Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP13-0161
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/23/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/23/2013 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Passed | |
| 08/23/2013 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Passed | Per Addressing form |
| 08/26/2013 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Please indicate location of existing and/or proposed fire hydrants, with dimensions to property lines. Note E on sheet C3.1 indicates a red painted curb will mark the Fire Lane. The only approved method of marking fire lanes is through the use of signage. Please refer to Development Standards for proper signage and include in the Submittal package. |
| 08/26/2013 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/27/2013 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP13-0161 5725 E Broadway Boulevard Development Package - Texas Longhorn Restaurant TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 27, 2013 DUE DATE: September 9, 2013 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code and Administrative Manual Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 22, 2014. 2. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 2-06.2.1 Application Form A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee; 2-06.2.2 Development Package A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein; 2-06.2.3 Related Reviews In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the; 2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and, 2-06.2.5 Fees Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.1 - Each sheet shall measure 24 inches by 36 inches and include a minimum one inch margin on left side and one-half inch margin on all other sides to facilitate efficient record keeping. A larger sheet format may be used with the approval of the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD). 2-06.3.2 - All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for record-keeping purposes. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. Smaller scales (60:1 or greater) may be used for some or all of the sheets with the prior approval of PDSD when it is determined legibility and the ability to be digitized and/or reduced for archiving will not be affected. 2-06.3.3 - All lettering and text (upper or lower case), and numbering, shall be a minimum of three-thirty-seconds inches in height to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for archiving. 2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. COMMENT: All sheets that are part of the development package must include the approval stamp. Add the approval stamp to the plan sheets that are missing the stamp. 2-06.3.6 - Provide a blank three-inch by five-inch block in the lower right corner of the plan adjacent to the title block on the first sheet of the development package for use by Pima County Addressing. COMMENT: The Pima County Addressing block must be located in the lower right corner next to the title block of the first sheet. 2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. COMMENT: For all applicable sheets such as the site and grading plan sheets, add under the north arrow the contour interval used. 2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. COMMENT: The sheet index should include the sheet numbers, 1 of 19, 2 of 19, 3 of 19 etc. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. COMMENT: Add the email addresses for all registrants listed on the cover sheet. Also, I am requesting that the contact information for storm water be removed from the cover sheet. This information is not required by the standards and is inappropriate to have this information of a City of Tucson employee on any plans submitted for review. It gives the appearance of and could be construed as a conflict of interest. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; COMMENT: Include a brief legal description in the title block as required and noted above by this standard. 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). COMMENT: Revise the title block to include the sheet numbers as required and noted above by this standard, ie 1 of 19, 2 of 19 etc. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. COMMENT: This project has been assigned the development package case number DP13-0161. List the case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets as required and noted above by this standard. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. COMMENT: 2-06.4.2.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. COMMENT: Add under the location map(s) the information as required and noted above by this standard. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes COMMENT: Add the notes as required by the following standards on the site plan sheet C3.1. 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. COMMENT: On sheet C3.1, revise the text for area to site area and include the square footage of the overall site as required and noted above by this standard. 2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. COMMENT: Add to the cover sheet and site plan sheet C3.1 the above note as required and noted above by this standard. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. COMMENT: List as a note on the site plan sheet existing and proposed use as classified by the UDC. Include any applicable Use Specific Standard Section number in the note, as required and noted above by this standard. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. COMMENT: Provide a separate detailed response letter identifying how all rezoning conditions have been or will be met. It is acknowledged that the conditions of rezoning as listed on the plans as of this review are preliminary and may change. However compliance with the conditions of rezoning must be demonstrated on the development package plans and when applicable providing specific documentation to demonstrate compliance. The response letter assists the reviewer in verifying the conditions of rezoning have been addressed. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: COMMENT: Provide the following information on the site on the cover sheet and site plan sheet. 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building; COMMENT: List as a note on the cover sheet and the site plan sheet C3.1 the square footage of the proposed building as required and noted above by this standard. 2-06.4.7.B - Drainage Notes List the following notes as appropriate: COMMENT: 2-06.4.7.B.1 - List the following notes on all plans/plats: "The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall." COMMENT: This note could not be verified on any of the plan sheets. Add the note on the appropriate sheets as required and noted above by this standard. 2-06.4.7.B.3 - List the following note on all development package documents: "Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan." COMMENT: This note could not be verified on any of the plan sheets. Add the note on the appropriate sheets as required and noted above by this standard. 2-06.4.7.C - Streets and Roads Notes 2-06.4.7.C.2 - List the following note on all development package documents: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual." COMMENT: This note could not be verified on any of the plan sheets. Add the note on the appropriate sheets as required and noted above by this standard. 2-06.4.7.D - Utilities Note All development package documents are to include the following note: "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public." COMMENT: This note could not be verified on any of the plan sheets. Add the note on the appropriate sheets as required and noted above by this standard. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. COMMENT: Clarify if there are any existing recorded easements on the project site. If so draw, label the purpose, dimension and label the recordation information (docket and page or sequence number). 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. COMMENT: Provide this information on the site and grading plan sheets as required and noted above by this standard. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. COMMENT: label the zoning classifications adjacent to the project site as required and noted above by this standard. 2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation 2-06.4.9.H.1 - Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual, to include streets, intersections, street names, right-of-way widths, curve radii of centerlines and curb returns, and proposed improvements, such as pavement, curbs, access points (driveways), accessible ramps, and sidewalks. Street improvements, such as sidewalks, curbs, pavement, and accessible ramps, do not need to be drawn on the plan if such information is provided on typical street cross sections. Please be aware that, if a new street is created (for other than for subdivisions) which divides the property into two or more lots, a subdivision plat is required (refer to the definition of subdivision in Section 11.4.20 of the UDC). COMMENT: The site plan indicates that aprons are proposed at both driveway entrances. I believe that curb returns with a minimum of 25 foot radiuses will be required. Follow up with the PDSD Engineering TDOT Traffic plans reviewers for additional information related to this item. Revise the driveway entrances as required. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. COMMENT: Draw and label the existing and future sight visibility triangles as required and noted above by this standard. 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. COMMENT: Label Broadway Blvd. and Tenth St. as public Right of Way. Label the width from the existing and future curb to property along the Broadway frontage. Label the width of the curb to property line long the Tenth Street frontage. If Tenth St. does have a curb dimension the width from the edge of pavement to property line. These dimensions are used to verify compliance for building setback. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. COMMENT: After reviewing for compliance with this standard it has been noted that the widths of the PAALs have been designed to comply with the minimum width standards per the UDC Design criteria. However the most current rezoning condition 20 may require that the parking area along the north side of the site or (rezoned portion of the site) be redesigned. Additional comments related to this issue may be forthcoming on the next submittal of the development package. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. COMMENT: Revise the parking data on the cover sheet and sheet C3.1 as follows. Remove the parking summary text as it is not relevant due to full code compliance. The calculations for the vehicle parking should be listed as the number required based on the ratio for food service and actual number of spaces provided must be listed, ie, parking ratio 1 space per 100 GFA, total GFA 6,280, number of space required 63, number of spaces provided 127 etc. The number of parking spaces required for the physically disabled is based on the number of spaces provided for this project is 5 HC spaces which include 1 Van Accessible parking space. Provide the detail drawings for a standard parking spaces and physically disabled parking spaces as required and noted above by this standard. Parking spaces (including physically disabled parking spaces) that abut pedestrian sidewalks that are not a minimum of 6.5 feet in width must be provided with wheel stops that are located no less than thirty inches from the front of the parking space. Where a sidewalk is 6.5 feet in width or wider the wheel stops are not required but the 2.5 foot overhang must be drawn and labeled on the site plan sheets. By the same token, parking spaces that abut landscape areas must be provided with wheel stops to prevent vehicles from overhanging into the landscape buffers and damaging the vegetation. Where parking stalls are labeled as 15.5 feet, draw and label the 2.5 foot overhang. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4. COMMENT: This project is required to provide a Type "A" loading space. The cover and C3.1 plan sheets both indicate the correct requirement for loading zones. The loading zone keynote, location or maneuverability in and out of the loading zone could not be verified. Add a keynote to identify the loading zone location and demonstrate maneuverability in and out of the loading zone. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. COMMENT: Short term bicycle parking facilities must be located within 50 feet of the public entrance. Add a dimension from the public entrance to the short term facility that demonstrates compliance. 2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) COMMENT: Add the information as required and noted above by this standard. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. COMMENT: If applicable to this project provide the information as required and noted above by this standard. 2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan 2-06.4.9.M.2 - Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently. COMMENT: The grading plan has been reviewed concurrently with the development package site plan. Any changes that are made to the base site plan must be made to the grading and landscape plan sheets. Once the site plan can be approved the grading plan is also approved. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. COMMENT: Label the building setbacks from the Broadway Blvd. existing and future back of curb locations. The minimum building setback is based on the greatest of 21 feet or the height of the building wall facing the street property line. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). COMMENT: Label the height of the building as required and noted above by this standard. The allowed and proposed height must also be listed as a note under the calculations text block on the cover sheet and the site plan sheet C3.1. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. COMMENT: the pedestrian circulation (sidewalk) should be continued along the west and north sides of the building and between the parking spaces and the landscape areas. This sidewalk will provide an accessible route from the west side parking areas. The minimum width of the side walk in this area must be 4 feet clear 6.5 feet if next to the parking spaces without wheel stops. 2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. COMMENT: Demonstrate maneuverability in and out of the refuse enclosure location. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. COMMENT: Demonstrate compliance as required and noted above by this standard. It is acknowledged that the conditions are preliminary as of this review. Zoning has reviewed for compliance any rezoning conditions that apply to the zoning purview but cannot approve the plan until compliance with all rezoning conditions have met. It is further acknowledged that compliance with some of the rezoning conditions cannot be demonstrated on the site plan or plan sheets of the development package, such as rezoning conditions 12, 13 or 19. However notes on the site plan that relate to each condition where possible should be added indicating compliance. Drawings or exhibits as required by rezoning condition 8 must be included with the next submittal of the development package. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. COMMENT: One monument sign has been verified on the site plan. As of this review it is not clear if the monument sign is within the sight visibility triangle. Additional comments could be forthcoming based on the SVT location. 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. COMMENT: See the landscape reviewer comments related to landscape buffers and screening requirements. COOMENT: All zoning data, notes and calculations should be listed on the cover and site plan sheets. Ensure that these items match on both sheets. COMMENT: Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on the changes made to the development package sheets and if the final conditions of rezoning are different than what has been presented on the development package as of this review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. |
| 08/27/2013 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports the rezoning change. Thank you. ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. . |
| 08/27/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | See letter in SIRE |
| 08/27/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2575.15') is less than 12" below the first floor elevation (2576.00'). Provide a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 08/29/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk that contains all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve this plan. |
| 08/30/2013 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Passed | |
| 09/03/2013 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Denied | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ada Griffin GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: August 30, 2013 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding: DP13-0161/LONGHORN * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. ___X___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: " THE TITLE BLOCK MUST BE LOCATED IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER; IT MUST HAVE THE NUMBER OF LOTS OR UNITS OR BLOCKS OR ANY COMBINATION OF THESE. IT MUST HAVE THE COMMON AREAS LISTED, IF THERE ARE ANY. IT MUST HAVE THE SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE AND IF IT'S A RESUBDIVISION, IT MUST MENTION THE PLAT NAME AND THE MAP & PLAT. " GENERAL NOTES MUST HAVE THE GROSS AREA OF THE SUBDIVISION, THE NUMBER OF LOTS, THE NUMBER OF MILES OF NEW ROAD, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, EVEN IF THE NUMBER IS 0, AND THE BASIS OF BEARING. " ALL LOTS MUST BE NUMBERED AND HAVE SQUARE FOOTAGE. IF THE AREA IS TOO SMALL, THEY CAN HAVE A TABLE TO THE SIDE FOR THE SQUARE FOOTAGE. " ALL STREETS MUST BE NAMED (SOMETIMES THEY ARENT IN THE TENTATIVE) IN THE FINAL PLAT, AND HAVE DIMENSIONS, BEARINGS AND CURVE DATA. " ALL ADJACENT SUBDIVISIONS SHOULD BE NAMED, WITH MAP AND PLAT IN THE APPROPRIATE AREAS AROUND THE SUBDIVISION. " CHECK OWNERSHIP TO MAKE SURE IT MATCHES WHAT WE HAVE. (HEIGHTS PROPERTIES LLP) NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 09/04/2013 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | From Zelin Canchola TDOT Traffic Engineering September 4,2013 DP13-0161 The development plan as shown must be revised for approval. 1. Driveway entrances to be designed with 25 feet curb return radius according to: Transportation Access Management guidelines for the City of Tucson. 5.7 Design Standards table 5-2 - minimum curb return radius driveway to arterial roadway street - 25 feet. 2. Add Sight visibility triangles according to transportation tech manual 10-01 5.2 sight distance 5.3 line of sight matrix (driveway to arterial) near side 245 feet, far side 125 feet 3. Show offsite improvements to the median island with proper dimensions. 4. Note 24. add: Offsite improvements will require a private improvement agreement (PIA) with the City ofTucson Department of Transportation. contact City of Tucson Permits and Codes for information 520 791-4259 |
| 09/05/2013 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET C1.1 1. Under Parking Data: a. The accessible spaces required for Code Required Parking is not 2% of the total. As per the 2009 ICC A117.1, Table 1106.1, 63 parking spaces require 3 accessible parking spaces. b. In the parking summary chart, 4 accessible spaces is not correct. As per Table 1106.1, for a total of 127 parking spaces provided, 5 of those must be accessible spaces with 1 of those 5 being a "Van Accessible" parking space. 2. At note 15 please reference the 2012 IBC, Chapter 11 and the 2009 ICC A117.1 accessible codes. Marked crossing requirements may be found in the 2009 ICC A117.1, Sections 106.5, 406.12, 13 and 14. SHEET C3.1 3. Provide another accessible parking space as per comment 1b. 4. Note F references to architectural plans for details. Either provide the specific details in these documents or include all architectural reference sheets with specific detail number and sheet reference. 5. Substitute the ADA reference at note H with reference to the required accessible code of the 2012 IBC, Chapter 11 and the 2009 ICC A117.1. 6. At notes B and D of the Signage and Pavement Marking Notes, reference comment 2 for proper accessible code references. Please delete all references to ADA. 7. Provide a large scale detail of both ramps showing all accessible requirements such as dimensions, slopes, grade difference, landings and materials 8. Delete all detectable warnings at the front of the parking spaces. These are not required. 9. Provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking layout and show all accessible requirements such as dimensions, markings, allowable grade slopes, signage, access to accessible route, van accessible space and aisles. 10. Insure all slopes of the accessible route complies with ICC A117.1, 403.3; 5% maximum running slope and 2% maximum cross slopes. 11. Delete the curb ramp and detectable warning strip at the most Northern end of the concrete accessible route. This leads to no where. SHEET C6.1 12. Remove all references to ADA. Reference comment 2 for proper accessible code references. END OF REVIEW |
| 09/05/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this request. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept 837-7428 |
| 09/05/2013 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approv-Cond | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#267939 September 5, 2013 Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc Attn: Heather Hirscherg 7740 N 16th St Suite 300 Phoenix, Arizona 85016 Dear Ms. Hirscherg: SUBJECT: Longhorn Steakhouse DP13-0161 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted August 26, 2013. It appears that there are conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Possible removal of existing poles within development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Chuck Leon at (520) 918-8707. Sincerely, Tina Zarate Office Support Design/Build Enclosures cc: City of Tucson (email) C. Leon, Tucson Electric Power |
| 09/06/2013 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Additional comments may be forthcoming once the rezoning has been approved and the conditions are finalized. The DP will not be approved until the appeal period of the rezoning has passed. 2. The Geotechnical report recommends providing positive drainage of a minimum of 4 per cent slope for 10 feet from the building foundation. Provide clarification for how the landscape and water harvesting areas adjacent to the building meet this recommendation. Provide assent from the geotechnical engineer for the solution. 3. Provide a complete SWPPP in accordance with the checklist available from ADEQ. http://www.azdeq.gov/environ/water/permits/download/cgp_swapp_checklist.pdf 4. Provide 25-foot curb returns for the two driveways onto Broadway in accordance with the Transportation Access management Guidelines. 5. Show the approximate extent of the water harvesting basins. Show how the linear landscaping areas will be designed to maximize the water harvesting performance by providing flat areas throughout. |
| 09/06/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approv-Cond | See documents in SIRE |
| 09/09/2013 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the plans in accordance with any proposed conditions of rezoning. 2) Landscape borders proposed in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements. 3) An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. If the proposed diamond planter, located north of the building, is 6x6 as indicated on the site plan, the adjacent parking spaces may not allow for vehicles to park within the spaces. Revise as necessary. |
| 09/09/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Denied | Project denied. 1)No recycle enclosure provided. 2)Clear space for entry to waste enclosure requires 14'x40'. Not 12x40 as shown. Jeff Drumm, P.E. Environmental Manager City of Tucson Environmental Services 520-837-3713 Project denied. 1)No recycle enclosure provided. 2)Clear space for entry to waste enclosure requires 14'x40'. Not 12x40 as shown. Jeff Drumm, P.E. Environmental Manager City of Tucson Environmental Services 520-837-3713 |
| 09/10/2013 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/10/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 09/10/2013 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | |
| 09/10/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 09/10/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 09/10/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 09/10/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/11/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |