Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - DP13-0247
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/14/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 3200 W. Starr Galaxy Dr. DP13-0247 Grading Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 14, 2014 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until approved by Engineering. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 01/16/2014 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Tim Robertson, R.A. SUBJECT: 3200 W Starr Galaxy Dr, Grading Plan Review LOCATION: Wildcat Pass S02-008 - lot 57, Sec 20, T14S, R13E REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold P.E. FLOODPLAIN INFO: 2360 L X unshaded, local jurisdictional floodplain at N side of lot ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP13-0247 (grading), T13OT01461 (floodplain), T13CM07476 (bldg) Summary: Engineering Division has reviewed the development package including a copy of the grading plan. Engineering does not recommend approval of the plan until the ERR-W.A.S.H. Report is approved and the following comments are addressed. GRADING/FLOODPLAIN COMMENTS: 1) Admin Manual Sec.2-06.4.8.B: Information within the lot boundary should be shown and labeled, including dimensions and bearings of lot boundary (per sheet 7 of Final Plat), floodplain limits (per sheet 2 of Final Plat), EHS (per sheet 7 of Final Plat), W.A.SH. Ordinance Study Area limits (per Tentative Plat sheet 7 & administrative directive documents), and all easements (per sheet 7 of Final Plat). See attachment and link: http://tdotmaps.transview.org/mandr/MP/MPSelect.cfm?bkpg=59041 2) Tucson Code Chapter 29 Article VIII sections 29-13 & 29-15(b)(1), Tech Manual Sec.4-02.2.2.B: Cholla Wash is a W.A.S.H. Ordinance watercourse and is subject to W.A.S.H. Ordinance review per administrative directive 28MAR05 and this section of Tucson Code. Show W.A.S.H. Study Area on lot planview and submit ERR-W.A.S.H. Report under a separate review. Please note this review is a separate process and there is neighborhood notification that takes 30-45 days to complete. For W.A.S.H. Ordinance (Tucson Code Chapter 29 Article VIII) compliance, follow the outline of the elements listed under the Tucson Code Section 29-15(b)(1). Per this section, your W.A.S.H. Ordinance report should provide complete discussions regarding any effects on hydrology and hydraulics to the 50-foot Study Area due to the elements that are outlined in section 29-15(b)(1) a through i. In order to easily review the report each of these sections a through i can be addressed separately by section letter. There should be an objectives and/or summary section in the report discussing how the proposed project meets the purpose and intent of the W.A.S.H. Ordinance and ERR standards. See Tucson Code Sec.29-12(a) through (d). See Tech Man Sec.4-02 for additional report format. 3) Tech Manual Sec.2-01.4.1.D: Provide copy of soils report - geotechnical engineer should provide acceptance for stability of proposed 1:1 (H:V) slopes. 4) Tech Manual Sec.2-01.4.1.C.4: Clarify the following grading comments: i) Show on planview and with notes how the proposed retaining system is to be constructed without disturbance beyond grading limits. ii) Label spot elevations providing top of wall and bottom finished grade elevations for retaining system. iii) Show proposed spot elevations along south building pad area and driveway to assure positive gradient around structure. iv) Tech Man Sec.2-01.9.2: Show setbacks (minimum 2-ft) at east and west pad grading area from disturbance limits to property line. v) Show utility lines on planview (gas/water/electric). vi) East proposed grading area does not show cut conditions proposed per topography and proposed contour grades. Revise grading/disturbance limits to include cut slopes. vii) Consider any need for a revised disturbance limits to provide sufficient staging area. Please be aware that if construction disturbance exceeds approved plans, Inspector may issue Stop Work Order or request revised grading plan. 5) Address the following comments regarding the notes: i) Update Grading Note 2 to reflect current grading standard reference; replace "DS Sec11-01" with "Technical Standards Manual 2-01.0" ii) Complete General Site Note 1. iii) Revise General Site Note 4 to reference City of Tucson Hillside Development Zone regulations and grading standards 2-01.0. iv) General Site Note 7: Reference soils / geotechnical report(s) / addenda for lot and/or subdivision. Address redline comments and return redlines with resubmittal. Expedited counter review may be requested for Engineering review at resubmittal. I can be reached at 837-4934 if you have questions. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department City of Tucson |
| 01/28/2014 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Each lot within Wildcat Pass must submit a separate NPPO plan per approved tentative plat Case # S02-008 2. The NPPO shall include an inventory and analysis of all plants listed as Federal Endangered Species, all Saguaros, and all Ironwoods designated as Protected Native Plants according to 7.7.5. PLANT PRESERVATION STANDARDS. Preservation and mitigation requirements for these genus and species shall conform to 7.7. NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION. The NPPO plan prepared shall Including an aerial photograph, taken in minimum scale of 1" = 60'. Place NPP / landscape mitigation table, and aerial photograph on separate sheet measuring at least 24" x 36" indicating scale with the following information: Location(s) of NUOS area if applicable Fencing requirements as specified in UDC 7.7.5. PLANT PRESERVATION STANDARDS Add the following Fencing Standards All Protected Native Plants designated by the approved Native Plant Preservation Plan to be preserved-in-place and all areas designated to remain undisturbed or as NUOS must be fenced off in accordance with Section 7.7.5.C.4, Fencing Standard. No plants may be salvaged from within fenced areas per this section. Fencing must remain in place for the duration of construction activities. 3. Plant Nondisturbance Area All plants designated by the approved Native Plant Preservation Plan to be preserved-in-place must be retained at their existing grade during and after construction for a distance as outlined in Section 7.7.5.C.4, Fencing Standards. 4. Fencing Standards a. Fencing is required during construction for all undisturbed natural desert areas of Protected Native Plants and for individual Protected Native Plants to be preserved-in-place. The area to be fenced must be beyond the "drip-line" of the vegetation by one-half the distance of the "drip-line" radius. For Saguaros and cacti, the area to be fenced must be equal to the distance of one-half the height of the plant. The preservation of a substantial portion of the root system for either undisturbed natural desert areas of Protected Native Plants or individual Protected Native Plants preserved-in-place will improve the survival rate and health of these plants as well as preserve a portion of their associated plant community. Grading and construction that encroaches into the required root zone may be allowed on a case-by-case basis as determined by an inspector with the Planning and Development Services Department depending upon the size and species of the Native Plant. Under no circumstances may grading encroach to the base or trunk of a Native Plant. b. The site developer must include language in all contracts with contractors about the importance of staying out of all undisturbed natural desert areas and away from all individual Protected Native Plants to be preserved-in-place. 5. On-Site Monitoring On-site monitoring of all aspects of site clearing, grading, plant protection, preservation, salvage, and mitigation must be provided during project construction at the expense of the developer for all residential development that is over five acres and for all commercial and industrial development that is over one acre. The monitoring must be performed by an individual who is qualified in arid lands native plant resource identification and protection as specified in Section 7.7.4.D, Professional Expertise. The monitor must provide periodic progress reports to the developer outlining the status of work accomplished and any problems encountered. A copy of these reports must be submitted to the PDSD for the project file. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/29/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |