Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP14-0148
Parcel: 11006005F

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - DP14-0148
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/20/2015 AROMERO4 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
08/21/2015 BVIESTE1 COT NON-DSD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Approved Patricia G. reviewed and approved ESD conditions of approval.
08/24/2015 PGEHLEN1 PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved 201 N. STONE AV, 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207







MICHELENE NOWAKADDRESSING REVIEW
PH #: 721-9512






TO:
CITY PLANNING
FROM:
MICHELENE NOWAK, ADDRESSING REVIEW

SUBJECT:
DP14-0148 COLUMBUS TOWNHOMES LOTS 1-16, COMMON AREA A,B/TENTATIVE PLAT-2ND REVIEW

DATE:
AUGUST 24, 2015







The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project.





1.) Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Final Plat to City Planning


***PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING MUST RECEIVE A COPY OF THE RECORDED FINAL PLAT PRIOR TO THE ASSIGNMENT OF ANY ADDRESSES. PLEASE COORDINATE THE DELIVERY AND RECORDATION OF THE MYLAR WITH THE CITY OF TUCSON PLANNING***


2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection.




***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files.
These CAD files can be e-mailed to: CADsubmittals@pima.gov
The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.***
09/01/2015 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT: DP14-0148
Address: 3103 N Columbus Boulevard
Development Package: Tentative Plat

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 2, 2015

DUE DATE: September 18, 2015

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 15, 2015.
*********************************************************************

1. Follow up to previous comments 6 and 23: Address the following comments related to the rezoning conditions.

Condition 3, requires that the developer construct sidewalks along the Columbus and Blacklidge frontages. The sidewalk along the Blacklidge frontage appears to be on private property. A public pedestrian access easement must be provided for the sidewalk that is to be placed in the subdivision boundary and over lots, 11, 12, 13 and Common Area A. Draw label and dimension the easement.

Condition 7, the requirements of condition 7 must be demonstrated on the TP as well. Add the necessary information to the DP that demonstrates compliance.

Condition 8, same as condition 7, demonstrate compliance.


2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet.

Previous comment 6: Rezoning condition 20 must be listed on the cover sheet. Provide a separate response memo stating how all conditions of rezoning have been addressed.

2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning.

Previous comment 23: Provide a separate cover letter that details how all conditions of rezoning have been addressed with this DP plan submittal.

*********************************************************************

2. Follow up Comment to previous comments 8 and 15: The information on the title block shall be consistent on all sheets. Revise the title block on the landscape sheets to match the DP/TP sheets. Clarify if the private street will be considered a common area. If so list the private street as "Common Area A" in the title block of all plan sheets and label the street as Common Area A on the plan sheets.

2-06.4.7.A.5 - On residential projects, list the total number of units/lots proposed.

Previous Comment 08: Revise the title block if the intent is to subdivide the land and create individual lots for single family development whether attached or detached. For consistency revise the use reference and reference to units and calculation information under the general notes section.

2-06.4.9.C - If the project has common areas, label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association, or any common area that is separated by a public right-of-way.

Previous Comment 15: Label Common Area "A" as "Private Street" on the plan sheets and the title block.
*********************************************************************

3. Follow up to previous comment 21: This development has an ADT greater than 140. The required building setbacks from the street property line are based on the greatest of 21 feet or the height of the structure from the nearest edge of travel lane. The building setback can be measured from the face of the curb plus an additional six feet in the areas of the street where parking is provided. The garage/carport must be setback 18 feet from the property line on all lots.

Revise the lot details per the sample attached to sheet two. The lot details shall be added and based on the adjacent perimeter zoning and interior ADT, and MSR adt of 1000 plus for lots 1 and 16.

2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

Previous comment 21: Include dimensioned detail drawings of a corner and midblock lot detailing the proposed setbacks, from the interior side perimeter yards, from the street perimeter, and subdivision boundary. The detail drawings shall include the street perimeter building setbacks for the dwelling and carport/garage/driveway.
*********************************************************************

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS)

4. Follow up to previous comment 25 and 26: The private street must be included in the coverage calculation. The street is considered a common area owned by the residents and the square footage of the streets, sidewalk areas etc. must be included in the overall coverage of the site. Revise the calculation accordingly.

The calculation of each lot shall include the building footprint of the building. Per the calculation the second floor was included in the lot coverage. Revise the calculation to accurately provide the correct building footprint square footage of the two stories structures. If more than one model is to be constructed on this subdivision, the largest footprint should be used in the calculation.

2-06.5.2.A - Provide, by note on the plat, the developable area calculation for the entire FLD; and,

Previous comment 25: Include the developable area calculation as defined in Art. 11 section 11.4.5 definitions.

2-06.5.2.B - Show the maximum developable area of each lot (i.e., building footprint).

Previous comment 26: List the developable area of each lot as noted by the standard above. A separate matrix would be a method to provide the information and calculations for the FLD.
*********************************************************************

5. Follow up to previous comment 27: See related follow up comment

2-06.5.3 Additional Information
The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable:

2-06.5.3 A. Reduced Perimeter Yards
Street perimeter yards along interior street rights-of-way and perimeter yards between interior lots may be modified in accordance with Section 8.7.3.L, Perimeter Yards on Interior Lots, of the UDC. Applicants requesting a perimeter yard reduction must indicate what the required and reduced perimeter yards are and their locations. Applicants requesting a reduced street perimeter yard must provide a written description of how the reduced yard will enhance the architectural design or the vehicular circulation in the FLD and submit a transportation statement, or if required by the Department of Transportation, a traffic impact analysis;

Previous comment 27: See related comment 21. Include any detail drawings that demonstrate the proposed building setbacks as noted by the standard above.
*********************************************************************

6. Follow up to previous comment 30: No elevation drawings were included in the re-submittal of the development package as noted by your response to the previous comment. Submit the building elevations with the next submittal of the development package.

2-06.5.3.D - Building Elevations
Provide dimensioned building elevations of all proposed units. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. The model home construction plans will be used to determine exact setbacks and screening requirements at the time of application for building permits;

Previous comment 30: Provide the building elevations on the next submittal of the DP.
*********************************************************************

7. Follow up to previous comment 33: The building elevation drawings were not included in the Development Package. Submit the building elevations with the next submittal.

2-06.5.3.F.2 - Provide photographs of the site and its interface with the adjacent properties documenting the existing conditions; and,

2-06.5.3.F.3 - Provide a written statement and drawings (such as elevations and landscape plans) demonstrating how the proposed mitigation techniques comply with Section 8.7.3.M.2.b of the UDC. The plan should include when practicable additional design elements to increase privacy such as the siting angle of buildings, windows, and lots;

Previous comment 33: Provide the necessary documents as noted by the two (2) standards above.
*********************************************************************

8. COMMENT: Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the response to the zoning review comments, response to rezoning conditions, FLD compliance and changes made to the plans.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents.
09/14/2015 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
09/15/2015 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
09/18/2015 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change 1) UDC 7.6.5.C.2. Screen walls along a street frontage must be located on the development side of the street landscape borders so that they do not obstruct the view of the street landscape borders from the street.

2) UDC 7.6.4.C.2 The street landscape border along Columbus Blvd is required to be 10' wide, be visible from the street, wide enough to accommodate the required plantings and include vegetative groundcover planted in the ground. Revise the plans to make this border code compliant.

3) UDC 7.6.4.C.2.c Landscape borders proposed in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements.

4) UDC 7.6.4.C.2.b The landscape borders must be recorded as common area and maintained by the homeowners association (HOA) for the subdivision. The subdivision CC&Rs shall reference and require compliance with the maintenance standards in Section 7.6.8, Maintenance.
09/21/2015 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
09/21/2015 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:

1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) All items requested by review staff
3) All items needed to approve these plans
09/21/2015 BVIESTE1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change Previous comments noted by developer in response letter, but no changes on actual plans.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/21/2015 KROBLES1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed