Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP14-0152
Parcel: 13423411B

Address:
135 S WILMOT RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP14-0152
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/16/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to the building, building sewer, site lighting, natural gas, or electrical service to the building). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for constructing the building or as a separate permit.
2. Revise the site drawing to include pipe diameter of the public sanitary sewer, the inverts and rim elevations of the manholes up stream and down stream of the building sewer connection along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number for the manholes. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual No. 2-06.0.0, Section 4.8 and Section 107.2.13, IBC 2012.
09/17/2014 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
09/23/2014 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
09/26/2014 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT: DP14-0152
135 S. Wilmot Road
Kneader's Restaurant

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 29, 2014

DUE DATE: October 14, 2014

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is September 8, 2015.


2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.1 - Each sheet shall measure 24 inches by 36 inches and include a minimum one inch margin on left side and one-half inch margin on all other sides to facilitate efficient record keeping. A larger sheet format may be used with the approval of the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD).

2-06.3.2 - All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for record-keeping purposes. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. Smaller scales (60:1 or greater) may be used for some or all of the sheets with the prior approval of PDSD when it is determined legibility and the ability to be digitized and/or reduced for archiving will not be affected.
2-06.3.3 - All lettering and text (upper or lower case), and numbering, shall be a minimum of three-thirty-seconds inches in height to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for archiving.

2-06.3.4 - A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet.

01. COMMENT: The title block with the following information shall be placed in the lower right corner as noted by the standard above.

******************************************************************************************

2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

02. COMMENT: Add the digital approval stamp to all plan sheets. Follow the link to download the digital stamp in a PDF format, http://pdsd.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/cdrc/acad-cot_stamp_model_1_0.pdf or the following link to download or open the DWG digital format http://pdsd.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/development-permits
******************************************************************************************

2-06.3.6 - Provide a blank three-inch by five-inch block in the lower right corner of the plan adjacent to the title block on the first sheet of the development package for use by Pima County Addressing.

03. COMMENT: Provide on the cover sheet, the 3"x5" block for use by Pima County Addressing as noted by the standard above.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.3.7 - A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet.

04. COMMENT: Provide the location map as noted by the standard above. See related sections 2-0.4.A - .C. Only one Project location map is required and it should be on the cover sheet. If multiple project location maps are used they shall be consistent with the same information and scale.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet.

05. COMMENT: The contour interval shall be labeled under the north on the appropriate sheets as noted the standard above.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.3.10 - A legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing is to be provided, preferably on the first sheet.

06. COMMENT: The cover sheet labeled as T-1 should be removed and replaced with the C1.0. Sheet C1.0 can be revised to include all the required notes and information required on a cover sheet. For purposes of the zoning review I will make my comments based on sheet C1.0 replacing the current cover sheet.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.3.11 - A key plan (if provided) shall be located on the first sheet.

07. COMMENT: Has been provided on sheet C1.0.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet.

08. COMMENT: The sheet index on sheet C1.0 must include the landscape plan sheets.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

09. COMMENT: List on the cover sheet (C1.0), as noted by that standard above, the information for the owner / developer and all registrants that that prepared this plan or has sealed the plans. Include email addresses for all listed names or firms.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

10. COMMENT: This parcel has been created as a result of a recent lot split from a larger parcel and has yet to be recorded. The legal description of the newly created parcel must be listed in the lower quadrant of the title block. Dan Castro of Rick Engineering in Tucson Az, (520-795-1000) was processing the lot split application through PDSD. It is suggested that contact with Dan Castro be made in order to confirm the lot split has been recorded. The new legal description as recorded must be listed in the title block.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

11. COMMENT: The sheet index must include the following: the actual sheet number i.e., 1 of 14, 2 of 14, 3 of 14 etc. The sheet index can include the C1, C2, L1, L2, and the sheet numbers must be listed in the title block as 1 of 14, 2 of 14 etc.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

12. COMMENT: The administrative address must be listed on the cover sheet in the lower right corner next to the title block. This project has been assigned the PDSD case number DP14-0152; list the case number in the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets. List the lot split reference case number S14-039 in the lower right corner next to the title block.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

13. COMMENT: Revise the project location map on sheet C1.0 to a scale of 3 inches = 1 Mile
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and,

14. COMMENT: Draw and label the Alamo and Rose Hill Washes on the project location map
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

15. COMMENT: Label the Section corners surrounding the section where the project is located.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

16. COMMENT: The zoning and Land use notes and applicable zoning data must be listed on the cover sheet. Create a zoning data table that includes the zoning requirements such as Lot size, building square footage, building height allowed and actual, vehicle and bicycle parking required and provided and loading zone required and provided.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____."

17. COMMENT: List as a general note on the cover sheet the existing zoning of the subject property.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

18. COMMENT: List as a general note on the cover sheet the square footage and acreage of the subject property based on the newly created lot. See comment 12 (lot Split).
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

19. COMMENT: List as a general note on the cover sheet the use of the property as noted by the standard above. Refer to the UDC for the "subject to" requirements associated with the use.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.7.C.2 - List the following note on all development package documents: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual."

20. COMMENT: Revise the note 3 on sheet C1.3 that is listed under the "City of Tucson Drainage Notes" as noted by the standard above.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.7.C.3 - Provided the following notes as applicable:

2-06.4.7.C.3.a - "Total miles of new public streets is ____________."

21. COMMENT: Add as a general note the total of new public streets (0).
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.7.C.3.b - "Total miles of new private streets is ____________."

22. COMMENT: Add as a general note the total of new private streets (0).
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.7.E.1.a - The following notes will be placed on all plans/plats.

2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

23. COMMENT: label the distance and bearings of the newly created parcel. A lot split application was processed through PDSD which included a survey drawing that included new distance and bearings. See related comment 10.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

24. COMMENT: If applicable, include the information as noted by the standard above.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

25. COMMENT: Add the information on the site plan as noted by the standard above.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements.

26. COMMENT: Add the information as noted by the standard above. Also see related comment 23.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.E - Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) Land splits require a separate permit and review.

27. COMMENT: Add the information as noted by the standard above.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

28. COMMENT: Add the adjacent zoning classifications as noted by the standard above.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

29. COMMENT: Refer to the PDSD Engineer's comments related to the sight visibility triangles. I don't believe the triangles depicted are correct.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability.

30. COMMENT: It appears that there is some inconsistency in the parking lot design dimensions the site plan and the other site drawings. All site plan sheets whether site, grading, horizontal or landscape must be consistent in design and dimensions that comply with the design regulations in Article 7 of the UDC.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

31. COMMENT: Label the public and private streets on the site plan sheets. Add the information as noted above for curbs, sidewalks, utility locations and fully dimension the private and public streets.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

32. COMMENT: As noted in comment 30, there is an inconsistency between the site plan sheets. Refer to UDC section 7.4.6 for motor vehicle use area design criteria. Ensure that the all sheets depicting the site match not only in design but dimensions. Section 7.4.6.D.1 and table 7.4.6-A contains the design criteria that is to be used for the parking lot layout.
****************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

33. COMMENT: As noted in comment 16, the vehicle parking requirements must be listed in the zoning data table as noted in comment 16. The data for required and provided must include standard and Handi-capped parking spaces.

As also noted in comment 32, the parking lot design on the site plan and other site sheets are inconsistent. The parking lot dimensions on the site plan sheet do not meet the minimum standards listed in table 7.4.6-A.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

34. COMMENT: Add the information for short and long term bicycle parking as noted by the standard above. List in the zoning data table the number of required and provided bicycle parking facilities. Add the dimensioned details drawing specific to the locations of the facilities.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.)

35. COMMENT: Dimension the Wilmot Road right of way, label the width of the sidewalks, dimension the curb to property line etc. Add the same information for the private street.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

36. COMMENT: If applicable to this site add the information as noted by the standard above.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan

2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan.

2-06.4.9.M.2 - Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently.

37. COMMENT: The grading plan is being reviewed concurrently by zoning as it relates to the zoning review purview. Ensure that any changes that are made to the base site plan are made to all site sheets, whether grading, landscaping or horizontal sheets.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

38. COMMENT: Draw and label the building setbacks from both Wilmot Road and the private street. The required building setback along the Wilmot Road frontage is based on the greatest of 21 feet or the height of the structure wall facing the street and is measured from the back of the future curb. The required building setback along the private street frontage is based on the greatest of 21 feet or the height of the structure wall facing the private street and is measured from the nearest edge of travel lane. (The height of the wall is measured from design grade.) Refer to the UDC section 6.4.4 for more information on measurement of building height and UDC section 6.4.5.C.2 for developing area setback information.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

39. COMMENT: Label the building height of the within the building footprint on the site plan sheet.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

40. COMMENT: Label the width of all sidewalks on site. The minimum acceptable width within the development is four (4) feet.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual.

41. COMMENT: Draw and label the property boundary on the site plan to ensure that the required sidewalk shown on the site plan is actually in the public right of way. Note 41 is annotated with the property line note but the line on the drawing is not distinguished very well. Draw a bolder and darker line that represents the property boundary. Dimension the width of the sidewalk along the public and private street.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm.

42. COMMENT: It does not appear that the refuse collection area has been designed to comply with Technical Standards 8-01. Review the standards and design accordingly.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

43. COMMENT: If applicable to this project, draw and label any proposed freestanding monument signs.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.

44. COMMENT: Refer to the Landscape reviewer's comments related to landscape buffers, parking lot landscaping and screening.
******************************************************************************************

45. COMMENT: It clear that this development package was not completed using AM 2-06 or not all of the sections were to complete it. The package must be revised to present all applicable requirements by AM 2-06 as well as any supporting standards or data requirements that are found in the UDC and Technical Standards. Additional comment may be forthcoming based on the response to the zoning comment and revisions to the development package drawings. See redlines by the plans reviewers on plan sheets. Not all items incomplete items have been redlined.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents.
10/01/2014 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: October 01, 2014
DUE DATE: October 14, 2014
SUBJECT: Kneaders Restaurant Development Plan Package- Engineering Review
TO: FFG Development, Attn: Austin Smith
LOCATION: 135 S Wilmot Rd; T14S R15E Sec18
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP14-0152

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the links for further clarification:
http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

The following items need to be addressed:

SITE PLAN:

1) AM Sec.2-06.3.5: Revise the development plan package to include the approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of each sheet, to include Landscape Sheets. The link to the stamp can be found here: http://pdsd.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/development-permits.

2) AM Sec.2-06.4.2.E: Revise the development plan package to provide the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e sheet 1 of 14, 2 of 14 etc.). The total number of sheets needs to include the landscape plans.

3) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant Development Plan Package case number (DP14-0152) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets

4) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: Revise the development plan package to provide the administrative street address adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

5) AM Sec.2-06.4.4: Revise the project location map to meet the minimum requirements within the referenced section; show the property approximately centered within 1 square mile, label sections, township and ranges, section corners, north arrow, major water course (Alamo Wash) and minimum scale (3"=1 mile).

6) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.A.6: Revise the development plan package to provide a general note stating "This project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria Sec.5.4, Major Streets and Routes Setback Zone."

7) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.C.2: Revise the development plan package and City of Tucson Drainage Note #3 to read per the referenced section; "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual."

8) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.D: Revise the development plan package to include a General Note per the referenced section; "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public."

9) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.A: Revise the development plan package to include the perimeter information for the new property lines to include bearing in degrees, minutes and seconds together with distance in feet or other functional reference system. Provide a copy of the approved Lot Split.

10) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.B: Revise the development plan package to provide the recordation information for any existing easements onsite, if applicable. A Title Report was not submitted with this project so verification of existing easements could not be made at this time.

11) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.C: Revise the development plan package to dimension the existing right-of-way width, width of curbs, curb cuts, curb to property line and sidewalks within the public right-of-way. Label the street as "Public" and "MS&R."

12) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.D: Revise the development plan package to label the existing electric pole in plan view that is located within the right-of-way of Wilmot Road.

13) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.E: Revise the development plan package and all Benchmark Section to either provide the datum referenced used (i.e. NGVD29 or NAVD88) or provide the City of Tucson field book number and page if using the stated "City of Tucson Datum."

14) AM Sec.2-06.4.9: Revise the development plan package to remove the word "Preliminary" from Sheet A-1. The development plan package and specifically Site Plan Sheet will not be preliminary once approved.

15) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan package to clearly label all existing or proposed improvements within the right-of-way. Verify if the sidewalk located adjacent to Wilmot Road falls within the right-of-way or onsite. Provide the existing dimension of the sidewalk and curbing.

16) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the existing and/or future SVTs for the driveway entrances, refer to TSM Sec.10-01.5.3 for line of sight matrix. On a designated MS&R street, the SVTs are based on the MS&R cross-section. The SVTs are only required for the driveways or access lanes that have a Stop Sign not the adjacent Roadway turning into the site.

17) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.4: Revise the development plan package to label the existing street as "Public."

18) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5: Revise the development plan package and Keynote references to provide the detail call out and the Sheet reference for all Keynotes that have "-/-" within them. The Keynotes should provide for a specific detail for construction purposes.

19) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension all existing and proposed PAAL and access lanes that are shown in plan view. Label all areas adjacent to new parking spaces and all proposed PAAL/Access entrances to ensure minimum width requirements.

20) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the parking space depth dimension as shown in the UDC Figure 7.4.6-A and Table 7.4.6-1 for all angled vehicle parking shown on the plan. Verify that the site sheets and civil sheets match in dimensions, currently there are discrepancies on both sheets that need to be revised.

21) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the required 1-foot setback from the drive-thru lane to all associated buildings, specifically Buildings "C" and "H" per UDC Sec.7.4.6.F.2.a.2.

22) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to provide a typical parking space detail for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. As wheel stops are proposed for the parking spaces provide a wheel stop location dimension per UDC Section 7.4.6.H.3.

23) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.J: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the future MS&R right-of-way for Wilmot Road. If the existing right-of-way is at or larger than the future right-of-way clearly state on the development plan package "Existing/Future Right-of-Way" in plan view.

24) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.J: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the future sidewalk area. Label and dimension the MS&R future sidewalk area and the future sight visibility triangles based on the future MS&R cross section, if applicable.

25) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.L: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension any proposed easements onsite, if applicable. If there are proposed easements provide the recordation information in plan view.

26) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development plan package to provide the cut and fill quantities as a General Note on the civil sheets.

27) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development plan package and the Site Data Section to provide the total disturbed area of the site.

28) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development plan package and Grading Note #6 specifying conformance with City of Tucson Technical Standards Manual Sec.2-01 (excavation and grading requirements). Remove the reference to the Development Standard 11-01 since it no longer is applicable.

29) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Provide the Geotechnical Report as stated in the Additional Note #3 on Sheet C1.3 for review of all site requirements.

30) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.2: Revise the development plan package to clearly label that the new water harvesting areas are to be depressed 6-inches. Per Keynote #5 it states a depressed 8-inch area that would require percolation rates for storm water to ensure drain down times.

31) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.2: Revise the development plan package and Detail #3 to correctly show the 6-inch water harvesting depression. The detail as currently shown does not show that the area is to be depressed it appears that the rock rip rap is flush with grade, revise. If 8-inches is proposed and used a geotechnical report will be required for drain down times.

32) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.2: Revise the development plan package to provide a spot grade at all proposed curb openings to ensure that the onsite storm water drains into the water harvesting areas and out as proposed. Verify that the water harvesting areas, curb opening and flow patterns meet the required Drainage Statement requirements.

33) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project.

34) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package to clearly dimension all sidewalks onsite to ensure the minimum 4-foot width requirements per TSM Sec.7-01.4.3.A. Per Construction Note #6 it states width as shown on plan however plan view did not show the width for all sidewalk areas, revise.

35) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package to label all existing and proposed handicap access ramps. Offsite ramps within the right-of-way must be constructed per PC/COT Standard Detail 207 and all onsite ramps must meet the minimum ANSI requirements.

36) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package and Construction Keynote #14 to correctly reference the Sheet that the detail is on, Sheet C1.4. Ensure that the detail meets the required onsite handicap requirements.

37) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package to provide the Keynote call out for the proposed sidewalk located along the east end of the vehicular use area. Provide a Keynote to label the required handicap access ramps at all sidewalk locations where they are needed.

38) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the minimum 6-foot width requirement for the sidewalk within the right-of-way of Wilmot Road.

39) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development plan package to verify conformance with handicap accessibility for the existing sidewalk within the right-of-way. Provide existing longitudinal and cross slopes to ensure maximum 2% or provide written approval from TDOT Permits and Codes that the existing sidewalk meets accessibility requirements.

40) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Revise the development plan package to provide for centralized onsite solid waste and recycle collection service pick up per TSM Sec.8-01.5.1.A. Provide specific details on the development plan package for construction purposes. The details must match TSM Sec.8-01, Figure 2 and Figure 3a for the required double enclosure walls with gates, concrete thickness and compressive strength, concrete approach apron dimensions, space from wall to bollards, anchoring bolts, 14'x40' clear approach for each container, etc. Since the refuse enclosures are part of site construction they need to be included on the development plan package and can not be deferred to the building plans.


DRAINAGE STATEMENT:

41) TSM Sec.4-04.2.3.2.D: Provide a Drainage Statement with a discussion for all proposed drainage infrastructure. The discussion should address the pre and post imperviousness, scuppers, valley gutter, and proposed water harvesting areas. Verify that all points of discharge located at pedestrian access points contain the 10-year flow. Verify if the proposed improvements meet the overall design of the Master Drainage Report for the CVS Development Plan.

SWPPP:

42) Since the site is less than an acre a Stormwater Pollution Prevent Plan is not required. The 2 Sheets submitted (Sheet C3.0 and C3.1) were reviewed for supplemental information only. Best management practices are expected however a General Construction Permit through the State is not required.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Due to the numerous comments and formatting requirements further comments may be generated upon the 2nd submittal.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
10/09/2014 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change SHEET C1.2
1. Reference the accessible parking layout to the large scale detail 1/C1.4.
2. Identify all curb and sidewalk ramps and reference them to the large scale details of all the diffrent types of ramps to be drawn on this same sheet.
a. Show all accessible requirements such as dimensions, widths, landings, slopes, percentages and arrows.
3. At the marked crossing located in the North east corner of the site plan, provide a ramp at the most northerly end of the crossing.
SHEET C1.3
4. Add a note: "All accessible route slopes are to comply with the 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% maximum running slope and 2% maximum cross slope.
5. At note 15 remove the COT STD 207 reference. This is for right of way accessible construction only.
6. At note 14 correct the detail reference C/1.3 to C/1.4.
SHEET C1.4
7. Change all detail title references from C1.3 to C1.4.
8. At detail 1:
a. Provide all parking space and aisle dimensions both widths and lengths.
b. Provide all dimensions for sidewalk ramps
c. Indicate a maximum slope of 2% in all directions for the parking and aisle areas.
d. Show location of accessible parking signage.
e. Revise note five to read "Accessible parking signs are to be centered on each parking space and loacted just behind the concrete curb/sidewalk line.
f. The main accessible parking sign is to be mounted 7'-0" above finished grade.
END OF REVIEW
10/14/2014 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change 1) UDC 7.6.4.C Revise the plans to provide a Street Landscape Border along the Private Street frontage.

2) UDC 7.6.4.B.1 Revise the plans to provide canopy trees in the vehicular use area in accordance with the General Standards in the area south of the building.

3) UDC 7.6.4.F Landscaping proposed in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements. (520) 701-5100

4) UDC 7.6.5 Revise the plans to provide screening along the Private Street.

5) TSM 4-01.4.2 All systems shall include rain shut-off devices. Instruments shall be correctly placed to ensure plants are kept healthy using a combination of harvested and non-harvested water and to ensure the stated water-saving goal of the ordinance is met.
10/14/2014 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/25/2014 FERNE RODRIGUEZ OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed