Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP14-0133
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/01/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/01/2014 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Passed | |
| 08/01/2014 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Passed | |
| 08/04/2014 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/04/2014 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its approval. Thank you. |
| 08/04/2014 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/04/2014 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 08/04/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | See documents in SIRE |
| 08/07/2014 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) Outdoor storage area shall be screened by a minimum six-foot tall opaque closure. Identify any storage areas. C9-12-10 2) The commercial land use, including outdoor display areas and service bays, require a minimum 5' high screen along 36th St.. UDC 7.6.4.-I 3) Submit an irrigation plan. UDC 7.6.6.E.3 4) A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. UDC 7.4.6.H 5) Provide information on the plans regarding compliance with the screening requirements. a. Location of screening elements; b. Height of screening material and reference point for measurement; c. Nature of screening material (e.g., permanent or temporary as in phased development); and, d. Type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material). 6) Access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least two feet from a wall, screen, or other obstruction over six inches. UDC 7.6.4.F.2.b |
| 08/07/2014 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Passed | |
| 08/12/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 1849 E. Street. Development Package (1st Review) DP14-0133 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 13, 2014 DUE DATE: August 29, 2014 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is July 30, 2015. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 2-06.2.1 Application Form A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee; 2-06.2.2 Development Package A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein; 2-06.2.3 Related Reviews In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the; 2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and, 2-06.2.5 Fees Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.4 - A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. 1. COMMENT: Provide a title block in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. 2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. 2. COMMENT: Provide an index of the drawings on the first sheet. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 3. COMMENT: Provide the name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site and the developer of the project on the right half of the cover sheet. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; 4. COMMENT: Provide a brief legal description in the title block. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 5. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP14-0133, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 6. COMMENT: Provide the administrative street address adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 2-06.4.2.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 7. COMMENT: Label the section corners on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 8. COMMENT: General Note 3, existing use should be listed as "AUTOMOTIVE: MAJOR SERVICE AND REPAIR" and the proposed use should be listed as "AUTOMOTIVE: MAJOR SERVICE AND REPAIR (EXCLUDING BODYWORK AND PAINT-BOOTHS) SUBJECT TO USE SPECIFIC STANDARD 4.9.13.E". 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 9. COMMENT: Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)." 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 10. COMMENT: Provide the type and dimensioned width of the curbs and sidewalks along both 36th and Campbell. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 11. COMMENT: Provide the zoning for the parcels located east of Campbell. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles (SVTs). On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 12. COMMENT: Provide both the existing and future SVTs on the plan. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 13. COMMENT: Per UDC Section 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said the areas at both entrance access lanes off of 36th and Campbell are required to have some type of barrier. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 14. COMMENT: Provide a dimension for the wheel stop shown on the parking space detail, see UDC Section 7.4.6.H.3. 15. COMMENT: Per UDC Section 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said wheel stop curbing is required for all vehicle parking spaces shown on the plan. 16. COMMENT: Per UDC Section 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said some type of barrier is required to prevent vehicles from damaging the proposed & existing fence shown on the plan. 17. COMMENT: It does not appear that the vehicle parking space calculation is correct. Based on the most current aerial photos the area under the canopy, that shows up after 2005, is used for auto repair. If that is the case than the use area is to be included in the square footage used to calculate the vehicle parking requirements. This may also apply to the other canopy located to the southwest of the existing building, not shown on the plan but shown on the most current aerial photo. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 18. COMMENT: Remove all references to "CLASS 2" bicycle parking as it is no longer applicable. All references should be Short-Term. 19. COMMENT: The proposed location for the bicycle rack does not meet the requirements of UDC Section 7.4.9.C.2.c Clearly visible from the adjacent sidewalks, drives, and/or a public entrance(s). 20. COMMENT: Provide a short-term bicycle parking detail that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Sections 7.4.9.B.1.d, .e & .g, & 7.4.9.B.2.a, .f, .g, 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 21. COMMENT: Clearly shown the attached canopy on the plan along with the square footage and height within the footprint. As shown it appears to be all building. Provide approved permitting documents for this canopy. 22. COMMENT: Based on the most current aerial photos there is some type of canopy southwest of the existing building. If this structure is to be removed show it on the plan to be demolished. If it is to remain shown it on the plan and provide the square footage and height within the footprint and provide approved permitting documents. 23. COMMENT: Clearly define any proposed outdoor storage areas. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 24. COMMENT: Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. That said provide a sidewalk from the existing building to both streets. 25. COMMENT: Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.C 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 26. COMMENT: A sidewalk is required adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no other parking spaces or PAALs intervene. That said clearly shown the required four (4) foot sidewalk between the existing building and the two vehicle parking spaces shown on the plan. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 27. COMMENT: Once any outdoor storage areas are defined, see comment 23, compliance with rezoning condition 8 can be verified. 28. COMMENT: The existing and proposed chainlink fence shown around the perimeter of the site does not meet the requirements of rezoning condition 18. 29. COMMENT: Provide the required drainage report see rezoning condition 21. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 30. COMMENT: If applicable show any existing or proposed signs on the plan. Additional Comments COMMENT: Sheet 1 clarify what the site plan is for on this sheet. As this plan does not serve any purpose Zoning recommends that it be removed from the sheet and sheets 1 & 2 be combined. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package . |
| 08/14/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | See documents in SIRE |
| 08/18/2014 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 PO Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#281095 August 14, 2014 Tim McCann Consulting LLC Attn: Tim McCann 229 N. Redcoat Ln Tucson, AZ 85748 Dear Mr. McCann: SUBJECT: Automotive Repair/Tire Shop DP14-0133 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and has approved the development plan submitted August 12, 2014. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. " It does not appear that TEP has any facilities that are in conflict with the work being done. No TEP facilities are shown on the drawings. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will not be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (OH204) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Jennifer Necas at (520) 918-8295. Sincerely, Jeffery Shea Admin Support Specialist Design/Build cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) J. Necas, Tucson Electric Power |
| 08/22/2014 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The accessible route to 36th street will be required by zoning to be concrete, 4'-0" wide minimum and accessible. Please confirm with zoning these requirements. a. It must be accessible meaning the slopes shall meet the requirements of the 2009 ICC A 117.1, Section 403.3; 5% maximum running slope ansd 2% cross slope. Please provide a note on the drawings that all accessible route slopes are to comply with this code section. 2. Please define the front access of the building: materials (concrete?), slopes, show the entry door location. 3. Provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking layout showing all accessible requirements such as dimensions, grade slopes, markings, van accessible space, ramps as required, access to accessible route and to building front entry door. a. Show location of building entry door. 4. Provide dimensional widths for all accessible routes. 5. All ramps are to comply with ICC A117.1, Sections 405 and 406 as applicable. PC/COT SD 207 is for right of way construction only and may not be used for private property accessible compliance. END OF REVIEW |
| 08/25/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | See informational letter in PRO |
| 08/26/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this proposal. |
| 08/27/2014 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | FROM: TDOT Zelin Canchola PROJECT: 1849 E. 36 Street. Development Package (1st Review) DP14-0133 The plan requires additional information. 1. Dimension sidewalks shown on plan. 2. Any unused curb cuts must be closed. Unused curb cut on S. Campbell must be shown on plan. Vertical curb to be installed should be called out on plan. |
| 08/29/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. The location and size of water lines, and fire hydrants. b. The location of sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. c. The points of connection to existing public sewers. d. The locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights. e. Any existing or proposed utility easements f. The first floor elevation for the building Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual No. 2-06.0.0, Section 4.8 and Section 107.2.13, IBC 2012. |
| 09/02/2014 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve this plan. |
| 09/02/2014 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 09/02/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | The Development Package has been reviewed on behalf of Environmental Services and the following comments need to be addressed on the resubmittal: 1. The plan shows a fenced enclosure for a single dumpster. Either provide the double dumpster enclosure per TSM Section 8 Figure 3A or provide waste stream calculations per TSM 8-01.8.0 Table 1 to demonstrate the use of APCs are allowed. The enclosure needs to provide for both refuse and recycling containers. 2. If the use of APCs are allowed by the waste stream calculations, provide the details for their enclosure and the type of screening that will be provided to screen the containers from public view and adjacent properties. Also, per TSM 8-01.5.1.B, all containers require enclosures with gates. Show the type of screening to be used on the gates. 3. Provide a general note on the cover sheet specifying anticipated method of collection and frequency based on the calculated tonnage from Table 1. There may be additional comments once more information is shown on the plans in regards to the required container type and enclosure. If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net |
| 09/02/2014 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/02/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 09/02/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 09/02/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 09/02/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/05/2014 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |