Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP14-0020
Parcel: 13822032C

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - DP14-0020
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/21/2014 CPIERCE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
05/27/2014 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: May 27, 2014
SUBJECT: QuickTrip #1463 Development Plan Package- 2nd Engineering Review
TO: MetroTED; Attn: Lisa Bowers
LOCATION: 1011 W Valencia Rd; T14S R13E Sec14
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP14-0020


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package, Drainage Report (The WLB Group, Inc.; 31JAN14 revised 20MAY14), Stormwater Pollution Prevent Plan (The WLB Group, Inc.; 07FEB14 revised 20MAY14) and Geotechnical Investigation (Speedie and Associates; 14JAN14). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the following link for further clarification:
http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

The following items need to be addressed:


SITE PLAN:

1) Complied.

2) Complied.

3) Complied.

4) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.3: It is acknowledged that the development plan package was revised to provide the administrative street address for the subject parcel however Pima County Addressing will not accept the address within the Title Block. The address must be placed on the first sheet outside of the Title Block, revise

5) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.7.A.3: List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. Provide a letter with the resubmittal that specifically describes how each condition of rezoning has been addressed. Verify that all rezoning conditions have been completed.

6) Complied.

7) Complied.

8) Complied.

9) Complied.

10) Complied.

11) Complied.

12) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.A: Provide approval proposed for the Final Block Plat under S14-007. The development plan package can not be approved prior to final approval of the Final Block Plat.

13) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.F: This project was submitted concurrently with the proposed Rezoning application, C09-14-01 and can not be approved until the rezoning is approved and all required conditions of rezoning have been addressed.

14) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Provide approval from the Arizona Department of Transportation for all proposed work along the I-19 frontage road. Engineering Section did not review any portion of the proposed work along the frontage road since the review falls under the ADOT regulations. The development plan document can not be approved until ADOT approves the plan set.

15) Complied.

16) Complied.

17) Complied.

18) Complied.

19) Complied.

20) Complied.

21) Complied.

22) Complied.

23) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.L: Per the proposed development plan package it appears that some proposed grading and construction of the vehicular use area, pedestrian ADA access, etc. will take place on the adjacent property (access easement). Provide written notarized approval along with a temporary construction easement for any and all work that is proposed offsite and a long-term maintenance easement for the proposed drainage infrastructure that is proposed offsite into the public ADOT right-of-way.

24) Complied.

25) Complied.

26) Complied.

27) Complied.

28) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.3: It is acknowledged that the Drainage Report and development plan package are providing a Triton first flush filters at the curb openings to eliminate contaminants from entering the water harvesting basins however the development plan package and associated details must clearly provide manufactures specifications and details for construction purposes. The detail must match the details as shown in the Drainage Report in Appendix B. This method of containing spills and providing routing maintenance will only be reviewed for approval once the manufacture specifications and recommendations are presented on the development plan package for construction purposes.

29) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.3: Revise the development plan package to provide the required erosion protection at the end of the new 18"x22" RCPs in the ADOT right-of-way into the existing channel. Provide a detail for construction purposes for the headwall design or erosion protection for the pipe outlet. ADOT must review and approve all improvements within the right-of-way for conformance with their standards. If ADOT approves the plan set and does not require erosion protection this comment will no longer be applicable.

30) Complied.

31) Complied.

32) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project.

33) Complied.


DRAINAGE REPORT:

34) Complied.


SWPPP:

35) Complied.

36) Complied.

37) Complied.

38) Complied.

39) Complied.


GEOTECHNICAL REPORT:

40) Complied.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package and Drainage Report that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Due to the acknowledgment that a Final Block Plat and Rezoning application is in concurrent review for the proposed project additional comments maybe forth coming once all of the above comments have been addressed.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.

Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
05/27/2014 JENNIFER STEPHENS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved 201 N. STONE AV, 1ST FL

TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207







MICHELENE NOWAK
ADDRESSING REVIEW

PH #: 721-9512







TO:
CITY PLANNING
FROM:
MICHELENE NOWAK, ADDRESSING REVIEW

SUBJECT:
DP14-0020 QUIKTRIP STORE #1463/ 2ND REVIEW

DATE:
MAY 23, 2014







The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project.





1.) Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar or bond paper of approved Development Plan to City Planning.



2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection.





A COPY OF RECORDED VESTING DEED IS REQUIRED FOR QUIKTRIP STORE PRIOR TO ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT.





***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files.

The CAD files can be e-mailed to: CADsubmittals@pima.gov

The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.***
05/29/2014 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Michael St Paul
Planning Technician

PROJECT: DP14-0020 (S14-007) [2nd Review]
1011 West Valencia Road
Retail (Quick Trip # 1463)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 29, 2014


COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code, The Administrative and Technical Manuals were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 12, 2015.

2. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.1.1 PURPOSE
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property.

This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes.

2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY
This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review.

2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided.
The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application:

2-06.2.1 Application Form
A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee;

2-06.2.2 Development Package
A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein;

2-06.2.3 Related Reviews
In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the;

2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and,

2-06.2.5 Fees
Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.1 - Each sheet shall measure 24 inches by 36 inches and include a minimum one inch margin on left side and one-half inch margin on all other sides to facilitate efficient record keeping. A larger sheet format may be used with the approval of the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD).

2-06.3.2 - All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for record-keeping purposes. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. Smaller scales (60:1 or greater) may be used for some or all of the sheets with the prior approval of PDSD when it is determined legibility and the ability to be digitized and/or reduced for archiving will not be affected.
2-06.3.3 - All lettering and text (upper or lower case), and numbering, shall be a minimum of three-thirty-seconds inches in height to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for archiving.

2-06.3.6 - Provide a blank three-inch by five-inch block in the lower right corner of the plan adjacent to the title block on the first sheet of the development package for use by Pima County Addressing.

1) Completed.

2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet.

2) Completed.

2-06.3.9 - The plan drawing shall be oriented with north toward the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan drawing shall be oriented with north to the left side of the sheet.

3) Completed.

2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet.

4) Completed.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

5) Completed.

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.A - The proposed name of the project or subdivision, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name;

6) Completed.

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

7) Completed.

2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

8) Completed.

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

9) Completed.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet.

10) COMMENT: Provide previous rezoning case number (C9-80-77) and current rezoning case number (C9-14-01) in the lower-right corner of each sheet.
ADDITION TO COMMENT: Enlarge and move the reference number and the development package number to inside the margins in the lower-right corner of each sheet. Place this information above or adjacent to the approval stamp.

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

11) Completed.

2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

12) COMMENT:
A) Provide the rezoning conditions for the concurrent rezoning on the coversheet. See comment number 41. Acknowledged.
B) Complied.

2-06.4.7.A.6.c - If the property includes Protected Riparian Area add a note stating that the project is designed to comply with Technical Manual Section 4-02, Floodplain, WASH, and ERZ Standard, specifying all lots impacted and including a total for the regulated area and the Protected Riparian Area.

13) Completed.

2-06.4.7.A.7 - If the property is part of a subdivision plat that is being reviewed or has been recorded, provide the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note, indicate whether the project is part of a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), condominium, or another similar type project.

14) COMMENT: Place the subdivision case number (S14-007) in the lower-right corner of each sheet.
ADDITION TO COMMENT: See comment # 10.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.C - Streets and Roads Notes

2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

15) Completed.

2-06.4.7.C.1 - List the following note if applicable: "All new public roads within and adjacent to this project will be constructed in accordance with approved plans. Construction plans will be submitted to the City Engineer's Office for review and approval."

16) Completed.

2-06.4.7.C.2 - List the following note on all development package documents: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual."

17) Completed.

2-06.4.7.C.3 - Provided the following notes as applicable:

2-06.4.7.C.3.a - "Total miles of new public streets is ____________."

2-06.4.7.C.3.b - "Total miles of new private streets is ____________."

18) Completed.

2-06.4.7.D - Utilities Note
All development package documents are to include the following note: "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public."

19) Completed.

2-06.4.7.E - Wastewater Management Notes
List the following notes as appropriate.

2-06.4.7.E.1 - If public sewers are proposed, the following notes will appear on the plan/plat, as applicable.

20) Completed.

2-06.4.7.E.1.a 2 - "A project Construction Permit must be secured from Pima County Wastewater Management before beginning any work on this project."

2-06.4.7.E.3 - The following note shall be placed on a plan/plat proposed for commercial or industrial use: "Any wastewater discharged into the public sanitary sewerage system shall meet the requirements of Pima County Ordinance No. 1991-140, as currently amended."

21) Completed.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

22) Completed.

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

23) Completed.

2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

24) Completed.

2-06.4.8.D - The following information regarding existing utilities shall be provided: the location and size of water wells, water pumping plants, water reservoirs, water lines, fire hydrants, sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number; locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights. If water mains and sewers are not located on or adjacent to the tract, indicate the direction, distance to, and sizes of those nearest the property.
Identifying the locations of all utilities and service equipment immediately adjacent to the project is especially important in situations where pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation or landscaping can be in conflict. By knowing the location of the existing utilities, design of the project can take those elements into consideration and can help avoid expensive and time-consuming relocation of utilities, major redesign, or requests to vary regulations after commencement of construction.

25) Completed.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements.

26) Completed.

2-06.4.9.D - Delineate proposed Natural Undisturbed Open Space (NUOS) in a surveyable manner.

27) Acknowledged.

2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

28) Completed.

2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation

2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

29) Completed.

2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability.

30) Acknowledged.

2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

31) Acknowledged.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

32) COMMENT: Provide the calculations for the parking requirements. Include the outside dining or seating area in the use area, along with the building square footage, for the parking calculation. Also provide the dimension for the PAAL adjacent to the canopy along the north and the east. Also provide parking details for each type of parking space. Provide the curb design and bollards for the space near the building. Provide detail references on the site plan.
ADDITION TO COMMENT: Provide the dimension to the PAAL between the building and the canopy along the north side of the building (Min 24'-0" - UDC Section 7.4.6.D.1; Table 7.4.6-1 & Figure 7.4-6.A). The canopy requires an additional one (1) foot setback from the PAAL (UDC Section 7.4.6.F.2.a). Provide the dimensions for both on the site plan.

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

33) COMMENT: Provide the bicycle parking locations for both the short-term and long-term bicycle parking on the site plan. Provide PLAN VIEW and elevation dimensioned details with equipment specifications on the plans (UDC Section 7.4.9). (The detail L11 on Sheet 19 is inadequate.)
ADDITION TO COMMENT: Provide a fully dimensioned plan view for the short-term bicycle parking (DC Section 7.4.9.B.2). Depict the long-term bicycle parking detail and security system specification for locking the bicycles.

2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.)

34) Acknowledged.

2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

35) Acknowledged.

2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan

2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan.

36) Completed.


2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

37) Completed.

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

38) Completed.

2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual.

39) Acknowledged.

2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm.

40) Completed.

2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning.

41) COMMENT: Provide the above information on the plans. See comment number 12A. Provide a separate response memo stating how the condition of rezoning are to be met. ACKNOWLEDGED

2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

42) Acknowledged.

2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.

43) Acknowledged.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Michael St. Paul, (520) 837-4959.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents.

Coordinate this set of plans with the subdivision plat (S14-007) and the rezoning case.

Provide two sets of plans and related documents.

Provide proper detail references on the site plan.
05/30/2014 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Approved
06/04/2014 PGEHLEN1 COT NON-DSD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Approved The resubmittal of the Development Package has been reviewed on behalf of ESD and is approved. If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net
06/04/2014 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approv-Cond Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to Landscape approval sinature.
06/05/2014 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approv-Cond · The current submittal, dated 5/21/14, is acceptable to Regional Traffic Engineering since the revised Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) addresses the need for a right turn lane and driveway connections to the existing frontage road for the Quik Trip development.

· Note that future developments will need to submit a revised TIA for approval from Regional Traffic Engineering and a design for a continuation of Calle Santa Cruz, to the south, accessing the remainder of the site.
06/05/2014 JIM ROSSI COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Reqs Change - Defer to TDOT on any R/W dedication issues.
- The DP shows an on site drain pipe leaving the site and crossing public right of way. I will defer to TDOT and/or ADOT to address how the new (private/public) drainage system in and across the frontage road and Calle Santa Cruz is to be handled/managed/owned; ie: privately owned crossing the public right of way covered by an easement or maintenance agreement or publicly owned built under a PIA. I still do not see how this issue is being addressed on the plan so it is recommended that the applicant purchase an easement across the right of way for its private drainage facilities. This easement could be shown on the plan once it is recorded but DP14-0020 can not create these real property rights.
- It appears that the drainage easement being addressed and abandoned by the plat is still sowing in the background....it can be removed for the subject site only.

Jim Rossi
837-6718
06/05/2014 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:

1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) A disk containing all items submitted
3) All items requested by review staff
4) All items needed to approve this plan.
06/05/2014 PGEHLEN1 COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approv-Cond From TDOT
Zelin Cacnhola
DP14-0020
Quik Trip 1463 1011 W Valencia

Provide approval from the Arizona Department of Transportation for all proposed work along Valencia Road and the I-19 frontage road. The Traffic Study has indicated requirements for a deceleration lane. TDOT will defer to ADOT for comments and requirements.
06/05/2014 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY PLANNING COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

DP14-0020 Quik Trip - Valencia

(X) Tentative Plat
(X) Development Plan
(X) Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other - Elevations

CROSS REFERENCE: (Pending/inprogress) C9-14-01 Quik Trip - Valencia

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz Area Plan and Plan Tucson

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: YES

COMMENTS DUE BY: June 5, 2014

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
() Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies
(X) See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
(X) Resubmittal Required:
(X) Tentative Plat
(X) Development Plan
(X) Landscape Plan
(X) Other - On Hold - Pending Rezoning approval

Reviewer: msp
DATE: 06/05/14
Planning and Development Services Department
Community Planning Section
DP14 0020 - Quik Trip - Valencia
June 5, 2014

Based on the applicant's request; a concurrent review is under way for both Development Plan DP14-0020, a commercial/retail project and Rezoning Case C9-14-01, Quik Trip, to change the land use zone from PI Park Industrial and I-2 Heavy Industrial to C-2 Commercial, to allow the site to be developed for a commercial convenience store with ten (10) fueling stations (20 fuel pumps).

Prior to the approval of the proposed development plan DP14-0020; rezoning case C9-14-01(as of June 5, 2014 still in process), must be approved by Mayor and Council. Development plan DP14-0020 shall be in full compliance with C9-14-01 rezoning conditions.

Staff offers the following comments:

1. Prior to development plan resubmittal, the proposed development plan shall be in full compliance with rezoning case C9-14-01, as approved by Mayor and Council.

2. Prior to development plan approval, general notes to include all C9-14-01, rezoning conditions, verbatim, as approved by Mayor and Council.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/14/2014 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed