Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP14-0138
Parcel: 137276530

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP14-0138
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/19/2014 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
08/20/2014 ELIZABETH EBERBACH ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change TO: Mike Jackson, P.E. TMAD Taylor & Gaines
SUBJECT: Commercial Parking Lot Development Package Engineering Submittal Review
FLOODPLAIN STATUS: X-unshaded zone, 040076-2288L
REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, PE
ADDRESS: 1600 W Valencia Rd
PROJECT AREA: 1.15 Acres
CASE NUMBER: DP14-0138
DATE: August 21, 2014

SUMMARY: The development package was submitted for the proposed improvements at southeastern Track 3 Lot 3 of Midvale Park Commercial Center. PDSD Engineering Division does not recommend approval until the following comments are addressed for next submittal.

MASTER COVER SHEETS/ GENERAL NOTES:
1) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.7.A, Tech Man Sec.2-01: Address the following Development Package general note comments:
a) Add Geotechnical/Soil Engineering Report reference for Soil Investigation Report to note 3 on sheet C1.0.
b) Add to sheet C1.0 cover sheet or grading sheet C1.3 the total disturbance area in square feet or acres.
c) On sheet C1.3, revise Grading Note 5 to read: Call for SWPPP inspection and Grading Pre-construction meeting. For a PDSD Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), http://pdsd.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/scheduling-inspections or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Planning & Development Services Department, or contact PDSD Engineering at 837-4888.
d) Add the following as notes to C1.3:
i) There shall be no disturbance outside of these approved grading limits. Any grading outside of the grading limits requires separate grading permit or a submittal, review, and approval for separate permits.
ii) Permitee shall notify PDSD when grading operation is ready for final grading inspection. Final grading approval shall not be given until all work, including installation of all erosion control measures, have been completed in accordance with approved grading plan and grading permit, and all conditions of permit are completed.
iii) As-builts are required to be submitted under activity number DP14-0138 to PDSD permit clerks.
iv) Add note to grading plan that no structures shall be constructed on easements.
e) Assure disturbance/grading limits match on C1.3 and C3.0
f) Please be aware, to start the Final Revised Grading Plan review, contact Patricia Gehlen to begin process. Typically, submittal will be reviewed and then if acceptable, a copy will be provided to PDSD Engineering Inspector for final grading inspections. Call for Final Grading Inspection. For Grading Permit Project Completion documentation, submit: cover letter explaining any as-built changes to plans, one copy of original grading plans, 2 copies of as-builts ("Final Revised Grading Plan"), and letters of substantial completion. As-builts shall include: locations of existing/remaining utilities, finished pavement elevations, as-built elevation of scuppers and water harvesting areas, and other general finished grades as determined by RLS to show substantial completion for project.


BASE LAYER SHEET COMMENTS:
2) Admin Man Sec.2-06.3.5: A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for Development Package approval stamp, using the following link: http://pdsd.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/cdrc/acad-cot_stamp_model_1_0.jpg or see website for other file versions: http://pdsd.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/development-permits
3) Admin Man Sec.2-06.3: Add DP14-0138 case number to Development Package sheets.

SITE PLAN SHEET COMMENTS:
4) No comments at this time.

DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS:
5) Tech Man Sec.4-04.2.3.1.1.B: Provide drainage statement with statement regarding conformance to any associated plat, and which states compliance with City Standards and any master drainage report for this Midvale Park Commercial Center, including statement for basin requirements. Sites over one acre are required to have 5-yr threshold retention (which may overlap volume for waterharvesting requirements). Include also how existing stormdrain system functions and provide pre-and post developed flowrates.
6) Tech Man Sec.4-04.2.3.1.1: Add address of project and project numbers (DP14-0138) to statement/report cover.
7) Tech Man Sec.4-04.1.5.2: Provide a maintenance checklist for drainage improvements in the Drainage Report/Statement.

LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS:
8) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9.O: Existing or proposed vegetation shall not be located within project's SVT areas.
9) Tech Man Sec.10-01.5.1.A.1: Show existing and future SVT's on planviews on sheets C1.3 and L-200 to assure no conflict with proposed vegetation.

GRADING, PAVING, DETAIL SHEET COMMENTS:
10) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9.I: Label right-of-way information abutting the site: MS&R Arterial Gateway Route for Valencia Road, and MS&R Arterial for Midvale Park Road on planview for Site Plan / Grading Plan sheet C1.3. Include existing and future ROW dimensions. (Future MS&R ROW widths are 150-ft for both streets.)
11) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.8.C: Label the following information regarding existing public right-of-way adjacent to the site: right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.
12) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.7.A: Revise Keynote 12 on sheet C1.3 per geotech/soils report.
13) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9.N: On sheet C1.3, label flowrates for pre-developed and post-developed conditions entering and exiting the site.
14) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Delineate, dimension, and label future and existing sight visibility triangles for both ingress/egress areas on grading and SWPP sheet planviews.
15) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9.T, Tech Man Sec.8-01.5.2.D: Address the following solid waste pick-up comments:
a) Provide refuse enclosure detail, add note that gates shall be opaque (no see-through gates allowed).
b) Show 40-ft back-up area in front of refuse containers.
c) Label minimum 2% slope away within trash enclosure pad on planview sheet 2. Assure solid waste pick-up area is elevated so as not to become a flowline for general local flows in the east corner area of the project.
d) Show vehicle maneuverability with turning radii delineations on planview sheet C1.3 for refuse collection areas per Tech Man Sec.8-01.5.3.C.
16) Tech Man Secs.2-01.4.1.C, 8-01.5.2.G: Address the following grading comments:
a) Clarify, identify, and label on planview sheet C1.3 the benchmarks for Basis of Bearings and also label local Basis of Elevation.
17) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9.H.6: Clarify disturbance limits on plans, include any offsite construction easement information.
18) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: For review of feasibility, provide footprint of proposed building structures. Include width and radii dimensions for curve and drive-thru' lane. Sheet E-1 shows a conflict with proposed footprint and utility easement. Footprint of proposed buildings can not be in conflict with easements.
19) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1.3: Label dimension between existing Fire hydrant and proposed curb. Check with Fire reviewer for compliance to assure minimum width is met.
20) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: On sheet C1.4 detail A, label pavements structural design dimensions of pavement per geotech/soils report.

UTILITIES / EASEMENTS COMMENTS:
21) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.8.B: All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. Assure complete information is provided for easements on the site. If needed, assure any offsite construction easements are obtained for proposed offsite disturbance and sequence numbers provided on plans. Sheet E-1 shows a conflict with proposed footprint and utility easement. Footprint of proposed buildings can not be in conflict with easements. Also, provide copy of any cross access easement. Also, add note to grading plan that no structures shall be constructed on easements.

STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN COMMENTS:
22) Tucson Code Chap.26 Art.2: The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) does not meet the minimum requirements of AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise SWPPP according to the following comments:
a) Address the following general SWPPP comments:
i) For inspection purposes, post filled-out City of Tucson's "AZPDES - Posting Requirements" green sheet, or post the NOI at construction entrance of the site at beginning of construction activities and maintain this posted document throughout project construction.
ii) Specify that all erosion and sediment control measures must be properly selected, installed, and maintained per the manufacturers' specifications and good engineering practices. If periodic inspections or other information is discovered that indicates a control has been used inappropriately, or installed incorrectly, Operator must replace or modify the control for site situations as soon as practicable and before next anticipated storm event.
iii) It may be necessary to provide a SWPPP Report that includes the Owner/Operator Certification Statements, compliance evaluation report forms, and other forms as well as general permit.
iv) At minimum for the pre-con meeting, provide copy of the AzPDES general permit (#AZG2013-001) as part of the SWPPP. See the following weblink: http://www.azdeq.gov/environ/water/permits/download/2013_cgp.pdf
v) At pre-con meeting, provide copy of completely filled-out NOI that has been sent to ADEQ. See weblink: http://www.azdeq.gov/environ/water/permits/download/cgp_noi_form2013.pdf
vi) Provide a copy of the form for the NOT in the SWPP report. See weblink: http://www.azdeq.gov/environ/water/permits/download/cgp_not_form2013.pdf
b) Address the following comments for the SWPPP exhibit sheets:
i) Show, label, and provide leader line for the receiving waters either on location map on cover sheet, on vicinity map on exhibit, or on other planview.
ii) Identify Receiving Waters (Oak Tree Channel which is a tributary to West Branch Santa Cruz River (WBSCR) Diversion Channel on sheet C3.0
iii) Revise item 1 in sequence of activities on sheet C3.0, to state Verify instead of determine the disturbance limits as grading /disturbance limits shall match on SWPPP sheets.
iv) Label rock size for construction entrance.
v) Clarify which control type to use on sheet C3.0 Keynote 4.
vi) Add flow arrows to sheet C3.0.
vii) On sheet C3.0 revise the symbols for grade break, swale and property line so that they are clearly depicted and legible on planview.
viii) Regarding silt fence control measure installation detail on SWPP sheet C3.1, consider revising this detail without drain rock along the base of the silt fence, since most contractors do not typically provide special drain rock for most projects within the City of Tucson. Any drain rock material that is placed along the base of the silt fence shall not obstruct or divert stormwater flow. If drain rock is not used with silt fence, then earthen material shall only be backfilled against silt fence - at grade - to maintain flow pattern.
ix) Revise boundary controls according to the following comments:
(1) Assure grading limits on SWPP sheet match any revised limits of Grading Plan sheets.
(2) Revise location of controls at edge of project to be included within the grading/disturbance limits. Assure all construction areas for improvements are included within the disturbance limits and within the control measures. Or revise grading plan disturbance limits.
x) Provide the following general notes on the SWPPP sheet C3.0:
(1) Provide a note to the SWPP plan cover sheet and/or front of SWPP report stating that the Operator shall report to ADEQ any noncompliance (including spills) which may endanger human health or the environment. The Operator shall orally notify the office listed below within 24 hours:
(a) Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
1110 W. Washington, 5th floor (5515B-1)
Phoenix, AZ 85007
Office: 602-771-4466; Fax 602-771-4505
23) For SWPP resubmittal package, provide 2 copies of revised SWPPP exhibit, report, copy of NOI, and general permit.

SOILS/GEOTECHNICAL REPORT COMMENTS:
24) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.8.H: Submit Soil Investigation Report that includes information regarding removal of fuel tanks from site, and pavement structural design recommendations for pavement.

For resubmittal, provide 2 copies of revised Development Package sheets, Soils Investigation Report, Drainage Statement, SWPPP exhibit / report / copy of NOI / general permit, and response letter. If you have questions, call me at 837-4934.

Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM
Civil Engineer
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
City of Tucson
08/26/2014 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Denied Please indicate location of existing and/or proposed fire hydrants. Refer to section 507 of the 2012 International Fire Code for spacing requirements.
08/26/2014 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Panda Tucson Center
Development Package (1st Review)
DP14-0138

TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 27, 2014

DUE DATE: September 15, 2014

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless 1855 n review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 14, 2015.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.1.1 PURPOSE
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property.

This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes.

2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY
This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review.

2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided.
The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application:

2-06.2.1 Application Form
A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee;

2-06.2.2 Development Package
A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein;

2-06.2.3 Related Reviews
In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the;

2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and,

2-06.2.5 Fees
Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.2 - All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for record-keeping purposes. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. Smaller scales (60:1 or greater) may be used for some or all of the sheets with the prior approval of PDSD when it is determined legibility and the ability to be digitized and/or reduced for archiving will not be affected.

1. COMMENT: Sheet A-100 Site Plan should be drawn at an engineering scale.

2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

2. COMMENT: Provide the PDSD Development Package approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of all sheets. The required stamp can be found at http://pdsd.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/development-permits under Development Package.

2-06.3.6 - Provide a blank three-inch by five-inch block in the lower right corner of the plan adjacent to the title block on the first sheet of the development package for use by Pima County Addressing.

3. COMMENT: Provide the required blank three-inch by five-inch block in the lower right corner of the plan adjacent to the title block on sheet G-001 of the development package for use by Pima County Addressing.

2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet.

4. COMMENT: Provide the north arrow and scale in the upper right corner of sheet A-100.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

5. COMMENT: Provide a brief legal description within the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

6. COMMENT: Provide the page number and total number of pages on all sheets. The total number should be 12

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

7. COMMENT: Remove the address from the title block and provide it adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

8. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP14-0138, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

9. COMMENT: Provide a project location map on sheet G-001 in the upper right corner of the sheet. The location map shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile.

2-06.4.2.A - Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area;

10. COMMENT: Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area of the location map.

2-06.4.2.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and,

11. COMMENT: Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property on the location map.

2-06.4.2.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

12. COMMENT: Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled on the location map.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____."

13. COMMENT: Provide a general note on either sheet G-001 or A-100 stating "EXISTING ZONING IS C-2"

2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

14. COMMENT: Provide a general note on either sheet G-001 or A-100 stating the site by square footage and acreage.

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

COMMENT: Provide a general note on either sheet G-001 or A-100 identifying the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.
15.

2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

16. COMMENT: Provide a general note either sheet G-001 or A-100 stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) & ARTICLE 5.5 GATEWAY CORRIDOR ZONE (GCZ)."

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

17. COMMENT: Provide the site boundary perimeter information, bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, together with distances in feet on sheet A-100.

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

18. COMMENT: Show all existing easements on sheet A-100 along with the recordation information, book and page or sequence number.

19. COMMENT: There is a "6' MSTT" communication easement shown on sheets C1.2, it appears that the proposed building may encroach into this easement. The easement will need to be abandoned prior to approval of this development package.

2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

20. COMMENT: Provide the above right-of-way (ROW) information on sheet A-100.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

21. COMMENT: Provide all existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) on sheet A-100 with zoning boundaries clearly defined.

2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles (SVTs). On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

22. COMMENT: Show the required SVTs on sheet A-100.

2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

23. COMMENT: Provide the above information on sheet A-100.

2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

24. COMMENT: Provide a fully dimensioned vehicle parking area on sheet A-100. Zoning acknowledges that some dimensions are provided on sheet C1.2 but not all.
PAAL width for the northern most PAAL.
Access lane providing access to the adjacent parcel to the north.
Access lane to Midvale Park Road
Access lane to Valencia Road
Drive thru width

25. COMMENT: Show the require stacking for the drive thru, see UDC Table 7.4.7-1.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

26. COMMENT: Provide a fully dimensioned vehicle parking layout.

27. COMMENT: Provide a detail for a standard vehicle parking space.

28. COMMENT: Per UDC Section 7.4.6.F.2.b Minimum Width Requirement When Adjacent to Barrier. A motor vehicle off-street parking space must have a minimum width of ten feet when the side(s) of the parking space abuts a vertical barrier over six inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport. That said provide a width dimension for the two (2) vehicle parking spaces show adjacent to the proposed refuse enclosures.

29. COMMENT: Until all sidewalk widths have been provided, see comment 40, the requirement for wheel stop curbing cannot be determined. If wheel stops are required show the wheel stop on the required standard and accessible vehicle parking space details along with a location dimension, see UDC Section 7.4.6.H.3 & UDC Figure 7.4.6-C.

30. COMMENT: The vehicle parking calculation is not correct. Based on a "42'x74' proposed building the square footage should be listed as 3,108 sq ft with a total of 7,677 for Tract 3. 7,677/200 = 38 required not 46.

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

31. COMMENT: Provide a bicycle parking space calculation on the plan. Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1 The required number of bicycle parking spaces for multiple or mixed use development composed of more than one building are be calculated on a per building basis using the formulas provided above
32. COMMENT: Provide a short term bicycle parking detail that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Sections 7.4.9.B & .C are met.

33. COMMENT: Provide a long term bicycle parking detail that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Sections 7.4.9.B & .D are met.

2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

34. COMMENT: Provide building perimeter yard setback dimensions for the street perimeter yards for both buildings, see UDC Section 6.4.5.C.2.

2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

35. COMMENT: For the eastern most building the square footage should be listed as 3,108 s.f.

36. COMMENT: It appears that some type of canopy or cover is proposed for the outdoor seating. Provide the height of this structure on the plan within the footprint.

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

37. COMMENT: Clearly shown all sidewalks on sheet A-100.

38. COMMENT: Provide width dimensions for all sidewalks on sheet A-100.

39. COMMENT: Per TSM 7-01.4.1.C A sidewalk is required adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no other parking spaces or PAALs intervene. That said provide a four (4) min. sidewalk along the north side of the eastern most building.

40. COMMENT: As it appears that you are proposing that vehicles will overhang sidewalks, show the 2'-6" overhang on the plan and then demonstrate on the plan that a minimum four (4) foot wide sidewalk is maintained, see UDC Section 7.4.6.H.3 and TSM 7-01.4.3.A.

41. COMMENT: Per TSM 7-01.4.1.A At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. That said show the required sidewalk out to Midvale Park Road.

2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

42. COMMENT: If applicable show the location and types of proposed signs on sheet A-100.

Additional Comments

43. COMMENT: Sheet A-100 does not match sheets C1.2 or C1.3 clarify the difference. If you are proposing not to do the site improvements for the eastern portion of the site remove the improvements from sheet A-100 and revise any applicable calculations. A new development package will be required at the time the eastern portion of this site is developed.

44. COMMENT: Remove the existing development shown on sheets C1.2 or C1.3.

45. COMMENT: Clarify why two (2) cover sheets have been provided. All required notes, calculation, etc. for the site and grading can be provided on a single cover sheet.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
.
09/04/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to the building, building sewer, site lighting, or electrical service to the building). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for constructing the building or as a separate permit.
2. Revise the site drawing to include the following information:
a. The location and size of water lines,
b. The location of fire hydrants.
c. The location of sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number.
d. The point of connection to the existing public sewer.
e. The proposed first floor elevations for the buildings
Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual No. 2-06.0.0, Section 4.8 and Section 107.2.13, IBC 2012.
09/05/2014 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change SHEET A-100
1. At the marked crossing located in the South West corner of the site:
a. Both ramps must comply with the 2009 ICCA117.1, Section 405 which requires all flared sides to have a minimum slope of 1:10. Please redraw these ramps to show this minimum slope.
b. Flared sides on a ramp generally are for conditions where cross traffic may occurr. In both these cases there is no cross traffic and return curbs might be a better solution.
SHEET C1.3
2. Insure all accessible route slopes comply with ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% maximum runinning slope and 2% maximum cross slope. Include a note to that effect on the drawings.
3. Remove the term ADA shown in several places on this sheet and replace with "2012 IBC, Chapter 11 and the 2009 ICC A117.1.
SHEET C1.4
4. Detail:
a. Remove the term ADA and replace with "2012 IBC, Chapter 11 and the 2009 ICC A117.1".
b. Note that the slopes are to be 2% maximum in all directions.
c. Delete the reference to "COT DET 207 Sheet 4A" and replace with "2009 ICC A117.1, Sections 406.12, 13 and 14 as applicable".
5. Change note 5 to read as follows:
"All accessible parking signs are to be located on the center line of the parking space, just behind the 6" curb face and the bottom of the main sign is to be 7'-0" above finished grade".
END OF REVIEW
09/11/2014 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS

Identification and Descriptive Data

All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:

Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval

Provide previous approved landscape plans for reference. If no plan exist then this submittal will become the document of record.

Provide the following information:

Both the proper and common name of existing plant materials

Ensure that all zoning comments and concerns are addressed

Additional comments may apply
09/11/2014 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/27/2014 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed