Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP13-0253
Parcel: 117060670

Address:
220 N 4TH AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP13-0253
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/07/2014 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Denied Please indicate occupant load of "future bar/patio" and whether or not the area is to be covered.
Verify A-2 occupancies (bar/restaurants) with occupant load of 100 of greater have, or will have, fire sprinklers.
01/09/2014 LAITH ALSHAMI ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 01/21/2014,



SUBJECT: Tofoy
DP13-0253, T14S, R13E, SECTION 12

RECEIVED: Development Plan Package on December 19, 2013

The subject project has been reviewed. The project can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that where made and references the exact location in the plan and in the Drainage Report where the revisions were made:

Development Package:

1. All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale. Revise plan and the Trash Enclosure Details accordingly (A.M. 2-06.3.2).
2. Provide the name, mail and emailing addresses and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents as required by (A.M. 2-06.4.1).
3. The Development Package Case number is DP13-0253. Provide, on every sheet, the correct case number (A.M. 2-06.4.3).
4. The project gross area and parcel numbers, provided in General Note #2, do not appear to correspond to the buildings designated by a star. Clarify and Revise as necessary (A.M. 2-06.4.7.A.2).
5. It appears that more lots are affected by the regulatory floodplain than what is stated in General Note #5 and shown on the plan. Revise as necessary (A.M. 2-06.4.7.B.2.a). Please be advised that any proposed improvements to any of the buildings within the regulatory floodplain, will require the submission and issuance of a floodplain use permit (FUP). The FUP application shall include an appraisal of the improved building(s) value and the contractors estimate for the work being proposed including labor and material.
6. Provide the boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes and seconds, with the basis of bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredth of foot as required by A.M. 2-06.4.8.A. Additionally, provide the tie between the basis of bearing and one of the parcel corners.
7. Show all existing onsite easements with their recordation information (A.M. 2-06.4.8.B).
8. Provide the adjacent streets information (i.e. public or private, right of way widths, recordation data, curbs, curb cuts, sidewalks, etc.) as required by A.M. 2-06.4.8.C.
9. Provide the existing type and dimensioned paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks (A.M. 2-06.4.8.C).
10. Indicate the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson Datum (indicate City of Tucson field book number and page). Additionally, provide the basis of elevation (A.M. 2-06.4.8.E).
11. Show, if applicable. Any existing storm drainage facilities on or adjacent to the site (A.M. 2-06.4.8.F).
12. The regulatory floodplain provided on the plan is shown in correctly. Revise the regulatory floodplain delineation and provide the 100-year water surface elevations as required by (A.M. 2-06.4.8.I). Please be advised that the floodplain limits and water surface elevations need to be certified by the stamp of a registered civil engineer.
13. It appears that a lot combo might be required. Check with Zoning Review for this requirement (A.M. 2-06.4.9.E).
14. Show, if applicable, all proposed easements with their dimensions and recordation information as required by A.M. 2-06.4.9.L.
15. The trash enclosure does not appear to be the standard enclosure. Revise the detail to match the standard detail shown in T.S.M. 8-01 and demonstrate how it will be accessed. Additionally, provide the required back up dimensions (A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.3) and (A.M. 2-06.4.9.T).
16. All proposed work in the public right of way will require a right of way excavation permit or a Private Improvement Agreement. Contact Richard Leigh of Transportation Department Permit and Codes at 791-5100 for additional information.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4933 or Laith.Alshami@tucsonaz.gov



RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan Package
01/15/2014 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Insure accessible entrances to all spaces requiring a change of use. Reference 2012 IBC, Chapter 3411, Section 1105 and 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 402.
2. Extend the accessible route on the east side of the building to the public right of way.
3. Insure and note to that effect that all accessible route slopes comply with ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% maximum running slope and 2% maximum cross slope.
END OF REVIEW
01/17/2014 LEERAY HANLY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Passed
01/21/2014 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change 1) Refer to UDC 7.6.2 and revise the Development Package Narrative as necessary.

7.6.2. APPLICABILITY
The provisions of this section (Landscape & Screening) apply to the following:
A. All new development; and,
B. Expansion of existing development, ...
01/21/2014 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Passed
12/20/2013 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
12/24/2013 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change FROM: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT: DP13- 0253
220 N 4th Ave. & 215 N. Hoff Ave. - TOFOY Block
Development Package - Site Review for Change of Use Full Code Compliance
Retail to Bar / Restaurant Use

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 24, 2013

DUE DATE: January 21, 2013

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the UDC and Administrative and Technical Standards were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC).

The zoning review comments include the actual 2-06 Administrative Manual Standard (AM) first with the applicable AM 2-06 section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

Link to the Digital Development Package Plan Stamp for all development package applications. http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/dsd/CDRC/acad-cot_stamp_model_1.pdf

1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is .

A.M. Section 2. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

A.M. Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL

A.M. Section 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

A.M. Section 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

A.M. Section 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

A.M. Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL

A.M. Section 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property.

This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes.

A.M. Section 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY
This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review.

A.M. Section 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided.
The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application:

A.M. Section 2-06.2.1 Application Form
A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee;

A.M. Section 2-06.2.2 Development Package
A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein;

A.M. Section 2-06.2.3 Related Reviews
In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the development package documents;

A.M. Section 2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and,

A.M. Section 2-06.2.5 Fees
Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule.

A.M. Section 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

A.M. Section 2-06.3.1 - Each sheet shall measure 24 inches by 36 inches and include a minimum one inch margin on left side and one-half inch margin on all other sides to facilitate efficient record keeping. A larger sheet format may be used with the approval of the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD).

A.M. Section 2-06.3.2 - All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for record-keeping purposes. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. Smaller scales (60:1 or greater) may be used for some or all of the sheets with the prior approval of PDSD when it is determined legibility and the ability to be digitized and/or reduced for archiving will not be affected.
2-06.3.3 - All lettering and text (upper or lower case), and numbering, shall be a minimum of three-thirty-seconds inches in height to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for archiving.

A.M. Section 2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet.

COMMENT:

A.M. Section 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

A.M. Section 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

1. COMMENT: List the email address for the Architect on this project and owner of the property.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

A.M. Section 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

2. COMMENT: List a brief legal description in the title block, i.e., A portion of section of the sw qtr of the sw qrt of section 30 T 14 R14, etc.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

3. COMMENT: List in the corner of the title block Sheet 1 of 1.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

4. COMMENT: This project has been assigned the DP case number DP13-0253. List the number next to the title block. Per the DP notes the owner/applicant will be requesting Board of Adjustment variances for specific UDC zoning development regulations that cannot be met as well as a TSMR. List the case numbers for the B. of A. variance and TSMR in the right corner next to the title block. List as general notes the variance and TSMR case numbers, date of approval and conditions of approval for each.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

5. COMMENT: Address the following items related to the location map.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.2.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and,

6. COMMENT: Label the following on the location map, draw and label Main Avenue, and label the railroad (SPRR).

A.M. Section 2-06.4.2.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

7. COMMENT: Label the section corners, see redlines.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

A.M. Section 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; re-zonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

8. COMMENT: Add the necessary information based on the requested processes for Board of Adjustment and Modification to Technical Standards as noted by the above two (2) standards.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.7.A.6.b - If there is more than one lot within the site, the note should specify which lots are affected by the additional applications or overlay zones.

9. COMMENT: Add the required information as noted by the standard above.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

A.M. Section 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and,

10. COMMENT: Include in the in the zoning development criteria the proposed expansion area for the patio. This is considered an expansion of use and must be calculated for vehicle and bicycle parking or remove from the proposed patio from the plans. Also label the square footage of the storage shed and what suite will be utilizing the shed. The square footage of the shed counts towards the square footage of the suite.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met.

11. COMMENT: List all calculations related to zoning regulations/development criteria for each suite as allowed, required and actual, i.e., parking 20 required, proposed or actual 3 etc.. List the actual height of the existing building(s).

A.M. Section 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

12. COMMENT: Label the distance and bearings of the individual lots. Per the site plan it appears that a property line intersects building 218. (It is suggested that a tax parcel combo is done to create one individual tax code and one parcel.) If a tax parcel combo is not going to be pursued a Lot Combo Covenant will have to be recorded prior to Zoning's approval of the Development Package.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) are provided.

13. COMMENT: If applicable to the overall project, provide the information related to easements on the project site as noted by the standard above.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

14. COMMENT: Label the information as noted by the standard above.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements.

15. COMMENT: See similar comment 12 related to distance and bearings.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.B - Identify each block or lot by number within the subdivision boundary and include the approximate square footage of each, or a note may be provided stating that all lots comply with the minimum lot size requirements.

16. COMMENT: List the actual lot size as a zoning note under the development criteria section. The zoning review has been done based on multiple lots and uses, suites buildings etc. List the use for each address and clarify if the areas listed as suites are separate from the areas listed with addresses. If the suites are part of the addressed building state so and include the suite square footage with each associated building



A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

17. COMMENT: Label the existing adjacent zoning (C-3) along the east and west sides of the subject site.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation

A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

18. COMMENT: Label 4th and Hoff Avenues as public streets.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

19. COMMENT: It is clear that parking is not proposed anywhere on the site including the rear portion of the lot. Indicate if any vehicular activity is to occur within the rear of the site, such as a loading area for delivery of goods. If so the rear yard must be paved. If any parking spaces are proposed in the rear yard delineate and dimension the vehicular use area. The parking area must meet the design criteria in UDC Article 7 Section 7.4.6.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

20. COMMENT: Until it is clear what uses will be occupying the buildings or suites it is not known how many parking spaces are required. As of this review it is not clear how many spaces are required but if no parking is proposed a Board of Adjustment variance to delete the total number of parking spaces will be required. The parking calculations indicate a parking ratio of 1 per 300 SF for several of the suites but the actual or proposed uses are not listed. List the actual or proposed uses in order to verify that the correct ratios have been listed for the actual or proposed uses.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.H.5.b - If any of the required parking is located off-site as permitted by the UDC, a drawing of that parking area is to be provided, together with the city's required parking agreement (include a copy of the lease agreement if applicable) must be provided. Please remember that in these situations, if the off-site parking location is a new parking area, it must comply with all parking area requirements and must be allowed as a principal use by the zoning classification of that property. If the off-site parking area location is an existing parking lot, the parking spaces utilized for the proposed land use must be non-required parking for the existing use for which the parking area was established.

21. COMMENT: If offsite parking is proposed as noted by the standard above, provide the necessary documentation to verify compliance.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4.

22. COMMENT: It is clear per the plan that a loading zone is not proposed for the site. Based on the overall square footage of the bars (exceeds 5,000) one (1) type A loading is required. If a loading is not proposed a Board of Adjustment variance to delete the loading zone will be required.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

23. COMMENT: Add fully dimensioned detail drawings for the short and long term bicycle parking facilities. The facilities must be designed to comply with bicycle parking design criteria in UDC 7.4.9. Explain how the long term bicycle parking will be accessible to all employees of the suites in this development. Will the long term facilities be provided in all suites, will a specific area that is accessible by all employees be provided, etc?

Provide the 4th Avenue right of way information on the plan to verify the location of the short term bicycle parking and whether they are in the City R/W or on private property.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

24. COMMENT: If applicable draw, dimension and label the purpose of any proposed easement.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

25. COMMENT: Label the requested information as noted by the standard above.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

26. COMMENT: The pedestrian system must connect all areas of the site and out to the street sidewalks. Clearly depict on the plan how the pedestrian access from the rear suites is provided to Hoff avenue and 4th Avenue. The minimum width for a pedestrian sidewalk is four (4) feet.

Per the site plan, the 4th Avenue property line is depicted about 2 to 3 feet from the existing curb. Clarify if the City of Tucson has an easement over the property for the public sidewalk. If so provide the recordation information (dkt. / pg) and a copy of the recorded easement for review.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual.

27. COMMENT: See comment 26.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm.

28. COMMENT: Due to full code compliance, the refuse enclosure may have to be re-constructed to comply with the current technical standards. See the Engineering reviewer comments regarding the Refuse Enclosure requirements.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping.

29. COMMENT: Indicate on the plan how mail delivery is proposed. If mail is to be delivered internally to each individual suite, state so as a general note. If gang mailboxes are proposed draw and label the location on the site plan. The location of the gang mailboxes must not interfere with pedestrian, SVT, or bicycle parking facilities etc.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

30. COMMENT: If applicable to this project, draw and label the locations of any proposed free standing monument signs.

A.M. Section 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.

31. COMMENT: See the landscape reviewer comments related to landscape buffers and screening.

32. Comment: See redlines for additional info related to the review.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/10/2014 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed