Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP14-0152
Parcel: 13423411B

Address:
135 S WILMOT RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP14-0152
Review Name: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
12/04/2014 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Needs Review FROM: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT: DP14-0152
135 S. Wilmot Road
Kneader's Restaurant

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 5, 2014

DUE DATE: December 24, 2014

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC).


1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is September 8, 2015.
********************************************************************

2-06.3.4 - A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet.

01. Follow up to previous comment 2: the digital approval stamp was not added to the landscape or irrigation sheets of the DP Package.

2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

02. COMMENT: Add the digital approval stamp to all plan sheets. Follow the link to download the digital stamp in a PDF format, http://pdsd.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/cdrc/acad-cot_stamp_model_1_0.pdf or the following link to download or open the DWG digital format http://pdsd.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/development-permits
******************************************************************************************

02. Follow up to previous comment 4: See the zoning redlines on the cover sheet related to previous comment 4 and 5.

2-06.3.7 - A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet.

04. COMMENT: Provide the location map as noted by the standard above. See related sections 2-0.4.A - .C. Only one Project location map is required and it should be on the cover sheet. If multiple project location maps are used they shall be consistent with the same information and scale.
******************************************************************************************

03. Follow up to previous comment 8: The sheet index must be revised; see the zoning redlines on the cover sheet.

2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet.

08. COMMENT: The sheet index on sheet C1.0 must include the landscape plan sheets.
******************************************************************************************

04. Follow up to comment 10: Until the recordation of the lot split occurs the development package cannot be approved. The recordation of the lot split will have to be listed on the cover sheet as a general note related to the lot split along with the Lot Split case number.

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

10. COMMENT: This parcel has been created as a result of a recent lot split from a larger parcel and has yet to be recorded. The legal description of the newly created parcel must be listed in the lower quadrant of the title block. Dan Castro of Rick Engineering in Tucson Az, (520-795-1000) was processing the lot split application through PDSD. It is suggested that contact with Dan Castro be made in order to confirm the lot split has been recorded. The new legal description as recorded must be listed in the title block.
******************************************************************************************

05. Follow up to previous comment 11: The sheet numbers in the lower right corner must be added on the landscape and irrigation sheets and corrected to state the sheet number and the total number of sheets (15). (There are 15 sheets in the package and 14 are listed in the sheet index and in the lower right corner.)

2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

11. COMMENT: The sheet index must include the following: the actual sheet number i.e., 1 of 14, 2 of 14, 3 of 14 etc. The sheet index can include the C1, C2, L1, L2, and the sheet numbers must be listed in the title block as 1 of 14, 2 of 14 etc.
******************************************************************************************

06. Follow up to previous comment 13: See new related comment 02.

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

13. COMMENT: Revise the project location map on sheet C0.1 to a scale of 3 inches = 1 Mile
******************************************************************************************

07. Follow up to previous comment 15: See new related comments 02 and 06

2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

15. COMMENT: Label the Section corners surrounding the section where the project is located.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

08. Follow up to previous comment 16: See the attached redline document for an example of a zoning data table. Revise the table placed on the cover sheet.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

16. COMMENT: The zoning and Land use notes and applicable zoning data must be listed on the cover sheet. Create a zoning data table that includes the zoning requirements such as Lot size, building square footage, building height allowed and actual, vehicle and bicycle parking required and provided and loading zone required and provided.
******************************************************************************************

09. Follow up to previous comment 18: The comment was not addressed as requested. Add as a general note the gross site area in square feet and acres. (If the info requested is listed in the Zoning Data Table there is no need to add a general note.)

2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

18. COMMENT: List as a general note on the cover sheet the square footage and acreage of the subject property based on the newly created lot. See comment 12 (Lot Split).
******************************************************************************************

10. Follow up to previous comment 19: List the Use Specific Standard(s) in the proposed general note 4. The correct use specific standard(s) that must be listed is based on which food service use is proposed. Review the Food Service type in table 4.8.6 under the commercial land use group and list the correct section that apply to C-1 zone and this development.

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

19. COMMENT: List as a general note on the cover sheet the use of the property as noted by the standard above. Refer to the UDC for the "subject to" requirements associated with the use.
******************************************************************************************

11. Follow up to previous comments 30, 32, and 33: The parking lot design still includes some incorrect dimensions or missing dimensions. For the angled parking spaces, label the angle of the proposed angled parking spaces, label the correct dimension for "D", and label the width of the HC access aisle between the HC parking spaces. All PAALs that provide access to 90 degree parking spaces must be a minimum of 24 feet in width except where angled parking is proposed. See redlines on sheets 2 and 6.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability.

30. COMMENT: It appears that there is some inconsistency in the parking lot design dimensions the site plan and the other site drawings. All site plan sheets whether site, grading, horizontal or landscape must be consistent in design and dimensions that comply with the design regulations in Article 7 of the UDC.

32. COMMENT: As noted in comment 30, there is an inconsistency between the site plan sheets. Refer to UDC section 7.4.6 for motor vehicle use area design criteria. Ensure that the all sheets depicting the site match not only in design but dimensions. Section 7.4.6.D.1 and table 7.4.6-A contains the design criteria that is to be used for the parking lot layout.

33. COMMENT: As noted in comment 16, the vehicle parking requirements must be listed in the zoning data table as noted in comment 16. The data for required and provided must include standard and Handi-capped parking spaces.
As also noted in comment 32, the parking lot design on the site plan and other site sheets are inconsistent. The parking lot dimensions on the site plan sheet do not meet the minimum standards listed in table 7.4.6-A.
******************************************************************************************

12. Follow up to previous comment 34: There was no response provided to the previous comment. The previous comment was not addressed on the revised DP submittal. Address the previous comment and respond accordingly.

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

34. COMMENT: Add the information for short and long term bicycle parking as noted by the standard above. List in the zoning data table the number of required and provided bicycle parking facilities. Add the dimensioned details drawing specific to the locations of the facilities.
******************************************************************************************

13. Follow up to previous comment 36: There was no indication as to how and when the new easement for the Water Hydrant would be recorded or recorded document provided.

2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

36. COMMENT: If applicable to this site add the information as noted by the standard above.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan

14. Follow up to previous comment 37: The grading plan is assumed approved once the development package is approved as a whole.

2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan.

2-06.4.9.M.2 - Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently.

37. COMMENT: The grading plan is being reviewed concurrently by zoning as it relates to the zoning review purview. Ensure that any changes that are made to the base site plan are made to all site sheets, whether grading, landscaping or horizontal sheets.
******************************************************************************************

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents.
12/09/2014 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: December 09, 2014
DUE DATE: December 24, 2014
SUBJECT: Kneaders Restaurant Development Plan Package- 2nd Engineering Review
TO: FFG Development, Attn: Austin Smith
LOCATION: 135 S Wilmot Rd; T14S R15E Sec18
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP14-0152

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package, Drainage Statement (not sealed and dated), Geotechnical Evaluation (Ninyo & Moore, 24OCT12) and Title Report (Dated 25SEP14) . Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the links for further clarification:
http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

The following items need to be addressed:

SITE PLAN:

1) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.3.5: Revise the development plan package to include the approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of each sheet, to include Landscape Sheets. The link to the stamp can be found here: http://pdsd.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/development-permits. The stamp is not included on the Landscape Sheets.

2) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.2.E: Revise the development plan package to provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e sheet 1 of 15, 2 of 15 etc.). The total number of sheets needs to include the landscape plans. Specifically Sheet 14 "Planting Specification" sheet is not included in the Index or the sheet count, revise.

3) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant Development Plan Package case number (DP14-0152) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. The case number must be added to the landscape sheet as well.

4) Complied.

5) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.4: Revise the project location map to meet the minimum requirements within the referenced section; the following still need to be revised or added to the location map; label sections, township and ranges, section corners, and minimum scale (3"=1 mile).

6) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.7.A.6: Revise the development plan package to provide a general note stating "This project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria Sec.5.4, Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone." Per the Site Plan Sheet the note is General Note #7 not #5. Note #5 needs to be removed since it is still incomplete and the information is included within Note #7.

7) Complied.
8) Complied.
9) Complied.
10) Complied.
11) Complied.
12) Complied.

13) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.8.E: Revise the development plan package and all Benchmark Section to either provide the datum referenced used (i.e. NGVD29 or NAVD88) or provide the City of Tucson field book number and page if using the stated "City of Tucson Datum." This information was not included on the 2nd submittal.

14) Complied.

15) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Provide the existing dimension of the sidewalk and curbing. Per the site plan sheet the existing sidewalk within the right-of-way is less than 4-feet (labeled on Sheet 1.0 as 3.84-feet). Per TSM Sec10-01.4.1.A.1.b all projects which have an adjacent sidewalk less than 4-feet in width will provide a sidewalk with a minimum width of 6-feet (MS&R Streets).

16) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the existing and/or future SVTs for the driveway entrances, refer to TSM Sec.10-01.5.3 for line of sight matrix. On a designated MS&R street, the SVTs are based on the MS&R cross-section. The SVTs are only required for the driveways or access lanes that have a Stop Sign not the adjacent Roadway turning into the site. The SVT dimensions for the Far Side do not meet the matrix dimensions, revise.

17) Complied.

18) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5: It is acknowledged that the Keynotes have been revised to reflect the correct Sheet Number where they can be found; however the details on Sheet C1.4 should read 1.4 and not 1.3 as currently shown.

19) Complied.

20) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the parking space depth dimension as shown in the UDC Figure 7.4.6-A and Table 7.4.6-1 for all angled vehicle parking shown on the plan. Verify that the site sheets and civil sheets match in dimensions. The dimensions must be on the sheets and on Detail 1/1.3. It is acknowledged that the table has been added to the sheet; however without the specific angle call out the site layout dimensions can not be verified, revise.

21) Complied.

22) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to provide a typical parking space detail for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. As wheel stops are proposed for the parking spaces provide a wheel stop location dimension per UDC Section 7.4.6.H.3. These details could not be located on the development plan package sheets and the 2.5 foot overhand was not dimension in plan view, revise.

23) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.J: Revise the development plan package to label the right-of-way as "Existing/Future Right-of-Way" in plan view on all sheets. Currently the label is missing on Sheet C1.0, revise.

24) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.J: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the future sidewalk area. Label and dimension the MS&R future sidewalk area and the future sight visibility triangles based on the future MS&R cross section, if applicable. These dimensions could not be located on the development plan package. For a future 150-foot right-of-way the sidewalk area would be 12-feet with a 6-foot future sidewalk, revise.

25) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.L: Revise the development plan package to provide the recordation information in plan view for the 14-foot water easement that is shown on Sheet C1.0.

26) Complied.
27) Complied.
28) Complied.
29) Complied.
30) Complied.
31) Complied.
32) Complied.
33) Complied.
34) Complied.
35) Complied.
36) Complied.
37) Complied.

38) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the minimum 6-foot width requirement for the sidewalk within the right-of-way of Wilmot Road. Per the site plan sheet the existing sidewalk within the right-of-way is less than 4-feet (labeled on Sheet 1.0 as 3.84-feet). Per TSM Sec10-01.4.1.A.1.b all projects which have an adjacent sidewalk less than 4-feet in width will provide a sidewalk with a minimum width of 6-feet (MS&R Streets).

39) Complied.
40) Complied.


DRAINAGE STATEMENT:

41) Restated: TSM Sec.4-04.2.3.2.D: Provide a Drainage Statement with a discussion for all proposed drainage infrastructure. The discussion should address the pre and post imperviousness, scuppers, valley gutter, and proposed water harvesting areas. Verify that all points of discharge located at pedestrian access points contain the 10-year flow. Verify if the proposed improvements meet the overall design of the Master Drainage Report for the CVS Development Plan.

42) New: Provide a Drainage Statement stamped, signed and sealed by a civil engineer registered in the State of Arizona for all proposed drainage infrastructure, pre and post imperviousness, and scuppers to contain the 10-year flow under pedestrian sidewalks, water harvesting areas, etc. The Statement submitted was not reviewed since it was not sealed by an engineer and was incomplete not meeting the minimum requirements of TSM Sections 4-03 and 4-04


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
12/15/2014 RONALD BROWN HC SITE REVIEW Reqs Change SHEET C1.0
1. Reference to the sidewalk key plan on sheet C1.4
SHEET C1.4
2. Detectable warnings strips (truncated domes) are required only at transportation platforms. All detectable warnings stips may be omitted.
3. Detail 1
a. Provide an aisle width dimension.
b. Delete the detectable warning strip and note reference to COT DTL 207.
SHEET C1.3
4. Delete the ADA reference at note 9 and any where else on these documents.
END OF REVIEW
12/22/2014 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change 1) Revise the landscape plans to show the same property line locations as the site plan. AM 2-10.4.1.A

2) UDC 7.6.4.B.1 Revise the plans to provide canopy trees in the vehicular use area in the area south and east of the building. UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a

3) UDC 7.6.4.F Landscaping proposed in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements. (520) 791-5100
12/23/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/05/2015 SHANAE POWELL OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
01/05/2015 SHANAE POWELL REJECT SHELF Completed