Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - - 1ST
Permit Number - DP13-0232
Review Name: REVISION - - 1ST
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/09/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Central Tucson Des Office Development Package (1st Revision) DP13-0232 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 9, 2014 DUE DATE: May 22, 2014 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 1. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4.c A minimum distance of three (feet must be provided between the back of spur and any wall, screen, or other obstruction over six inches in height. That said provide a dimension at the north end of the proposed the PAALs, three (3) locations, between the back of spur and the proposed screen wall/fence. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 2. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said at the northern most, east side, proposed vehicle parking area, there are two (2) areas that appear to be headers, not curbing. Some type of barrier is required to prevent parking vehicles from damaging the proposed wall/fence. 3. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.6.D.2.b Minimum Width Requirement When Adjacent to Barrier. A motor vehicle off-street parking space must have a minimum width of ten feet when the side(s) of the parking space abuts a vertical barrier over six inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport. That said provide a dimension from the proposed wall/fence to the vehicle parking spaces located at the northeast corner of the proposed northern most parking area. 4. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b Access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least two feet from a wall, screen, or other obstruction over six inches. The additional area is necessary to provide clearance for fire, sanitation, and delivery vehicles. That said provide a setback dimension from the PAAL to the wall/fence at the northern end of the proposed parking area. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. . |
| 05/09/2014 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Per Ken Brouillette's comments during initial review ALL FIRE HYDRANTS AND WATER LINES ARE REQUIRED TO BE PUBLIC AND NOT PRIVATE PER THE ADOPTED FIRE CODE |
| 05/12/2014 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/12/2014 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. 5' wall is required along east property line to screen vehicle use area from residential zoned property. Screening Materials Walls All walls required by this section must be of masonry material or masonry with a stucco or textured finish. Decorative openings may be incorporated into the upper 20% of an otherwise solid masonry wall located along a street frontage. Proposed revision indicates a 5' high wrought iron fence with 30" vegetative screen. This is not an acceptable substitution. Variance is required. Include on the lower right hand corner of all plans the variance case number and any conditions imposed. |
| 05/14/2014 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/19/2014 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 05/19/2014, SUBJECT: Central Tucson DES Office DP13-0232, T14S, R14E, SECTION 22 RECEIVED: Development Plan Package and Drainage Report on May 08, 2014 The subject project has been reviewed. The revised Drainage Report is acceptable and it is hereby approved. The revised Development Package is recommended for a conditional approval pertaining to Engineering and Floodplain Review subject to the following: " Submit a written and notarized verification that any proposed drainage solution, which occur outside the boundaries of the development area, are conducted with adjacent owner's permission (A.M. 2-06.4.9N.5). If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4933 or Laith.Alshami@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/13/2014 | SHANAE POWELL | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 06/13/2014 | SHANAE POWELL | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 06/13/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |