Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP14-0020
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/25/2014 | SPOWELL1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/25/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no objections to this proposal. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept 837-7428 |
| 03/25/2014 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Passed | per the form |
| 03/25/2014 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/27/2014 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: April 1, 2014 SUBJECT: QuickTrip #1463 Development Plan Package- Engineering Review TO: MetroTED; Attn: Lisa Bowers LOCATION: 1011 W Valencia Rd; T14S R13E Sec14 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP14-0020 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package, Drainage Report (The WLB Group, Inc.; 31JAN14) and Stormwater Pollution Prevent Plan (The WLB Group, Inc.; 07FEB14). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the following link for further clarification: http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN: 1) AM Sec.2-06.3.9: Revise the development plan package so that the plan drawing is oriented with north toward the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan drawing shall be oriented with north to the left side of the sheet. Currently all plan sheets have the north arrow oriented to the bottom of the page which does not meet the minimum referenced standard, revise. 2) AM Sec.2-06.4.1: Revise the development plan package to provide the email addresses for the primary property owner, surveyor, engineer of record, project manager, etc of the project. Information shall be provided under the Project Contact List Section. 3) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: Revise the development plan package to provide the relevant Development Plan Package case number (DP14-0020), Rezoning case number (C09-14-01) and Final Block Plat case number (S14-007). The numbers may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 4) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: Revise the development plan package to provide the administrative street address for the subject parcel. 5) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.A.3: If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. Provide a letter with the resubmittal that specifically describes how each condition of rezoning has been addressed. Verify that all rezoning conditions as shown on Sheet 2 have been completed. 6) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.A.6: Revise the development plan package and General Note #4 with the correct code reference for the overlays applicable to the site, specifically state that "the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria for Sec.5.4, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. 7) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.C.2: Revise the development plan package and Grading General Note #30 to read per the referenced section; "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual." 8) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.B: Provide approval from all parties who have a vested interest in the existing 5-foot planting strip as shown on Sheet C100 for all proposed work of the vehicular use area. If this portion of the easement is to be abandoned provide the recordation information and remove that area from the development plan package. 9) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.C: Revise the development plan package to dimension the existing width of all public right-of-ways for streets that are adjacent to the site in plan view. Provide right-of-way (ROW) width, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 10) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.F: Revise the development plan package to include the infrastructure improvement plan number in plan view for existing drainage infrastructure located within the public right-of-way. 11) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.I: Revise the development plan package and the Flood Certification Section to provide the correct FEMA FIRM Panel reference. The panel reference should read "04019C2288L." 12) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.A: Provide approval proposed for the Final Block Plat under S14-007, comments have already been posted under that activity number for ENG purposes. The development plan package can not be approved prior to final approval of the Final Block Plat. 13) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.F: This project was submitted concurrently with the proposed Rezoning application, C09-14-01 and can not be approved until the rezoning is approved and all required conditions of rezoning have been addressed. 14) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Provide approval from the Arizona Department of Transportation for all proposed work along the I-19 frontage road. Engineering Section did not review any portion of the proposed work along the frontage road since the review falls under the ADOT regulations. The development plan document can not be approved until ADOT approves the plan set. 15) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Clarify and/or provide approval from ADOT for the proposed work at the I-19 frontage road adjacent to the new entrance to the site. Per Sheet C100 it appears that this project is proposing to close off the frontage road with vertical curbing and a new sidewalk. The frontage road must remain open for traffic or provide the approval to allow this project to close of the roadway. 16) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan package and the demolition sheet (C030) to clearly show that the existing concrete driveway aprons that are no longer to be used for site access will be removed. 17) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the existing and/or future SVTs for all existing and proposed driveway entrances and street intersections, refer to TSM Sec.10-01.5.3 for line of sight matrix. On a designated MS&R street, the SVTs are based on the MS&R cross-section. 18) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to label the minimum dimensions for the required back-up spur at the end of the PAAL per UDC Sec.7.4.6.F.4. Provide curbing to allow the 3-foot radii and the 3-foot depth plus additional 3-feet if there are obstructions over 6-inches in height. 19) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to clearly dimension all PAAL widths to verify minimum requirements, specifically the PAAL located adjacent to the south side of the proposed gas canopy. Verify the 1-foot separation from the structure and 24-foot PAAL per UDC 7.4.6.F.2.a.1. 20) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to provide for a concrete header at the end of the new asphalt roadway to the gravel transition to prevent erosion. 21) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.7: Revise the development plan package to clarify the new entry roadway off of the I-19 Frontage Road. Per Sheet C100 it is called out as a 60-foot proposed roadway extension. Verify if this is to be a new public street built to public street standards, a new private street or an access lane for this lot and adjacent lots with a new access easement or a recorded (per the Final Block Plat) access easement to allow access for all lots utilizing it. 22) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.L: Revise the development plan package to provide the recordation information for any new or abandoned easements. Provide the SEQ# in plan view or as a note under the General Note Section. 23) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.L: Per the proposed development plan package it appears that some proposed grading and construction of the vehicular use area, pedestrian ADA access, etc. will take place on the adjacent property (access easement). Provide written notarized approval along with a temporary construction easement for any and all work that is proposed offsite and a long-term maintenance easement for the proposed drainage infrastructure that is proposed offsite into the public ADOT right-of-way. 24) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development plan package and Grading General Note #3 to provide the information to fill in the blanks for the Alta Vista Survey. 25) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development plan package and Grading General Note #4 to include the reference to the Geotechnical Report prepared for this project. Provide the date, job number, engineer who prepared the report, etc. Provide the Geotechnical Report for review to address the comments under the Geotechnical Report Section below. 26) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development plan package to clarify the limits of grading on the grading plan sheet. Specifically for the removal of the existing concrete driveway aprons located with in the ADOT right-of-way. 27) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Provide a Grading General Note on the development plan package stating; "a) The property owner is responsible to make sure that there will be appropriate containment and/or diversionary structures onsite to prevent discharged petroleum products from reaching the public regional watercourse. b) It is the responsibility of the property owners to notify PCADEQ, AZADEQ and the City of Tucson Planning & Development Services Department in the event of a spill. c) Used absorbent materials containing oil must be picked up by a qualified disposal contractor." 28) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.3: Provide the locations, dimensions, details and manufactures specifications for the required remediation improvements within the water harvesting basin and around the proposed catch basins to prevent discharged petroleum products from reaching the Santa Cruz River. The water harvesting basin and catch basins must provide appropriate containment and/or diversionary structures to prevent discharged petroleum products from reaching the regional watercourse. This method of containing spills and providing routing maintenance will only be reviewed for approval once the manufacture specifications and recommendations are presented and approvable. 29) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.3: Revise the development plan package to provide the required erosion protection at the end of the new 18"x22" RCPs in the ADOT right-of-way into the existing channel. Provide a detail for construction purposes for the headwall design or erosion protection for the pipe outlet. ADOT must review and approve all improvements within the right-of-way for conformance with their standards. 30) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.3: Verify with ADOT approval that all drainage infrastructure as proposed is acceptable and clarify that the improvements meet the minimum ADOT details for State Standards. For example the Type 4 catch basin is called out per the PC/COT Standard Detail however it must be compliant with the State. 31) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package to clearly dimension all sidewalks onsite to ensure the minimum 4-foot width requirements per TSM Sec.7-01.4.3.A. 32) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project. 33) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Revise the development plan document to provide for a double refuse enclosure per TSM Sec.8-01. Revise the plan set and any associated details for the refuse enclosures to show that it meets TSM Sec.8-01, Figure 2 and Figure 3a for the required enclosure walls with gates, concrete thickness and compressive strength, concrete approach apron dimensions, space from wall to bollards, anchoring bolts, 14'x40' clear approach for each container, etc. Any deviation from the standard will require a Technical Standard Modification Request (TSMR), it is advisable that prior to submitting the TSMR to contact Environmental Services to see if they would support the modifications. DRAINAGE REPORT: 34) TC Sec.26-11.2(f): Address the following discussions in the revised Drainage Report evaluating possible flood hazards: a) Explain how the proposed retention system prevents contamination from entering into the storm drains and groundwater tables due to flooding. b) As a permanent stormwater issue for this project, the plans and report shall clearly demonstrate how contaminants from the site areas are pretreated and kept out of the regulatory watercourse. c) State how there will be appropriate containment and/or diversionary structures to prevent discharged petroleum products from reaching regulatory watercourses. SWPPP: 35) Revise all Section on the SWPPP Exhibits to verify conformance with the City of Tucson Ordinance 10209 and the AZPDES 2013 CGP. The new 2013 permit for the state became effective June 23, 2013 and the SWPPP must comply with the new requirements. Refer to http://www.azdeq.gov/environ/water/permits/cgp.html. 36) Revise the SWPPP and Section 8.3.7 to reference the correct City of Tucson code section not Pima County. The subject parcel falls within the City's jurisdiction. 37) Part 6.3.(5)b: Revise the SWPPP and Sheet C143 to clearly delineate the area of disturbance. The area in the ADOT right of way where the existing concrete driveway entrances that are to be removed are located should be shown under the area of disturbance. 38) Part 6.4(1): Revise the SWPPP to include a copy of the CGP-2013 (AZG2013-001) permit. 39) Part 6.4(2): Revise the SWPPP Report to include the correct NOI certification under the CGP-2013 (AZG2013-001) permit. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: TSM Sec.4-03.3.5.1.3.a and 4-04.14.2.6: Provide a Geotechnical Report evaluation that addresses the following: a) Provide pavement structure design recommendations. b) Provide slope stability recommendations for the proposed constructed slopes that are proposed. c) Description of existing soil constraints for the site. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package, Drainage Report, SWPPP and Geotechnical Report that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Due to the numerous comments and the acknowledgment that a Final Block Plat and Rezoning application is in concurrent review for the proposed project additional comments maybe forth coming once all of the above comments have been addressed and depending on the out come of the geotechnical evaluation, Drainage Report and SWPPP. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 03/31/2014 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 04/01/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | See informational letter in SIRE |
| 04/04/2014 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | 201 N. STONE AV, 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 MICHELENE NOWAK ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 724-9512 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: MICHELENE NOWAK, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP14-0020 QUIKTRIP STORE #1463-1ST REVIEW DATE: APRIL 7, 2014 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1. Label project# DP14-0020 on all Sheets. 2. Provide a copy of the recorded Deed describing property being conveyed to Quiktrip Store #1463. Note: Project #S14-007 is a proposed block plat for Quiktrip Store #1463 |
| 04/04/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | See documents in SIRE |
| 04/08/2014 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Reqs Change | Following a review of the submittal for the above mentioned project, Regional Traffic Engineering has comments on the proposed development and the associated Traffic Impact Analysis. Although the developers of this project have not applied for a formal ADOT permit, Regional Traffic has met with their representatives and previously discussed some of the following concerns. These comments should be addressed prior to a subsequent submittal and are available for posting on the City of Tucson’s comment web site. The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) does not address the westbound to southbound left-turn bay entering the development and whether any modifications are needed. The south leg of Calle Santa Cruz shows a future width of 60-foot but there is no mention of future land uses. If phased, the TIA should address future traffic volumes. The site plan should show the north leg of Calle Santa Cruz and identify how through lanes and turn lanes align north/south. It appears that the proposed 35-foot width on the south leg is narrower than the existing 50-foot (approx.) width. How will the narrowing effect the alignment with the north leg which is approximately 48-ft wide? The site plan submitted land locks ADOT and road users from the existing frontage road which ADOT previously identified as being unacceptable. The plan needs to be revised to allow access to the frontage road as it currently exists or propose an alternate access. As documented, an eastbound right-turn lane is warranted in the opening year. Due to the high eastbound volumes in the AM peak (>2,300 veh/hr) and the increasing growth along Valencia Road, it is recommended that the turn lane be provided. Right-of-way boundaries should be provided on the plans to determine whether ADOT or City of Tucson standards should apply. ADOT is currently widening the I-19 southbound off-ramp at Valencia Road. Improvements will not extend to Calle Santa Cruz but future traffic volumes may be available from this study (PSOMAS). The above items and any review comments by the City of Tucson will need to be addressed before ADOT can accept the Traffic Impact Analysis for this development. We look forward to working with you on a subsequent submittal. Thank you. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. . |
| 04/10/2014 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | SHEET C100 1. At the PAAL crossing on the East side of the building, provide a marked crossing and detectable warning at both ends of the marked crossing. END OF REVIEW |
| 04/10/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/10/2014 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Michael St Paul Planning Technician PROJECT: DP14-0020 (S14-007) 1011 West Valencia Road Retail (Quick Trip # 1463) TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 10, 2014 DUE DATE: April 18, 2014 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code, The Administrative and Technical Manuals were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 12, 2015. 2. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 2-06.2.1 Application Form A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee; 2-06.2.2 Development Package A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein; 2-06.2.3 Related Reviews In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the; 2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and, 2-06.2.5 Fees Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.1 - Each sheet shall measure 24 inches by 36 inches and include a minimum one inch margin on left side and one-half inch margin on all other sides to facilitate efficient record keeping. A larger sheet format may be used with the approval of the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD). 2-06.3.2 - All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for record-keeping purposes. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. Smaller scales (60:1 or greater) may be used for some or all of the sheets with the prior approval of PDSD when it is determined legibility and the ability to be digitized and/or reduced for archiving will not be affected. 2-06.3.3 - All lettering and text (upper or lower case), and numbering, shall be a minimum of three-thirty-seconds inches in height to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for archiving. 2-06.3.6 - Provide a blank three-inch by five-inch block in the lower right corner of the plan adjacent to the title block on the first sheet of the development package for use by Pima County Addressing. 1) COMMENT: Provide the addressing block in the lower-right corner next to the title block on the cover sheet. 2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. 2) COMMENT: Place the north arrow and the scale in the upper-right corner of each sheet with any sight drawings or grading plans. Add contour intervals to all the applicable sheets. (See comment number 3.) 2-06.3.9 - The plan drawing shall be oriented with north toward the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan drawing shall be oriented with north to the left side of the sheet. 3) COMMENT: The plan shall be oriented with the north toward the top of the sheet. 2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. 4) COMMENT: The index sheet shall have the numbering corresponding with the continuous sheet number requirement (See comment number 8; 2-06.4.2.D). You may provide both numbering systems in the index. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 5) COMMENT: Provide the email address for the owners, developer and all consultants. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.A - The proposed name of the project or subdivision, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name; 6) COMMENT: Provide the proposed subdivision information in the title block. See next comment. 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; 7) COMMENT: Provide the proposed lot number and subdivision information in the title block. 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). 8) COMMENT: See comment number 4 (2-06.3.12). 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 9) COMMENT: Provide the administrative street address (1011 West Valencia Road, Tucson Arizona 85756) adjacent to the title block. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. 10) COMMENT: Provide previous rezoning case number (C9-80-77) and current rezoning case number (C9-14-01) in the lower-right corner of each sheet. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 11) COMMENT: Change "subject to" to "use specific standards" in the General Notes on sheet 2. .State the applicable use specific standard (Section 4.9.9.B.1), along with the code reference, on the plan: "Out door display or storage of fertilizer, manure, or other odorous material shall be located at least 30 feet from any interior lot lie." 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 12) COMMENT: A) Provide the rezoning conditions for the concurrent rezoning on the coversheet. See comment number 41. B) Correct the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), in General Notes number 4, Sheet 2, code reference from the LUC to the UDC Section 5.4. 2-06.4.7.A.6.c - If the property includes Protected Riparian Area add a note stating that the project is designed to comply with Technical Manual Section 4-02, Floodplain, WASH, and ERZ Standard, specifying all lots impacted and including a total for the regulated area and the Protected Riparian Area. 13) COMMENT: Provide the riparian area information on the site plan. See comment from Landscaping and Engineering. 2-06.4.7.A.7 - If the property is part of a subdivision plat that is being reviewed or has been recorded, provide the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note, indicate whether the project is part of a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), condominium, or another similar type project. 14) COMMENT: Place the subdivision case number (S14-007) in the lower-right corner of each sheet. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.C - Streets and Roads Notes 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building; 15) COMMENT: Along with the gross floor area of each building on the site plan and canopy, provide the outside seating area square footage. 2-06.4.7.C.1 - List the following note if applicable: "All new public roads within and adjacent to this project will be constructed in accordance with approved plans. Construction plans will be submitted to the City Engineer's Office for review and approval." 16) COMMENT: There is a new "roadway" measuring sixty feet (60') wide. Is this a new public or private street? This street should be placed on the plat (S14-007) for this project. 2-06.4.7.C.2 - List the following note on all development package documents: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual." 17) COMMENT: Provide the above SVT note as quoted above on the site plan or in the General Notes. 2-06.4.7.C.3 - Provided the following notes as applicable: 2-06.4.7.C.3.a - "Total miles of new public streets is ____________." 2-06.4.7.C.3.b - "Total miles of new private streets is ____________." 18) COMMENT: Provide the appropriate above note for the proposed street, if applicable. 2-06.4.7.D - Utilities Note All development package documents are to include the following note: "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public." 19) COMMENT: Use only the statement quoted above on the plans, and place the note in the General Notes. 2-06.4.7.E - Wastewater Management Notes List the following notes as appropriate. 2-06.4.7.E.1 - If public sewers are proposed, the following notes will appear on the plan/plat, as applicable. 20) COMMENT: See comments provided by Pima Count Wastewater Management. 2-06.4.7.E.1.a 2 - "A project Construction Permit must be secured from Pima County Wastewater Management before beginning any work on this project." 2-06.4.7.E.3 - The following note shall be placed on a plan/plat proposed for commercial or industrial use: "Any wastewater discharged into the public sanitary sewerage system shall meet the requirements of Pima County Ordinance No. 1991-140, as currently amended." 21) COMMENT: Provide the previous note. See comments by Pima County Wastewater Management. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 22) COMMENT: Identify the existing and proposed zoning of the adjacent sites. Identify the uses of those sites and all basic information as described above (2-06.4.8). 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 23) COMMENT: Provide all the above easement information on the site plan. If an easement is to be abandoned by the plat it must be stated on the plan. Private easements cannot be abandoned by the plat and must be individually vacated and properly recorded. The recording documentation information must be on the site plan. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 24) COMMENT: Provide all the right-of-way information for the proposed right-of-way as described above (2-06.4.8.C). It also appears that the proposed site extends into the freeway access road. ADOT review and approval shall be required. 2-06.4.8.D - The following information regarding existing utilities shall be provided: the location and size of water wells, water pumping plants, water reservoirs, water lines, fire hydrants, sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number; locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights. If water mains and sewers are not located on or adjacent to the tract, indicate the direction, distance to, and sizes of those nearest the property. Identifying the locations of all utilities and service equipment immediately adjacent to the project is especially important in situations where pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation or landscaping can be in conflict. By knowing the location of the existing utilities, design of the project can take those elements into consideration and can help avoid expensive and time-consuming relocation of utilities, major redesign, or requests to vary regulations after commencement of construction. 25) COMMENT: Provide all of the above information (2-06.4.8.D) relative to this site. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. 26) COMMENT: Be certain that the dimensions and lot information match the proposed subdivision (S14-007). Include the proposed street information (see sheet 4) on this development package and the subdivision plat. 2-06.4.9.D - Delineate proposed Natural Undisturbed Open Space (NUOS) in a surveyable manner. 27) COMMENT: See comments by Landscaping. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 28) COMMENT: Provide the zoning information as described above on the site plan for all adjacent properties (2-05.4.9.F). 2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 29) COMMENT: Provide the sight-visibility triangle (SVT) on the site plan. The SVTs must be delineated and dimensioned on the site plan. 2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability. 30) COMMENT: See comments by the Fire Department. 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 31) COMMENT: See comments number 16 and 17. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 32) COMMENT: Provide the calculations for the parking requirements. Include the outside dining or seating area in the use area, along with the building square footage, for the parking calculation. Also provide the dimension for the PAAL adjacent to the canopy along the north and the east. Also provide parking details for each type of parking space. Provide the curb design and bollards for the space near the building. Provide detail references on the site plan. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 33) COMMENT: Provide the bicycle parking locations for both the short-term and long-term bicycle parking on the site plan. Provide plan view and elevation dimensioned details with equipment specifications on the plans (UDC Section 7.4.9). (The detail L11 on Sheet 19 is inadequate.) 2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) 34) COMMENT: Depict the existing and future right-of-way and curb locations, and provide dimensions on the site plan. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 35) COMMENT: Provide all the above information (2-06.4.9.L) for any proposed easements on the site plan. 2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan 2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan. 36) COMMENT: See comments by Engineering. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 37) COMMENT: Dimension the setback from the proposed building to the south property line. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 38) COMMENT: Pedestrian circulation depicted is incomplete for this site. Provide continuous pedestrian circulation to each right-of-way and to all of the required on site locations as described above (2-06.4.9.R). Fully dimension the sidewalks and crosswalks on the site plan. Dimension the sidewalk area adjacent to the building on all sides, and provide dimensions for those areas where the pedestrian circulation clearance is reduced. The site along with pedestrian circulation is depicted as extending into the ADOT frontage road. Revise the plans to reflect the correct site boundaries. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 39) COMMENT: Provide pedestrian circulation along the right-of-way as described above (2-06.4.9.S). See Engineering comments. Pedestrian circulation, the sidewalk and curb cuts, are depicted in the existing ROW of the ADOT frontage road. Acquiring the ROW and review and approval by ADOT shall be required. 2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. 40) COMMENT: Provide pedestrian access to the refuse dumpster location. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 41) COMMENT: Provide the above information on the plans. See comment number 12A. Provide a separate response memo stating how the condition of rezoning are to be met. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 42) COMMENT: Provide the location with dimensions for all freestanding and monument signs. In addition to the above standards be certain that the signs are not placed in the SVT or the ROW. 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 43) COMMENT: See comments by Landscaping. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Michael St. Paul, (520) 837-4959. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. Coordinate this set of plans with the subdivision plat (S14-007) and the rezoning case. Provide two sets of plans and related documents. Provide proper detail references on the site plan. |
| 04/14/2014 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | FROM: Zelin Canchola TDOT Re: DP14-0020 Q Trip April 14, 2014 SE Corner of Valencia and Calle Santa Cruz Traffic Impact Analysis - Additional information is required. The information provided is acceptable and TDOT concurs with the information provided. However access to several properties, and drainage structures south of this project will be cut off by the proposed improvements. This issue must be resolved prior to approval. Developer should continue to work with ADOT. ADOT involvement and approvals will be required for frontage road impacts. Traffic control signs shall be placed on private property wherever possible and maintained by developer. Any future traffic signal modifications which are warranted due to impacts by new development will be funded by developer at no cost to the City of Tucson. Driveway extension to remain private. |
| 04/14/2014 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Rezoning case; Subdivision case; Board of Adjustment case; Design Development Option case; Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING 7.6.4 Minimum Width Street landscape borders must be a minimum of ten feet wide as measured from the streetproperty line. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border must be measured from the future MS&R right-of-way line as determined by Section 5.4.4, Establishment of MS&R Right-of-Way Lines and Gateway Routes. TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL 5-01.4.0 LANDSCAPE BORDERS 4.3 Streetscape Landscape Border - Maximum Width In situations where the street landscape border is wider than the minimum ten foot standard, the landscape border width needs to be determined for the purposes of calculating the 50% vegetative coverage standard. The width is that area between the required screen and the property line, unless there is permitted encroachment into the right-of-way as per this section. Dimension all requied landscape borders and provide correct calculations. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply upon subsequent reviews. |
| 04/16/2014 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP14-0020 Quik Trip - Valencia (X) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: C9-14-01 Quik Trip - Valencia NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz Area Plan and Plan Tucson GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: YES COMMENTS DUE BY: April 17, 2014 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: (X) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan (X) Other - On Hold - Pending Site/Design Issues R Reviewer: msp DATE: 04/17/14 Planning and Development Services Department Community Planning Section DP14 0020 - Quik Trip - Valencia April 17, 2014 Based on the applicant's request; a concurrent review is under way for both Development Plan DP14-0020, a commercial/retail project and Rezoning Case C9-14-01, Quik Trip, to change the land use zone from PI Park Industrial and I-2 Heavy Industrial to C-2 Commercial, to allow the site to be developed for a commercial convenience store with ten (10) fueling stations (20 fuel pumps). Prior to the approval of the proposed development plan DP14-0020; rezoning case C9-14-01 must be approved by Mayor and Council. Development plan DP14-0020 shall be in full compliance with C9-14-01 rezoning conditions. Staff offers the following comments: 1. Per Rezoning Staff, this development plan review is On -Hold, pending site/design issues. Following resolution of pending issues, items # 2 & 3 will be required prior to development plan approval. 2. Prior to development plan resubmittal, the proposed development plan shall be in full compliance with rezoning case C9-14-01, as approved by Mayor and Council. 3. Prior to development plan approval, general notes to include all C9-14-01, rezoning conditions, verbatim, as approved by Mayor and Council. |
| 04/17/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | The review of the Development Package submittal has been completed on behalf of ESD and the following will need to be addressed on the resubmittal: 1. Revise the layout to provide for the double enclosure as shown in Figure 3A of TSM Section 8. Add sufficient notes and details in regards to the enclosure to demonstrate compliance with the construction details, dimensions, slab reinforcement, bollard placement, apron dimensions, gates, etc. as shown in the Figure. See also Engineering comment #33. 2. Per TSM 8-01.5.3.B., the clear space for entry to a waste enclosure requires a 14' x 40' area in front of the enclosure for each container. The space required for a two container enclosure is therefore 28' x 40'. Show this area outlined on the Site Plan. 3. Per TSM 8.01.5.3.E Demonstrate there is adequate truck access and maneuverability in the vicinity of the enclosure. Provide an outline of the vehicle radius turning path to demonstrate turning capabilities in the vicinity of the enclosure. 3. Per TSM 8-01.4.B, add the general note specifying anticipated method of collection and frequency. If there are questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net. |
| 04/21/2014 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 04/21/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 04/21/2014 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/21/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 04/21/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 04/21/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 04/21/2014 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Passed | |
| 04/22/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | See letter in SIRE |
| 04/24/2014 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff. 4) All items needed to approve this plan |
| 04/24/2014 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#275978 May 23, 2014 The WLB Group 4444 E. Broadway Blvd Tucson, Arizona 85705 Dear WLB Group: SUBJECT: Quick Trip Irvington DP14-0020 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted April 15, 2014. It appears that there are conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. " Unit 72 to be removed as well as overhead secondary wire. Unit 3 and the associated anchors to be relocated because of proposed entrance. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer, Jen Necas at (520) 917-8295. Sincerely, Jeffery Shea Admin Support Specialist Design/Build Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) J. Necas, Tucson Electric Power |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/24/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |