Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - DP13-0158
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/17/2013 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The grading plan has been reviewed by the Landscape / NPPO Section but cannot approve the plan until all Engineering, comments, concerns, and appropriate revisions have been addressed |
| 09/18/2013 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: The Bridges - Block 10 Grading Plan (1st Review) DP13-0158 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 18, 2013 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administrative Manual (AM) & Technical Standards Manual (TSM) were addressed. 1. This grading was reviewed for compliance with the approved development package/tentative plat. 2. The grading plan is in substantial compliance with the approved development package/tentative plat. Once Engineering and Landscape have approved Zoning will approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP13-0158 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
| 09/18/2013 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: September 18, 2013 FOR: Pat Marum, P.E., Wood Patel Engineering SUBJECT: The Bridges Block 10 S11-043 Grading Plan Engineering Review LOCATION: T14S R14E Section 30 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP13-0158 SUMMARY: Engineering has reviewed the development package, and does not recommend approval until the following comments are addressed. MASTER COVER SHEETS/ GENERAL NOTES/GRADING SHEET COMMENTS: 1) Admin Man Sec.2-06.3.5: Add Development Package stamp to all sheets. http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/dsd/CDRC/dvpkg_stamp_10-11.jpeg 2) Admin Man Sec.4.9.S: See redline comments. Return redlines with resubmittal. 3) Tech Man Sec.4-04.9.3: Provide geotechnical supporting documentation for north slope - rear lot walls appear to abut slope that is adjacent to north swale. Verify setback. 4) Admin Man Sec.4.9.N.1: Provide WSEL's along north channel and within basin limits. Add WSEL data to both plan view and cross sections on sheet 4. 5) Tech Man Sec.4-04: Provide velocity in north channel / explain why erosion protection is not provided. Also identify Q100 within north channel. 6) Tech Man Sec.4-04: Provide at minimum one 15-ft wide maintenance access ramp that may be used concurrently with other access ramps. Also identify material for stabilization for each ramp. 7) Tech Man Sec.4-03.4.3: Provide computation and clarification of Cedar Creek Street capacity assuming full imperviousness cover for Block A. 8) Tech Man Sec.2-01.9: Label Grading limits on cross section details on sheet 4. 9) Tech Man Sec.4-03.3.3.4: Provide unattenuated flow condition erosion protection along basin 'entrance' area of constructed slopes. 10) Tech Man Sec.2-01: Label total disturbance area on cover sheet. 11) Tech Man Sec.2-01.4: Identify and label local benchmark with datum on planview. If you have any questions, please call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/02/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |