Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP13-0205
Parcel: 12412078A

Address:
124 S CHERRY AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Permit Number - DP13-0205
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/25/2014 CPIERCE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
02/26/2014 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: South Cherry Residential
Development Package (2nd Review)
DP13-0205

TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 26, 2014

DUE DATE: March 25, 2014

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 19, 2014.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

1. COMMENT: Provide a statement that this is a resubdivision of University Heights Lots 14, 15 & 16 within the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.2.C - The number of proposed lots and common areas are to be noted. If the subdivision is a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), a condominium, or a similar type of residential subdivision utilizing special provisions of the UDC, it shall be so noted;

2. COMMENT: Provide the number of lots and common areas within the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.9.C - If the project has common areas, label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association, or any common area that is separated by a public right-of-way.

3. COMMENT: Provide a copy of the proposed CC&Rs so that cross access, maintenance of common areas and insurances and be verified.

Once the above comments have been addressed zoning is willing to provide an over-the-counter review. Please call or email to schedule and appointment for this review.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & Proposed CC&Rs
02/27/2014 JENNIFER STEPHENS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved 201 N. STONE AV, 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

[Description: Pcseal]


MICHELENE NOWAK
ADDRESSING REVIEW
PH #: 721-9512


TO:

CITY PLANNING

FROM:

MICHELENE NOWAK, ADDRESSING REVIEW

SUBJECT:

DP13-0205 SOUTH CHERRY RESIDENTIAL TENTATIVE PLAT-2ND REVIEW

DATE:

February 27, 2014



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project.

1.) Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar or bond paper of approved Development Plan to City Planning.

2.) All addresses (once assigned) will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection.


***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files.
These CAD files can be e-mailed to CADsubmittals@pima.gov<mailto:CADsubmittals@pima.gov> The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County's Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.***
02/27/2014 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
02/28/2014 PGEHLEN1 PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Approved PIMA COUNTY
REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT
201 NORTH STONE AVENUE
TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207
JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500
DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135


February 28, 2014


To: KEVIN M. HALL, P.E.
CYPRESS CIVIL DEVELOPMENT, INC.

Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager
City of Tucson Development Services Department


____________________________________________
From: Tom Porter, P.E. (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department

Subject: SOUTH CHERRY RESIDENTIAL
Development Plan - 2nd submittal
DP13-0205

The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use:
The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the Development Plan.

Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality Department.

Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating, or engaging in any activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please do not hesitate to contact me.

If you have any questions about this review letter please call me @ the phone number above.
03/17/2014 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Approved
03/21/2014 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
03/24/2014 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
03/27/2014 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:

1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) a disk containing all items submitted
3) all items requested by review staff
4) All items needed to approve these plans.
03/27/2014 PGEHLEN1 ENV SVCS REVIEW Reqs Change The second submittal has been reviewed on behalf of ESD. Please address the following comments on the next submittal:
1. Per TSM Section 8-01.5.1A, new projects consisting of six to twenty four units shall provide centralized on-site solid waste and recycle collection service access within the tract. Utilization of individual containers (APCs) requires approval by ES on a case by case basis. Per TSM Section 8-01.4.0G, the use of APC's for multi-family, commercial, or industrial development requires prior approval from ES. Typically the case for allowance of the use of APCs is due to existing structures and limited site area as discussed in Section 8-01.4.0F. This project is currently vacant and therefore site layout should be able to accommodate the required centralized collection and enclosures and the adequate service vehicle access. ESD has reviewed this multi-family project and use of APCs will not be allowed.
2. Please show the metal containers and enclosures per TSM Section 8. Refer to Figure 3A for enclosure details and dimensions. Show on the plans the required clear areas in front of the enclosures and that the service vehicles have adequate access.
3. Revise General Note 27 to read solid waste and recycle service will be by onsite, centralized metal containers within enclosures. Collection is to be at least once per week.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/21/2014 FERNE RODRIGUEZ REJECT SHELF Completed