Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: DP14-0098
Parcel: 14026002E

Address:
2000 E DREXEL RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - DP14-0098
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/11/2014 PGEHLEN1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
07/01/2014 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office
FROM: Michael St. Paul

PROJECT: DP14-0098 (DP12-0005)
A-Family Discount Storage
Development Package

TRANSMITTAL: July 1, 2014


COMMENTS: Place the new Development Package number (DP14-0098) in the lower-right corner next to the previous number (DP12-0005) on each sheet.

1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The previous approval date has expired but has been extended to 1/10/2014. The new one-year expiration date for this development plan is 01/10/2014.

2. List the WASH case number in the space in general note 25. T12SA00260.

ADDITION TO COMMENT: Add the case number (T12SA00260) information in general note 25.

Previous Comment 2. Per your response to the previous comment there has not been a submittal for review of the WASH overlay. This portion of the previous comment will remain until the overlay has been completed and approved. Please address the previous comment and revise or add the appropriate information related to the WASH overlay as requested.

Portion of Previous comment 2: DS 2-01.3.3 This project is required to submit for and obtain approval of a special application for a wash overlay. Once completed, place the case number near the lower right corner of all sheets and provide a note indicating case umber, date of approval, what the special application was for and any conditions of approval.

ADDITION TO COMMENT: Place the case number (T12SA00260) in the lower-right corner, above or adjacent to the title block, on each sheet. This information was provided on the coversheet only.

3. Label the recordation information.

Provide the recordation information on the plans, when recorded.

Previous Comment 3. The recording information for the right of way dedication must be labeled on the plan where the keynotes have been provided for the sequence number to be added. In addition and just as a clarification to your response to the previous comment, was the square footage of the parcel listed on the plan with or without the right of way dedicated area? Dedicated area cannot be used to increase the developable area.

Portions of the previous Comment 3: DS 2-01.3.9.I Clearly indicate the area of right of way dedication required by the conditions of rezoning. On sheet 2 of 14.

Provide recording sequence number for the dedication of right of way. On sheet 2 of 14

ADDITION TO COMMENT: Provide the recordation information on the plans, when recorded.

4. This information must be added to the plans as requested and if available, submit any documents related to such recordation prior to approval of the development package.

Previous Comment: DS 22-01.3.9.L Clearly indicate the recording information of the required easement per rezoning condition #5.

ADDITION TO COMMENT: Provide the recordation information, when recorded.

5. A separate letter was provided as requested but several of the conditions have not been completed. All conditions of rezoning must be demonstrated on the plans where possible and reflected via the response letter as to how the conditions were met or demonstrate on the plans how a specific condition that needs to be represented on the plans complies such as but not limited to such conditions, like dedication info along with recordation information, screening requirements, type of lighting, etc. It is acknowledged that compliance with some of the conditions is in process but it is also noted, in review of the plans that compliance with some of the conditions have not been demonstrated on the plan sheets.

For instance the screening condition along the south boundary has been depicted with Wrought Iron Fencing in 3 locations on the plans including on sheet 14. Rezoning condition 18 specifically states that 8-foot high Wrought Iron Fencing can be provided along Drexel and Campbell. The site and landscape plan sheets and elevations sheet 14 depict 3 locations with Wrought Iron fencing along the south boundary. Also, on sheet 14 there are two notes related to heights; one is for the building height and the other height is for the screen wall. The height of the screen wall where the screen wall is provided must be 8 feet tall, revise the plan sheets as required to demonstrate compliance with rezoning conditions 18.

Rezoning condition 13 is related to lighting, yet the plans do not indicate and lighting anywhere on the plan sheets nor are there any detail that demonstrate compliance with the type of lighting that will be used. Provide details drawings on the type and method of for shielding the light and locations.

ADDITION TO COMMENT: Provide the lighting on the plan or provide a lighting plan.

It is not clear if mechanical equipment is proposed and where. Rezoning condition 15 states that the mechanical equipment must be ground mounted and screened. The plan does not indicate the location of the equipment or method of screening.

ADDITIN TO COMMENT: General note 30 provides the ground mounting and screening note. Identify the location of the mechanical units on the plans.

There are several other conditions that need to be demonstrated on the plans that have not been clearly depicted on any of the plan sheets. Color elevations of the buildings were not provided in the development package. Review all rezoning conditions and ensure that conditions that need to be demonstrated on the plan sheets are depicted with details where necessary and provide any documentation required, such as recordation information. The response to the conditions should clearly state how the condition was addressed whether demonstrated on the plans via drawings or additional documents attached to the DP.

Previous Comment 5: DS 2-01.3.9.U Provide a separate letter clearly indicating how each of the conditions of rezoning have been met.

Condition of rezoning #17 requires an 8' wall along the south and east borders of the property. The elevations provided on sheet 14 of 14 indicate a 6'-8" wall. Clarify.

ADDITION TO COMMENT: Sheet 14 was not included in the new set.

The elevations provided do not appear to indicate the structures which are being used as part of the walls. Clarify.

Completed.

Clearly indicate the location and height of all walls and fences on the development plan.

Revise keynote #20 on sheet 2 of 14 to reflect the required 8' wall.

Completed.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961

There are several items that were not address or not available. Please contact Michael St. Paul at (520) 837-4959 or David Rivera at (520) 837-4957.
07/09/2014 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change Include documentation verifying that each of the conditions of rezoning has been met. DS 2-01.3.9.U

Ensure that all Zoning & Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to Landscape approval.

Additional comments may apply
07/10/2014 ELIZABETH EBERBACH ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: July 10, 2014
TO: Jeff Stanley, P.E.
SUBJECT: A-Family Discount Storage (Resubmittal DP12-0005) Review
LOCATION: 2000 E DREXEL RD, T15S, R14E, Section 08
REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold P.E.
ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP14-0098

Summary: Engineering Division has reviewed the resubmittal development package. Engineering does not recommend approval or the project until the remaining comments are addressed. A meeting is required prior to resubmittal.

COMMENTS:
1) LUC Section 5.3.8.2: A maximum of one year from the date of application approval of a development plan shall be obtained. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The previous approval date has expired but has been extended to 1/10/2014. The new one-year expiration date for this development plan is 01/10/2014.DS Sec.2-05.2.3.B: Address all Zoning comments and assure compliance with Rezoning conditions.
2) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.B.8: Provide recordation (Sequence number) data on planview for easements. Do not resubmit until recordation is completed.
3) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.G: To assure clarification of private maintenance of 50-ft W.A.S.H. area, clarify easement to be recorded as a 50-ft Private Maintenance Easement, Public Trail Access Easement, and Public Wash Maintenance Access Easement.
4) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a: It appears that the soils in this area are D soils and may limit infiltration; please be aware that if there is standing water for more than 12 hours after basin construction, redesign of basin will be required to meet maximum drain down time limit before final grading inspection approval can be provided.

In response letter explain how Rezoning Condition are met. I can be reached at 837-4934 if you have questions.

Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM
Civil Engineer
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
City of Tucson
07/11/2014 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:

1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) All items requested by review staff
3) All items needed to approved the plans

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/11/2014 FERNE RODRIGUEZ OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed