Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP13-0200
Parcel: 11446015A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP13-0200
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/16/2013 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
10/23/2013 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Please indicate location of existing and/or proposed fire hydrants. Refer to chapter 5 of 2013 International Fire Code for spacing requirements.
Determine if fire sprinklers will be required, based upon occupancy classification. If fire sprinklers are to be installed, indicate location of fire service underground.
10/24/2013 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Sabino Road Baptist Church
Development Package/Scenic Corridor Zone Review (1st Review)
DP13-0200

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 25, 2013

DUE DATE: November 13, 2013

This plan was reviewed for full code compliance due to the expansion of a non-conforming use.

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 12, 2014 .

2. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

1. COMMENT: The total number of pages should be shown as Sheet xx of 7 on all sheets.

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2. COMMENT: Remove the address from the title block and provide it adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

3. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP13-0200, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

4. COMMENT: Clarify what the "DS 13-XX" number is.

2-06.4.2.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

5. COMMENT: Label the sections corners on the location map.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

6. COMMENT: COMMENT: Provide a General Note stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESINGED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC SECTION 5.3 SCENIC CORRIDOR ZONE (SCZ) & 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)."

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

7. COMMENT: Provide the floor area for each building.

2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage;

8. COMMENT: Under General Note 4. A the "PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE = 85% plus or minus", provide the actual lot coverage not a plus or minus.

9. COMMENT: Per UDC TABLE 6.3-1.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE RH, SR, SH, RX-1, & RX-2 ZONES, SR Zone, the maximum lot coverage allowed is 15%, proposed lot coverage appears to be 85%. A Board of Adjustment for Variance is required. If a variance is approved provide the variance case number date of approval, what was varied and any conditions of approval on the plan as a note. Until the actual lot coverage percentage is provided, see comment above, variance comments cannot be provided.

2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and,

10. COMMENT: Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan.

11. COMMENT: Provide a lot area expansion calculation on the plan.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

12. COMMENT: Clarify why the site boundary lines shown around the northwest parcel is different than that of the remaining site.

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

13. COMMENT: If applicable show all easements on the plan.

2-06.4.9.E - Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) Land splits require a separate permit and review.

14. COMMENT: As this site consists of two (2) parcels, 114-46-0140 & 114-46-015A, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combination Request form with your next submittal.

2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

15. COMMENT: The zoning, R-3, listed for the parcel to the south is not correct. The parcel is zoned R-2.

16. COMMENT: Provide the zoning for the parcels west of Sabino Canyon Road.

2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

17. COMMENT: Show the future sight visibility triangles based on the MS&R cross-section.


2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

18. COMMENT: Provide a width dimension for the southern most entrance off of Sabino Canyon Road.

19. COMMENT: Per UDC Section 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said demonstrate how the requirements of this UDC section are met at the southeast corner of the site.

20. COMMENT: Dimension the backup spur shown at the southeast corner of the site. See UDC Section 7.4.6.F.4.

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

21. COMMENT: Detail 2 sheet 1 the distance required between the racks is 4'-0" clear, see UDC Figure 7.4.9-C.

22. COMMENT: The proposed short-term bicycle parking does not meet the requirements of UDC Section 7.4.9.C.2.c.

23. COMMENT: Provide a detail showing how the proposed long-term bicycle parking meets the requirements of UDC Section 7.4.9.D.2.b & .c.

2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.)

24. COMMENT: Show the future curb and sidewalk locations on the plan.

2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

25. COMMENT: Under General Note 4.C the street perimeter yard is shown as 43.5'. Per UDC Section 5.3.5,A The maximum height of a structure is one-third the distance of the structure from the future right-of-way line. That said based on a wall height of 24.0' the required street perimeter yard is 72.0', proposed is 60.6'. Board of Adjustment for Variance is required. If a variance is approved provide the variance case number date of approval, what was varied and any conditions of approval on the plan as a note.

2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

26. COMMENT: Per UDC Section 5.3.5,A The maximum height of a structure is one-third the distance of the structure from the future right-of-way line. That said based on a perimeter yard of 60.6' the maximum height of the west building exterior wall would be 20.2', proposed height is 24.0'. A Board of Adjustment for Variance is required. If a variance is approved provide the variance case number date of approval, what was varied and any conditions of approval on the plan as a note.

27. COMMENT: Provide the square footage and height for all buildings within the footprints.

28. COMMENT: Per the most current aerial photos there are three (3) structures located at the southeast corner of the property. Show these structures on the plan and provide the applicable information within the footprints. Also provide any applicable information for required calculations.

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

29. COMMENT: Provide width dimensions for all sidewalks (existing & proposed) on the site plan.

30. COMMENT: Provide a width dimension for the sidewalk located along the east side of the southeast building. As wheel stops are not proposed for this area the sidewalk must be a minimum of 6'-6" wide.

31. COMMENT: For the sidewalk located along the east side of the southeast building demonstrate how the accessibility is proposed for the accessible parking spaces.

UDC Section 5.3 Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) Comments

32. COMMENT: Per UDC Section 5.3.5,A The maximum height of a structure is one-third the distance of the structure from the future right-of-way line. That said based on a perimeter yard of 60.6' the maximum height of the west building exterior wall would be 20.2', proposed height is 24.0'. A Board of Adjustment for Variance is required. If a variance is approved provide the variance case number date of approval, what was varied and any conditions of approval on the plan as a note.

33. COMMENT: Demonstrate on the plan how the requirements of UDC Section 5.3.6 are met.

34. COMMENT: Provide a note on the plan stating "PER UDC SECTION 5.3.10.A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE SURFACES, THAT ARE VISIBLE FROM THE SCENIC ROUTE, SHALL HAVE COLORS THAT ARE PREDOMINANT WITHIN THE SURROUNDING LANDSCAPE, SUCH AS DESERT AND EARTH TONES."

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
.
11/07/2013 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Denied SHEET C1 OF 2
1. Identify all accessible routes and note that the slopes shall comply with the 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% maximum running slope and 2% maximum cross slope.
2. At detail 1:
a. Indicate grade slopes in all directions to be a maximum of 2% in all directions.
b. Indicate a flush curb to paving at the accessible parking aisles.
3. Provide an accessible passenger loading zone as required by the 2012 IBC, Section 1106.7 and ICC A117.1, Section 503.
a. Provide a large scale detail showing all accessible requirements.
SHEET C2 OF 2
4. At detail 5, the 7'-0" dimension is to be to the bottom of the larger sign.
END OF REVIEW
11/08/2013 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to the building, building sewer, site lighting, or electrical service to the building). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for constructing the building or as a separate permit.
2. Provide cleanouts in the building sewer at intervals not exceeding 100 feet. Reference Section 708.3.2, IPC 2012.
3. Show the point of connection to the existing public sewer. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
11/12/2013 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS

Identification and Descriptive Data

All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:

Rezoning case;

Subdivision case;

Board of Adjustment case;

Design Development Option case;

Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or,
Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

Maintenance Schedule

Pruning schedules to show that plant material will maintain pedestrian and vehicular clearances or that the material will establish opaque hedge screens, if required;
Replacement criteria, should plant material not survive;

Replacement or upkeep maintenance schedules for inert ground cover materials;

Upkeep maintenance schedules for exterior hardscape materials; and,

Maintenance and replacement schedules for irrigation systems.

Grading Information

Grade changes across the site indicated by one-foot interval contour lines or by spot elevations;

Percent slope across the site and the direction of the slope of paved areas;

Existing grades on adjacent rights-of-way and adjacent sites. If an adjacent right-of- way or site is under construction, show the proposed finish grade

Extent of grading boundaries if a portion of the site is to be kept in its natural undisturbed state.

Indicate natural contours of undisturbed areas;

Areas of detention/retention, depths of basins, and percentage of side slope;

The methods by which water harvesting or storm water runoff is used to benefit the planting areas on the site.

5.3.4. SCENIC ROUTE BUFFER AREA

Requirement

A buffer area 30 feet wide, adjacent to the MS&R future right-of-way line, is required and shall be preserved and maintained in its natural state;

Submit NPPO plan as determined by A.M. Section 2-11 Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

Additional comments may apply.
11/13/2013 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
11/18/2013 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Provide the activity number near the title block. This development package is DP13-0200.
Where the edge of pavement abuts landscape areas and no parking blocks are indicated, provide curb or other barrier to prevent cars from driving off the paved areas. For example see the southeast corner of the project.
Provide complete dimensions of parking areas, islands, curb radii and sidewalks throughout the plan.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/25/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed