Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE/GRADING ALL
Permit Number - DP14-0012
Review Name: RESUB - SITE/GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/19/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/19/2014 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS PRESENTED IN ALL CAPS SHEET C1.1 1. Provide a summary and site plan location of the different types of dwelling units as required by the 2012 IBC, Section 1107.6.2, Accessible Types, Types "A" and Types "B". Once identified on the site plan, adjust the location of the 8 accessible parking spaces as required by Section 1106.6. PROVIDE CODE ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION ON THE DRAWINGS 2. The Unit Summary Chart has been cut off by S. Park Avenue. Please reconcile. OK 3. There are two marked crossings shown in the center of the development near the Kids Soccer retension basin and none provided at the garden area/clubhouse and splash pad. Relocate one from the soccer area to the clubhouse or add another for the clubhouse/splash pad crossing. OK 4. For all marked crossings, please comply with ICC A117.1, Sections 406.12, 13 and 14 as applicable. a. Provide all curb ramps as per ICC A117.1, Section 406. b. Provide detectable warning strips as per section 406. DETECTABLE WARNING STRIPS ARE TO BE 2'-0" DEEP IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL, FULL WIDTH OF THE MARKED CROSSING AND PLACED 6 TO 8 INCHES OF THE CURB LINE. SHOW MARKED CROSSING ON BOTH DETAILS. DELETE THE DETECTABLE WARNING STRIP SHOWN ON A2 AND RELOCATE IN DIRECTION OF TRAVEL THROUGH MARKED CROSSING. 5. Provide an accessible route (ramps as required per ICC A117.1, Section 405) to the bottom of the Kids Soccer retension basin. REFERENCE THE 2009 ICC A117.1, SECTION 1108. PLEASE PROVIDE A RAMP TO THE FIELD. 6. Provide a statement on the drawings that all accessible route slopes shall be as per ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% maximum running slope and 2% maximum cross slope. CAN NOT FIND NOTE SHEET C5.1 7. For details A1, B1 and B3: a. show intended accessibility access to all three areas. b. Show accessible slope compliance in all three areas. NO ACCESS SHOWN FOR A1 8. At detail A2, provide detectable warning strips at all marked crossings as per ICC A117.1, Sections 406.12, 13 and 14 as applicable. NOT COMPLIANT REFERENCE 4B COMMENT SHEET C5.2 9. At detail A1, revise the truncated dome note to read "Surface ramp with detectable warning strips as per ICC A117.1, Sections 406.12, 13 and 14 as applicable." DETAIL NOT COMPLIANT, REFERENCE COMMENT 4B 10. At detail A2, delete the requirement for truncated domes. These are not required in this situation. NOT COMPLIANT REFERENCE COMMENT 4B 11. At detail D4, add a "Van Accessible" sign. OK 12. At detail D3: a. Show location of accessible parking sign. b. Show accessible route and access from the accessible parking aisle. CORRECT REFERENCED DETAIL AS PER NOTE 4B END OF RESUBMITTAL REVIEW |
| 02/24/2014 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/24/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The rim elevation of public manhole 3067-01 will have no bearing on the need for any backwater valves because you show the private sewage collection systems terminating at a new manhole. Provide the proposed rim elevations of the new manholes (see also comment #2 regarding manhole rim elevations). [Initial comment: Revise the site drawing to include the following existing utility information: a. The invert and rim elevations of all public manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. b. Any existing or proposed utility easements c. The first floor elevation for each building Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.13, IBC 2012.] 2. The deferred submittal of the sewer layout is noted but be aware that due to the required capacities of the two private sewage collection systems, each system will require 8" sewer pipe and that private manholes will be required instead of simple cleanouts. The need for any backwater valves will be based upon the rim elevations of the private manholes that you install. [Initial comment: The total flow for each of the two private sewage collection systems for this project is in excess of 3000 gallons per day. The design for the system must be submitted to the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality for their approval prior to obtaining a permit for constructing the sewage collection system from the City of Tucson. Reference A. R. S. 49-104 (B) (13).] |
| 02/25/2014 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) UDC 7.7.6.4.B Within a vehicular use area, one canopy tree is required for each four motor vehicle parking spaces or fraction thereof. Sheet C1.1 indicates 214 parking spaces. 54 canopy trees are required to be planted for the parking lots. 2) TSM 4-03.4.3.1 (SDRM P. 78) Basin slopes are required to have slopes no steeper than 4:1 where depths are three feet or greater. Slopes for basins less than three feet are to be no steeper than 3:1 for unprotected slopes and 2: 1 for protected. TSM 4-03.4.3.1 AM 2-10.4.2.B.5 Note the proposed slope ratios on the landscape plan. |
| 02/25/2014 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/25/2014 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. This comment was not adequately addressed. The calculation uses the incorrect conversion from gallons to cubic yards. The correct conversion factor is 202 gallons per cubic yard. Also provide a note indicating collection frequency to establish adequacy of service. Clarify how the area is calculated. "Provide the waste stream calculation and provide a note specifying the method and frequency of solid waste collect to demonstrate it will be sufficient. TSM 8-01.4.0.B" 2. This comment was not adequately addressed. The Geotech Report requires the buildings to be set back 15 feet from the basin or 4 times the designed maximum depth, "whichever is greater." "The Geotechnical Engineering Report in the Drainage Report indicates the structures should be set back a minimum of 15 feet from the basin. Page 2 Addendum 1. Revise the plans to show and dimension the appropriate setbacks. " |