within the private right-of-way. 3) Complied. The basin side slopes have changed which causes changes to the landscape sheets under DP14-0095 and the planting plan. Verify with landscaping that the basin and landscaping still meet code requirements. 4) Complied. The Private Paving Plans will be re-reviewed for conformance with all details and cross section for the areas within the private right-of-way 5) Complied. 6) Complied. The Private Paving Plans will be re-reviewed for conformance with all details and cross section for the areas within the private right-of-way 7) Complied. The Private Paving Plans will be re-reviewed for conformance with all details and cross section for the areas within the private right-of-way SWPPP: 8) Complied. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 01/27/2015 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Alamo Crossing Development Package, Grading Only (2nd Review) DP14-0197 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 04. 2015 DUE DATE: February 17, 2015 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. The grading plan does not match the tentative plat. See Engineering comments. 3. Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until Engineering and Landscape review sections have approved the plan. 4. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved tentative plat. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 01/30/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | A separate grading plan must show identical site layout as the approved Development Plan to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the Grading Plan are reflected on the Development plan. The approved Development Plan indicates a 3:1 slope for CA B-2 the grading plan indicates a 2:1 slope. Revise as necessary to comply with DP or show how basin will facilitate required landscaping with slop revision. Ensure that all Engineering comments and concerns are addressed Additional comments may apply |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/18/2015 | SHANAE POWELL | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/18/2015 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |