Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP14-0148
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/05/2015 | SPOWELL1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/06/2015 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 02/10/2015 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Julieann Arechederra GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: February 10, 2015 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat COLUMBUS TOWNHOMES DP14-0148 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: " THANKS YOU FOR THE SUBMITTAL. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 02/11/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | See additional documents in PRO No objections/adverse comments. See attached. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This report and/or data was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and/or Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The contents of this report and/or data reflect the views and opinions of the author(s) who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily state or reflect the official views or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Arizona Department of Transportation, or any other State or Federal Agency. This report and/or data does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. The information in this publication is provided on an “as is” basis, and there are no warranties, express or implied, including, but not limited to, any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall PAG be liable for any damages resulting from the use of the information. PAG provides the information in good faith and has endeavored to create and maintain accurate data. The users of this report and/or data are advised to use the information with caution and to independently verify accuracy. ____________________________ Eric W. Kramer, Ph.D., AICP Senior Land-Use Modeler 1 E. Broadway Blvd, Ste. 401 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 495-1455 (tel) (520) 620-6981 (fax) www.pagregion.com ekramer@pagregion.com |
| 02/11/2015 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | 201 N. STONE AV, 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 MICHELENE NOWAKADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 724-9512 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: MICHELENE NOWAK, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP14-0148 COLUMBUS TOWNHOMES LOTS 1-16, COMMON AREA A, B /TENTATIVE PLAT-1ST REVIEW DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 2015 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.Label project# DP14-0148 on all Sheets2.Label Common Area A as a “private” or “public” street on title block and site plan3.Common Area A needs to be named–-the street is longer than 100’ from main road. (Please submit proposed street name choices to: addressing@pima.gov for review)4.Correct legal description on Title Block on all Sheets:Columbus Townhomes Units 1-16, Common Area “A” (private or public), Common Area B (Retention/Detention Basin & Open Spaces) being a portion of Lot 66 and Lot 114 of McCormick Place Townhomes Block II recorded in Book 30 of Maps and Plats at Page 29 and a portion of Section 34 . . . |
| 02/17/2015 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approv-Cond | Buildings that are together will require 2 hour fire wall, unless additional fire hydrants are installed and project can meet fire flow requirements. |
| 02/18/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | See additional documents in PRO February 18, 2015 City of Tucson CDRC Attn: Patricia Gehlen, Manager 201 N. Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ 85701 RE: SWG Plan Review for Columbus Townhomes Units 1-16 - Tentative Plat CDRC No. DP14-0148 Dear Ms. Gehlen: Southwest Gas Corporation (SWG) has no objection to the development of the above-mentioned project. Existing natural gas facilities are located in adjacent rights-of-way to the area of development and may be affected by construction of this project; specifically, a gas main stub is located within the rights-of-way of Columbus road and La Cienega drive which may be used for future extension into the proposed development. All information is provided for reference use only. Please note that it is the responsibility of excavators or those developers planning excavation to verify actual field conditions in advance of construction so that requests for gas service or any potential issues can be addressed in a timely manner. Blue Stake and potholing are suggested for best accuracy when locating SWG facilities. Please include SWG in all future development plan submittals of this project. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me at (520) 794-6194 or ben.delosmonteros@swgas.com. Sincerely, Ben De Los Monteros Engineering Technician Southern Arizona Division Enc: SWG Contact Information (pdf) |
| 02/26/2015 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP14-0148 Address: 3103 N Columbus Boulevard Development Package: Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL DATE: DUE DATE: COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 15, 2015. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.1 - Each sheet shall measure 24 inches by 36 inches and include a minimum one inch margin on left side and one-half inch margin on all other sides to facilitate efficient record keeping. A larger sheet format may be used with the approval of the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD). 2-06.3.2 - All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for record-keeping purposes. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. Smaller scales (60:1 or greater) may be used for some or all of the sheets with the prior approval of PDSD when it is determined legibility and the ability to be digitized and/or reduced for archiving will not be affected. 2-06.3.3 - All lettering and text (upper or lower case), and numbering, shall be a minimum of three-thirty-seconds inches in height to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for archiving. 2-06.3.6 - Provide a blank three-inch by five-inch block in the lower right corner of the plan adjacent to the title block on the first sheet of the development package for use by Pima County Addressing. 01. COMMENT: Provide on the cover sheet only the address block as noted by the standard above. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. 02. COMMENT: Label the contour interval under the north arrow, on the appropriate sheets. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 03. COMMENT: List the Owner/Developer's Email address on the cover sheet. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.2.C - The number of proposed lots and common areas are to be noted. If the subdivision is a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), a condominium, or a similar type of residential subdivision utilizing special provisions of the UDC, it shall be so noted; 04. COMMENT: Clarify the type of use that is proposed. The information in the title block is conflicting as written. In the title block, references to townhomes (FLD) Subdivision has been made and a reference to units has been listed which implies a multi-family development such as an apartment complex or condo development. General note 3 states that the use is for a Multi-family residential (FLD) development, yet the plan clearly depicts 16 individual lots. If this is a single family development with attached buildings the title block and general note 3 must be revised to clearly state the type of development. If this is supposed to be a multi-family development such as an apartment complex or condominium there should be no individual lot lines. If it is a condo development the plan should be revised depict the building areas only and any common elements associated with the overall development or if limited elements to each condo unit. Revise all notes and calculations accordingly. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 05. COMMENT: This project has been assigned the PDSD case number DP15-0148. List the case number in the lower right corner of the plan sheets as noted by the standard above. Remove the "S15" from the sheets. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. 06. COMMENT: Rezoning condition 20 must be listed on the cover sheet. Provide a separate response memo stating how all conditions of rezoning have been addressed. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 07. COMMENT: See related comment 4 above and address as noted by the standard above. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.7.A.5 - On residential projects, list the total number of units/lots proposed. 08. COMMENT: Revise the title block if the intent is to subdivide the land and create individual lots for single family development whether attached or detached. For consistency revise the use reference and reference to units and calculation information under the general notes section. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 09. COMMENT: This site is subject to compliance with the Major Streets and Routes overlay. Add a general note that states that this development has been designed to comply with the Major Streets and Routes Overlay UDC Section 5.4. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.7.B - Drainage Notes List the following notes as appropriate: 2-06.4.7.B.1 - List the following notes on all plans/plats: 2-06.4.7.C.2 - List the following note on all development package documents: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual." 10. COMMENT: Revise General Note 12, as noted by the standard above. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.7.E.1.a - The following notes will be placed on all plans/plats. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 11. COMMENT: Double check the perimeter boundary dimensions. Some of the lot dimensions abutting the perimeter boundary when added together do not match the overall distances labeled on the plan. Also, some of the dimensions are not legible due to overlapping information. Ensure that all text is legible. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 12. COMMENT: If applicable, add the information relat4ed to easements as noted by the standard above. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 13. COMMENT: Label the recordation data for Blacklidge Drive. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. 14. COMMENT: Label; all distance and bearings for all lot lines and curve data where applicable. Double check the lot distances to ensure that they are correct. I noted that a few of the distances were not correct because when added together the overall distance did not match the cumulative lot distances adjacent to the boundary, i.e. north boundary. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.C - If the project has common areas, label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association, or any common area that is separated by a public right-of-way. 15. COMMENT: Label Common Area "A" as "Private Street" on the plan sheets and the title block. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation 2-06.4.9.H.1 - Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual, to include streets, intersections, street names, right-of-way widths, curve radii of centerlines and curb returns, and proposed improvements, such as pavement, curbs, access points (driveways), accessible ramps, and sidewalks. Street improvements, such as sidewalks, curbs, pavement, and accessible ramps, do not need to be drawn on the plan if such information is provided on typical street cross sections. Please be aware that, if a new street is created (for other than for subdivisions) which divides the property into two or more lots, a subdivision plat is required (refer to the definition of subdivision in Section 11.4.20 of the UDC). 16. COMMENT: Label the Radius for the Cul-de-sac. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 17. COMMENT: It is clear that the maximum mid-block right of way is existing and then some. However, if future "roadway" widening is possible or proposed ensure that the new curb and sidewalks are drawn, dimensioned and labeled as well as future SVT's. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 18. COMMENT: Clarify on the plan if the Cul-de-sac has been designed for on street parking. If not, indicate the location of the no parking area as noted in Section 10-01.9.0 figure 20. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 19. COMMENT: If applicable draw and label any proposed easements as noted by the standard above. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan 2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan. 2-06.4.9.M.2 - Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently. 20. COMMENT: The grading plan is being reviewed concurrently by zoning, as it pertains to the zoning review purview. Once zoning has approved the DP the grading plan is also considered approved. To ensure consistency, any changes that are made to the DP site plan sheet are to be made to the grading and Landscape sheets. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 21. COMMENT: Include dimensioned detail drawings of a corner and midblock lot detailing the proposed setbacks, from the interior side perimeter yards, from the street perimeter, and subdivision boundary. The detail drawings shall include the street perimeter building setbacks for the dwelling and carport/garage/driveway. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. 22. COMMENT: Indicate by note if the refuse pick up is proposed at the frontage of each lot or is there is to be location for a collocated refuse pick up area. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 23. COMMENT: Provide a separate cover letter that details how all conditions of rezoning have been addressed with this DP plan submittal. Per my conversation with Glenn Moyer, it is suggested that the issue of a change of PDP be addressed on confirmed through Glenn prior to resubmittal of the DP. If it is found that the changes made with this DP from the previous change approved by the PDSD director are minor provide a memo From Glenn with the next submittal. If it is founds that the change is major, Glenn will provide you with the necessary steps to process a change of PDP. In either case a memo from Glenn Moyer is required prior to the next submittal. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required in accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 23. COMMENT: See the landscape reviewer comments as it relates to screening and landscape buffers as well as any open spaces requirements related to the FLD. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS) 2-06.5.1 Site Plan Required FLDs not proposing to subdivide the project site must prepare a site plan in accordance with Section 2-06.0.0, Development Package, including Section 2-06.5.3, Additional Information; 2-06.5.2 Tentative Plat Required An FLD proposing to subdivide the project site into two or more lots must prepare a tentative plat. Tentative plats for FLDs must be prepared in accordance with Section 2-06.0.0, Development Package, including Section 2-06.5.3, Additional Information, and the following developable area information: 24. COMMENT: This plan was reviewed as a tentative plat with the intent to subdivide the property into 16 fee simple lots under the FLD development Criteria. If this is not the intent of the developer revise the DP accordingly. 2-06.5.2.A - Provide, by note on the plat, the developable area calculation for the entire FLD; and, 25. COMMENT: Include the developable area calculation as defined in Art. 11 section 11.4.5 definitions. 2-06.5.2.B - Show the maximum developable area of each lot (i.e., building footprint). 26. COMMENT: List the developable area of each lot as noted by the standard above. A separate matrix would be a method to provide the information and calculations for the FLD. 2-06.5.3 Additional Information The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable: 2-06.5.3 A. Reduced Perimeter Yards Street perimeter yards along interior street rights-of-way and perimeter yards between interior lots may be modified in accordance with Section 8.7.3.L, Perimeter Yards on Interior Lots, of the UDC. Applicants requesting a perimeter yard reduction must indicate what the required and reduced perimeter yards are and their locations. Applicants requesting a reduced street perimeter yard must provide a written description of how the reduced yard will enhance the architectural design or the vehicular circulation in the FLD and submit a transportation statement, or if required by the Department of Transportation, a traffic impact analysis; 27. COMMENT: See related comment 21. Include any detail drawings that demonstrate the proposed building setbacks as noted by the standard above. 2-06.5.3.B - Maximum Density Option Applicants requesting a Maximum Density Option in accordance with Section 8.7.3.C.3.b must demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria by written report or on the plat or site plan, whichever is appropriate; 28. COMMENT: It is not quite clear if the FLD alternative is A or B. Revise general note 3 to list the correct use as proposed. The site is large enough to provide the proposed number of lots under Alternative A; is this a typo or is the intent to develop the site under Alternative B? Review UDC section 8.7.3.C.3.b to ensure the DP is being designed accordingly. If developing under Alternative B, provide the written report demonstrating compliance with section 8.7.3.C.3.b. Also as mentioned in comment 4, the use in general note 3 is listed as a multi-family development yet this DP plan was submitted as a tentative plan suggesting a subdivision with individual lots. The plan clearly depicts individual lots with attached dwellings at the property line. If this is not the intent of the developer, the DP must be revised to depict a site plan which does not include individual lots. 2-06.5.3.C - Functional Open Space Delineate the boundaries of the proposed functional open space on the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable. Provide, by note on the plat, the required and proposed functional open space calculations; 29. COMMENT: Demonstrate compliance with the Functional Open space requirements listed in UDC section 8.7.3.F. 2-06.5.3.D - Building Elevations Provide dimensioned building elevations of all proposed units. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. The model home construction plans will be used to determine exact setbacks and screening requirements at the time of application for building permits; 30. COMMENT: Provide the building elevations on the next submittal of the DP. 2-06.5.3.F - Privacy Mitigation Plan When applicable, a privacy mitigation plan is required in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.2.d of the UDC as follows: 31. COMMENT: Provide a copy of the privacy mitigation plan that demonstrates compliance with UDC Section 8.7.3.M.2.d with the next submittal of the DP. 2-06.5.3.F.1 - Identify on the tentative plat or site plan the lots and/or units that must provide privacy mitigation; 32. COMMENT: List as general note the lot numbers that will be affected. 2-06.5.3.F.2 - Provide photographs of the site and its interface with the adjacent properties documenting the existing conditions; and, 2-06.5.3.F.3 - Provide a written statement and drawings (such as elevations and landscape plans) demonstrating how the proposed mitigation techniques comply with Section 8.7.3.M.2.b of the UDC. The plan should include when practicable additional design elements to increase privacy such as the siting angle of buildings, windows, and lots; 33. COMMENT: Provide the necessary documents as noted by the two (2) standards above. 2-06.5.3.G - Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions 2-06.5.3.G.1 - Provide three copies of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) regarding the homeowner's association's responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly-owned property. 34. COMMENT: If available at this time provide copies of the proposed CC&R's 2-06.5.3.G.2 - Provide two copies of the protective covenants or common use agreements for any shared areas being established by easements over individually-owned property. 35. COMMENT: If available at this time provide copies of the proposed Common use agreements. 36. COMMENT: Clarify if the Design Professional has reviewed the FLD plans. If so address any comments and provide a copy of the DP comments and responses with the next submittal. 37. COMMENT: Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the response to the zoning review comments, response to rezoning conditions, FLD compliance and changes made to the plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. |
| 02/27/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this proposal. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept. 1100 S. Alvernon Tucson, AZ 85711 520-837-7428 >>> DSD_CDRC 2/5/2015 3:01 PM >>> Dear Reviewers: This is an electronic distribution for a CDRC Tentative Plat review. If you normally receive paper copies of the review documents, you will receive them soon. The applicable case numbers are: CDRC Development Plan: DP14-0148 |
| 03/03/2015 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | March 3, 2015 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP14-0148 PROJECT NAME: Columbus Townhomes PROJECT ADDRESS: Parcel 110-06-005F PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT Resubmittal Required TDOT does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 1. Along Columbus Blvd ensure that all existing signs that are affected by the off-site improvements and are applicable to the roadway remain in place or relocated to an appropriate location. If damaged or unsuitable for reuse then replace with new sign and/or post. 2. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-4259 for permit information. Note this on plan 3. Ensure that the dimensions for the 'CUL-DE-SAC' are per the city's Development Standards 3-01 Figure 21. Show on plan. 4. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks, cul de sac, curb return radius. (DS 2-05.2.2.D) 5. The access points shall have 25' radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) Show on plan. 6. Dimension the width of all ingress/egress points (Tucson City Code, Chapter 25, section 39 & 40) If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/04/2015 | FDILLON1 | DESIGN EXAMINER | REVIEW | Approved | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL NOT REQUIRED. PROJECT IS UNDER 20 LOTS AND PRIVACY MITIGATION IS NOT TRIGGERED DUE TO SUFFCIENT LOT SPACING FROM EXISTING PROPERTIES. FD |
| 03/04/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction of on-site utilities (e.g. water service, building sewer, site lighting, or electrical service to the buildings). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for constructing the building or as a separate permit. Remove any notes relating to how the site utilities are to be constructed. 2. A separate permit is required for the installation of a private sewer collection system. Reference Title 18, R18-9-E302, 4.02 General Permit, Arizona Administrative Code. 3. Where the finish floor elevation is less than 12 inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer or private sewer collection system, a backwater valve shall be installed in the building drain or branch of the building drain serving that floor. Identify the lots that will require backwater valves. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 03/05/2015 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/05/2015 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this plat. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/06/2015 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Columbus Townhomes 1. Clarify and revise the drainage report as to whether the site is within a balanced basin or not. The DR reports both. See sections 2.1.2 and 2.2.2. 2. Provide all digits for the water surface contours in Blacklidge Drive. At least one of the numbers appears to be truncated. 3. Clarify the depth of fill on the outer 100 feet of the project. It appears the depth exceeds 2 feet at some locations along the west portion of the site. Engineering justification for the excess fill will not be approved since alternative solutions are available. 4. Provide enough information to demonstrate the basin meets the requirements for human activity zones. 5. Provide sufficient spot grades to demonstrate the drainage scheme will work. |
| 03/06/2015 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) A.M. 2-06.5.3.C Delineate the boundaries of the proposed functional open space on the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable. Provide, by note on the plat, the required and proposed functional open space calculations. 2) Address the FLD Requirements of UDC 8.7.3.F.,G, & H. |
| 03/09/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | see documents in PRO |
| 03/09/2015 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Passed | |
| 03/09/2015 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/09/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approv-Cond | The Development Plan has been reviewed on behalf of Environmental Services and the following will need to be addressed on the resubmittal: 1. Per TSM Section 8-01.4.0.B, revise General Note 24 so that the first sentence reads “Anticipated trash collection: 1- 90 gal. refuse APC and 1- 90 gal. recycling APC per unit.” Also revise the last sentence to read “APCs are to be collected once per week, and will be placed at and removed from the curbside collection area on the day of service, and shall be stored from public view and adjacent properties.” If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net. |
| 03/09/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 03/09/2015 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: COLUMBUS TOWNHOMES TENTATIVE PLAT DP14-0148 Tucson Electric Power Co. has reviewed and approves the Tentative Plat for Columbus Townhomes. Please note that in the absence of the standard 10 foot strip PUE for utilities, separate 10 foot by 10 foot easements for TEP pedestals and transformers will be required to be shown on the Final Plat before TEP will approve the plat. An Equipment Placement drawing identifying the proposed TEP equipment locations will be provided to the developer within the next few weeks. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 917-8744. Thank you, Mary Burke Right of Way Agent Tucson Electric Power Co. Mail Stop HQW603 PO Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 Office - 520-917-8744 Cell - 520-401-9895 mburke@tep.com |
| 03/09/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 03/09/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 03/09/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 03/10/2015 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve this plan set. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/31/2015 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |