Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP14-0038
Parcel: 11101035C

Address:
3800 E RIVER RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP14-0038
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/12/2014 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Jewish Community Campus
Development Package (1st Review)
DP14-0038

TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 14. 2014

DUE DATE: April 08, 2014

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 20, 2013 .

2. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.1.1 PURPOSE
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property.

This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes.

2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY
This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

1. COMMENT: Provide the PDSD Development Package approval stamp on all sheets. The stamp can be found at http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/dsd/CDRC/acad-cot_stamp_model_1.pdf

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

2. COMMENT: Provide a brief legal description with in the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

3. COMMENT: Remove the address and development package case number from the title block and provide adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

4. COMMENT: It does not appear that the location map is to scale.

2-06.4.2.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

5. COMMENT: Label the sections corners on the location map.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage;

6. COMMENT: The floor area ratio (FAR ) shown on the plan is not correct. A FAR includes all floors of the building therefore would include the proposed additions.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

7. COMMENT: Show all existing zoning classifications adjacent to the project and across any adjacent right-of-ways on the plan.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

Vehicle parking calculation:
8. COMMENT: Education use, specify what grades.

9. COMMENT: Education use shows 1/200 for office space should be 1/300

10. COMMENT: Clarify what Adult Education is.

11. COMMENT: If the Child Care is Daycare than the parking ratio is 1/300 if not clarify what the use is.

12. COMMENT: Clarify what type of Recreation you are using. Take a look at Commercial Recreation at 1/ 300.

13. COMMENT: Clarify what section of the code allows to "EXCLUDE CORRIDORS, STORAGE AND BACK OF HOUSE AREAS" from the gross floor area (GFA) when calculating the number of required vehicle parking spaces is based on GFA.

14. COMMENT: Once the above vehicle parking comments are addressed and the parking calculation is revised the letter from the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD) director, dated March 7, 2014, may need to be revised if this project is still short vehicle parking and your provided number of vehicle parking spaces does not match or exceed the number of required vehicle parking spaces.

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

15. COMMENT: Short Term bicycle parking calculation for "JCC OFFICES" shows a ratio of 1/2000, should be 1/20,000. also comment 13 above applies to calculating bicycle parking based on GFA.

16. COMMENT: Short Term bicycle parking calculation "ADULT EDUCATION" clarify this use so that the required ratio can be verified.

17. COMMENT: Short Term bicycle parking calculation, it doesn't appear that the "CHILD CARD" shown in the vehicle parking calculation is accounted for in the bicycle parking calculation.

18. COMMENT: Short Term bicycle parking calculation, clarify what type of Recreation you are proposing. Take a look at Commercial Recreation at 2 required.

19. COMMENT: Short Term bicycle parking calculation, there is a required number shown but no provided.

20. COMMENT: Show the Short Term bicycle parking location on the plan.

21. COMMENT: Long Term bicycle parking calculation "ADULT EDUCATION" clarify this use so that the required ratio can be verified.

22. COMMENT: Long Term bicycle parking calculation, it doesn't appear that the "CHILD CARD" shown in the vehicle parking calculation is accounted for in the bicycle parking calculation.

23. COMMENT: Long Term bicycle parking calculation, clarify what type of Recreation you are proposing.

24. COMMENT: Long Term bicycle parking calculation, there is a required number shown but no provided.

25. COMMENT: Provide a detail showing how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.D are met.

Additional Comments

COMMENT: There is a shade structure located along the east property, permitted under DP14-0032, that is not shown on the plan.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
03/24/2014 AROMERO4 NPPO REVIEW Needs Review
03/24/2014 AROMERO4 LANDSCAPE REVIEW Needs Review

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/24/2014 AROMERO4 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed