Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP13-0157
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/19/2013 | CPIERCE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/23/2013 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Complete the marked crossing in front of the dumpster area by providing painted stripes defining the crossing area. |
| 09/23/2013 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 09/23/2013 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP13-0157 3601 E Broadway Blvd. Cheddar's Restaurant - Food Service Use Development Package TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 23, 2013 DUE DATE: October 3, 2013 COMMENTS: Please resubmit final sign off copies with the sequence numbers for the CC&R's and the plat. The remaining comments are from the last review which could not be addressed at this time. The recordation information must be noted on the DP and final plat. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above. 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 19, 2014. and, 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.7 - If the property is part of a subdivision plat that is being reviewed or has been recorded, provide the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note, indicate whether the project is part of a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), condominium, or another similar type project. COMMENT: The legal description of the parcel in question may have to be revised if this development package is not approved prior to the recordation of the Subdivision plat S13-016. If the subdivision plat is approved and recorded after the approval of this development package the legal description may remain as noted in the title block. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. COMMENT: As mentioned in a comment above, there is a subdivision plat that is in process fore review, approval and eventual recordation. If the plat is approved before this development package is approved, the overall parcel and boundary (distance and bearing) of the parcel will have to be drawn and labeled on the development package plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. |
| 09/23/2013 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | MICHELENE NOWAK ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 721-9512 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: MICHELENE NOWAK, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP13-0157/CHEDDERS AT ELCON (PAD 3) 2nd REVIEW DATE: SEPTEMBER 23, 2013 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. 1.) Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar or bond paper of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through Pima County Addressing. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County's Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 09/27/2013 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Ensure that all Zoning & Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior NPP / Landscape approval signature. |
| 10/03/2013 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/04/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Reqs Change | · The plans provided show a structural tube over the top of the gates and a roof over the compactor/recycle enclosure. Please revise the plans to provide the twenty-five (25) foot minimum height clearance over the collection area. TSM Section 8.01.6.2.C · The dimensions and clearances inside the enclosure for the compactor and recycling container must comply with Figure 3A of TSM Section 8.01. The enclosure shall have a minimum ten (10) foot by ten (10) foot unobstructed interior space per compactor and container within the bollards. Also, show how the gates will be securable in the open position. · Show the required 10 ft. wide concrete service apron in front of the enclosure, and call out its six (6) inch thickness and reinforcement. If there are questions, contact me at kperry@perryengineering.net |
| 10/04/2013 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please include the following items: 1) 3 sets of the rolled plans 2) a disk containing all items submitted. 3) all items requested by review staff 4) all items needed to approve these plans. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/24/2013 | SHANAE POWELL | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/24/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |