Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP14-0167
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/30/2014 | AROMERO4 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/01/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 10/01/2014 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | DATE: October 01, 2014 DUE DATE: October 07, 2014 SUBJECT: Interstate Commerce Park Lots 8-11 Development Plan Package- 2nd Engineering Review TO: EEC Inc., Attn: Ryan Stucki LOCATION: 9095 S Rita Rd; T15S R15E Sec34 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP14-0167 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement (EEC Inc., 17SEP14). Engineering Division recommends conditional approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. The following items need to be addressed prior to Engineering Section stamp approval: 1) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.A: Provide a copy of the Recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property and Cross Access Agreement. The document must have the Sequence Number prior to approval. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide the supplemental information requested above for Development Plan Package review and approval. For expedite purposes the Development Plan Package can be reviewed over the counter (PDSD Engineering Division comment only) for stamp approval once the supplemental information is provided For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 10/01/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Interstate Commerce Park Lots 8 -11 Development Package (2nd Review) DP14-0167 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 1, 2014 DUE DATE: October 7, 2014 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 20, 2015. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 2-06.2.1 Application Form A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee; 2-06.2.2 Development Package A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein; 2-06.2.3 Related Reviews In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the; 2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and, 2-06.2.5 Fees Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. 1. Zoning acknowledges that a Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property was submitted. The submitted document had and additional section added, 3.5 Partial Release. This section will need to be reviewed and approved by the COT Prosecutor's Office staff. Zoning has sent a copy of the covenant to the Prosecutor's Office for review. Once the additional section has been approved the document will need to be recorded, and the recordation information provide to Zoning staff prior to approval of the development package. COMMENT: It appears Buildings "F" & "H" are proposed to be built over property lines. A lot combination is required. Provide a copy of an approved Pima County Combo Request form with your next submittal. Additional Comments 2. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the Covenants and Restrictions. Article 2 section 2.1 (b) states "However, if the City expressly permits a reduced number of parking spaces on a Parcel due to the inclusion of the Parcel in the Project, the reduced number of parking spaces satisfies the foregoing minimum parking requirement. This statement needs to be removed from the Covenants and Restrictions as the COT is not going to approve a reduction in parking unless the appropriate process, i.e. variance, has been approved. As the submitted development package does not show that each individual parcel meets the minimum required number of vehicle parking spaces for the use(s) on that parcel cross parking is required. . The Covenants and Restrictions will need to be recorded prior to approval of the development package. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package . |
| 10/02/2014 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/08/2014 | AROMERO4 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 10/08/2014 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | 1) Revise the landscape plans to incorporate the Native Plant Mitigation requirements of D07-0028. 2) Address the screning requirements along the Science Park Drive frontage. UDC Table 7.6.4-1 3) Address the screening requirements on the south and east boundaries. UDC Table 7.6.4-1 |
| 10/08/2014 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/08/2014 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |