Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP13-0221
Parcel: 12314126D

Address:
711 E LESTER ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP13-0221
Review Name: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/26/2014 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 1ST Lester Homes
Development Package (2nd Review)
D13-0221

TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 26, 2014

DUE DATE: April 16, 2014

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 07, 2013 .

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

1. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.d A single rack is designed and located to accommodate two bicycles. That said the bicycle parking space calculation should show six (6) provided.

2. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.f and Figure 7.4.9-C Each required short-term bicycle parking space must be at least two feet by six feet or four (4) clear between bicycle racks. Zoning recommends that you go to a single inverted "U" that provides for two (2) bicycles.

Once the above comments have been addressed zoning is willing to provide an over-the-counter review. Please call or email to schedule and appointment for this review.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
03/26/2014 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: March 26, 2014
SUBJECT: 1st Lester Homes Development Plan Package- 2nd Engineering Review
TO: Oracle Engineering Group, LLC; Attn: Peter Salonga. PE
LOCATION: 711 E Lester St; T14S R14E Sec06
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP13-0221

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package and Storm Drainage Statement (Oracle Engineering Group, LLC, 05NOV13 revised 13MAR14). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the following link for further clarification:
http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

The following items need to be addressed:

SITE PLAN:

1) Complied.

2) Complied.

3) Acknowledged. However under the General Note Section there are 2-#12 notes. Revise the note numbering to be continuous.

4) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: It is acknowledged that the project is proposing to use a standard driveway entrance however written approval from TDOT Permits and Codes that the proposed project does not have to meet the minimum 18-foot radii and a smaller radii or standard driveway apron can be utilized is still required.

5) Complied.

6) Complied.

7) Complied.

8) Complied.

9) Complied.

10) Complied.

11) Complied.

12) Complied.

13) Complied.

14) Complied.

15) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Provide written approval for the proposed refuse collection location. Per TSM Sec.8-01.5.3.G specifically figure 1 this type of collection requires prior approval from ES. It appears that Environmental Services has been added to the review for this project, once they review and approve the plan this comment will not apply.

STORM DRAINAGE STATEMENT:

16) Complied. It is acknowledged that the Hydrologic Data Sheets where completed using the PC Hydro Procedure however the City of Tucson does not use the NOAA14 (90% UCL) rain fall depths. For future projects refer to TSM Sec.4-04.4.2.1 and Table 4.1 for the one hour rain fall depth that should be used in the PC Hydro procedure.

GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comment provided above. For expedite purposes the development plan package can be reviewed over the counter (PDSD Engineering Division comment only) for stamp approval once all items have been addressed. Please call to schedule an appointment when ready.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
03/28/2014 RONALD BROWN HC SITE REVIEW Approved
04/01/2014 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approv-Cond Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.
04/01/2014 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
04/15/2014 PGEHLEN1 COT NON-DSD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Reqs Change The submittal has been reviewed on behalf of ESD and the following comments on the next submittal:

1. The use of TSM Section 8, Figure 1 will be allowed for refuse collection service, however an enclosure will need to be added north of the one shown for a metal, front loading dumpster container for recycling. Similar access as to that shown for the enclosure on the plan will need to be provided for this additional enclosure. APC use for this project requires prior approval from ESD per TSM 8-01.4.0G. The use of APCs for recycling for this eight unit project will not be allowed.

2. Ensure that Detail D on Sheet 2 and all additional construction details associated with the enclosures comply with the figures in TSM Section 8 as to gates, slab reinforcement, bollard placement, overall width, door anchors, etc.

3. On the Grading Plan on Sheet 2, provide spot grades within the enclosure and on the aprons to show compliance with TSM 8-01.5.2G.

4. Per TSM 8-01.4.B, add the general note specifying anticipated method of collection and frequency.

If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net.
04/15/2014 PGEHLEN1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER WRITE DECISION LETTER Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:

1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) A disk containing all items submitted
3) All items requested by review staff
4) All items needed to approve this plan

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/14/2014 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed