Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE/GRADING ALL
Permit Number - DP14-0005
Review Name: RESUB - SITE/GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/29/2014 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/05/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Mountain Group Home Development Package (3rd Review) DP14-0005 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 5, 2014 DUE DATE: September 26, 2014 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is January 06, 2015. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 1. This comment was not addressed. Provide the DDO conditions on the plan. COMMENT: Provide a general note stating the DDO case number, date of approval, what was approved and any conditions of approval on the plan. 2. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: The site plan and elevations will need to be stamped by the DDO section prior to approval of this development package. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 3. COMMENT: The new location shown for the short term bicycle parking is adjacent to a wall. Per UDC Section 7.4.9.B.2.g A bicycle rack must be a minimum of two and one half feet from a wall or other obstruction. Show the required 2'-6" dimension on the short term detail. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package . |
| 09/10/2014 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: September 10, 2014 DUE DATE: September 26, 2014 SUBJECT: Mountain Group Home Development Plan Package- 3rd Engineering Review TO: Kurt Brown LOCATION: 1300 E 10th St; T14S R14E Sec07 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP14-0005 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the following link for further clarification: http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN: 23) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan package and provide a Keynote for the existing driveways that are to be closed off to clearly label the curbing and sidewalk dimensions along with a reference to the Standard Detail for Public Improvements to match existing for construction purposes. The plan set provided the code reference however it must label the actual detail for construction purposes out of the Pima County/City of Tucson Standard Detail for Public Improvement Book 2003 Edition. 28) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to provide a Parking Space Detail so that it is designed in accordance with Sec.7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. Specifically revise plan view and Detail 12/T1.1 to relocate the handicap access sign outside of the required 2.5 foot clear overhang area. 38) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: It is acknowledged that the 5-foot sidewalk has been added to the Mountain Avenue side of the parcel however since a portion of the sidewalk is to be constructed on private property a new pedestrian access easement with recordation (SEQ #) will be required prior to development plan package approval. 39) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Revise the development plan package to provide for centralized onsite solid waste and recycle collection service pick up per TSM Sec.8-01.5.1.A. The detail provide for the refuse containers do not meet the minimum specifications per Technical Standard Manual Section 8-01. The detail must match TSM Sec.8-01 and Figures 2 and 3b for the required enclosure walls, gates, concrete thickness and compressive strength, concrete approach apron dimensions, footer construction, bollard dimensions, etc. The detail must clearly show that the enclosure doors do not encroach into either the alleyway or the proposed access lane when open. Plan view shows the doors to swing opening fully however the detail must provide construction aspects of the design to ensure that it is constructed as such. DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 41) Restated: Provide a Drainage Statement that addresses the proposed development and new vehicular use area with an increase in impervious surface. The drainage statement must clearly show pre and post imperviousness and must show that post developed offsite flows do not increase into the right-of-way from pre-developed conditions. Utilize curb cuts in the vehicular use area and required landscape areas to alleviate offsite flows into the public-right-of-way. No Drainage Statement was submitted with the 2nd or 3rd submittal. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 09/15/2014 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | AT DETAIL 12/T1.1 1. Delete the flared side of the ramp and move the ramp North to the corner of the building. Provide another 1:12 max sidewalk ramp where the flared side ramp was located to the newly created landing at the head of the accessible aisle. 2. Mount the signage on the wall and delete the pole. 3. What is referenced with the circle 1 at both signs? AT DETAIL 5/A1.1 4. Indicate wall mounted signage as noted. AT DETAIL 1/T-1 5. Revise the Site Plan accordingly. END OF REVIEW |
| 09/18/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 09/19/2014 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Provide note stating the DDO case number, date of approval, what was approved and any conditions of approval on appropriate plan Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/25/2014 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |