Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP14-0072
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/18/2014 | CPIERCE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/18/2014 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | Conditions of approval have been met and verified by Patricia |
| 09/22/2014 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 09/23/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Casa De Los Ninos Development Package (1st Review) DP14-0072 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 23, 2014 DUE DATE: October 02, 2014 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is May 06, 2015. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 2-06.2.1 Application Form A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee; 2-06.2.2 Development Package A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein; 2-06.2.3 Related Reviews In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the; 2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and, 2-06.2.5 Fees Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.1 - Each sheet shall measure 24 inches by 36 inches and include a minimum one inch margin on left side and one-half inch margin on all other sides to facilitate efficient record keeping. A larger sheet format may be used with the approval of the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD). 2-06.3.2 - All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for record-keeping purposes. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. Smaller scales (60:1 or greater) may be used for some or all of the sheets with the prior approval of PDSD when it is determined legibility and the ability to be digitized and/or reduced for archiving will not be affected. 2-06.3.3 - All lettering and text (upper or lower case), and numbering, shall be a minimum of three-thirty-seconds inches in height to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for archiving. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 1. Zoning acknowledges the letters from the utilities regarding abandonment of the easements. Once a building permit is started zoning will put a hold on the certificate of occupancy and conditionally approve the development package. COMMENT: For all existing easements that are shown "TO BE VACATED" provide the recordation information for the vacation. The development package cannot be approved until these easements are vacated. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 2. COMMENT: As the layout has changed to the northwest vehicle parking space shown adjacent to the eastern entrance off of Helen Street provide a dimension from the edge of the vehicle parking space north to the wall show on the plan. At a minimum it must be 1'-6". 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 3. It appears that you are proposing to use the sidewalks within the right-of-way for the required continuous pedestrian circulation from the visitation buildings to the other buildings on site. A Technical Standards Modification Request (TSMR) will need to be approved prior to approval of the development package. See TSM Section 1-01.6.0 for requirements. Also it is not clear how the continuous pedestrian circulation continues from the sidewalk shown along the west side of the parking garage to the other buildings. There are doors that appear to open into vehicle parking spaces in the garage. COMMENT: Per PAD 20 Part III, C.5 & TSM Section 7-01.3.3 Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required as follows, .B The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas. That said provide sidewalks that connect the "VISITATION" buildings to the other buildings on site. Additional Comments This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: Per PAD 20 Part III, C.2 A "Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property" is required. Provide a copy of the recorded covenant with your next submittal. Once the above comments have been addressed zoning is willing to provide an over-the-counter review. Call or email to schedule an appointment for this review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & recorded covenant regarding development and use of real property. . |
| 09/24/2014 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/24/2014 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Sheets 8 through 11 have not been submitted to Zoning for a TSMR as required. Reference Zoning comments. Until all the variances as discussed in our meeting have been approved by zoning through the TSMR process, comments 3, 4, 5 and 8 stand as stated and the drawings need to be changed accordingly. END OF COMMENTS |
| 09/24/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 09/25/2014 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/25/2014 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | |
| 09/25/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this proposal. >>> DSD_CDRC 9/25/2014 8:50 AM >>> http://www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO/Command?mode=permit&firstTime=true&number_key=dp14-0072&command=InitialProcess Try the above link. Trish >>> Rebecca Noel 9/24/2014 4:31 PM >>> I cannot open the files to view. (: >>> DSD_CDRC 9/18/2014 10:51 AM >>> Dear Reviewers: This is an electronic distribution for a CDRC Development Plan review. If you normally receive paper copies of the review documents, you will receive them soon. The applicable case numbers are: CDRC Development Plan: D14-0072 Existing and Proposed Zoning: PAD Proposed Use: Shelter Care Due Date: October 2, 2014 Electronic Documents may be found at the following link: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO/Command?mode=permit&firstTime=true&number_key=d14-0072&command=InitialProcess 1. If the PRO disclaimer appears, click on the “I have read the disclaimer” button at the bottom of the page. 2. On the Permit and Parcel Detail page click on the Associated Documents and Plans button for activity number DP12-0004 to display the document list 3. Click on the View File button next to the desired document to view that document. Development Plan Review This is the second review of the proposed development plan. All documents and plans submitted with this review start with the number 2. Please provide comments based on all applicable codes and ordinances. Should you deny the review, you will receive the resubmittal of this plan for further review and comment. Please post your comments in Permits Plus as you normally do or send the comments to: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov For questions and/or for further information concerning the development plan review, please contact Patricia Gehlen at 837-4919 or patricia.gehlen@tucsonaz.gov. Patricia |
| 09/25/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approved | The resubmittal of the Development Plan has been reviewed on behalf of Environmental Services and is approved. If there are any questions, I can be contacted at kperry@perryengineering.net From: DSD_CDRC DSD_CDRC [mailto:DSD_CDRC.DSPO2.CHDOM2@tucsonaz.gov] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 10:19 AM To: kperry@perryengineering.net; Andrew Connor; John Beall; Joseph Linville; Loren Makus; Rebecca Noel; Robert Sherry; Ronald Brown; Zelin Canchola Cc: Ernie Duarte Subject: Fwd: DP14-0072/Casa de Los Ninos Importance: High Morning- Due date just moved to tomorrow at 5pm. The internal lists will change shortly. Please let me know if you have any questions. Trish >>> DSD_CDRC 9/18/2014 10:51 AM >>> Dear Reviewers: This is an electronic distribution for a CDRC Development Plan review. If you normally receive paper copies of the review documents, you will receive them soon. The applicable case numbers are: CDRC Development Plan: D14-0072 Existing and Proposed Zoning: PAD Proposed Use: Shelter Care Due Date: October 2, 2014 Electronic Documents may be found at the following link: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO/Command?mode=permit&firstTime=true&number_key=d14-0072&command=InitialProcess 1. If the PRO disclaimer appears, click on the “I have read the disclaimer” button at the bottom of the page. 2. On the Permit and Parcel Detail page click on the Associated Documents and Plans button for activity number DP12-0004 to display the document list 3. Click on the View File button next to the desired document to view that document. Development Plan Review This is the second review of the proposed development plan. All documents and plans submitted with this review start with the number 2. Please provide comments based on all applicable codes and ordinances. Should you deny the review, you will receive the resubmittal of this plan for further review and comment. Please post your comments in Permits Plus as you normally do or send the comments to: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov For questions and/or for further information concerning the development plan review, please contact Patricia Gehlen at 837-4919 or patricia.gehlen@tucsonaz.gov. Patricia |
| 09/25/2014 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 09/26/2014 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All items requrested by review staff 3) All items needed to approve this plan |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/26/2014 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |