Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP14-0040
Parcel: 11504263A

Address:
307 E HELEN ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP14-0040
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/24/2014 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
03/26/2014 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: March 27, 2014
SUBJECT: Chinese Christian Church Development Plan Package- Engineering Review
TO: Permit Resource Services
LOCATION: 307 E Helen St; T14S R13E Sec01
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP14-0040


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement (CMG Drainage Engineering Inc.; 20DEC13). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the following link for further clarification:
http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

The following items need to be addressed:


SITE PLAN:

1) AM Sec.2-06.3.12: Revise the development plan package and Drawing Index on Sheet 1 to correctly reference Sheet 1- C1 Site Plan, Sheet 2- C2 Grading Plan, etc. Remove the Building Plan Sheets from the package and Drawing Index.

2) AM Sec.2-06.4.2.B: Revise the development plan package to include a brief legal description of the subject property within the Title Block.

3) AM Sec.2-06.4.2.D: Revise the development plan package and the Title Block to include the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., Sheet XX of XX). For development plan package purposes the building plan sheets should not be part of the package submittal, remove and revise the Drawing Index and Sheet count to reflect.

4) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant Development Plan Package case number (DP14-0040) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets.

5) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.B.2.a: Revise the development plan package to include the flowing note; "This project is affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations."

6) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.B.2.b: Revise the development plan package to include the flowing note; "A Floodplain Use Permit and Finished Floor Elevation Certificates are required for all new buildings."

7) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.C.2: Revise the development plan package to provide a General Note to read per the referenced section; "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual." Revise the package to remove all references to the old Development Standards. All notes should reflect the new Technical Standard Manual with correct corresponding code reference.

8) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.C: Revise the development plan package to dimension on both the site plan and grading plan sheets the existing dimensions of the public right-of-ways for both adjacent roadways. Provide along with the right-of-way width the type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. Label on both the site plan and grading plan the roadways as "Public."

9) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.C: Revise the development plan package to dimension the existing alley located along the eastside of the property.

10) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.I: Revise the development plan package to include the floodplain information, including the location of the 100-year floodplain limits with the 100 year water surface elevation in plan view.

11) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan package to provide vertical curbing for the proposed curb returns within the right-of-way for the new driveway entrance. Per the Keynote it is proposed to be extruded; however improvements within the right-of-way have to meet the minimum requirements for the PC/COT Standard Details for Public Improvements.

12) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan package and provide a Keynote for the existing driveways that are to be closed off to clearly label the curbing and sidewalk dimensions along with a reference to the Standard Detail for Public Improvements to match existing for construction purposes. Existing curb cuts that are no longer used must be closed off per Tucson Code Chapter 25 Sec.25-43.

13) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to label the minimum dimensions for the required back-up spur at the end of the PAAL per UDC Sec.7.4.6.F.4. Per plan view it appears that the existing wall lies within the additional 3-feet that are behind the curb.

14) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Provide a note on the development plan package to state; "Approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction."

15) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development plan package and the associated Grading Note specifying conformance with City of Tucson Technical Standards Manual Sec.2-01 (excavation and grading requirements) not the old Development Standard code reference.

16) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development plan package to provide a General Note to state; "Call for a Pre-construction meeting prior to start of earthwork. To schedule a PDSD Pre-construction meeting, SWPPP inspection or general Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Planning Development Services Department, or contact PDSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html"

17) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development plan package to provide a General Note to state; "All proposed fencing and walls will require a separate permit for review and approval by all necessary Planning Development Services Departments."

18) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development plan package, the COT Datum reference and other referenced datum sections to clarify which datum is being used, NGVD29 or NAVD88. Per the Drainage Statement the WSEL is on NAVD88 datum with a conversion to NGVD29 datum however there is a discrepancy on the plan sheets as to which datum elevation is being used, revise.

19) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development plan package to verify where Detail 1/c5.0 is located in plan view. It appears that this detail is for a curb opening along a street however it is not delineated in plan view. All proposed right-of-way improvements will require a right-of-way use permit.

20) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development plan package to clarify detail 9/C5 and its location in plan view. The detail references an earthen v-ditch spillway but it could not be found in plan view on either the site or grading plan sheets.

21) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.2: Revise the development plan package to provide a detail for the proposed wall openings along the west side of the property. Verify that the openings match the requirements within the submitted Drainage Statement in size and location.

22) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.6: Revise the development plan package and all WSEL or FFE sections to clarify the datum used to elevate the structure to the required 1-foot freeboard above the calculated water surface elevation as determined in the submitted Drainage Statement. WSEL-2389.72 NAVD88 with a minimum FFE-2390.72 NAVD88.

23) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package and the pedestrian access section under the Zoning Code Information to provide the correct code reference under the Technical Standards Manual, the referenced development standard no longer applies.

24) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package and Keynote #4 to provide a reference to the detail for the construction of the proposed sidewalks.

25) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package to provide the required pedestrian circulation connection from the new building to 5th Avenue refer to TSM Sec.7-01.3.3.A

26) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan document to provide for a pedestrian circulation path to the refuse containers. Per TSM Sec.7-01.3.3.B all areas of development must be connected to the refuse areas.

27) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package to provide the detail reference in plan view for the onsite sidewalk. Detail 12/C4 should be labeled in plan view for construction purposes.

28) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project.

29) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development plan package to verify minimum widths of the existing sidewalk within the right-of-way of each adjacent street. Verify the 5-foot width and to ensure that the sidewalk is not buckled, cracked or damaged.

30) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development plan package and the referenced detail for the proposed handicap access ramp within the right-of-way. The detail now shows 9/C4 however it appears that the correct detail is 15/C5.

31) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development plan package to verify conformance with handicap accessibility for the existing sidewalk within the right-of-way. Provide existing longitudinal and cross slopes to ensure maximum 2% or provide written approval from TDOT Permits and Codes that the existing sidewalk meets accessibility requirements.

32) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Revise the development plan package to provide for the required double refuse enclosure and provide associated details for the refuse enclosures to show that it meets TSM Sec.8-01 (revise all keynotes to reflect the TSM not DS code references). The detail must match TSM Sec.8-01, Figure 2 and Figure 3a for the required double enclosure walls with gates, concrete thickness and compressive strength, concrete approach apron dimensions, space from wall to bollards, anchoring bolts, 14'x40' clear approach for each container, etc.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.

Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
03/27/2014 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Tucson Chinese Christian Church - New Sanctuary Building
Development Package (1st Review)
DP14-0040

TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 27, 2014

DUE DATE: April 18, 2014

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

2-06.2.3 Related Reviews
In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied

1. COMMENT: Remove all development package sheets from the building plans. Zoning acknowledges that concurrent reviews allowed but the development package, site review, and building plans are two (2) separate reviews.

2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently;

2. COMMENT: Remove all building plan sheets from the development package. Zoning acknowledges that concurrent reviews allowed but the development package, site review, and building plans are two (2) separate reviews.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 20, 2015.

2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

3. COMMENT: Provide the development package approval stamp on all sheets including the site detail sheets.

2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet.

4. COMMENT: Revise the "INDEX OF DRAWINGS" to only include the development package drawings.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

5. COMMENT: Provide a brief legal description within the title block.

2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

6. COMMENT: Revise the total number of sheets to reflect only the development package sheets.

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

7. COMMENT: Remove the address from the title block and provide it adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

8. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP14-0040, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

9. COMMENT: Remove the parcels from the project location map as it is difficult to read.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

10. COMMENT: Under "zoning code information" remove the reference to "DEVELOPMENT DESIGNATOR" as it is no longer applicable.

11. COMMENT: Zoning acknowledges that the "EXISTING AND PROPOSED USE GROUPS" are shown on the plan. Provide the existing and proposed use on the plan.

2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

12. COMMENT: Provide the Neighborhood Preservation Zone (NPZ) case number, NPZ-12-02, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

13. COMMENT: Provide a general note stating the NPZ case number, date of approval, what was approved and if applicable any conditions of approval on the plan.

2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage;

14. COMMENT: The allowed percentage of lot coverage shown, 70%, is not correct. Per UDC TABLE 6.3-2.B: EXCEPTIONS TO THE R-1, R-2, R-3, MH-1, & MH-2 DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS the allowed lot coverage is 60%.

15. COMMENT: Provide the proposed lot coverage percentage on the plan

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.E - Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) Land splits require a separate permit and review.

16. COMMENT: Under "zoning code information" there is a reference to a lot split. Provide the approved documents for the split or remove the reference from the plan.

2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

17. COMMENT: Provide all existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) on the plan with zoning boundaries clearly defined.

2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles (SVTs). On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

18. COMMENT: The SVTs shown on the plan do not line up with the curbs as required.

2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

19. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4.c. A minimum distance of three (feet must be provided between the back of spur and any wall, screen, or other obstruction over six inches in height. That said at the north end of the vehicle parking area the existing masonry screen wall encroaches into the required three (3) foot distance from the back of spur.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

20. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.3.G Fractional Amounts. When the calculation of required motor vehicle and bicycle parking spaces results in a fractional number, a fraction of one-half or more is adjusted to the next higher whole number, and a fraction of less than one-half is adjusted to the next lower whole number. That said the required number of vehicle parking spaces should be shown as 41.

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

21. COMMENT: Remove all references to Class 1 and Class 2 bicycle parking as it is no longer applicable.

22. COMMENT: The bicycle parking calculation should include the number required and provided for both short and long term bicycle parking.

23. COMMENT: For your information per UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.d A single rack is designed and located to accommodate two bicycles. That said based on the racks shown on the site plan the short term bicycle parking provided should be four (4)

24. COMMENT: Detail 3 sheet C4, "bike rack detail" does not match what is shown on the site plan.

25. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.f & Figure 7.4.9-C Each required short-term bicycle parking space must be at least two feet by six feet. Show the required 2' x 6' bicycle parking space on the detail.

26. COMMENT: Demonstrate on the plan how the requirements UDC Article 7.4.9.B,1.e, Outdoor bicycle parking areas must be lighted so that they are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings during hours of use, are met.

27. COMMENT: Provide a long term bicycle parking detail that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.D are met.

2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

28. COMMENT: Under "zoning code information", "SETBACK REQUIREMENTS" "ROADS = SEC/ 6.4.5.C" should be "6.4.5.C.1". That said the front street perimeter yard setback requirement should be 20 feet or one and one-half the height of the proposed wall (H), measured from the street property line, whichever is greater. The side street perimeter yard setback requirement should be 10 feet. Provide the applicable setback dimensions on the plan.

2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

29. COMMENT: Provide the square footage and the height of each building within the footprint on the site plan.

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

30. COMMENT: Provide width dimensions for all existing sidewalks on the plan.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

31. COMMENT: A separate demolition permit will be required. This permit will require Historic review prior to approval by the Zoning review section.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
.
03/28/2014 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change SHEET T1
1. Change the accessible code ICC A117.1 2012 to ICC A117.1 - 2009 Edition
SHEET C-1
2. Delete the detectable warning strip at the accessible parking aisle. The accessible parking aisle is a safe zone and requires no warning prior to entry.
3. Relocate the accessible parking signs to a point just inside the concrete curb line.
4. Reference the accessible parking layout to the large scale detail 7/C4.
5. The accessible route to the new Sanctuary is called out as a 1:20 ramp. Accessible routes with slopes of 1:20 or less are not considered ramps. Please remove the ramp reference.
6. Provide a large scale detail of the accessible route connected to the accessible parking aisle and to the front entrance of the Sanctuary. Show all accessible requiremenets such as slopes, grade elevations, ramps and dimensional lengths,widths, dimensions, landings and connection to the accessible parking aisle.
SHEET C-2
7. Provide a note to the effect that all accessible route slopes are to comply with ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% maximum running slope and 2% maximum cross slopes.
SHEET C-4
8. At detail 4, the van accessible sign is a separate sign to be added just below the main sign.
9. At detail 7:
a. Generic layouts are not acceptable. Provide a exact duplicate of the accessible parking design as shown on the site plan shhet C-1.
b. Note 3, the 2% maximum slope is to be in all directions and includes the accessible parking aisle.
c. Show the sign location as per the site plan C-1.
d. Show all accessible ramp systems as per sheet C-1.
10. Where is detail 9/C4 used on this project. Please delete if not used.
END OF REVIEW
03/28/2014 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Please indicate location of existing and/or proposed fire hydrant location(s), with dimensions to property lines.
04/02/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Revise the site drawing to include the following existing utility information:
a. The location and size of water lines and fire hydrants.
b. The location and size of public sanitary sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. (The next upstream manhole is not identified on the drawings.)
c. The points of connection to existing public sewers.
d. The first floor elevation for the building (verify that the vertical datum used for the floor elevations is consistent with the rim elevations of the sanitary manholes).
Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.13, IBC 2012.
2. Provide cleanouts in the building sewer at intervals not exceeding 100 feet. Reference Section 708.3.2, IPC 2012.
3. Backflow prevention assemblies shall be located as close as practicable to the service connection and in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and Tucson Water's standard installation details. Reference: Chapter 27, Article V, Section 27-76 (a), Tucson Code. http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf
04/18/2014 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING

Interior landscape borders are required as determined in Table 7.6.4-1, which ranks land uses and zones based upon their land use intensity and the impact a use will have on adjacent land uses.

Continuous screens along street frontages for vehicle use area are required as determined by Table 7.6.4-I. Provide appropriate screening.

Within a vehicular use area, one canopy tree is required for each four motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space must be located within 40 feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk).

An unpaved planting area, which must be a minimum of 34 square feet in area and four feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. Dimension planters for trees within vehicle use area.

Inorganic Ground Cover

Except as otherwise provided by this section, the area between the right-of-way line and sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the curb, if not covered with vegetation, must be covered with an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite.

Submit NPPO plan as determined by A.M. Section 2-11 or Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property.

Grading Information

The methods by which water harvesting or storm water runoff is used to benefit the planting areas on the site.

Irrigation Plan

Type of water conserving irrigation systems proposed and differentiation between systems for the different water use zones on the site;

Source of irrigation water;

Indicate potable or reclaimed water use. Reclaimed water system specifications, if used;

System specifications and system design and layout (Section 4-01.4.2, Irrigation Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual);

Extent of supplementary irrigation in each planting area, provided by water harvesting methods;

Point of drainage off roof areas, amount of flow, and disposition of flow;

Temporary systems proposed to establish native seeded areas;

The length of irrigation duration (e.g., for native plat material, automatic drip for two years or until established).

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

Additional comments may apply.
04/18/2014 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Reqs Change Submit NPPO plan as determined by A.M. Section 2-11 or Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/23/2014 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed