Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP14-0005
Parcel: 124082240

Address:
50 N MOUNTAIN AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP14-0005
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/08/2014 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
01/09/2014 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied PLEASE CORRECT OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION TO I-1-KRB
01/13/2014 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking layout showing all accessibile requirements such as dimensions, van accessible parking spaces, ailses, grade slopes, signage, access to the accessible routes, markings and all ramps as required.
a. Provide a large scale detail of the signage including van accessible signage.
2. Insure and note to that effect that all accessible route slopes comply with the 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% maximum running slope and 2% maximum cross slopes.
3. Provide dimensional widths for all accessible routes.
END OF REVIEW
01/13/2014 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Mountain Group Home
Development Package (1st Review)
DP14-0005

TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 14, 2014

DUE DATE: February 05, 2014

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is January 06, 2015.

2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and,

1. COMMENT: Separate the building/foundation plans from the development package/site plan. These reviews can run concurrently but are separate reviews.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.2 - All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for record-keeping purposes. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. Smaller scales (60:1 or greater) may be used for some or all of the sheets with the prior approval of PDSD when it is determined legibility and the ability to be digitized and/or reduced for archiving will not be affected.
2-06.3.3 - All lettering and text (upper or lower case), and numbering, shall be a minimum of three-thirty-seconds inches in height to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for archiving.

2. COMMENT: The provided site plan is not drawn at an engineering scale. Provide a site plan that meets this standard.

2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

3. COMMENT: Provide the PDSD Development Package approval stamp on all sheets. The stamp can be found at http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/dsd/CDRC/acad-cot_stamp_model_1.pdf

2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet.

4. COMMENT: Provide the north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet in the upper right corner of each sheet.

2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet.

5. COMMENT: The drawing index for the development package should only include the development packages sheets.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

6. COMMENT: Provide the name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site and the developer of the project,

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

7. COMMENT: Provide a brief legal description within the title block.

2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

8. COMMENT: Provide the page number and total number of development package pages, (sheet x of y) on all sheets.

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

9. COMMENT: Remove the address from the title block and provide the address adjacent to the title block.

10. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP14-0005, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

11. COMMENT: Provide a location map the meets the three inch equals one mile scale.

2-06.4.2.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

12. COMMENT: Provide the section, township, and range for this project adjacent to location map.

13. COMMENT: Label the section corners on the location map.

14. COMMENT: Label the scale on the location map.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

15. COMMENT: Under "SITE CODE REVIEW, GOVERNING CODES:" there is a reference to "(REF. GEN. NOTE #14)". Zoning was not able to find "GEN. NOTE #14".

16. COMMENT: Remove the "BUILDNG CODE REVIEW" from the development package sheets as it is not applicable.

2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

17. COMMENT: Provide the acreage with the square footage shown under "MINIMUM SITE AREA".

18. COMMENT: Remove the reference to "MINIMUM SITE AREA, 5,000 SQUARE FEET" as minimum site area is not applicable to "Nonres" projects in the R-3 Zone, see UDC Section 6.3.3.D.2 and UDC Table 6.3-2.A.

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

19. COMMENT: Identify the existing use on the plan.

2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

20. COMMENT: Provide the floor area for each building.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

21. COMMENT: Provide the site boundary perimeter information, bearings and distances for all property lines on the plan.

2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

22. COMMENT: Provide the above information for both 10th Street and Mountain Avenue.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

23. COMMENT: Provide the zoning for the parcels north of 10th Street.

2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles (SVTs). On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

24. COMMENT: Show the applicable SVTs on the plan.

2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

25. COMMENT: Provide the above information for both 10th Street and Mountain Avenue.

2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

26. COMMENT: Provide a width dimension for the access lane providing access to 10th Street.

27. COMMENT: Provide a width dimension for the access lane providing access to Mountain Avenue.

28. COMMENT: Provide a width dimension for the parking area access lane (PAAL) that provides access to the vehicle parking spaces.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

29. COMMENT: Provide a fully dimensioned parking area.

30. COMMENT: Provide a vehicle parking space calculation that includes the ratio used, number of required and provided standard and accessible vehicle parking spaces.

31. COMMENT: Provide a typical parking space detail for both standard and accessible vehicle parking spaces.

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

32. COMMENT: Provide a short & long term bicycle parking space calculation that includes the number required and provided.

33. COMMENT: Show the location of the short term bicycle parking on the plan and provide a detail that shows how the requirements of UDC Sections 7.4.9.B & C are met.

34. COMMENT: Show the location of the long term bicycle parking on the plan and provide a detail that shows how the requirements of UDC Sections 7.4.9.B & D are met.

2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

35. COMMENT: There are numerous setback dimension strings that are to small to read.

36. COMMENT: Provide building elevations so that all required perimeter yard setbacks can be verified. Until provided perimeter yard requirements cannot be verified.

2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

37. COMMENT: Provide the square footage and height of the buildings within the footprint.

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

38. COMMENT: Provide width dimensions for all sidewalks shown on the plan.

39. COMMENT: There is a sidewalk shown along the west end of the vehicle parking area that crosses what appears to be an access lane off of Mountain Avenue. If this sidewalk walk is flush with the pavement some type of ramp is required at the north and south end of the access lane.

2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm.

40. COMMENT: Show the refuse collection area on the plan.

2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping.

41. COMMENT: Demonstrate how the mail delivery will be handled for this site.

2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.

42. COMMENT: Provide landscape and irrigation plans with your next submittal.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
.
01/15/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Revise the site drawing to include the following existing utility information:
a. The location and size of water lines.
b. The location and size of sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number.
c. The locations of gas lines and street lights.
d. Any existing or proposed utility easements
e. The first floor elevation for the building
Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual No., Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.13, IBC 2012.
01/23/2014 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: January 23, 2014
SUBJECT: Mountain Group Home Development Plan Package- Engineering Review
TO: Kurt Brown
LOCATION: 1300 E 10th St; T14S R14E Sec07
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP14-0005

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the following link for further clarification:
http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

The following items need to be addressed:

SITE PLAN:

1) AM Sec.2-06.2.4: Revise the development plan package to separate the building plan sheets from the development plan review. The 2 reviews can run concurrently for review purposes; however they should be 2 separate submittals and should be treated as such. Provide approval of the DEMO permit prior to development plan package approval.

2) AM Sec.2-06.3.2: Revise the development plan package and all mapped data to be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50-feet to the inch. The scale is the minimum accepted, architectural scales do not meet this requirement.

3) AM Sec.2-06.3.5: Revise the development plan package to include the approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. The link to the stamp can be found here: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp

4) AM Sec.2-06.3.8: Revise the development plan package to include the north arrow, contour interval and scale to each sheet and placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet.

5) AM Sec.2-06.3.12: Revise the development plan package and Index Section to only include the Sheets associated with the development plan package. All building plan sheets should be removed and provided under a separate package with the associated building plan application.

6) AM Sec.2-06.4.1: Revise the development plan package to provide the name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site and the developer of the project. Information shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet.

7) AM Sec.2-06.4.2.B: Revise the development plan package to include a brief legal description of the subject property within the Title Block.

8) AM Sec.2-06.4.2.D: Revise the development plan package and the Title Block to include the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., Sheet XX of XX). For development plan package purposes the building plan sheets should not be part of the package submittal, remove and revise the Index Section and Sheet count to reflect.

9) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant Development Plan Package case number (DP14-0005) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. The associated building plan number T14CM00090 should also be added to the sheet and is to be included on the separate building plan sheet submittal.

10) AM Sec.2-06.4.4.A: Revise the development plan package and project location map to show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area.

11) AM Sec.2-06.4.4.B: Revise the development plan package and project location map to identify the major watercourse, Arroyo Chico and High School Wash, if it falls within the one square mile area shown once revised to center the subject parcel.

12) AM Sec.2-06.4.4.C: Revise the development plan package and project location map to label the sections corners, scale and have it cover approximately one square mile. Standard scale is 3"=1 mile for a location map.

13) DS Sec.2-06.4.7.A.2: Revise the development plan package to provide a General Note to list the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage.

14) DS Sec.2-06.4.7.B.1: Revise the development plan document to include a Drainage Note per the referenced standard specifically; "The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall."

15) DS Sec.2-06.4.7.B.3: Revise the development plan document to include a Drainage Note per the referenced standard specifically; "Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this development plan."

16) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.C.2: Revise the development plan package to provide a General Note to read per the referenced section; "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual."

17) DS Sec.2-06.4.7.D: Revise the development plan document to include a General Note per the referenced section; "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public."

18) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.A: Revise the development plan package to include the perimeter information for all property lines to include bearing in degrees, minutes and seconds together with distance in feet or other functional reference system.

19) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.C: Revise the development plan package to dimension the existing width of the public right-of-way in plan view for both roadways. Provide right-of-way (ROW) width, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, sidewalks and on street parking. Label both roadways as "Public."

20) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.E: Revise the development plan package to indicate the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson Datum. Provide contour interval on the plan sheets.

21) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan package to label the required 18-foot radii at both driveway entrances (10th Street and Mountain Ave) per TSM Sec.10-01.3.2.C and Figure 6. Provide written approval from TDOT Permits and Codes that the proposed project does not have to meet the minimum 18-foot radii and that a standard driveway apron can be utilized. Provide a Keynote call out with the PC/COT Standard Detail for the driveway apron if allowed.

22) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1:Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the proposed driveway setbacks from adjacent driveways and/or street intersections along with any existing street lights, fire hydrants, electrical pole, etc per Chapter 25 of the Tucson Code Sec.25-38.

23) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan package and provide a Keynote for the existing driveways that are to be closed off to clearly label the curbing and sidewalk dimensions along with a reference to the Standard Detail for Public Improvements to match existing for construction purposes. Existing curb cuts that are no longer used must be closed off per Tucson Code Chapter 25 Sec.25-43.

24) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan package to label the required handicap access ramps at the driveway locations per 10-01.3.3.E, if applicable. Label a Keynote in plan view to ensure that the ramps are constructed under this project and provide a description of the Keynote in the Keynote Legend to verify conformance with PC/COT Standard Detail #207.

25) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the existing SVTs for the proposed driveway entrances and the street intersection of 10th Street and Mountain Ave, refer to TSM Sec.10-01.5.3 for line of sight matrix.

26) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Revise the development plan package to verify and dimension the on street parking along 10th Street for use with the SVT matrix.

27) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the minimum 24-foot clear PAAL width for the vehicular use areas.

28) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to provide a Parking Space Detail so that it is designed in accordance with Sec.7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. Specifically a standard parking stall must be 8.5 feet wide by 18-feet long and the proposed bumper blocks must be placed to allow for the 2.5 foot overhang so that the vehicle does not encroach into the required pedestrian access space or landscape area.

29) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to ensure all dimensions are labeled for the vehicular use area.

30) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to label the minimum dimensions for the required back-up spur at the end of each PAAL per UDC Sec.7.4.6.F.4. Provide curbing to allow the 3-foot radii and the 3-foot depth plus additional 3-feet if there are obstructions over 6-inches in height.

31) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to label in plan view and to provide a Keynote call out for the proposed 6-inch curbing within the vehicle use area. Either provide a reference to a PC/COT Standard Detail or provide a separate detail for construction purposes.

32) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan package to label the required screen wall along the front of the property, verify if the screen wall is adjacent to the 2 parking spaces or if this is curbing. If it's a wall provide a dimension from the proposed screen wall to the vehicle parking spaces to the south. Per UDC Sec.7.4.6.D.2.b a motor vehicle off-street parking space must have a minimum width of ten feet when the side(s) of the parking space abuts a vertical barrier over six inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport.

33) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Provide a note on the development plan package to state; "Approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction."

34) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Provide a note on the development plan package to state; "All proposed fencing and walls will require a separate permit for review and approval by all necessary Planning & Development Services Departments."

35) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package to provide a call out for PC/COT Standard Detail #200 for the proposed sidewalk or provide a separate detail for construction purposes.

36) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package to clearly dimension all sidewalks onsite to ensure the minimum 4-foot width.

37) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project.

38) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the minimum 5-foot requirement for the sidewalk within the right-of-way of both roadways. Provide a Keynote to call out the PC/COT Standard Detail #200 for the required sidewalk to ensure conformance with the minimum City of Tucson requirements.

39) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Revise the development plan document to provide for centralized onsite solid waste and recycle collection service pick up per TSM Sec.8-01.5.1.A, Utilization of individual containers (APCs) for six or more new dwelling units requires approval by ES on a case by case evaluation (provide written approval from ES). Provide a construction detail for the refuse enclosures. The detail must match TSM Sec.8-01 and Figure 3a for the required enclosure walls, gates, concrete thickness and compressive strength, concrete approach apron dimensions, 14'x40' clear approach for each container, etc.

40) Sec.2-06.4.9.X: Provide a Landscape and Irrigation Plan with the next submittal and include the sheets in the page count and sheet index. Refer to comments from the Landscape Section for further clarification.


DRAINAGE STATEMENT:

41) Provide a Drainage Statement that addresses the proposed development and new vehicular use area with an increase in impervious surface. The drainage statement must clearly show pre and post imperviousness and must show that post developed offsite flows do not increase into the right-of-way from pre-developed conditions. Utilize curb cuts in the vehicular use area and required landscape areas to alleviate offsite flows into the public-right-of-way.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.

Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
01/31/2014 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Reqs Change Submit NPPO plan as determined by A.M. Section 2-11 or Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property.
01/31/2014 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

The standards in this Section 7.6.4. apply to all developments that provide more than four motor vehicle parking spaces. Landscape must be submitted for review.

LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING

To enhance the visual appearance of the streetscape, a street landscape border is required in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1 along the street frontage of a site as follows:

Minimum Width
Street landscape borders must be a minimum of ten feet wide as measured from the streetproperty line. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border must be measured from the future MS&R right-of-way line as determined by Section 5.4.4, Establishment of MS&R Right-of-Way Lines and Gateway Routes.

Fifty percent or more of the area of the street landscape border must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover. The required ground coverage must be achieved within two years from the date of planting.

Interior landscape borders are required as determined in Table 7.6.4-1, which ranks land uses and zones based upon their land use intensity and the impact a use will have on adjacentland uses.

One canopy tree is required for every 33 linear feet of landscape border or fraction thereof, excluding vehicular ingress or egress points.

Continuous screens along street frontages for vehicle use area must be as determined by Table 7.6.4-I. Provide appropriate screening.

Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1

Within a vehicular use area, one canopy tree is required for each four motor vehicle parking spaces or fraction thereof.

The canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space must be located within 40 feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk).

Submit NPPO plan as determined by A.M. Section 2-11 or Provide acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

Additional comments may apply


ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS

Identification and Descriptive Data

All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:

Rezoning case;

Subdivision case;

Board of Adjustment case;

Design Development Option case;

Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or,
Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

Planting Plan

Vegetation Plan and Schedules

Ultimate size of plants indicated by the spread of canopy, circumference of shrubs, or spread of ground cover;

Both the proper and common name of each type of plant material.

Material and areas of inert ground cover.

Calculations

Square footage of the site;

Square footage of the oasis allowance area and calculation;

Square footage of the vehicular use area; number of parking spaces, including the required and provided parking space calculations; and the calculation of the required number of canopy trees.

Maintenance Schedule

Pruning schedules to show that plant material will maintain pedestrian and vehicular clearances or that the material will establish opaque hedge screens, if required;
Replacement criteria, should plant material not survive;

Replacement or upkeep maintenance schedules for inert ground cover materials;

Upkeep maintenance schedules for exterior hardscape materials; and,

Maintenance and replacement schedules for irrigation systems.

Grading Information

Grade changes across the site indicated by one-foot interval contour lines or by spot elevations;

Percent slope across the site and the direction of the slope of paved areas;

Existing grades on adjacent rights-of-way and adjacent sites. If an adjacent right-of- way or site is under construction, show the proposed finish grade

Extent of grading boundaries if a portion of the site is to be kept in its natural undisturbed state.

Indicate natural contours of undisturbed areas;

Areas of detention/retention, depths of basins, and percentage of side slope;

The methods by which water harvesting or storm water runoff is used to benefit the planting areas on the site.

Irrigation Plan

Type of water conserving irrigation systems proposed and differentiation between systems for the different water use zones on the site;

Source of irrigation water;

Indicate potable or reclaimed water use. Reclaimed water system specifications, if used;

System specifications and system design and layout (Section 4-01.4.2, Irrigation Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual);

Extent of supplementary irrigation in each planting area, provided by water harvesting methods;

Point of drainage off roof areas, amount of flow, and disposition of flow;

Temporary systems proposed to establish native seeded areas;

The length of irrigation duration (e.g., for native plat material, automatic drip for two years or until established); and,

The extent to which systems are proposed within the public right-of-way.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
02/05/2014 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
02/05/2014 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed