Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP14-0115
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/03/2014 | CPIERCE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/03/2014 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/07/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | POLICE | REVIEW | Passed | Special Exception has expired. |
| 07/10/2014 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP14-0115 (Houghton Town Center) 10200 E. Old Vail Road Development Package - Dunkin Donuts TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 10, 2014 DUE DATE: August 1, 2014 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC). 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is . 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.11 - A key plan (if provided) shall be located on the first sheet. 01. COMMENT: It is requested that an overall site drawing at a reduced scale be added to the cover sheet and the proposed development be identified on the reduced scale drawing. (See the cover sheet of DP13-0178 for reference.) 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 02. COMMENT: List the telephone number and email address for the Owner / Developer of this project and list the information as noted in the standard above for any other registrant that helped prepare the development package documents. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). 03. COMMENT: The updated scenic Corridor Sheets must be included in the development package set. Revise the sheet index on the cover sheet to include the required sheets and revise the pagination in the title block of all plan sheets. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 04. COMMENT: This project has been assigned the PDSD case number DP14-0115. List the number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets. Also list any and all relevant case numbers in the lower right corner of all plan sheets. See the cover sheet of DP14-0019 for reference numbers associated with the overall development. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 05. COMMENT: The overall site is subject to compliance with Scenic Corridor regulations. Include the Scenic Corridor sheets as part of this package and draw the proposed building footprint on the sheet. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 06. COMMENT: The development is subject to compliance with the regulations of the Major Streets and Routes setbacks. Add a note stating that the site has been designed to comply with the regulations of the MS& R. List as a note that the site is designed to meet the regulations of the SZC, include the related UDC section numbers for the MS&R and the SCZ. If any other process is required list the case number in the lower right corner of the plan sheets and any conditions of approval if applicable. 2-06.4.7.A.6.b - If there is more than one lot within the site, the note should specify which lots are affected by the additional applications or overlay zones. 07. COMMENT: Refer as to the cover sheet of DP14-0019 for additional notes that are applicable. 2-06.4.7.A.7 - If the property is part of a subdivision plat that is being reviewed or has been recorded, provide the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note, indicate whether the project is part of a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), condominium, or another similar type project. 08. COMMENT: List the subdivision case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets. 2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 09. COMMENT: Draw and label existing and future SVT's along the West Access Drive and Old Vail Road. 2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability. 10. COMMENT: Clarify what the number 9 enclosed in a dashed circle within the drive-through represents. The stacking spaces should be drawn and labeled within the drive-through lane. (It is clear that the minimum stacking spaces can be met.) 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided and fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 11. COMMENT: Upon reviewing the parking requirements is noted that the correct number of parking spaces cannot be verified. The square footage of the Walk-in freezer was not included in the overall GFA, and it is not clear on the plan if there is an outside seating area in the proposed patio area. The number of parking spaces must be based on all GFA, Walk-in Freezer and outside patio. The Zoning data matrix table on the cover sheet must be updated to correctly indicate the number of parking spaces based on the information noted above. Also, the square footage for the Walk-in freezer and patio must be labeled in the matrix for this use. The matrix currently indicates that 28 regular parking spaces and two (2) HC parking spaces have been provided. A count of the parking spaces depicted on the drawing indicates that a total of 31 spaces have been provided. Revise the drawing and/or data matrix table as required. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 12. COMMENT: If additional bicycle parking is required due to the outside patio and storage freezer square footage, revise the bicycle parking calculations as required. 2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan. 13. COMMENT: The grading plan has been reviewed by zoning as part of the development package review. Once the DP site plan can be approved by zoning the grading plan will be approved as it relates to the zoning review purview. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 14. COMMENT: Label the overall building setback dimension from the future back of curb location. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 15. COMMENT: Clarify if there is an existing pedestrian sidewalk along the west side of the private road. If so label the width and sidewalk as existing. If the sidewalk does not exist, a connection is required from the building to the Old Vail Road sidewalk. Demonstrate on the plans how pedestrian circulation will be provided to connect to the Old Vail Street sidewalk. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 16. COMMENT: If signs are proposed for this project, draw and label the locations, type and size. 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 17. COMMENT: See the landscape reviewer comments related to the Landscape buffers and screening. 18. Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the responses to the zoning comments and revisions to the plan sheets. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. |
| 07/21/2014 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Flooplain Review, 07/23/2014, SUBJECT: Dunkin Donuts - Houghton Town Center DP14-0115, T15S, R15E, SECTION 35 RECEIVED: Development Package on July 03, 2014 The subject submittal has been reviewed and it can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location on the Development Package where the revisions were made: Drainage Report: 1. Show on the Proposed Conditions Drainage exhibit the parking area ponding limits with water surface elevation and depth. 2. Address proposed onsite drainage and how it will be conveyed through the P.A.A.L's including the building roof drainage. Clarify if sidewalks scuppers are needed. 3. Provide discussion and design calculations for any proposed drainage structure associated specifically with the Dunkin Donuts improvements (i.e. curb openings, erosion control pads, swales, grate inlets, sidewalk scuppers, etc.). 4. The report shall address water harvesting provision for the Dunkin Donuts improvements (Chapter 26 of the Tucson Code (i.e. Floodplain Ordinance) and Chapter II of the City of Tucson Drainage Manual). 5. The drainage exhibit shall include all the required information, mentioned above, with all necessary details (i.e. materials, dimensions, locations etc.). 6. Address in the report the drainage structures maintenance responsibility and provide the maintenance checklist. Development Package: 1. The Development Package Case number is DP14-0115. Provide, on every sheet, all correct case number and reference the Tentative Plat Case Number S11-044 (A.M. 2-06.4.3). 2. Show, on the plan, the basis of bearing and provide the tie between the basis of bearing and one of the corners of the parcel (A.M. 2-06.4.8.A). 3. The Site Plan has several dashed lines, which appear to indicate existing easements. Clarify where all existing onsite easements are and where their limits are (A.M. 2-06.4.8.B). 4. Show, if applicable, any existing storm drainage facilities on or adjacent to the site (A.M. 2-06.4.8.F). 5. Clarify if the private driveway, south of the subject property, will be constructed with this project (A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.1). 6. The sidewalk, along the West Access Drive shall be constructed with this project (A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.1). 7. Show sight visibility triangles as required by A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.2. 8. Show, if applicable, all proposed easements as required by A.M. 2-06.4.9.L). 9. Show the extent of the 100-year ponding within the parking area with maximum water depth (A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.2). 10. Show roof drainage direction and the sidewalk scuppers, if applicable, as required by (A.M. 2-06.4.9.N.2). 11. Add the following grading notes, which are intended to protect the owner/developer and the engineer of record: a. The contractor is not permitted to make an autonomous decision to carry out construction field changes without prior written approval from the Engineer of Record and the City of Tucson Development Services Department. b. The approved Grading Plan/Development Package is the only acceptable construction plan onsite. The Contractor may not use any other plans, such as the approved Tentative Plat and/or Development Plan, for construction purposes. The Contractor may ask the Planning and Development Services Inspector to consult with the other approved plans for additional information or details that might not be included on the approved grading plan but needed for completion of work. c. The contractor shall remove the fine materials from the bottom of all basins and scarify the basin bottoms once the construction activities are completed in order to remove any fine material build up caused by construction and to restore soil percolation. Install BMP's at the basin inlet(s) to prevent the fines from entering the basin d. Any proposed engineering work to be done below grade (i.e. toe-downs, cutoff walls, drainage pipes/structures, etc.) shall not be back filled until Development Services Inspector inspects the work and approves it. e. "CALL FOR SWPPP INSPECTION AND PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETINGS. FOR A PDSD ENGINEERING INSPECTIONS, CALL IVR (740-6970), OR SCHEDULE WITH A CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE AT THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, OR CONTACT DSD ENGINEERING AT 791-5550 EXTENSION 2101, OR SCHEDULE INSPECTIONS ONLINE AT: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/inspections". f. The project will be in compliance with City of Tucson Technical Standard 2-01.0 (Excavating and Grading). g. A copy of the approved Grading Plan, Grading Permit, and any Geotechnical Reports shall be kept at the site at all times, until final grading approval. h. Any revision to the Grading Plan MAY require a re-submittal of a revised grading plan for review. Contact PDSD Engineering at 791-5550 to discuss changes in grading design. i. If grading construction is expected to last longer than the expiration date of the grading permit, contact PDSD to renew/extend the Grading Permit. If Final Grading Inspection has not been completed before the Grading Permit expires, and the permit has not been renewed, additional fees and reviews may be required. j. See the associated Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan as a part of this grading permit. k. Contact Permits and Codes at 791-5100 for any questions regarding any right-of-way permit requirements. l. As-builts and letters of completion for basin and overall project are required. m. The Engineer of Record shall submit a statement of conformance to as-built plan and the specifications. n. The permitee shall notify the PDSD when the grading operation is ready for final grading inspection. Final grading approval shall not be given until all work, including installation of all drainage facilities and their permanent protective devices, and all erosion control measures have been completed in accordance with the approved grading plan and grading permit, and any required reports have been submitted. o. Depress all landscaped areas a maximum of 6" for waterharvesting" SWPPP: 1. It appears that, since the property is less than on acre, a SWPPP is not required, however the submitted SWPPP is acceptable If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4933 or Laith.Alshami@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan Package and drainage statement |
| 07/24/2014 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please indicate location(s) of existing and/or proposed fire hydrants. Sheet 5 of 9 has a notation regarding "hazardous materials storage area". Please indicate type and quantities of hazardous materials. Refer to chapter 50 of the 2012 International Fire Code for guidance regarding limitations. Please provide response letter regarding these comments. |
| 07/25/2014 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/28/2014 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING Street landscape borders must be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five feet of the required ten foot width may be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets. Provide permission for use of ROW and verify if property lines are drawn correctly on landscape plan. Use of the Public Right-of-Way Non-required landscaping may be placed in the public right-of-way, if the following standards are met: 1. The landscaping is approved by the City Engineer or designee and complies with the City Engineer's standards on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type; 2. All vegetation complies with the standards of Section 7.6.4, Landscaping Standards; and, 3. The landscaping does not interfere with the use of the sidewalk. An unpaved planting area, which must be a minimum of 34 square feet in area and four feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. Dimension tree planter(s) within vehicle use area. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Rezoning case; Subdivision case; Board of Adjustment case; Design Development Option case; Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Planting Plan Location, size, and name of existing vegetation to remain in place Grading Information Note: Verify if a separate Grading plan is necessary. The following information can indicated on that document.. Grade changes across the site indicated by one-foot interval contour lines or by spot elevations; Percent slope across the site and the direction of the slope of paved areas; Existing grades on adjacent rights-of-way and adjacent sites. If an adjacent right-of- way or site is under construction, show the proposed finish grade Extent of grading boundaries if a portion of the site is to be kept in its natural undisturbed state. Indicate natural contours of undisturbed areas; Areas of detention/retention, depths of basins, and percentage of side slope; The methods by which water harvesting or storm water runoff is used to benefit the planting areas on the site. |
| 07/29/2014 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/30/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the site drawing to include the rim elevation of the manhole to which the building sewer is connected, along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 07/31/2014 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All items requested by review staff 3) All items needed to approve this plan. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/18/2014 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |