Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP14-0059
Parcel: 117130410

Address:
18 E OCHOA ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP14-0059
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/22/2014 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
04/22/2014 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
04/23/2014 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 18 E. Ochoa Street - Parking Lot Improvements.
Development Package (1st Review)
DP14-0059

TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 23, 2014

DUE DATE: May 06, 2014

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is April 20, 2015.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet.

1. COMMENT: The survey, structural plan, and electrical plans are not part of a development package. Remove them from the development package and revised the sheet index.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

2. COMMENT: Provide a brief legal description within the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

3. COMMENT: Revise the total number of sheets to correctly reflect the total number of sheets in the development package, see comment 1 above.

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

4. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP14-0059, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

5. COMMENT: Once completed provided any other relevant case numbers, DRB, MDR, etc, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

6. COMMENT: Provide a scaled, minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, location map on the plan.

2-06.4.2.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

7. COMMENT: The section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled on the location map.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

8. COMMENT: This project will require Rio Nuevo District (RND) design review board (DRB) approval prior to approval of the development package. Contact Russlyn Wells, 837-4948, for DRB requirements.

9. COMMENT: Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.11 RIO NUEVO DISTRICT (RND). I you elect to use the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District add "UDC ARTICLE 5.12 DOWNTOWN AREA INFILL INCENTIVE DISTRICT (IID)" to the note.

10. COMMENT: Provide copies of the plan that approved the existing steel tube fence. This plan should include the DRB approvals.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

11. COMMENT: Provide the right-of-way width, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. For both Jackson and Ochoa Street.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

12. COMMENT: Provide the zoning classifications for the adjacent properties including across any adjacent right-of-way.

2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

13. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.a Access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least one foot from: (1) An open structure, such as a carport or covered pedestrian access path as measured from the closest part of the structure or roof overhang. That said provide the one (1) foot setback from the north & south end of the covered parking structure to the north & south access lanes.

14. COMMENT: The south access lane does not meet the minimum width for a two-way access lane, see UDC Table 7.4.6-2. Demonstrate on the plan how the one-way access lane will be regulated, signage, pavement marking, etc.

15. COMMENT: The width dimensions and setbacks to the north/south running PAALs are not clear, see redline.

16. COMMENT: Clearly show the access to the parking area and provide a width dimension. Per UDC Table7.4.6-2 the minimum width is 20'.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

17. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.6.D.2.b Minimum Width Requirement When Adjacent to Barrier. A motor vehicle off-street parking space must have a minimum width of ten feet when the side(s) of the parking space abuts a vertical barrier over six inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport. That said provide a width dimension for the two vehicle parking spaces located at the south end of the vehicle parking lot.

18. COMMENT: Provide a width dimension for the eastern most vehicle parking spaces.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
.
04/25/2014 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
04/29/2014 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approved
04/30/2014 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change 1. As per the 2012 IBC, Table 1106.1, 2 accessible parking spaces are required for a total of 49 public parking spaces.
a. Please provide 2 accessible parking spaces , one is to be van accessible.
2. Provide an accessible route from these two accessible parking spaces to the West Jackson Street right of way.
3. Provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking layout showing all accessible requirements such as dimensions, minimum grade slopes, signage, markings, access to accessible route, ramps as required, van accessible space and aisles.
a. Provide a large scale detail the accessible parking signage including van accessible signage.
4. Slopes of the accessible route are to comply with ICC A117.1, Section 403.3, 5% maximum running and 2% maximum cross.
5. Any ramps required are to comply with ICC A117.1, Sections 405 and/or 406 as applicable.
END OF REVIEW
04/30/2014 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
05/05/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Passed

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/14/2014 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed