Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP14-0094
Parcel: 13812050B

Address:
50 W VALENCIA RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP14-0094
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/01/2014 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
07/09/2014 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: July 14, 2014
DUE DATE: July 29, 2014
SUBJECT: Mexico Lindo Development Plan Package- Engineering Review
TO: Frank Rendon
LOCATION: 50 W Valencia Rd; T15S R13E Sec12
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP14-0094


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the following link for further clarification:
http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

The following items need to be addressed:

SITE PLAN:

1) Due to the full code expansion requirement per the Zoning Section make sure that all dimensions, details, sections, keynotes, proposed improvements and all other aspects of this project meet the minimum requirements within Administration Manual, Technical Standards Manual and the Unified Development Code and are reflected on the development plan package.

2) AM Sec.2-06.3.5: Revise the development plan package to include the approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. The link to the stamp can be found here: http://pdsd.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/development-permits.

3) AM Sec.2-06.3.12: Revise the development plan package and Sheet Index on Sheet 1 to remove the reference to the building plans. The submittal for the development plan package only included Sheet T.1 and C.1.

4) AM Sec.2-06.4.2.B: Revise the development plan package to include a brief legal description of the subject property within the Title Block.

5) AM Sec.2-06.4.2.D: Revise the development plan package and the Title Block to include the correct page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., Sheet XX of XX). For development plan package purposes the building plan sheets should not be part of the package submittal, remove and revise the Drawing Index and Sheet count to reflect.

6) AM Sec.2-06.4.1: Revise the development plan package to provide the name, mailing and email address, and phone number for the primary property owner of the project. Information shall be provided under the Client Section.

7) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant Development Plan Package case number (DP14-0094) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets.

8) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: Revise the development plan package to provide an administrative street address adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

9) AM Sec.2-06.4.4.C: Revise the development plan package and project location map to label correct scale and have it cover approximately one square mile. Standard scale is 3"=1 mile for a location map.

10) AM Sec.2-06.4.4.C: Revise the development plan package and project location map to label the Section, Township and Range along with the scale.

11) AM Sec.2-06.4.7: Revise the development plan package to provide all of the required notes per the referenced sections. Specifically for ENG purposes; AM Sec.2-06.4.7.A.2, AM Sec.2-06.4.7.A.6, AM Sec.2-06.4.7.B.1, AM Sec.2-06.4.7.B.3, AM Sec.2-06.4.7.C.1, AM Sec.2-06.4.7.C.2, AM Sec.2-06.4.7.C.3 and AM Sec.2-06.4.7.D.

12) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.A: Revise the development plan package to include the perimeter information for all property lines to include bearing in degrees, minutes and seconds together with distance in feet or other functional reference system.

13) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.C: Revise the development plan package to dimension the existing width of the public right-of-way in plan view for both roadways adjacent to the site. Provide right-of-way (ROW) width, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

14) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.E: Revise the development plan package to indicate the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson Datum. Provide existing and/or future contour lines or spot grade elevations for construction purposes.

15) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.F: Revise the development plan package to include the location of the drainage infrastructure and the infrastructure improvement plan number in plan view for existing drainage infrastructure located within the public right-of-way.

16) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan package to label the required 18-foot radii at both driveway locations on Missiondale Road, per City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5. Refer to TSM Sec.10-013.2.C for street development standards. If the existing standard driveway entrances are request to stay as is then a Technical Standard Modification Request (TSMR) application with fees will be required to modify the reduced radii dimension. It is highly recommended to verify with TDOT Permits and Codes first to see if they will support the modification before submitting the TSMR application and fees.

17) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan package to label the required 25-foot radii at the driveway location on the MS&R Street, 22nd Street, per City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5. Refer to TSM Sec.10-013.2.C for street development standards. If the existing standard driveway entrances are request to stay as is then a Technical Standard Modification Request (TSMR) application with fees will be required to modify the reduced radii dimension. It is highly recommended to verify with TDOT Permits and Codes first to see if they will support the modification before submitting the TSMR application and fees.

18) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan package to label the existing bus stop within the adjacent right-of-way of Valencia Road.

19) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan package to label both roadways as "Public" and provide the "Arterial and Gateway" label for Valencia Road in plan view.

20) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the existing SVTs for all driveway entrances, refer to TSM Sec.10-01.5.3 for line of sight matrix.

21) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to label or Keynote all proposed/existing curbing around the vehicular use area.

22) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to provide a barrier, post barricade, wheel stops or curbing along all areas of the development around the vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines. Specifically the area adjacent to the proposed loading zone. Verify that the entire vehicular use area provides the required separation.

23) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the minimum 10-foot parking space width for the parking stalls located adjacent to the existing monument sign on the southwest side of the property per UDC Article 7.4.6.D.2.b.

24) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to provide a Parking Space Detail so that it is designed in accordance with Sec.7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. Specifically a standard parking stall must be 8.5 feet wide by 18-feet long and the proposed bumper blocks must be placed to allow for the 2.5 foot overhang so that the vehicle does not encroach into the required pedestrian access space or landscape area.

25) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.J: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the future right-of-way width for Valencia Road. The project is adjacent to a MS&R and the plan should dimension the future right-of-way lines and include the future sidewalk area and sight visibility triangles.

26) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project.

27) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package to provide a Keynote or a separate detail for all proposed sidewalks onsite. The Keynote should reference PC/COT Std Detail #200 or a separate detail must be provided for construction purposes.

28) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package to verify the required pedestrian access path from all areas of the property and structures to the sidewalk located along the right-of-way of 22nd Street. Per TSM Sec.7-01.3.3.A Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required as follows: This path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets.

29) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package to verify (label and dimension) all areas on the plan where a parking vehicle may overhang an existing or proposed sidewalk. Demonstrate on the plan that the parking vehicle will not overhang the sidewalks and reduce the sidewalk to less than 4-feet refer to TSM Sec.7-01.4.3.A for minimum sidewalk widths.

30) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the minimum 4-foot clear sidewalk widths for all existing and proposed sidewalks located onsite. Verify that a continuous sidewalk is provided along all sides of the building (existing and new) and adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building

31) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package to provide pedestrian access to the proposed refuse container locations. Per TSM Sec.7-01.3.3.B Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required as follows: The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas.

32) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development plan package to dimension the widths for the existing sidewalks located in the adjacent right-of-ways. Verify that the existing sidewalks meet the minimum width requirements of 5-feet for Missiondale Rd and 6-feet for Valencia Road. Also verify the sidewalks meet the accessibility requirements.

33) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Revise the development plan package to provide for centralized onsite solid waste and recycle collection service pick up for both waste and recycling containers per TSM Sec.8-01.5.1.A. The details must match TSM Sec.8-01, Figure 2 and Figure 3a for the required double enclosure walls with gates, concrete thickness and compressive strength, concrete approach apron dimensions, space from wall to bollards, anchoring bolts, 14'x40' clear approach for each container, etc.


DRAINAGE STATEMENT:

34) Provide a written Drainage Statement with a discussion on pre and post imperviousness of the site. The drainage statement must also provide a discussion about the subject property being located with a balanced basin per the "Balanced and Critical Basin Map for Study Session of January 27, 1987. Since the project is commercial in nature and will have additional impervious area added a Drainage Statement is required.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
07/15/2014 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Mexico Lindo
Development Package (1st Review)
DP14-0094

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 15, 2014

DUE DATE: July 29, 2014

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 29, 2015.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.1.1 PURPOSE
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property.

This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes.

2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY
This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review.

2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided.
The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application:

2-06.2.1 Application Form
A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee;

2-06.2.2 Development Package
A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein;

2-06.2.3 Related Reviews
In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the;

2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and,

2-06.2.5 Fees
Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

1. COMMENT: Provide the PDSD Development Package approval stamp on all sheets. The required stamp can be found at http://pdsd.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/development-permits under Development Package.

2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet.

2. COMMENT: Move the north arrow and scale to the upper right corner of each sheet.

2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet.

3. COMMENT: The sheet index is not correct, remove the building plans from the sheet index.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

4. COMMENT: Provide the name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer on the plan.

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.A - The proposed name of the project or subdivision, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name;

5. COMMENT: The "PROJECT" is listed as "TENANT IMPROVEMENT" within the title block. This is a development package not a tenant improvement.

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

6. COMMENT: Provide a brief legal description within the title block.

2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

7. COMMENT: The total number of sheets is not correct on either sheet.

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

8. COMMENT: Provide the administrative street address adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

9. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

10. COMMENT: Provide a scaled location map.

2-06.4.2.A - Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area;

11. COMMENT: Show the subject property approximately centered on the location map.

2-06.4.2.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

12. COMMENT: The section, township, and range listed under the vicinity map is not correct.

13. COMMENT: Label the section corners on the location map.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____."

14. COMMENT: Provide a general note stating "EXISTING ZONING IS C-1".

2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

15. COMMENT: Provide a general note listing the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

16. COMMENT: Provide a general note stating "EXISTING AND PROPOSED USE General Merchandise Sales, SUBJEXT TO USE SPECIFIC STANDARDS 4.9.9.B.3 AND 4.9.13.O" on the plan.

2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

17. COMMENT: Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R), GATEWAY CORRIDOR ZONE (GCZ) 5.5 & AIRPORT ENVIRONS ZONE (AEZ) 5.6."

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

18. COMMENT: Provide a general note stating the floor area of all structures on site.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

19. COMMENT: Provide the site boundary perimeter bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds,

2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

20. COMMENT: Provide the above information for both Valencia and Missiondale on the plan.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles (SVTs). On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

21. COMMENT: Show the required SVT's on the plan.

2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

22. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4.a A back-up spur must be provided at the end of a row of parking if no ingress or egress is provided at that end. That said provide a backup spur at the east end of the vehicle parking shown near the northwest corner of the site.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

23. COMMENT: The vehicle parking space calculation does not appear to be correct. Define the use area of the "OUTDOOR GRILL" and include the square footage in the vehicle parking calculation.

24. COMMENT: Remove the .40 from the required number of vehicle parking spaces.

25. COMMENT: Provide a typical parking space detail for both standard parking and accessible spaces.

26. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b Minimum Width Requirement When Adjacent to Barrier. A motor vehicle off-street parking space must have a minimum width of ten feet when the side(s) of the parking space abuts a vertical barrier over six inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport. That said provide width dimensions for both vehicle parking spaces adjacent to the monument sign.

2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4.

27. COMMENT: The loading space calculation is not correct. Per UDC Table 7.5.5-A: REQUIRED LOADING AREAS, Retail Trade Use Group, Merchandise Sales Less Than 25,000 sq. ft. GFA zero (0) required.

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

28. COMMENT: The bicycle parking space calculation is not correct. Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces, RETAIL TRADE USE GROUP, Retail Trade Uses Less Than 50,000 sq. ft. GFA, Short Term 1 space per 5,000 sq. ft. GFA. Minimum requirement is 2 spaces, Long Term 1 space per 12,000 sq. ft. GFA. Minimum requirement is 2 spaces. Also define the use area of the "OUTDOOR GRILL" and include the square footage in the vehicle parking calculation.

29. COMMENT: Show the long term bicycle parking on the plan.

30. COMMENT: Provide a short term bicycle parking detail that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B & C are met.

31. COMMENT: Provide a long term bicycle parking detail that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B & D are met.

2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.)

32. COMMENT: Show the future right-of-way requirements on the plan.

2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

33. COMMENT: Provide the height of the building within the footprint of the building.

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

34. COMMENT: Per TSM 7-01.3.3.A Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required as follows; This path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. Provide a sidewalk from the building to the sidewalk within the right-of-way along Valencia Road.

35. COMMENT: Per TSM 7-01.4.1.B A sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located. That said provide a 4' sidewalk along the west side of the building.

36. COMMENT: Provide width dimensions for all sidewalks shown on the plan.

2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm.

37. COMMENT: Show the refuse collection area on the plan.

Additional Comment;

38. COMMENT: Remove all references to the Land Use Code from the plan.

39. COMMENT: Remove all building code references from the plan.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
07/18/2014 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
07/23/2014 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Approv-Cond Applicant must obtain a building permit for the already constructed shade structures and walk in cooler boxes. These were done without a permit.
07/24/2014 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE

ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval per

Provide on the site plan.

Location, size, and name of existing vegetation to remain in place.

Both the proper and common name of each type of plant material.

Ensure that all Zoning & Engineering comments and concerns are addressed

Additional comments may apply
07/25/2014 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
07/28/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Show how storm water draining from the roof will be prevented from flowing across the adjoining lot. Reference: Section 1101.2, IPC 2012.
2. Revise the site drawing to include the following information:
a. The location and size of water meters, water lines, and fire hydrants.
b. The location of sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number.
c. The points of connection to existing public sewers.
d. The locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights.
e. Any existing or proposed utility easements
f. The first floor elevation for the building
Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual No. 2-06.0.0, Section 4.8 and Section 107.2.13, IBC 2012.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/31/2014 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed