Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP13-0205
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/22/2014 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/22/2014 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: South Cherry Residential Development Package (3rd Review) DP13-0205 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 22, 2014 DUE DATE: June 19, 2014 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 19, 2014. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS COMMENT: The Zoning Review Section approves the development package for this project. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development package to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov . |
| 06/12/2014 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/16/2014 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TDOT | Approved | |
| 06/18/2014 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/25/2014 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. The following items must be resubmitted: 1) Two copies of the rolled plans 2) a disk containing all items submitted. 3) all items requested by review staff 4) all items needed to approve this plan |
| 06/25/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | The submittal has been reviewed on behalf of Environmental Services and is denied. As a result of several discussions regarding the collection service, the applicant was sent an email on 4/15/14 describing the requirements of the enclosure and its use adjacent to the alley. Please address the following outstanding items: The email stated the concrete pad should slope no more than 0.2% in any direction and shall be constructed with the concrete thickness and reinforcement as shown in the Figures in TSM Section 8. The concrete pad should extend at least 13 feet into the alley and be the normal width associated with the enclosures. Ensure the pad is flush with the adjoining grades. The plans show the 13 feet, but there are no spot grades or slopes shown on the portion extended into the alley. Also, the slope shown within the enclosure is 1 percent. Please revise the plans to comply with the comment. The email required 20 ft. clear interior dimension without the center wall or support to limit the overall dimensions of the enclosure. The comment response letter states the 20 ft. clear space is provided, however the detail for the enclosure calls out only 16.67 feet clear area within the enclosure. Please revise the plans to provide 20 ft. clear space within the enclosure. The email required the gates to open 180 degrees. The gates shown on the provided detail do not open 180 degrees, but only to 90 degrees. Because the enclosure provided is not per the standard details as shown in TSM Section 8, a TSMR will be required. If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/17/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |