Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP13-0196
Parcel: 13817047B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP13-0196
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/10/2013 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Please indicate location(s) of existing and/or proposed fire hydrants. Refer to Section 507.5 of the 2012 International Fire Code for spacing requirements.
Provide details regarding gate into parking area. Must have an unobstructed width of 20'-0". Other requirements must comply with Section 503.5 of the code.
Fire sprinklers will be required. Please indicate proposed source of water supply.
10/10/2013 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
10/11/2013 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Tabernaculo Emanuel
Development Package (1st Review)
DP13-0196

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 14, 2013

DUE DATE: November 05, 3013

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 09, 2014 .

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

1. COMMENT: Provide the Development Package case number "DP13-0196" adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2-06.4.2.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

2. COMMENT: The northeast section corner shown on the location map as "17" is not correct. This section should be "7".

2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

3. COMMENT: Provide a General Note stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESINGED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC SECTION 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) & UDC SECTION 5.6 AIRPORT ENVIRONS ZONE (AEZ)."

4. COMMENT: Per UDC Section 5.6.11.A provide a building measurement based on the mean sea level (MSL) elevation established for the SW end of runway 3.

2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

5. COMMENT: As a general note provide the floor area for each building.

2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage;

6. COMMENT: Per UDC TABLE 6.3-2.B: EXCEPTIONS TO THE R-1, R-2, R-3, MH-1, & MH-2 DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS, Religious Use, the maximum lot coverage allowed is 60%. Provide a lot coverage calculation that meets the requirement of UDC Section 6.4.3. Additional comments may be forth coming.

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

7. COMMENT: There are several easements listed under the General Notes on sheet 1. Show these easements on the DEVELOPMENT/UTIILITY PLAN, sheet 2.

2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

8. COMMENT: Provide the existing public right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks on sheet 2.

2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles (SVTs). On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

9. COMMENT: Show the future SVTs on sheet 2.

2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

10. COMMENT: Sheet 2 provide width dimensions for the entrance access lanes off of Los Reales Road and Geronimo Avenue.

11. COMMENT: Sheet 2 provide a width dimension for the center PAAL located along the northern most parking.

12. COMMENT: On the east side of EXIST. BLDG 1 there appears to be a canopy that overhangs into the 24' wide PAAL. Per UDC Section 7.4.6.E.2 Height Clearance. The minimum height clearance along access lanes and PAALs is 15 feet. Demonstrate on the plan that this clearance is maintained.

13. COMMENT: On the north side of EXIST. BLDG 1 there appears to be a canopy that appears to encroach into the PAAL. Clearly show the canopy on the plan. Per UDC Section 7.4.6.E.2 Height Clearance. The minimum height clearance along access lanes and PAALs is 15 feet or per UDC Section 7.4.6.F.2.a.(1) Access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least one foot from an open structure, such as a carport or covered pedestrian access path as measured from the closest part of the structure or roof overhang. Show that the height or setback is met on the plan.

14. COMMENT: On the west side of the proposed worship building there are piers called out under key note 36, clarify what these piers are for. If there is a canopy associated with the piers show the limits of the canopy. The requirements of UDC Sections 7.4.6.E.2 & 7.4.6.F.2 may apply.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

15. COMMENT: Under the "PARKING SUMMARY" the required number of "REGULAR SPACES" is listed as "35", and listed above you show "REQUIRED SPACES" as "155", clarify which is correct.

16. COMMENT: Under the "PARKING SUMMARY" the required number of "DISABLED SPACES" does not appear to be correct. See Ron Browns comments.

17. COMMENT: "TYPICAL PARKING SPACES" detail 3, sheet 4, the location dimension shown for the "PARKING BUMBER" is not correct, see UDC Section 7.4.6.H.3.

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

18. COMMENT: Provide a short & long term bicycle parking space calculation that provides the number required and provided. Provide the maximum expected daily attendance in the short term bicycle and the number of employees in the long term bicycle parking calculation.

19. COMMENT: "SHORT TERM BICYCLE PARKING DETAIL" detail 6, sheet 4, as multi racks are proposed provide a detail that matches what is shown on the plan. See figure 7.4.9-C for an example.

20. COMMENT: Per UDC Section 7.4.9.B.2.g A bicycle rack must be a minimum of two and one half feet from a wall or other obstruction. That said show the required dimension on the detail.

21. COMMENT: Per UDC Section 7.4.9.C.2.d Where buildings have more than one public entrance or a site has more than one building, short-term bicycle parking must be distributed so that at least one short-term bicycle parking space is within 50 feet of each public entrance. That said distribute the short term bicycle.


2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.)

22. COMMENT: Provide the future sidewalk, curb and SVTs on sheet 2.

2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

23. COMMENT: Per UDC TABLE 6.3-2.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE R-1, R-2, R-3, MH-1, & MH-2 ZONES, Nonres Use to a Nonres Zone the required perimeter yard setback from the proposed building to the east property line is 10 or ¾(H) of the exterior building wall, which ever is greatest. Based on a building height of 25' the required perimeter yard setback to the east property line is 18'-9", proposed perimeter yard setback to the east property is 15'. A Design Development Option (DDO) will need to be approved to reduce the setback prior to approval of the development package.

24. COMMENT: The street perimeter yard setback is UDC Section 6.4.5.C.2 and Table 6.4.5.C-1, ADT of 1,000 or greater, the required perimeter yard setback is 21feet or the height (H) of the exterior building wall, which ever is greatest, measured from the back of future curb. Until the future curd is shown on sheet 2 the perimeter yard setback cannot be verified.

25. COMMENT: Provide building elevations so that perimeter yard requirements can be verified.

2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

26. COMMENT: Provide the square footage and the height and the specific use proposed for all structures shown on sheet 2.

27. COMMENT: The "ALLOWED HEIGHT 50'" shown within the footprint of the proposed building is not correct. Per UDC TABLE 6.3-2.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE R-1, R-2, R-3, MH-1, & MH-2 ZONES, R-2 Zone the allowed height is 25'.

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

28. COMMENT: Provide sidewalk width dimensions for all sidewalks shown on sheet 2, see blue highlites.

29. COMMENT: Per TSM Sections 7-01.3.3.A & 7-01.4.1.A continuous pedestrian circulation path, a sidewalk, is required to connect from the site to the sidewalks located with in adjacent street right-of-way (ROW). That said provide a sidewalk to the sidewalk located within the ROW of Geronimo Avenue.

30. COMMENT: Per TSM Sections 7-01.3.3.B The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas. That said provide a sidewalk that connects all building on site.

31. COMMENT: Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.B A sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located. That said a sidewalk is required along the entire north side of the EXIST. BLDG 1.

32. COMMENT: Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.C A sidewalk is required adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no other parking spaces or PAALs intervene. That said a sidewalk is required along the entire north side of EXIST. BLDG 2 & west side of EXIST. BLDG 3.

33. COMMENT: "TYPICAL PARKING SPACES" detail 3, sheet 4 shows a "PARKING SIGN" that appears to encroach in the minimum required 4 foot width of the sidewalk, clearly show that the 4 foot width is maintained.

2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm.

34. COMMENT: Show the refuse collection area on the plan.

Additional Comments

35. COMMENT: Provide the PDSD approval stamp on all sheets of the development package.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
.
10/28/2013 LAITH ALSHAMI ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 11/04/2013,


SUBJECT: Tabernaculo Emanuel
DP13-0196, T15S, R13E, SECTION 13

RECEIVED: Development Plan Package and Drainage Report on October 08, 2013

The subject project has been reviewed. The project can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that where made and references the exact location in the plan and in the Drainage Report where the revisions were made:

Drainage Report:

1. It appears that Elvado Road has significant amount of runoff during the 100-year storm. Analyze the impact of this runoff on the subject property.
2. Show clearly on the drainage exhibit the footprint of the proposed building and the locations of the retention/waterharvesting basins.
3. It appears that the proposed drainage scheme alters the existing drainage pattern. Clarify the proposed drainage patterns and demonstrate that it will not introduce discharge at non-historical points.
4. The proposed basins shall be setback from the building in accordance with the recommendation of the geotechnical report.
5. The proposed retention basin(s) percolation rates shall be in compliance with the requirements of the City of Tucson Detention/Retention Manual.
6. Submit a geotechnical report that addresses retention basin(s) percolation rates and building setbacks from ponding water.
7. Clarify if bleed pipes are proposed for the retention basin(s).
8. The drainage exhibit shall show and label clearly the detention basin and waterharvesting basins with their dimensions, side slopes and any proposed associated drainage structure such as inlet, outlet, erosion control structures or pads, etc.
9. The drainage exhibit appears to show that the proposed detention/retention and waterharvesting basins are located adjacent to the proposed building, which is not acceptable. The basins shall be setback away from the buildings in accordance with the findings of the Geotechnical Report. Provide a geotechnical report that determines the required building setback from the ponding water in the detention basin and water harvesting basins. Verify that the building is set back in accordance with the geotechnical report recommendations.
10. If any runoff discharge from the site to offsite is proposed to be concentrated, ensure that the discharge point is setback at least 2 feet from the lot line to disperse the discharge energy and eliminate any erosion on the adjacent properties.
9. Provide, on the drainage exhibit the 100-year ponding limits and water depth and water surface elevation in the proposed retention/detention and water harvesting basins. The proposed structure finished floor elevation might need to be determined based on the water depth in the basins.
10. 11. The geotechnical report shall also address slope treatment and stabilization requirements if applicable. Additionally, show on the drainage exhibits the proposed slope treatment based on the Soils Report recommendation.
12. Provide design calculations for any proposed sidewalk scuppers, erosion control structures, and all proposed drainage structures.
13. The drainage report shall address erosion control requirements for this project.
14. Address water harvesting requirements in more details and demonstrate how roof and site drainage will be directed to maximize water harvesting.
15. According to Section 14.3 of the "Standard Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management In Tucson, Arizona", the proposed retention/detention basins require maintenance access ramp that shall be wide enough to accommodate vehicular access. The minimum width should be 15' and the ramp slope should not exceed 15 percent. Please be advised that maintenance ramps should be designed in such a way that does not allow inadvertent access to vehicles. Verify that the maintenance ramps will not reduce the required size of the basins. Smaller access ramps or the elimination of the ramp might be considered based on the size of the basin.
16. According to Section 3.3.5 "Low-Flow Channels" of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual the proposed basins floors shall be sloped to provide positive drainage. The section recommends a minimum of 0.5% floor slope and 0.2% low flow concrete channel slope. Please be advised that based on the City's experience with similar projects, 0.5% slope was difficult to construct and maintain which resulted in nuisance ponding in the basins. Show the provided positive drainage on the drainage exhibit.
17. The retention/detention basin may require security barriers. Check Section 4.3 of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual for additional information.

Development Package:

1. Provide a 3" X 5" space in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp (A.M. 2-06.3.4).
2. Provide, on every sheet, all relevant case numbers (A.M. 2-06.4.3).
3. Show all existing onsite easements with their recordation information (A.M. 2-06.4.8.B).
4. Provide the adjacent streets information (i.e. public or private, right of way widths, recordation data, curbs, curb cuts, sidewalks, etc.) as required by A.M. 2-06.4.8.C.
5. Verify if the future right of way information described in Keynote #12 and shown on Sheet 2 of 9, is correct. If the information is correct, revise the plan to remove all proposed improvements outside the future right of way (A.M. 2-06.4.8.C).
6. Show, if applicable. Any existing storm drainage facilities on or adjacent to the site (A.M. 2-06.4.8.F).
7. Depending on the results of the drainage report floodplain study, show, if applicable, the floodplain information, including the location of the 100-year flood limits for all flows of 100 cfs or more with 100-year water surface elevation (A.M. 2-06.4.8.I).
8. Provide the width of all access driveways and within the parcel (A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.1).
9. Include a general note that specifies the PAAL's and parking spaces dimensions are taken from the curbs gutter line (A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.5.).
10. It appears that Keynotes #29 and #38 are not shown on the plan on Sheet 2 of 9. Revise as necessary.
11. Show, if applicable, all proposed easements with their dimensions and recordation information as required by A.M. 2-06.4.9.L.
12. Provide the proposed basins side slopes and dimensions. Provide all necessary construction details (A.M. 2-06.4.9.N).
13. Show retention and waterharvesting basins 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevations. Show the water depth on Detail 5A/C-2.0 (A.M. 2-06.4.9.N.1).
14. Show proposed buildings roof drains and sidewalk scuppers if the roof drains discharge onto sidewalks or walkways (A.M. 2-06.4.9.N.2 & 3).
15. Show required retention and waterharvesting basins setback lines based on the geotechnical report recommendations. Ensure that all existing and proposed buildings are outside the ponding setback lines (A.M. 2-06.4.9.O).
16. Provide the location of the trash enclosure, and demonstrate how it will be accessed. Provide the trash enclosure detail (A.M. 2-06.4.9.H.3) and (A.M. 2-06.4.9.T).
17. Show and label grading limits. Include the grading limits symbol in the legend (A.M. 2-06.4.9.M).
18. Show retention basin bleed pipes if applicable (A.M. 2-06.4.9.N.3).
19. Keynote #7 is not shown on the plan on Sheet 3 of 9.
20. Provide the proposed cut and fill quantities (T.S. 2-01.5).
21. Any runoff discharge points onto the public right of way shall be setback at least two feet and provided with onsite energy dissipation structure to prevent concentrated discharges and erosion issue in the right of way (A.M. 2-06.4.9.N).
22. Provide wheelchair access ramp at Los Reales Road/Geronimo Avenue intersection (A.M. 2-06.4.9.S).
23. Add the following grading notes, which are intended to protect the owner/developer and the engineer of record:

a. "CALL FOR SWPPP INSPECTION AND PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETINGS. FOR A PDSD ENGINEERING INSPECTIONS, CALL IVR (740-6970), OR SCHEDULE WITH A CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE AT THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, OR CONTACT DSD ENGINEERING AT 791-5550 EXTENSION 2101, OR SCHEDULE INSPECTIONS ONLINE AT: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/inspections".
b. The contractor shall remove the fine materials from the bottom of the detention/retention basin and scarify the basin bottom once the construction activities are completed in order to remove any fine material build up caused by construction and to restore soil percolation. Install BMP's at the basin inlet(s) to prevent the fines from entering the basin.
c. The approved Grading Plan/Development Package is the only acceptable construction plan onsite. The Contractor may not use any other plans, such as the approved Tentative Plat and/or Development Plan, for construction purposes. The Contractor may ask the Planning and Development Services Inspector to consult with the other approved plans for additional information or details that might not be included on the approved grading plan but needed for completion of work.
d. Any proposed engineering work to be done below grade (i.e. toe-downs, cutoff walls, drainage pipes/structures, etc.) shall not be back filled until Development Services Inspector inspects the work and approves it.
e. The contractor is not permitted to make an autonomous decision to carry out construction field changes without prior written approval from the Engineer of Record and the City of Tucson Development Services Department.
f. The project will be in compliance with City of Tucson Technical Standard 2-01.0 (Excavating and Grading).
g. A copy of the approved Grading Plan, Grading Permit, and any Geotechnical Reports shall be kept at the site at all times, until final grading approval.
h. Any revision to the Grading Plan MAY require a re-submittal of a revised grading plan for review. Contact PDSD Engineering at 791-5550 to discuss changes in grading design.
i. Contact Permits and Codes at 791-5100 for any questions regarding any right-of-way permit requirements.
j. As-builts and letters of completion for basin and overall project are required.
k. The Engineer of Record shall submit a statement of conformance to as-built plan and the specifications.
l. The permitee shall notify the PDSD when the grading operation is ready for final grading inspection. Final grading approval shall not be given until all work, including installation of all drainage facilities and their permanent protective devices, and all erosion control measures have been completed in accordance with the approved grading plan and grading permit, and any required reports have been submitted.
m. See the associated Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan as a part of this grading permit.


24. According to T.S. 2-01.8.A, the minimum cut or fill setback shall be 2' from the parcel line. Verify compliance with this requirement especially for the proposed detention basin.
25. All proposed work in the public right of way will require a right of way excavation permit or a Private Improvement Agreement. Contact Richard Leigh of Transportation Department Permit and Codes at 791-5100 for additional information.
26. Revise the Development Plan Package according to the Drainage Report revisions.

Landscape Plan:

1. Ensure that the proposed landscaping does not conflict with the basin inlets, outlets, and access ramps.
2. Ensure that the proposed landscaping does not obstruct visibility within the sight visibility triangles.

Geotechnical Report:

1. Provide a Geotechnical Report that addresses soils percolation rates for the proposed retention basins.
2. The Geotechnical Report shall address the required building setbacks from ponding water within the retention and waterharvesting basins.

SWPPP:

Provide a SWPPP report that is based on ADEQ Guidelines. It should include, among other things, the following:

1. A copy of the completed (signed by the owner) NOI form that was submitted to ADEQ (Part III.D.3). Provide some blank forms for the unknown operators. (Part IV.F) Each operator is responsible for submitting a completed NOI to ADEQ and to the City of Tucson. Please note that the remaining signatures from the operators must be on the onsite copy of the SWPPP at or before commencement of construction.
2. A location map and identify the nearest receiving waters on the Location Map (Part III.C.4).
3. A copy of the authorization certificate received from ADEQ (Part III.D.2).
4. A dated and signed certification form for each known operator (including the owner) in accordance with Part VII.K. (Part IV.J.1). Provide blank certification copies for unknown operators.
5. Identify any city or county which received a copy of the authorization certificate (Part III.D.4).
6. It is recommended to protect the inlets of the basins in order prevent fine sediments from entering the basins during construction.
7. Revise the SWPPP exhibits in accordance with the Site and Grading Plan comments.
8. The sequence of construction activities" section, shall include the following as the first two activities:

a- Determine the disturbance limits.
b- Install the proposed BMP's within these limits.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4933 or Laith.Alshami@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan Package, SWPPP, Geotechnical Report and Drainage Report
10/31/2013 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Denied SHEET 1
1. The REQUIRED number of accessible parking spaces for 170 total spaces is 6 not 4. Please reconcile.
SHEET 2
2. Provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking layout that is relative to the design shown on the site plan. Show all accessible requirements such as dimensions, "Van Accessible" parking spaces, accessible parking aisles, markings, slopes, access to the accessible route, ramps as required, concrete wheel bumpers, signage and accessible routes.
3. Insure that the slopes of all new accessible routes comply with ICC A117.1, Section 403.3, 5% maximum running slope and 2% cross slope.
4. All new concrete walks connecting to existing buildings are to be accessible routes connected to accessible building entrances.
SHEET 4
5. Please identify detail 1 as COT DOT drive entrance curb ramps for use in the puiblic right of way only.
6. At detail 3, redesign all accessible parking spaces as per comment 2.
7. At detail 7, dimension the bottom of the main sign to 7'-0" a.f.g.
END OF REVIEW
11/04/2013 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
11/05/2013 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS

Identification and Descriptive Data

All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:

Rezoning case;

Subdivision case;

Board of Adjustment case;

Design Development Option case;

Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or,
Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

Square footage of the vehicular use area; number of parking spaces, including the required and provided parking space calculations; and the calculation of the required number of canopy trees. Within a vehicular use area, one canopy tree is required for each four motor vehicle parking spaces or fraction thereof. The canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space must be located within 40 feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk).

7.6.2. APPLICABILITY

The provisions of this section apply to the following:

A. All new development; and,

B. Expansion of existing development, as provided below:

Buildings Greater Than 10,000 Square Feet

On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is more than 10,000 square feet, expansion in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows:

a. If the expansion is less than 25%, the standards of this section apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning standards in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval.

b. If the expansion is 25% or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991, cumulatively result in a 25% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the standards of this section apply to the entire site. Provide expansion calculations.

ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING:

Street landscape borders must be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five feet of the required ten foot width may be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets.

An unpaved planting area, which must be a minimum of 34 square feet in area and four feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. Dimension planter areas.

Interior Landscape Borders:

Interior landscape borders are required (if applicable for the entire site) as a buffer and visual transition along the common property lines between adjacent land uses and zones as follows, except as provided in Section 7.6.4.C.4, Exceptions to the Landscape Border Standards.

Interior landscape borders are required as determined in Table 7.6.4-1, which ranks land uses and zones based upon their land use intensity and the impact a use will have on adjacent land uses. One canopy tree is required for every 33 linear feet of landscape border or fraction thereof, excluding vehicular ingress or egress points.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

Additional comments may apply
11/05/2013 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/08/2013 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/08/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed