Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP14-0177
Review Name: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/03/2014 | ELEIBOL1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | TO: Paul Iezzi P.E., Mark Fellinger R.L.A. SUBJECT: DP14-0177 Development Package (SP/GP/SWPP) 2nd submittal Engineering Review ADDRESS: 9455 E Valencia Rd, Ward 4 LOCATION: T15S R15E Section 15 PROPERTY: 117-06-0620, TUCSON LOT 3 BLK 80 FLOODPLAIN: FEMA zone X-unshaded, 2277L, local jurisdictional riparian floodplain REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, P.E. SUMMARY: Engineering has reviewed the resubmittal of the Development Package for site/grading/SWPP plan review including Drainage Report review, and recommends conditional approval pending approval of ERR-TSMR. Standard permit conditions forthcoming including parcel combination completion prior to submittal of as-builts. If you have questions, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 11/13/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/14/2014 | RONALD BROWN | HC SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | RESUBMITTAL REVIEW COMMENTS PRESENTED IN ALL CAPS SHEET 5 1. At note 6 delete "ADA" and insert reference to 2012 IBC, Chapter 11 and 2009 ICC A117.1. OK SHEET 6 2. Identify the sidewalk ramp, show all dimensions, slopes, directional arrows and percentages. OK 3. Provide a man gate for egress to the right of way. OK SHEET 8 4. At the north east corner of building 3 there is an unidentified element that looks rather like an outdoor stage area (Amphitheater?). Please provide a large scale detail of this area and show all accessible requirements including seating as required, ramps, landings, slopes, directional arrows and slope percentage, landings and handrails. Provide a large scale elevation detail of the handrails. AN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW AND APPROVAL CAN NOT BE PROVIDED WITHOUT SUFFICIENT DETAILS PROVIDED WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE SHOWING ALL ACCESSIBLE REQUIREMENTS AS PER THE 2012 IBC, CHAPTER 11 AND THE 2009 ICC A117.1. 5. At the south end of building 3 there is another special area that looks like seating in the round. Please provide a large scale detail and show all accessible requirements as per the 2012 IBC, Section 1108.2 and the 2009 ICC A1217.1, Section 802. Show all companion seating. AN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW AND APPROVAL CAN NOT BE PROVIDED WITHOUT SUFFICIENT DETAILS PROVIDED WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE SHOWING ALL ACCESSIBLE REQUIREMENTS AS PER THE 2012 IBC, CHAPTER 11 AND THE 2009 ICC A117.1. SHEET 11 6. At detail S: Generic details are not acceptable. Please provide large scale details for all the different types of parking layouts as shown on the site and grading plans. Show all accessible parking requirements. OK SHEET 12 7. At detail X: a. Show all handrails in plan and elevation for all ramps and stairs. Show required handrail extensions. b. Provide large scale detailed elevations of all handrails. c. Show all stair and ramp dimensions, riser and treads, slopes, directional arrows and landings. d. Draw all details to scale. AN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW AND APPROVAL CAN NOT BE PROVIDED WITHOUT SUFFICIENT DETAILS PROVIDED WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE SHOWING ALL ACCESSIBLE REQUIREMENTS AS PER THE 2012 IBC, CHAPTER 11 AND THE 2009 ICC A117.1. END OF REVIEW |
| 11/14/2014 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/18/2014 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | TSMR CASE # DS14-31 REVIEW IS REQUIRED All plans will contain relevant case number(s) for reviews or modifications that affect the site in the lower right corner of each sheet. |