Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP14-0158
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/29/2015 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 02/02/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: GoodWill Donation Drop-Off, 5775 E. Broadway Blvd Development Package (1st Review) DP14-0158 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 3, 2015 DUE DATE: February 26, 2015 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 20, 2015. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 2-06.2.1 Application Form A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee; 2-06.2.2 Development Package A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein; 2-06.2.3 Related Reviews In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the; 2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and, 2-06.2.5 Fees Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 1. COMMENT: Remove the address from the title block and provide it adjacent to the title block. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. 2. COMMENT: List the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 3. COMMENT: Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) & UDC ARTICLE 5.5 GATEWAY CORRIDOR ZONE (GCZ)." 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 4. COMMENT: All zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 5. COMMENT: The proposed gates along Broadway Blvd will need to be approved by COT Transportation Department prior to approval of this development package. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 6. COMMENT: The accessible vehicle parking space will required a wheel stop to prevent a parking vehicle from overhanging the sidewalk. See UCD Section 4.4.6.H.1. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 7. COMMENT: Under "PROJECT INFORMATION" you list "TYPE II" bicycle parking. As "TYPE II" bicycle parking is not listed in the UDC clarify what you are referencing. It appears that this should be long term. 8. COMMENT: If you "TYPE II" bicycle parking is long term demonstrate on the plan how the requirements of UDC Section 7.4.9.D are met. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 9. COMMENT: As several special exception conditions relate to specific items on the site, i.e. fence slats, wall colors, etc, either the keynotes associated with these items need to reflect the conditions or the keynote needs to direct you to the conditions. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 02/23/2015 | RONALD BROWN | HC SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. There exists a concrete walk the same width as the east side of the building and no indication of demolition for a new concrete walk and ramp as shown. a. Please indicate more clearly all those existing items to be demolished, all existing items to remain and all new items of construction. 2. The accessible parking detail needs to reflect more accurately the exact accessible parking design shown on the site plan. a. Show 2% maximum grade slopes in all directions. b. Detectable warning strips are required only at transportation platforms. 3. Show a pole mount for the sign detail: a. The bottom of the reserved parking sign is to be 7'-0" a.f.g., no more, no less. 4. Provide a large scale detail for all ramps not shown in the accessible parking detail. Show all accessible requirements such as dimensions, slopes, arrows, material and widths. Comply with all requirements of the 2009 ICC A117.1, sections 405 or 406 as applicable. END OF REVIEW |
| 02/23/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/23/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Rezoning case; Subdivision case; Board of Adjustment case; Design Development Option case; Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING Minimum Width Street landscape borders must be a minimum of ten feet wide as measured from the street property line. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border must be measured from the future MS&R right-of-way line as determined by Section 5.4.4, Establishment of MS&R Right-of-Way Lines and Gateway Routes. Located on Site Street landscape borders must be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five feet of the required ten foot width may be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets. Obtain permission for use of ROW Continuous screens along street frontages for vehicle use area must be as determined by Table 7.6.4-I. Provide appropriate screening. Within a vehicular use area, one canopy tree is required for each four motor vehicle parking spaces or fraction thereof. The canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space must be located within 40 feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk). Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 02/25/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 02/26/2015 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | LOCATION: 5775 E BROADWAY BL PROJECT: GOODWILL COSMOS Donation Drop-Off Development Package (1st Review) ACTIVITY: DP14-0158 SPEIAL EXCEPTION: T14SE00073 / SE-14-73 SUMMARY: In October 2014, PDSD Engineering reviewed the proposed Special Exception SE-14-73 to change the use from drive-through coffee shop to Goodwill Donation Center at 5775 E BROADWAY BL. This Development Package was submitted for review of the proposed improvements to improvement onsite parking area for new use. COMMENTS: 1) Tech Man Sec.2.3.1: Address the following floodplain comments: a. The Special Exception Engineering comments included that any plan: "should show 100-year floodplain limits on planview or add note stating that there is jurisdictional floodplain on the site not impacting the existing structure." b. A floodplain use permit for improvements, or any new structures, is required. c. Submit hydrology report/drainage statement with computation of WSEL (at upstream corner of existing building) and floodplain limits impacting this site. d. Add and label delineation of the 100-year jurisdictional floodplain limits on planview. e. Add and label 100-year WSEL (at upstream corner of existing building). 2) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.3 Provide administrative street address, Development Package DP14-0158, Special Exception SE-14-73 to cover sheet at lower right side of sheet near title block. 3) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.7.A.6.a: Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating that project is designed to meet Overlay Zone(s): UDC Article 5.4 Major Streets and Routes Plan (MS&R) & UDC Article 5.5 Gateway Corridor (GCZ)." 4) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5: Show layout for parking design in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. Specifically: a. Clarify distance; show and label minimum distance between curb cuts at west end of project along frontage. b. Label radii dimensions of curb returns on plan view and 5) On MS& R routes, gated entrances are typically not allowed without full turn around capacity. Prior to approval of this development package, additional review of proposed gated entrance along Broadway Blvd may be required after further discussions with Zoning and TDOT Staff. A copy of gated entrance guidelines may be obtained upon request. Show location of gate signage referenced in keynote 16. Provide comprehensive response ltter with resubmittal addressing all comments. If you have questions, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold P.E., CPM, CFM |
| 03/04/2015 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | March 4, 2015 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP14-0158 PROJECT NAME: Goodwill PROJECT ADDRESS: 5775 E Broadway PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT Resubmittal Required. TDOT does not recommend approval of the Development plan. therefore a revised Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 1. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-03.2.4.M). If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. 2. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-4259 for permit information. Note required on plan. 3. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R) If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. 4. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-05.2.2.D) 5. The access points shall have 25' radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) 6. Dimension the width of all ingress/egress points (Tucson City Code, Chapter 25, section 39 & 40) 7. Tucson City Code Chapter 25 Section 38 requires a minimum driveway separation of 12'. 8. Gates on MS&R not allowed. Gate on Chantilly for Goodwill Access acceptable. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |