Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP14-0010
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/22/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/22/2014 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/22/2014 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Passed | per form |
| 01/23/2014 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP14-0010 (Retail Use) 3727 E Broadway Boulevard Development Package - Site Review for Mattress Firm (El Con Mall) TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 24, 2014 DUE DATE: February 03, 2014 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the UDC and Administrative and Technical Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC). The zoning review comments include the actual 2-06 Administrative Manual Standard (AM) first with the applicable AM 2-06 section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Link to the Digital Development Package Plan Stamp for all development package applications. http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/dsd/CDRC/acad-cot_stamp_model_1.pdf 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is January 16, 2014. A.M. Section 2. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section A.M. Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL A.M. Section 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS A.M. Section 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS A.M. Section 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS A.M. Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL A.M. Section 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. A.M. Section 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. A.M. Section 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: A.M. Section 2-06.2.1 Application Form A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee; A.M. Section 2-06.2.2 Development Package A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein; A.M. Section 2-06.2.3 Related Reviews In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the development package documents; A.M. Section 2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and, A.M. Section 2-06.2.5 Fees Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule. A.M. Section 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS A.M. Section 2-06.3.1 - Each sheet shall measure 24 inches by 36 inches and include a minimum one inch margin on left side and one-half inch margin on all other sides to facilitate efficient record keeping. A larger sheet format may be used with the approval of the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD). A.M. Section 2-06.3.2 - All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for record-keeping purposes. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. Smaller scales (60:1 or greater) may be used for some or all of the sheets with the prior approval of PDSD when it is determined legibility and the ability to be digitized and/or reduced for archiving will not be affected. 2-06.3.3 - All lettering and text (upper or lower case), and numbering, shall be a minimum of three-thirty-seconds inches in height to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for archiving. A.M. Section 2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. 01. COMMENT: The required approval stamp has not been provided on the landscape plan sheets. Add the approval stamp as noted by the standard above. A.M. Section 2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. 02. COMMENT: Add the contour interval on the appropriate sheets as noted by the standard above. A.M. Section 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. A.M. Section 2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. 03. COMMENT: This project has been assigned the PDSD case number DP14-0010, list the case number in the lower corner next to the title block and in general note 6 of the first sheet. A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 04. COMMENT: Label the Dodge Boulevard on all site sheets and also label as Private Street. A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4. 05. COMMENT: On sheet 3 there appears to be a loading area but has been labeled incorrectly with the Monument Sign Keynote. Add the loading zone note and appropriate keynote. Clarify if the loading dock area is at grade or is it partially below grade. Also, demonstrate maneuverability in and out of the loading area area. Demonstrate maneuvering radius. A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 06. COMMENT: There appears to be a discrepancy between the Site and Civil plan sheets when compared to the Landscape plan sheet L1.1. The site plan sheet depicts a detention or retention area that is next to the long term bicycle facility. It does not appear that safe access (sidewalk area) to the bicycle locker facing the south side has been provided. In addition when comparing the L1.1 sheet with the site and civil sheets the west landscape area on the L1.1 sheet does not depict a detention/retention area. Review the plans sheets in question and revise accordingly. A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.M.2 - Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently. 07. COMMENT: The grading plan has been reviewed concurrently in the development package. Once the DP site plan is approved the grading plan is also approved. Ensure that any changes that are made to the site plan sheet are made on all the civil and landscape plan sheets to match. A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.N 1 - Show areas of detention/retention including 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevations. 08. COMMENT: As mentioned in comment 06, there is a discrepancy between the site, civil and landscape plan sheets as it relates to the detention/retention areas. Review the plans and revise accordingly. A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 09. COMMENT: There is no pedestrian connection from the Mattress Firm to any on site pedestrian circulation to the developments along the east or west sides of the Mattress Firm development. Sidewalk connection must be provided to the Claim Jumper sidewalk System and to the sidewalk system across Dodge Blvd. The minimum width requirement for the sidewalk is four (4) feet. (Label the front or customer entrance) A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 10. COMMENT: Label the street sidewalk and width for Broadway and Dodge. A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. 11. COMMENT: Demonstrate maneuverability in and out of the refuse area. Demonstrate maneuvering radius. A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 12. COMMENT: See the landscape reviewer comments related to the landscape buffer and screening requirements. 13. Additional Comments; a. On sheet SP-1, key note 5 was used to denote three areas that are not applicable to the actual note. Revise the keynotes as required and add the appropriate note for a keynote related to the loading area. b. The detention/retention areas and water harvesting areas do not match on the site, civil and landscape plan sheets. All sheets depicting the site must match. c. The conditions of rezoning must be listed on the plans. d. The subdivision case number has not been listed. List the case number on all plan sheets. e. Correct the typo for the label "Mattress Frim" (should be FIRM) in the building footprint of all site and civil sheets. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5550 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. |
| 01/23/2014 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 01/27/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/29/2014 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide an accessible route connection accross the private street Dodge to the rest of the El Con development a. Provide all accessible requirements such as marked crossings, curb ramps and detectable warnings as required. 2. Show and or denote accessible route connection to the Claim Jumper. 3. Provide a marked crossing accross the loading zone connection the two isolated accessible parking spaces to the accessible route in from of the Matress Firm store. 4. All accessible route slopes are to comply with ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% max running and 2% cross slopes. END OF REVIEW |
| 01/30/2014 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#273125 January 30, 2014 Optimus Civil Design Group LLC Attn: Jeff Behrana 4650 E Cotton Center Suite 200 Phoenix, Arizona 85040 Dear Mr. Behrana: SUBJECT: Mattress Firm Lot 2-El Con Mall Final Plat DP14-0010 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted January 28, 2014. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (OH-204) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Tina Zarate Admin Support Design/Build Enclosures Cc: City of Tucson M Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 01/31/2014 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 02/03/2014 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Prior to landscape approval signature. |
| 02/04/2014 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP14-0010 Mattress Firm - El Con 2/4/14 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: 1) Applicant to provide self-certification letter that proposed design is consistent with the El Con Mall design criteria as established by the El Con Mall's management team. () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER:jb 837-6966 DATE: 08/26/13 |
| 02/04/2014 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | The drainage statement is accepted for this project. Please note the FIRM has been updated and the L panel should be used for future drainage submittals. Provide the street name on for the entry drive. Ensure that the keynotes and descriptions are correct. |
| 02/06/2014 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) 3 rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve this plan |
| 02/06/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Denied | The Development Package has been reviewed on behalf of ESD and the following comments will need to be addressed: 1. The existing dumpster enclosure does not appear to meet the requirements of TSM Section 8. Just adding gates to the existing enclosure will not be adequate. Please provide a detail of the proposed enclosure and apron improvements to demonstrate compliance with the Figures and specifications in TSM Section 8. General Note 23 on the cover sheet states the enclosures shall meet the requirements of rezoning condition VI.e. Please demonstrate compliance with this condition and TSM Section 8 with the appropriate details and notes. 2. General Note 24 on the cover sheet states the existing enclosure will be modified when the parking phase is done. The enclosure modifications will need to be performed prior to parking lot completion and before paving begins. 3. Per TSM 8-01.4.B, add a General Note specifying the anticipated method of collection and frequency. 4. Per TSM 8-01.5.3.B, the clear space for entry to a waste enclosure requires a 14’ x 40’ area in front of the enclosure for each container. The space required for a two container enclosure is therefore 28’ x 40’. Show this area outlined on the Site Plan. If there are any questions or the applicant would like to discuss these comments, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/06/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |