Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP13-0205
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/18/2013 | SPOWELL1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/21/2013 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 10/22/2013 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | Patricia, I just received direction from my manager that future reviews should be directed to PC DOT's Traffic Engineering Division. Mo Farhat and Lauren Maine would be your primary contacts. They can be reached at 740-2601. However, I can guarantee the South Cherry Residential Tentative Plat (DP13-0205) will not need their review, so our folder can be closed out. I apologize for the confusion. We have undergone some recent restructuring, and this was an item I needed to get clarity on. Sincerely, Jessica Orto Pima County Building and Site Development 520.724.6490 |
| 10/22/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | See letter in SIRE |
| 10/23/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | Letter and additional information is in SIRE. Letter contains informational information only. |
| 10/24/2013 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Please indicate location)s) of existing and/or proposed fire hydrants. Refer to chapter 5 of the 2013 IFC for spacing requirements. Please indicate proposed use of buildings. Indicate if fire sprinklers will be installed. |
| 10/25/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: South Cherry Residential Development Package (1st Review) DP13-0205 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 28, 2013 DUE DATE: November 18, 2013 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 19, 2014 . 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 1. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP13-0205, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. COMMENT: Clarify why development package case number, DP12-0209, is listed on this plan. If this plan is no longer valid with drawn the plan. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 3. COMMENT: It appears that there are three primary uses proposed for this site, multi-family, parking & commercial recreation (pool). Clarify what is happening on this site. If the parking and pool are strictly for the multi-family units clearly demonstrate how all will function, i.e. CC&Rs, how will the parking and pool be maintained etc. Should the parking and pool be common areas? 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage; 4. COMMENT: Provide a lot coverage calculation the includes the allowed and proposed lot coverage for each lot, see UDC Section 6.4.3. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 5. COMMENT: Provide a dimension from centerline of street to curb and curb to property line for both Cherry & 12th. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.B - Identify each block or lot by number within the subdivision boundary and include the approximate square footage of each, or a note may be provided stating that all lots comply with the minimum lot size requirements. 6. COMMENT: Identify each lot by number within the subdivision boundary and include the approximate square footage of each. 2-06.4.9.C - If the project has common areas, label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association, or any common area that is separated by a public right-of-way. 7. COMMENT: Depending on how comment 3 above is addressed the above information may be required. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 8. COMMENT: Provide a typical parking space detail for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 9. COMMENT: The required number of short term bicycle parking spaces shown is not correct. Per UDC Section 7.4.3.G Fractional Amounts. When the calculation of required motor vehicle and bicycle parking spaces results in a fractional number, a fraction of one-half or more is adjusted to the next higher whole number, and a fraction of less than one-half is adjusted to the next lower whole number. That said 24 x 0.1 = 2.4 or 2 required. 10. COMMENT: Detail F" sheet 3 is not correct. Review UDC figure 7.4.9-C and revise the detail. 11. COMMENT: The proposed short-term bicycle parking does not meet the requirements of UDC Sections 7.4.9.C.a & d. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 12. COMMENT: As you have proposed individual residence on individual lots the interior perimeter yard setbacks will be based on a "Res Use" to a "Nonres Zone" having a 10' or 3/4 (H) of the building exterior wall, which ever is greatest. Based on a wall height of 18' the required interior perimeter yard setback would be 13.5'. All proposed buildings have interior perimeter yard setback issues. A Design Development Option (DDO) will need to be approved for each residence on each lot prior to approval of this development package. 2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. COMMENT: Show the refuse collection area on the plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package . |
| 10/28/2013 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its approval. Thank you. ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. . |
| 10/29/2013 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#269945 October 29, 2013 Cypress Civil Development Attn: Kevin M. Hall 2102 N Country Club Suite 9 Tucson, Arizona 85716 Dear Kevin M. Hall: SUBJECT: South Cherry Residential Tentative Plat DP13-0205 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted October 28, 2013. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (OH-204) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Tina Zarate Office Support Design/Build Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 10/29/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 October 29, 2013 To: KEVIN M. HALL, P.E. CYPRESS CIVIL DEVELOPMENT, INC. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, P.E. (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: SOUTH CHERRY RESIDENTIAL Development Plan - 1st submittal DP13-0205 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby conditionally approves the above referenced submittal of the Development Plan with the following conditions: 1. The Type II obtained for the previous project is no longer valid because you have changed the connection point and possible GPD for the new use. Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD's Development Liaison Unit, written within the past year, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/developer.htm#permits The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. 2. Sheet 1: The 204 FUE shown in General Note #9 seems low and may need to be revised for the proposed buildings shown on plan. The corrections can be shown by PDF or Mylar. The revised Type II letter can be sent to me by e-mail and an approval letter will be sent upon completion. |
| 10/30/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | MICHELENE NOWAK ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 724-9512 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: MICHELENE NOWAK, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP13-0205/SOUTH CHERRY RESIDENTIAL-TENTATIVE PLAT 1ST REVIEW DATE: OCTOBER 30, 2013 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1. Label Project# DP13-0205 on all Sheets 2. Remove "Addition" from legal of University Heights Mp 3 Pg 102 on all Sheets 3. For 911 purposes the current Address of 124 S Cherry Av will change due to no physical access to Cherry Av (per Tentative Plat) Access for project is: 12th Street 4. Provide site plan for the 6 --2 story buildings (6 Buildings) showing unit numbering scheme in accordance with county standards |
| 11/05/2013 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Susan King GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: November 5, 2013 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat DP13-0205 South Cherry Residential * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Thank you, Susan King |
| 11/06/2013 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | From Zelin Canchola TDOT DP13-0205 124 S Cherry Av November 6, 2013 Revise driveway design with 18 feet curb return radius. |
| 11/13/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | POLICE | REVIEW | Approved | I have no issues with this request. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept 837-7428 |
| 11/13/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Here are my comments - DATE: 11/12/2013 CASE: DP13-0205 SOUTH CHERRY RESIDENTIAL - TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENT: No objections or adverse comments Daily PM Peak Vehicle Trip Generation: 0 4 Thanks, -Eric Additional notes: See additional information in SIRE |
| 11/13/2013 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Passed | |
| 11/14/2013 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Add the following to note 11, "All accessible routes are to comply with 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% maximum running slopes and 2% maxium cross slopes". 2. Show accessibility to all common areas, pools etc. 3. Show the slopes at both accessible parking ramps to be 1:12 maximum. END OF REVIEW |
| 11/18/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Show how solid waste and recycling will be provided for the multi-family project per TSM Section 8. There does not appear to be any enclosure locations shown, nor dimensions or construction details for the container enclosure(s) on the plans. 2. Per TSM 8-01.4.B, add the general note specifying anticipated method of collection and frequency. 3. There may be additional comments once the solid waste and recycling provisions are provided on the plans. If there are questions, I can be contacted at kperry@perryengineering.net |
| 11/18/2013 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | |
| 11/18/2013 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/18/2013 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Show grade break in the parking area and provide sufficient detail for construction and inspection. Delineate and describe the water harvesting areas. Show spot grades throughout the site to demonstrate the run-off will be directed toward the water harvesting to the maximum extent practicable. |
| 11/18/2013 | LEERAY HANLY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/19/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 11/19/2013 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) One disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve the plans. |
| 11/19/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 11/19/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 11/19/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/25/2014 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/25/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |