Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP14-0127
Review Name: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/15/2014 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed |
| 12/16/2014 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP14-0127 440 N Toole Avenue Development Package for a Commercial Parking Lot Downtown - OCR-2 Zone, Rio Nuevo TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 16, 2014 DUE DATE: December 24, 2014 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 22, 2015 . ****************************************************************************** 01. Follow up to Previous Comment 6: This project is subject to compliance with the Rio Nuevo Regulations and compliance NPZ requirements. If the applications for both of these overlays have been processed, reviewed and approved, list the overlay case numbers in the lower right corner of all plan sheets. The overlay case numbers, date of approval and any conditions of approval must be listed as a general note on the cover sheet. Include the required information and provide copies of the approval letters for both overlays with the next submittal. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 06. COMMENT: This project has been assigned the PDSD case number DP14-0127. List the case number next to the title block of all plan sheets. Also if any additional applications are required for approval of this project such as IID, MDR etc. List the case number in the lower right corner of plan sheets and list as a general note the case number date of approval and list the conditions of approval if any for each process. ****************************************************************************** 02. Follow up to Previous Comment 9: Same as comment 01 above. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 09. COMMENT: If applicable add the information as noted by the standard above. 03. Follow up Comment to Previous Comment 12: The response provided to the previous comment does not address the required standard. Address the standard and provide the information on the plans. If no existing easements exist over the property state so. General note on sheet two does not address the standard as noted below. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 12. COMMENT: If applicable draw all recorded easements within the project site. ****************************************************************************** 04. Follow up Comment to Previous Comment 25: Provide the information noted in comment 1 and 2. 25. This project is subject to compliance with the Rio Nuevo District (RND) and Downtown Core Subdistrict (DCS) regulations. A DRB review and approval is required. Review the RND and DCS regulations in the Unified Development Code. Compliance with all applicable regulations of the Rio Nuevo and Downtown Core must be demonstrated on the Development package drawings. Contact Russlyn Wells 837-4948 or Mark Castro 837-4979 for information on processing a RND or DCS applications. ****************************************************************************** 05. Zoning is willing (with an appointment) to review the revisions to the plans over the counter and approve the plans assuming all remaining zoning comments are addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. |
| 12/17/2014 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Reqs Change | RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS SHEET 2 1. Relocate the accessible parking sign to a location just behind the concrete curb line. WIDEN THE SIDEWALK AS NECESSARY. THE SIGN MAY NOT BE LOCATED IN THE ASPHALTIC PAVING AREA. 2. Reference the accessible parking layout to the large scale detail 1/3. OK 3. Provide a note that indicates that the asphaltic paving, the concrete curb and the concrete sidewalk all are flush to provide access to the accessible route from the accessible parking aisles. OK 4. Provide a note to the effect that all new accessible route slopes comply with 2010 ADASAD, Section 403.3. NOTE NEEDS TO REFERENCE THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHEET 3 5. Detail 1: a. Relocate the accessible parking sign to a location just behind the concrete curb line. WIDEN THE SIDEWALK AS NECESSARY. THE SIGN MAY NOT BE LOCATED IN THE ASPHALTIC PAVING AREA. b. Show the concrete curb and the accessible route. SHOWN THE CONCRETE CURB AND THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE ON THIS DETAIL PLEASE. c. What do the numerical references mean? OK ADDITIONAL COMMENTS SHEET 4 6. Detail 1/4 does not match the design conditions shown on sheet 3: a. The is no concrete sidewalk on the side of the accessible parking area where the aisle is supposed to be. b. The dimensions for a Van Accessible is either 11' space and 5' aisle or 8' space and 8' aisle. Select one or the other. c. Generic details are not acceptable. Provide actual parking layout. SHEET 3 7. Note 2 placed in the middle of an accessible parking space refers to the slopes for an accessible route not the grade slopes for accessible parking spaces and accessible parking aisles which is ADASAD Section 502.4, no more than 1:48. END OF REVIEW |
| 12/19/2014 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |