Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP13-0252
Parcel: 12503019A

Address:
3035 E 5TH ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Permit Number - DP13-0252
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/16/2014 FDILLON1 DESIGN EXAMINER REVIEW Approved
10/16/2014 PGEHLEN1 OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed based on first review
10/16/2014 PGEHLEN1 UTILITIES EL PASO NATURAL GAS Passed based on first review
10/16/2014 JANE DUARTE COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Passed Based on first review.
10/16/2014 PGEHLEN1 UTILITIES CENTURYLINK Passed based on first review
10/16/2014 ROBERT YOUNG PIMA COUNTY PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW Passed Based on first review
10/16/2014 PGEHLEN1 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Passed based on first review.
10/16/2014 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Passed based on first review
10/16/2014 RONALD BROWN ADA REVIEW Passed
10/16/2014 PGEHLEN1 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed based on first review
10/16/2014 CPIERCE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
10/16/2014 PGEHLEN1 OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Passed based on first review
10/17/2014 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Reqs Change Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

BILL STAPLES
ASSESSOR



TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)


FROM: Ada Griffin
GIS Cartographer
Pima County Assessor's Office


DATE: October 17, 2014


RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding:

DP13-0252 THE RETREAT AT SAM HUGHES - TENTATIVE PLAT

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements.
___X___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements.

COMMENTS:


" PER OUR CONVERSATION: THE TITLE BLOCK MUST BE IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER ON FINAL PLAT.

" THERE MUST BE A SECTION TIE, WITH A BEARING AND DIMENSION FROM THE SECTION CORNER OR QUARTER CORNER TO THE POINT OF TIE ON THE SUBDIVISION.

" IT IS UNCLEAR TO US WHICH LINE IS THE PERIMETER BY THE MAPS PROVIDED (THE COVER SHEET AND/OR THE SITE PLAN) THE PERIMETER LINE MUST BE SOLID AND HEAVIEST LINE WEIGHT ON THE PLAT. THE LOT LINES AND COMMON AREA LINES MUST BE SOLID AND THE NEXT HEAVIEST. LINES FOR EROSION SETBACKS, FLOODPLAIN LINES ETC. SHOULD BE THE LIGHTEST LINE WEIGHT AND BE DASHED OR DOT-DASHED.

" WHEN HAND MAPPING OUT THE SUBDIVISION PERIMETER WITH OUR MAP OF RECORD, THE DIMENTIONS ARE NOT MATCHING.

" OWNERSHIP IS RETREAT IN SAM HUGHES LLC, PER DOCKET 13877 PAGE 18. PER PLAT, THE OWNERSHIP SHOWS LAYNE BOGULAS.



NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.
10/20/2014 PGEHLEN1 PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change 201 N. STONE AV, 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

ROBIN FREIMAN
ADDRESSING REVIEW
PH #: 724-9512

TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: ROBIN FREIMAN, ADDRESSING REVIEW
SUBJECT: DP13-0252 TENTATIVE PLAT THE RETREAT AT SAM HUGHES - 1ST REVIEW
DATE: October 20, 2014



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:
1. Sheet C1: Please remove bearing and distance from location map.
2. Sheet C1: Please remove Tucson Blvd as it is too confusing to be shown here.
3. Sheet C1: Are the dimensions shown for the ROW of Bentley Av?
4. Sheet C1: Move the abutter "Morning Side Annex #1" to the west side of the Bentley Av ROW.
5. Sheet C1 & C2: Please remove 6th St as it is too confusing to be shown here.
6. Sheet C1: Are the dimensions shown for the ROW of 5th St? If so, make dimension line solid.
7. Sheet C1 & C2: If dimension N00^24'49"W 475.09' is a tie distance to 6th St then extend the dimension line beyond the ROW of 5th St and clearly label as tie line to 6th St…otherwise, please remove this dimension.
8. Sheet C1: Jane Brook is an incorrect abutter. Abutter across 5th St is APN 125-01-098A Country Club Apartments LLC. Please show the abutter on the south side of 5th St ROW.
9. Sheet C1: Under "Owner" please add The Retreat In Sam Hughes, LLC.
10/22/2014 PGEHLEN1 UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Approved See documents in PRO
10/23/2014 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Approved
10/23/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Assuming single family residences with three bedrooms each, the sewer flow for the proposed private sewer collection system will be in excess of 3,000 gallons per day. The design for the system must be submitted to the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality for their approval prior to obtaining a permit for constructing the sewage collection system from the City of Tucson. Reference A. R. S. 49-104 (B) (13).
2. Private sewer collection systems designed per the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality will require manholes. Where the finish floor elevation is less than 12 inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole or cleanout in the public sewer or private sewer collection system, a backwater valve shall be installed in the building drain or branch of the building drain serving that floor. Floors discharging from above that reference point shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
3. The first floor elevations (FFE) for lots 7 through 12 on sheet C3 are different form those shown on sheet C5; coordinate the designs.
10/28/2014 PGEHLEN1 POLICE REVIEW Approved I have no issues with this request.



>>> DSD_CDRC 10/16/2014 10:23 AM >>>

EVEN THOUGH THIS IS AN OLD NUMBER THIS IS A COMPLETELY NEW LAYOUT AND WE ARE TREATING THIS AS THE FIRST REVIEW.





Dear Reviewers:



This is an electronic distribution for a CDRC Tentative Plat review. If you normally receive paper copies of the review documents, you will receive them soon.



The applicable case numbers are:



CDRC Development Plan: DP13-0252

Existing and Proposed Zoning: r-1

Proposed Use: Residential Subdivision

Due Date: October 29, 2014

Electronic Documents may be found at the following link: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO/Command?mode=permit&firstTime=true&number_key=DP13-0252&command=InitialProcess
10/29/2014 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Reqs Change October 27, 2014, 2006
ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP13-0252
PROJECT NAME: The Retreat at Sam Hughes
PROJECT ADDRESS: 3035 E 5th Street Tucson Arizona
PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer

Resubmittal Required: TDOT does not recommend approval of the Subdiv/FLD therefore a revised plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.


1. Along -5th Street- ensure that all existing signs that are affected by the off-site improvements and are applicable to the roadway remain in place or relocated to an appropriate location. If damaged or unsuitable for reuse then replace with new sign and/or post.

2. Existing light poles may be impacted with the installation of the proposed development. If applicable, relocate the light pole and provide confirmation from Ernie Encinas electric Shop 791-3191 that the new location is acceptable to the city.

Corner of 5th Street and Bently Avenue the pole is in the middle of required ADA Accessible Ramp.
Alley Driveway at country Club will require 25 foot Curb Return Radius. Pole may be impacted.
Poles in the alley way may be impacted. The alley must be 20 feet clear. Poles seem to encroach in alleyway. Relocate poles to keep 20 feet clear in alley.

3. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-03.2.4.M). If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future.

4. This plan does not seem to take into account the future intersection widening on 6th Street and Country club in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes plan. Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the intersection widening for Country Club to 6th Street per the MS&R Map.


5. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved tentative plat is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact Permits and Codes for additional PIA information at 791-4259.


6. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-05.2.2.D)

7. The access points on country Club Road shall have 25' radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6)

8. Driveway from alley to Country club shall not exceed a 2% cross slope for wheelchair access.


9. AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the
Minimum 6-foot width requirement for the sidewalk within the right-of-ways of Country Club Road. For the existing 4-foot sidewalk width along Country Club Road verify conformance with handicap accessibility and if the sidewalk is in acceptable condition then per TSM Sec.10-01.4.1.A.1.c where sidewalks are less than five feet in width, passing spaces at least five feet by five feet will be located at reasonable intervals not to exceed 200 feet.

10. Show ADA Accessible Ramps on all corners of the development along the roadway/sidewalks.

11. Driveways need a minimum of 19 feet to garage vehicles should not block sidewalk. Please dimension

12. 20 feet clear, and constructed to City standards,is required on alley. It appears that utilities are located within the pavement area.

13. Show separation on Drives on lots 11&12.

14. No on street parking on 5th street due to drives too close to each other

15. 15 foot sight visibility triangles for drives on 5th, 20 feet elsewhere.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov
10/29/2014 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Reqs Change SUBJECT: The Retreat at Sam Hughes – DEVELOPMENT PLAN/TENTATIVE PLAT

DP13-0252



Tucson Electric Power Co. (TEP) has reviewed the Development Plan/Tentative Plat submitted for review on October 16, 2014 and is unable to approve the plat at this time. A new electrical design for the revised development must be completed by our Area Designer and easements for electrical facilities shown on the plat prior to TEP’s approval.



Please provide a pdf copy of the revised development to mburke@tep.com along with an AutoCAD file of the revised development so that we may update our database and provide a new design.



If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 917-8744.



Thank you,



Mary Burke

Right of Way Agent

Tucson Electric Power Co.

Mail Stop HQW603

PO Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702

Office - 520-917-8744

Cell - 520-401-9895

mburke@tep.com
10/29/2014 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Michael St Paul
Planning Technician

PROJECT: DP13-0252
3035 East 5th Street
Residential Subdivision R-1 zone FLD Option B

TRANSMITTAL DATE:

DUE DATE:

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code, The Administrative and Technical Manuals were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is .

2. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.1.1 PURPOSE
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property.

This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes.

2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY
This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review.

2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided.
The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application:

2-06.2.1 Application Form
A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee;

2-06.2.2 Development Package
A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein;

2-06.2.3 Related Reviews
In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the;

2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and,

2-06.2.5 Fees
Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.1 - Each sheet shall measure 24 inches by 36 inches and include a minimum one inch margin on left side and one-half inch margin on all other sides to facilitate efficient record keeping. A larger sheet format may be used with the approval of the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD).

2-06.3.2 - All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for record-keeping purposes. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. Smaller scales (60:1 or greater) may be used for some or all of the sheets with the prior approval of PDSD when it is determined legibility and the ability to be digitized and/or reduced for archiving will not be affected.
2-06.3.3 - All lettering and text (upper or lower case), and numbering, shall be a minimum of three-thirty-seconds inches in height to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for archiving.

2-06.3.4 - A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet.

1) COMMENT: See comments three and four.

2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet.

2) COMMENT: The sheet numbering system must be continuous for the entire set. You may include two numbering systems and provide that information in the sheet index. (See comment six.)

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

3) COMMENT: Revise the brief legal description to include the additional right-of-way to be added to the subdivision and the excluded spandrel and Country Club Road. See the Assessor's legal description for the parcel. This information should be in the title block of each sheet.

2-06.4.2.C - The number of proposed lots and common areas are to be noted. If the subdivision is a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), a condominium, or a similar type of residential subdivision utilizing special provisions of the UDC, it shall be so noted;

4) COMMENT: State that the proposed subdivision is as Flexible Lot Development (FLD) in the title block.

2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

5) COMMENT: Revise or simply add a continuous page numbering system to all the sheet and include that numbering in the sheet index on the cover sheet. (See comment two.)

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.7 - If the property is part of a subdivision plat that is being reviewed or has been recorded, provide the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note, indicate whether the project is part of a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), condominium, or another similar type project.

6) COMMENT: Add the note that this is a Flexible Lot Development (FLD) in the general notes.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.C - Streets and Roads Notes

2-06.4.7.E.2.b - "A property owners' association will be formed to accept responsibility and liability for construction, maintenance, operation, and control of all private sewers." (This applies only if there is more than one lot within the development.)

If no homeowners' association is being formed, use the following note: "Maintenance and operation of the private sanitary sewer to its point of connection to the public sanitary sewer is the responsibility of each and every property owner within this development."

7) COMMENT: State how the private sewer and roadway are to be maintained for this subdivision.

2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

8) COMMENT: The subdivision as presented shall need the acquisition of public right-of-way (ROW). Present the recording documents when the purchase has been completed. The recording documents and legal descriptions shall be required for the approval of the subdivision plans.

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

9) COMMENT: Be certain to provide all existing easement information on the plans.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.C - If the project has common areas, label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association, or any common area that is separated by a public right-of-way.

10) COMMENT: Delineate as described above, if there are to be any common areas.

2-06.4.9.H.7 - If streets are proposed, indicate if they are designed for on-street parking to accommodate visitor parking or if parking is provided in common parking areas. Visitor parking is to be evenly distributed and usable by all residents of the project. Extra parking on individual lots, such as tandem parking in driveways, does not count toward visitor parking, as it is not available to other property owners within the project. Design criteria for streets are located in Technical Standards Manual Section 10-01.0.0.
Streets designed at the minimum width, without on-street parking, need clearance for access to all homes by life safety vehicles and, where no alleys are provided, by refuse collection vehicles. If motor vehicles are parked along streets that are not designed to allow for parking, life safety services will be inhibited and, in many situations, blocked.

11) COMMENT: The required visitor parking is not adequately provided for on the proposed private street, nor are there enough parallel parking spaces between driveways for guest parking along 5th Street. "Local streets must be designed with parking on both sides of the street, unless parking is provided in common areas distributed throughout the subdivision, at a ratio or one parking apace per dwelling within the subdivision" (TSM 10.01.2.4.D). The required guest parking is not the same as the required parking or access for each residence in a subdivision that must be on the lot (UDC Section 7.4.4.B; Table 7.4.4-1).


12) COMMENT: The twelve lot subdivision plan, as presented, proposes the use of the alley to the north as vehicle access to six of the lots. "An alley abutting an existing development shall not be used for parking access" (UDC Section 8.7.3.I Parking. 2). A Board of Adjustment application, process and approval shall be required to use the alley to the north of this proposed subdivision for vehicle access to the north lots.

Also see "Acceptable Types of Access" (UDC Section 7.8.3):

A. Public street access, which is ingress-egress to a parcel provided by an abutting public street.
B. Private street access, which is ingress-egress to a parcel provided by an abutting private street in which the owner of the parcel has a legal interest to assure perpetual use for access.
C. Access easement, which is ingress-egress to a parcel provided over some other parcel through an area dedicated for such perpetual use.


"An alley, when used for access, must be a minimum of 20 feet wide, free of obstructions, and surfaced with a dust control method that is acceptable to the TDOT City Engineer" (UDC Section 7.4.6.K.2). The proposed alley access does not appear to allow for the trash containers and other obstructions in the existing alley.

2-06.4.9.K - Identify and provide dimensions, approximate areas in square footage, and purposes of any lots proposed for dedication (such as open spaces, recreation areas, or natural areas) or for reservation for a public use (such as public parks, water facilities, or school sites).

13) COMMENT: It appears that open space shall be required for this FLD. Identify and provide as described above.

2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

14) COMMENT: Be certain to provide any proposed easements.


2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

15) COMMENT: Dimension the driveway setbacks and the proposed building setbacks.

2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.

16) COMMENT: See comments by the landscape review section.

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS)

2-06.5.1 Site Plan Required
FLDs not proposing to subdivide the project site must prepare a site plan in accordance with Section 2-06.0.0, Development Package, including Section 2-06.5.3, Additional Information;

2-06.5.2 Tentative Plat Required
An FLD proposing to subdivide the project site into two or more lots must prepare a tentative plat. Tentative plats for FLDs must be prepared in accordance with Section 2-06.0.0, Development Package, including Section 2-06.5.3, Additional Information, and the following developable area information:

2-06.5.3 Additional Information
The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable:

2-06.5.3.B - Maximum Density Option
Applicants requesting a Maximum Density Option in accordance with Section 8.7.3.C.3.b must demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria by written report or on the plat or site plan, whichever is appropriate;

17) COMMENT: This FLD includes the Maximum Density Option (Option B). This subdivision meets the requirement for allowing this option due to its location adjacent to Country Club Road, a Major Street in the City's Central Core (UDC Section 8.7.3.C.3.b(6)).

2-06.5.3.C - Functional Open Space
Delineate the boundaries of the proposed functional open space on the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable. Provide, by note on the plat, the required and proposed functional open space calculations;

18) COMMENT: Functional open space shall be required. Delineate the boundaries of the functional open space as described above (2-06.5.3.C). Provide the functional open space requirements in the Unified Development Code (UDC Sections 8.7.3.F.1.a through .f and 8.7.3.F.2.a, .c & .d). This site does not appear to meet the exceptions for being within a quarter of a mile of a City park of at least fifteen acres (UDC Section 8.7.3.F.g (1)).

2-06.5.3.D - Building Elevations
Provide dimensioned building elevations of all proposed units. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. The model home construction plans will be used to determine exact setbacks and screening requirements at the time of application for building permits;

19) COMMENT: Provide the building elevations as described above (2-06.5.3.D).

2-06.5.3.G - Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions

2-06.5.3.G.1 - Provide three copies of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) regarding the homeowner's association's responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly-owned property.

20) COMMENT: If there is to be a common area, provide the CC&Rs as defined above (2-06.5.3.G.1).

2-06.5.3.G.2 - Provide two copies of the protective covenants or common use agreements for any shared areas being established by easements over individually-owned property.

21) COMMENT: If there are shared areas, provide the CC&Rs as defined above (2-06.5.3.G.2).


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Michael St. Paul, (520) 837-4959.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents.
10/29/2014 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change UDC 7.6.4.C.2.b.(3) The landscape borders must be recorded as common area and maintained by the homeowners association (HOA) for the subdivision. The subdivision CC&Rs shall reference and require compliance with the maintenance standards in Section 7.6.8, Maintenance. The PDSD Director may allow the recording of a public use easement with the subdivision plat in cases where the standards of this section are the only reason for the creation of an HOA. The public use easement shall require the abutting property owner to install and maintain a landscape border in accordance with the standards in this section.



UDC 7.6.4.C.2. The Country Club Rd street landscape border must be a minimum of ten feet wide as measured from the street property line.



UDC 7.6.4.F. Provide documentation of approval of any proposed landscaping elements in the public right of way.


will post soon
10/29/2014 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Reqs Change October 27, 2014, 2006
ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP13-0252
PROJECT NAME: The Retreat at Sam Hughes
PROJECT ADDRESS: 3035 E 5th Street Tucson Arizona
PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer

Resubmittal Required: TDOT does not recommend approval of the Subdiv/FLD therefore a revised plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.


1. Along -5th Street- ensure that all existing signs that are affected by the off-site improvements and are applicable to the roadway remain in place or relocated to an appropriate location. If damaged or unsuitable for reuse then replace with new sign and/or post.

2. Existing light poles may be impacted with the installation of the proposed development. If applicable, relocate the light pole and provide confirmation from Ernie Encinas electric Shop 791-3191 that the new location is acceptable to the city.

Corner of 5th Street and Bently Avenue the pole is in the middle of required ADA Accessible Ramp.
Alley Driveway at country Club will require 25 foot Curb Return Radius. Pole may be impacted.
Poles in the alley way may be impacted. The alley must be 20 feet clear. Poles seem to encroach in alleyway. Relocate poles to keep 20 feet clear in alley.

3. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-03.2.4.M). If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future.

4. This plan does not seem to take into account the future intersection widening on 6th Street and Country club in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes plan. Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the intersection widening for Country Club to 6th Street per the MS&R Map.


5. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved tentative plat is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact Permits and Codes for additional PIA information at 791-4259.


6. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-05.2.2.D)

7. The access points on country Club Road shall have 25' radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6)

8. Driveway from alley to Country club shall not exceed a 2% cross slope for wheelchair access.


9. AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the
Minimum 6-foot width requirement for the sidewalk within the right-of-ways of Country Club Road. For the existing 4-foot sidewalk width along Country Club Road verify conformance with handicap accessibility and if the sidewalk is in acceptable condition then per TSM Sec.10-01.4.1.A.1.c where sidewalks are less than five feet in width, passing spaces at least five feet by five feet will be located at reasonable intervals not to exceed 200 feet.

10. Show ADA Accessible Ramps on all corners of the development along the roadway/sidewalks.

11. Driveways need a minimum of 19 feet to garage vehicles should not block sidewalk. Please dimension

12. 20 feet clear, and constructed to City standards,is required on alley. It appears that utilities are located within the pavement area.

13. Show separation on Drives on lots 11&12.

14. No on street parking on 5th street due to drives too close to each other

15. 15 foot sight visibility triangles for drives on 5th, 20 feet elsewhere.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov
10/30/2014 PGEHLEN1 ENV SVCS REVIEW Approv-Cond Hello Patricia,

ES has no objections to the request for alley collection in the form of 2/300gal. APC's for both refuse and recycle service. These will serve lots 1-6. Keynote 23 should be corrected to reflect "lots 1-6".

Let me know if you still need me to attend the meeting scheduled on 10/29.

Thanks,
Andy
10/30/2014 ELIZABETH LEIBOLD ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: October 29, 2014
TO: Ken Perry, P.E.
SUBJECT: The Retreat in Sam Hughes Development Package Resubmittal Review
LOCATION: T14S, R15E, Section 08
REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold P.E.
ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP13-0252

Summary: Engineering Division has reviewed the submitted development package including a copy of the revised design on site & grading plan sheets, Drainage Report, & SWPPP. Engineering does not recommend approval or the project until remaining comments are addressed.

MASTER COVER SHEETS/ GENERAL NOTES/DRAINAGE/GRADING/SITE SHEETS COMMENTS:
1) UDC Sec.7.5.4(b), Admin Man Secs.4.9.I, 2-06.4.8.C, 4.9.H.4, Tech Man Sec.10-01.5.1.A: On Site Plan sheet, address the following comments:
a. On Bentley and Country Club from alley, revise existing SVT's on site plan and label dimensions for both future and existing SVT's on planview using AASHTO 15-ft leg SVT's from EOP as discussed in previous meetings.
b. Admin Manual Sec.2-06.4.8: Label on site plan sheet or in drainage exhibit, existing curb type in street along both sides of Bentley Avenue and west side of Country Club, and north side of 5th Street.
c. 20-ft clear/unobstructed paved ROW is needed for north alley.
2) UDC 8.4.3.B.6, Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9.N.4, Admin Man Sec.2-06.4.9.M, Tech Man Sec.2-01.4.F.b: Drainage Report needs to meet minimum standards per City Drainage Manual and Detention Retention Manual. Address the remaining comments:
a. Admin Man Sec.4.9.O, Tech Man Sec.2-01.9, Tech Man Sec.4-04.1.5, 4-04.2.3.1.4.C.5: Sufficient building setback lines shall be shown that minimizes issues for maintenance access and drainage function between proposed buildings. IBC Code 2012 sec.1804.3 requires 5% at 10-ft away from structure; if less, provide geotechnical engineering statement confirming smaller setback between structures.
b. Tech Man Sec.4-04.1.5.1: For this project, private maintenance should be established for drainage/landscaping/roadway maintenance, as the drainageway is proposed on more than one lot. A Homeowners' Association shall be established for this subdivision in order to create the authority and responsibility for maintaining constructed channels within the subdivision. Add verbiage for maintenance in general notes section regarding maintenance requirements of the HOA; see section 4-04.14.3.
c. Tech Man Sec.4-04.1.5.1: Regarding maintenance of drainageways, the City of Tucson will require that the proposed drainageway be encumbered by a public flowage easement, on top of the private drainage maintenance easement. The flowage easement shall not give the City maintenance responsibility, but shall give the City the right to allow drainage water to flow freely (ie., unobstructed) through the drainageway. Therefore, if necessary, the City shall have the right, by easement, to order the drainageway cleaned or repaired by the responsible entity. The flowage easement shall also give the City the right, should the required maintenance not be performed in a timely manner, to perform the maintenance and be reimbursed by the responsible entity.
d. Label flow limits and surface spot elevations & grades within drainage easement.
3) Tech Man Sec.11-01.4: Assure that there are no easement conflicts per title report. Show all easements including those listed on the Schedule B of title report, label with Book/page or Docket/page, and/or list as a blanket easement, and/or label with accurate dimensions and bearings on the plan. Provide statement that the proposed project has no conflicts with any existing easements.

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Package including revised Site & Grading Plan sheets, revised Drainage Report, SWPPP reports, copy of title report, geotechnical report, and response letter. Address redlines and comments. I can be reached at 837-4934 if you have questions.

Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM
Civil Engineer
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
City of Tucson
will post soon
11/04/2014 PGEHLEN1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change 1. Fire would like to see elevations that would indicate the location of the sleeping rooms. These rooms require Emergency Escape and Rescue openings per IFC Section 1029. IFC Section 504.1 requires emergency access to these openings. The elevations would indicate if the sleeping room windows are located on the exterior walls and if TFD would have enough width between buildings to ladder the buildings to gain access to the windows for a rescue.

2. TFD will accept the location of the existing fire hydrants for this project.

3. TFD requires an approved fire department turnaround for the private drive because it is a dead end. This is required per IFC Section 503.2.5. This requirement will be removed if the alley is constructed for fire department access with a minimum width of 20 foot wide (unobstructed) and to a clear height of 15 feet per IFC Section 503. This alley way would also need to be marked "NO PARKING-FIRE LANE" per IFC 503.3. The requirement for the turnaround and the improvements to the alley can be removed if the road was not a dead end. The private road will need to be marked as "NO-PARKING FIRE LANE" on one side per Section 503.2.5 of the IFC.

Please use the above comments for this review based on the plans submitted.

Ken Brouillette CFM
Fire Code Administrator
Tucson Fire Department
11/04/2014 FRODRIG2 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required: Please resubmit the following items:

1) 4 rolled sets of the plans
2) A disk containing all items submitted
3) All items requested by review staff
4) All items needed to approve this plan
11/04/2014 FRODRIG2 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change November 24, 2014

The Retreat at Sam Hughes

Processes required prior to approval

TDOT

" Petition to change alley from two-way to one-way west bound
" Have "no-parking" signs removed from 5th Street ROW
" Complete purchase of excess ROW along 5th Street and Bentley Avenue

Fire

" Lots 4 and 5 will be sprinklered


Planning and Development Services Department

" BofA Variance for the width of the alley (UDC 7.4.6.K.2) and access (UDC 8.7.3.I)
" Not all setbacks were dimensioned on the tentative plat. Setbacks must be verified prior to variance application
" BofA Variance needed because the landscape buffer along Country Club is entirely in the ROW (UDC 7.6.4.C.2.c)
" Prior to submittal of the variance need to verify sufficient quest parking along 5th Street
" Elevations are need to ensure setbacks and fire access for ladders,

Various

" A TSMR will be needed for various items. The width of the proposed street does not meet minimum width requirement but staff will support the TSMR for the street width.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/07/2014 AROMERO4 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed