Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: DP13-0222
Parcel: 13615040B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP13-0222
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/12/2013 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
11/14/2013 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Cope Behavioral Health Services - 8050 E. Lakeside Pkwy.
Development Package (1st Review)
DP13-0222

TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 14, 2013

DUE DATE: December 10, 2013

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 09, 2014

This development package was reviewed for full code compliance for the areas of building expansion changes to the site only.

2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

COMMENT: Provide the development package approval stamp on all sheets. This stamp can be found at http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

1. COMMENT: Provide a brief legal description within the title block.

2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

2. COMMENT: Provide the "Sheet 1 of 1" on all sheets of the development package.

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

3. COMMENT: The address shown within the title block needs to be removed from the title block and placed adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

4. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP-0222, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

5. COMMENT: Provide a location map that covers approximately one square mile, and is drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile.

2-06.4.2.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

6. COMMENT: Label the section corners on the location map and provide the scale.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

7. COMMENT: The proposed use shown under "CODE TABULATIONS:" does not appear to be correct. Based on the floor plans, T13CM06788, there are "EXAM" rooms, "VITALS" rooms shown. It appears to be a medical services outpatient use. Clarify what the proposed use is and if you wish to call it office you will need to provide a letter from the Zoning Administrator clarifying what the use is.

8. COMMENT: Both the Administrative and Professional Office use and Medical Services Outpatient use have Use Specific Standards that should be listed on the plan.

9. COMMENT: Under General Notes A.3 the existing use shown "BUSINESS". Business is not defined use in the UDC. Remove the use business from the note and provide a use listed in the UDC.

2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

10. COMMENT: Provide the floor area for all buildings on this site. This site includes the apartments to the east.

2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage;

11. COMMENT: Remove the reference to "F.A.R CALCULATION" from the plan as it is no longer applicable.

2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and,

12. COMMENT: Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan.

2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met.

13. COMMENT: This applies to comments 10 & 12 above.

14. COMMENT: This development package should show the apartments to the east.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way (ROW) width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

15. COMMENT: Provide the ROW width and width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles (SVTs). On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

16. COMMENT: Show the SVTs on the plan.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

17. COMMENT: Until comment 7 above has been addressed the number of required vehicle parking spaces cannot be verified.

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

18. COMMENT: Until comment 7 above has been addressed the number of required short & long term parking spaces cannot be verified.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
.
11/18/2013 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: November 18, 2013
SUBJECT: COPE Behavioral Development Plan Package- Engineering Review
TO: Carhuff + Cueva Architects; Attn: Philip Carhuff, AIA
LOCATION: 8050 E Lakeside Pkwy; T14S R15E Sec28
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP13-0222

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the following link for further clarification:
http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

The following items need to be addressed:

SITE PLAN:

1) AM Sec.2-06.3.5: Revise the development plan document to include the approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. The link to the stamp can be found here: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp

2) AM Sec.2-06.4.2.B: Revise the development plan document and Title Block to include a brief legal description of the property and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat.

3) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant Development Plan Package case number (DP13-0222) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan sheet.

4) AM Sec.2-06.4.4.C: Revise the development plan document and project location map to label the sections corners, scale and have it cover approximately one square mile. Standard scale is 3"=1 mile for a location map.

5) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.C: Revise the development plan document to dimension the existing width of the public right-of-way in plan view. Provide right-of-way (ROW) width, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. Label Lakeside Parkway as "Public."

6) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Revise the development plan document to label and dimension the existing SVTs for the driveway entrance. PAALs to Local road require a 20'x185' near side and a 20'x110' far side SVT.

7) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Provide a recorded copy of a cross access/parking agreement for the existing development. It appears that a portion of the PAAL and parking spaces are located along the existing property line.

8) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project.

9) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Clarify on the development plan document the shown location of the existing refuse enclosures. Per the aerial view of the property it appears that the enclosure area shown on the development plan documents differs from ground location and area approach. It also appears that the existing onsite refuse enclosure locations differ from the last approved site plan that was provided. Provide an approved site plan showing the accurate location approval or provide a revised development plan document that matches the last approved site plan for the 4 refuse enclosure locations to be constructed under this permit. Verify that the details meet the minimum details as shown in TSM Sec.8-01.

GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Depending on how the Zoning Comments are addressed further comments may be forth coming on the 2nd submittal. This review was not reviewed for full code compliance however that may change with the new calculations per Zoning comments.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
11/25/2013 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Denied 1. With a total of 54 parking spaces provided, Table 1106.1 requires 3 accessible spaces be provide with one of those 3 being a Van Accessible parking. Please redesign your accessible parking layout and resubmit.
a. Provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking showing all accessible requirements such as markings, slope, aisles, ramps as required, accessible route, van accessible parking spaces, curbs, signage and signage location.
b. Provide a large scale detail of the signage showing van accessible signage also.
2. Insure all slopes of new accesssible routes comply wit ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% max running and 2% cross slopes.
END OF REVIEW
12/04/2013 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approved
12/04/2013 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
12/04/2013 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/04/2013 SHANAE POWELL OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed