Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP14-0127
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/23/2014 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Passed | This is a COT owned or operated property. Reference ADA comments. |
| 07/24/2014 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/31/2014 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP14-0127 440 N Toole Avenue Development Package for a Commercial Parking Lot Downtown - OCR-2 Zone, Rio Nuevo TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 6, 2014 DUE DATE: August 19, 2014 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 22, 2015 . 2. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. 01. COMMENT: Add the signature approval stamp to sheet 5 of the DP. 2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. 02. COMMENT: Include the contour interval under the north arrows where applicable. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 03. COMMENT: List the names, mailing and email addresses on the cover sheet as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; 04. COMMENT: Include in the title block of all plan sheets a brief legal description of the property. 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). 05. COMMENT: The record of survey drawing sheet should be included in the sheet index as part of the set of 8 sheets. Revise the sheet pagination in the title block and sheet index on the cover sheet. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 06. COMMENT: This project has been assigned the PDSD case number DP14-0127. List the case number next to the title block of all plan sheets. Also if any additional applications are required for approval of this project such as IID, MDR etc. List the case number in the lower right corner of plan sheets and list as a general note the case number date of approval and list the conditions of approval if any for each process. 2-06.4.2.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 07. COMMENT: Label the section corners around the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 08. COMMENT: The use is classified as a Parking Use under the Commercial Land Use Class group. There are no Use Specific Standards that are applicable to this use under the OCR-2 zone. General note three (3) must be revised to list the correct Land Use Class as noted above under UDC Article 4 Section 4.8.6. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 09. COMMENT: If applicable add the information as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 10. COMMENT: Add the required information as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 11. COMMENT: Label the distance and bearing of the property lines. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 12. COMMENT: If applicable draw all recorded easements within the project site. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 13. COMMENT: Label the information for the abutting streets as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. COMMENT: 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. 14. COMMENT: Same as comment 11. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 15. COMMENT: Label the zoning classifications adjacent to the property including the zoning classifications from across the streets. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 16. COMMENT: Draw, label and dimension existing and future sight visibility triangles. 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 17. COMMENT: Add the information as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.I - Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half, to complete the street width. Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information. 18. COMMENT: Draw, label, and dimension the future right of way for 6th Avenue and Toole Avenue. 2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) 19. COMMENT: If applicable to this development, add the information to the site plan sheets as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan 2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan. 20. COMMENT: The grading plan is being reviewed concurrently. When the development package is approved both site and grading plans are considered approved. If any changes need to be made to the base site plan, ensure that the same changes are made to the grading plan and landscape plan sheets. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 21. COMMENT: provide the SVT info as noted in comment 16. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 22. COMMENT: provide the information as noted by the standard above and see related comment 13. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 23. COMMENT: If applicable to this project, draw and label any proposed freestanding signage. 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 24. COMMENT: See the landscape reviewer comments related to landscape buffers and screening regulations. 25. This project is subject to compliance with the Rio Nuevo District (RND) and Downtown Core Subdistrict (DCS) regulations. A DRB review and approval is required. Review the RND and DCS regulations in the Unified Development Code. Compliance with all applicable regulations of the Rio Nuevo and Downtown Core must be demonstrated on the Development package drawings. Contact Russlyn Wells 837-4948 or Mark Castro 837-4979 for information on processing a RND or DCS applications. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. |
| 08/06/2014 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Reqs Change | SHEET 2 1. Relocate the accessible parking sign to a location just behind the concrete curb line. 2. Reference the accessibvle parking layout to the large scale detail 1/3. 3. Provide a note that indicates that the asphaltic paving, the concrete curb and the concrete sidewalk all are flush to provide access to the accessible route from the accessible parking aisles. 4. Provide a note to the effect that all new accessible route slopes comply with 2010 ADASAD, Section 403.3. SHEET 3 5. Detail 1: a. Relocate the accessible parking sign to a location just behind the concrete curb line. b. Show the concrete curb and the accessible route. c. What do the numerical references mean? END OF REVIEW |
| 08/11/2014 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | TO: Steve Tineo, P.E., Dave Atler, P.E. TDOT SUBJECT: Commercial Parking Lot Development Package Engineering Submittal Review ADDRESS: 440 N Toole Avenue FLOODPLAIN STATUS: X-shaded 500-yr and X-unshaded zones, 040076-2227K REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, PE CASE NUMBER: DP14-0127 DATE: August 8, 2014 SUMMARY: The revised development package was submitted for the proposed Parking Lot improvements at 440 N Toole Avenue. PDSD Engineering Division does not recommend approval until the following comments are addressed for next submittal. MASTER COVER SHEETS/ GENERAL NOTES: 1) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.7.6.a,B.2.b, Tech Man Sec.2-01: Address the following Development Package general note comments: a) Assure total disturbance area is correctly listed in General Grading and Paving Note 26. It appears that the disturbance area is closer to 1.45 acres not 1.27 acres. b) For General Grading and Paving Note 10, include submittal of as-builts with substantial completion statements that will be needed prior to final grading inspection approval. c) Add the following notes: i) Call for SWPPP inspection and Grading Pre-construction meeting. For a PDSD Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Planning & Development Services Department, or contact PDSD Engineering at 837-4888. ii) There shall be no disturbance outside of these approved grading limits. Any grading outside of the grading limits requires separate grading permit or a submittal, review, and approval for separate permits. iii) Permitee shall notify PDSD when grading operation is ready for final grading inspection. Final grading approval shall not be given until all work, including installation of all erosion control measures, have been completed in accordance with approved grading plan and grading permit, and all conditions of permit are completed. iv) As-builts are required to be submitted under activity number DP14-0127 to PDSD permit clerks. Submittal will be reviewed and then if acceptable, a copy will be provided to PDSD Engineering Inspector for final grading inspections. For Grading Permit Project Completion documentation, submit: one copy of original grading plans, 2 copies of as-builts ("Final Revised Grading Plan"), and letters of substantial completion. As-builts shall include: locations of utilities, finished pavement elevations, as-built elevation of scuppers and water harvesting areas, and other general finished grades as determined by RLS to show substantial completion for project. BASE LAYER SHEET COMMENTS: 2) Assure all contents and formatting for project is in compliance with sections 2-06.3 and 2-06.4 of the Administrative Manual. See Zoning comments. 3) Admin Man Sec.2-06.3: Add DP14-0127 case number to Development Package sheets. SITE PLAN SHEET COMMENTS: 4) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.8.C: Label the following information regarding existing public right-of-way adjacent to the site: right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 5) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.8.G: Label existing 12-ft retaining system to west of project site. 6) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9.O: Label any setbacks from west existing retaining system. (See Geotechnical and Drainage setback comments.) 7) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Delineate and label future and existing sight visibility triangles. 8) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9.I: Label right-of-way information abutting the site: MS&R Collector for Toole Avenue and MS&R Arterial for 6th Avenue on planview for Site Plan / Grading Plan sheet. 9) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Show vehicle maneuverability with turning radii delineations on planview for refuse collection area per Tech Man Sec.8-01.5.3.C. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS: 10) Tech Man Sec.4-04.2.3.1.1.B: Add address of project and project numbers (DP14-0127) to report cover. 11) Tech Man Sec.4-04.1.5.2: Provide a maintenance checklist for drainage improvements in the Drainage Report. LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS: 12) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9.O: Trees are proposed along west side of project in right-of- way. See geotechnical and site plan comments. Explain and provide maintenance easement. 13) Tech Man Sec.10-01.5.1.A.1: Show SVT's on plan sheet 4 and assure no conflict with proposed trees. GRADING, PAVING, DETAIL SHEET COMMENTS: 14) Tech Man Secs.2-01.4.1.C, 8-01.5.2.G: Address the following grading comments for sheet 2: a) Provide Basis of Bearings and local Basis of Elevation location labeled and identified on grading plan. b) Label minimum 2% slope away within trash enclosure pad on planview sheet 2. Assure solid waste pick-up area is elevated so as not to become a flowline for general local flows in the east corner area of the project. 15) Tech Man Sec.8-01.5.2.D: For Refuse Enclosure detail 1 on sheet 4, add note that gates shall be opaque (no see-through gates allowed). UTILITIES / EASEMENTS COMMENTS: 16) Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.8.B: All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. Assure complete information is provided for easements on the site. If needed, assure any offsite construction easements are obtained for proposed offsite disturbance and sequence numbers provided on plans. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN COMMENTS: 17) Tucson Code Chap.26 Art.2: The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) does not meet the minimum requirements of AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise SWPPP according to the following comments: a) Address the following general SWPPP comments: i) For inspection purposes, post filled-out City of Tucson's "AZPDES - Posting Requirements" green sheet, or post the NOI at construction entrance of the site at beginning of construction activities and maintain this posted document throughout project construction. ii) Specify that all erosion and sediment control measures must be properly selected, installed, and maintained per the manufacturers' specifications and good engineering practices. If periodic inspections or other information is discovered that indicates a control has been used inappropriately, or installed incorrectly, Operator must replace or modify the control for site situations as soon as practicable and before next anticipated storm event. iii) It may be necessary to provide a SWPPP Report that includes the Owner/Operator Certification Statements, compliance evaluation report forms, and other forms as well as general permit. iv) At minimum for the pre-con meeting, provide copy of the AzPDES general permit (#AZG2013-001) as part of the SWPPP. See the following weblink: http://www.azdeq.gov/environ/water/permits/download/2013_cgp.pdf v) At pre-con meeting, provide copy of completely filled-out NOI that has been sent to ADEQ. See weblink: http://www.azdeq.gov/environ/water/permits/download/cgp_noi_form2013.pdf vi) Provide a copy of the form for the NOT in the SWPP report. See weblink: http://www.azdeq.gov/environ/water/permits/download/cgp_not_form2013.pdf b) Address the following comments for the SWPPP exhibit sheets: i) Show, label, and provide leader line for the receiving waters either on location map on cover sheet, on vicinity map on exhibit, or on other planview. ii) Identify Receiving Waters (Tucson Arroyo) on section I.I of Part 1 on sheet 5. iii) Provide information in sequence of activities on sheet 5 in Part 2 section III. The sequence of major activities should state whether establishment of erosion and stormwater controls are to occur prior to clearing and rough grading of this site. iv) Fill out Part 2 section V.A. and provide list of potential pollutant sources from this project. v) To prevent breakout of stormwater runoff along perimeter disturbance limits, revise location of the SWPP BMP controls such that segments of the interim erosion control devices are placed parallel to elevation contours such that runoff will not be channelized along linear protection. Only sediment log detail showed on sheet 6. Sheet 7 appears to indicate that the site will only pond stormwater. Specific temporary erosion/stormwater control installation details for silt fence, straw bale, wattle, scupper inlet control, vegetative cover, and/or other controls shall be provided on the SWPP exhibit. Consider providing a silt fence or wattle detail that will be useable to the contractor; provide a detail without drain rock or fill along the base of the silt fence/.wattle so as not to obstruct or divert stormwater flow. If drain rock or fill is not proposed to be used with silt fence/wattle, then earthen material shall only be backfilled against silt fence/wattle at grade to maintain flow pattern. vi) On sheet 7, show limits, dimensions, and designated locations on the planview for any temporary stockpile area, concrete washout area, and/or material / construction vehicle storage areas, with appropriate controls. Temporary material or vehicle staging / stockpile area, and designated concrete washout locations should not be located in or near waterharvesting areas / basins. vii) Show construction entrance locations on sheet 7. Dimension minimum depth and minimum length (50-ft) of stabilized entrance on SWPP exhibit. Label rock size for construction entrances (typically 3-in min, 6-in max). viii) Revise boundary controls according to the following comments: (1) Delineate project boundary limits on plan. (2) Depict and label disturbance / grading limits on SWPPP exhibit. (3) Label 2-ft grading offset from west boundary limits. (4) Assure grading limits on SWPP exhibit match any revised limits of Grading Plan sheets. Assure that the limits of disturbance are included within the interim controls -. (5) Revise location of controls at edge of project to be included within the grading/disturbance limits. Assure all construction areas for improvements are included within the disturbance limits and within the control measures. Or revise grading plan disturbance limits. Revise sheet 7 as needed. ix) Provide the following general notes on the SWPPP cover sheet: (1) Provide a note to the SWPP plan cover sheet and/or front of SWPP report stating that the Operator shall report to ADEQ any noncompliance (including spills) which may endanger human health or the environment. The Operator shall orally notify the office listed below within 24 hours: (a) Arizona Department of Environmental Quality 1110 W. Washington, 5th floor (5515B-1) Phoenix, AZ 85007 Office: 602-771-4466; Fax 602-771-4505 (2) Add note to sheet 5 stating that during pre-con meeting, AZPDES general permit and NOI with Authorization number must be provided in SWPPP prior to commencement of ground disturbing activities. (3) Add note stating that the permit shall not be finalized until copies of all of the project's NOT's have been received by Planning and Development Services Department. (4) Add note stating a water truck or other temporary water source will be provided for dust control, otherwise explain how wind erosion/dust control will be achieved and provide specific practices. (5) Provide note stating that adjacent street shall be cleaned daily of sediment and other construction debris. Specify that when sediment escapes the construction site, offsite accumulations of sediment must be routinely removed and at a frequency sufficient to ensure no adverse effects on water quality. (6) Add notation regarding restriction of storage or placement of construction material and vehicles within basin areas. 18) For resubmittal package, provide 2 copies of revised SWPPP exhibit, report, copy of NOI, and general permit. SOILS/GEOTECHNICAL REPORT COMMENTS: 19) IBC 2012 Secs.1605, 1607, & 1807: Provide statement or discussion with any calculations that might be needed, to address potentially increased load from parking, and increase landscaping irrigation and tree roots, to existing retaining system along west side of project for underpass. Explain whether sufficient distance is provided away from existing retaining structure and whether any impervious cover may need to be extended along this west side to protect the retaining system from pore water pressure from any increase in stormwater runoff that may contribute to infiltration along western edge of project. Delineate setback on planviews. For resubmittal, provide 2 copies of revised Development Package sheets, revised Geotechnical Pavement Section Report, revised Drainage Statement, revised SWPPP exhibit, report, copy of NOI, general permit, and response letter. If you have questions, call me at 837-4934 Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department City of Tucson |
| 08/15/2014 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/15/2014 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Verify that that submittal meets the following 5.11. RIO NUEVO DISTRICT (RND) 5.11.5. SITE DESIGN STANDARDS Shade Shade shall be provided for at least 50% of all sidewalks and pedestrian pathways as measured at 2:00 p.m. on June 21 when the sun is 82 degrees above the horizon (based on 32°N Latitude). Shade may be provided by arcades, canopies, or shade structures, provided they respect the historic and design context of the street and the architectural integrity of the building. Deciduous trees, as proposed in the Downtown Comprehensive Street Tree Plan, are encouraged to supplement existing evergreen trees. The use of plantings and shade structures in the Cityright-of-way are permitted to meet this standard with the approval of the City of Tucson Department of Transportation. The shade provided by a building may serve to meet this standard. ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed |
| 08/19/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/12/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |