Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP13-0150
Parcel: 10409002D

Address:
475 W WETMORE RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUB - SITE/GRADING ALL

Permit Number - DP13-0150
Review Name: RESUB - SITE/GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/15/2013 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Wetmore Plaza - Proposed Building
Development Package (2nd Review)
DP13-0150

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 15, 2013

DUE DATE: November 8, 2013

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

Provide the sequence number on the plan. COMMENT: There is an existing "1' NO-ACCESS EASEMENT DOCKET 6678 PAGE 600" shown along the north property line. A portion of this easement will need to be abandoned for the new access lanes prior to approval of the development package.

2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

This comment was not completely addressed. The future plans show vehicle use area located in an area that requires landscaping. Also as you have elected to provide a future site plan a MS&R Covenant will need to be recorded prior to approval of this plan. Provide a note on the plan stating "MS&R COVENANT RECORDED UNDER SEQUENCE #_______".COMMENT: Show the future right-of-way (ROW) for Wetmore Road. It appears that some of the proposed improvements may be located in the future ROW. Either design to meet the future ROW or provide a future site plan that shows how the site will meet all UDC requirements when the ROW is taken.

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: Provide a width dimension for the sidewalk that connects to the sidewalk in the ROW along Wetmore Road.

This comment was not addressed. The proposed cross walk shown runs into a curb that surrounds an empty landscape area. This pedestrian path must connect to the sidewalk and meet accessibility requirement. COMMENT: Per TSM Section 7-01.3.3.B Provide a continuous pedestrian circulation path between the proposed building and Building 1 to the south.

There are numerous keynotes on sheet 2 that have detail references to sheet 4, there are no details on sheet 4.

Once the above comments are addressed Zoning will provide an over-the-counter review. Call or email to schedule an appointment.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan.
10/16/2013 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Approved Need new fire hydrant within 400 feet of all portions of new structure or provide fire sprinkler system for new building
10/23/2013 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: October 24, 2013
SUBJECT: Wetmore Plaza Development Plan Package- 2nd Engineering Review
TO: Metro TED; Attn: Lisa Bowers
LOCATION: 4333 N Oracle Rd; T13S R13E Sec23
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP13-0150


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement (Cypress Civil Development, 02AUG13). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the following link for further clarification:
http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

The following items need to be addressed:

SITE PLAN:

1) Complied.

2) Complied.

3) Complied.

4) Complied.

5) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.8.B: Revise the development plan document to provide the SEQ # for the new/abandoned 1-foot NAE as shown on the submitted documentation and as labeled in plan view.

6) Complied.

7) Complied.

8) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Revise the development plan document to label and dimension the future SVTs for the eastern driveway entrance based on the future right-of-way and intersection tapering leg.

9) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to label the minimum dimensions for the proposed back-up spur at the end of the PAAL per UDC Sec.7.4.6.F.4. Specifically the 3-foot radius needs to be dimensioned on Sheet 3.

10) Complied.

11) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.J: Revise the development plan document to include all dimensions for the MS&R Street adjacent to the project. Specifically provide dimensions for future right-of-way and the portion of the intersection taper that is located along the eastern portion of the vehicle use area. Verify that required improvements are not constructed within this area. As you have elected to provide a future site plan a MS&R Covenant will need to be recorded prior to approval of this plan. Provide a note on the plan stating "MS&R COVENANT RECORDED UNDER SEQUENCE #_______".

12) Complied.

13) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.3: Revise the development plan document and plan view or culvert profile (Sheet 2) to clearly label the inlet invert elevation for the proposed pipe. As a side note the Keynotes on Sheet 2 references Sheet 4 for all detail call outs; however most of the details are shown on Sheet 5. Revise the Keynotes so that the correct Detail is referenced to the correct Sheet.

14) Complied.

15) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan document to clearly label all dimensions for the proposed sidewalks, specifically for the new sidewalk sections from the building to the right-of-way along Wetmore Road.

16) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan document to verify how the existing pedestrian cross walk between the existing building to the south and the new proposed building is accessible. It appears that the cross walk dead ends into a landscape planter and does not provide for accessibility from all buildings to the street frontage, revise.

17) Complied.

18) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project.

19) Complied.

DRAINAGE STATEMENT:

20) Complied.

GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
11/04/2013 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Denied ALL RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS PRESENTED IN ALL CAPS

NO WRITTEN RESPIONSES WERE ACCOMPANIED WITH RESUBMITTAL PACKAGE.

SHEET 2
1. Provide a large scale detail of the accessible ramp to the Wetmore Road right of way.
ONLY A PARTIAL RAMP DETAIL IS SHOWN AT DETAIL 1/5 WHICH IS PRESENTED FOR RIP RAP DETAIL. FINISH TTHE RAMP DETAIL IN THIS PARTIAL PALN AND SHOW ALL ACCESSIBLE REQUIREMENTS INCLUDING ALL DIMENSIONS, HANDRAILS, SLOPES AND LANDINGS,

2. At note 29, change the reference to read "the 2012 IBC, Chapter 11 and the 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 405, Ramps".
NON RESPONSIVE

3. Reference the accessible parking layout to the large scale detail 2/4.
NON RESPONSIVE

SHEET 3
4. Reference the accessible ramp to Wetmore right of way to the large scale detail requested per comment 1 above.
NON RESPONSIVE

SHEET 4 (NOW SHEET 3)
5. Provide detail numbers 2 and 3 to the two partial parking layout details.
NON RESPONSIVE

6. At the Handicap Parking Detail 2:
a. Indicate grade slopes at a maximum of 2% in all directions.
b. Identify the accessible parking signage and reference to detail A/4.
c. Provide a ramp width dimension.
NON RESPONSIVE
SHEET 5
7. At detail "H", show how the handrail is to be mounted.
NON RESPONSIVE

IN ADDITION FINISH THE RAMP DETAIL

END OF REVIEW
11/07/2013 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change 1) UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a.(3) An unpaved planting area, which must be a minimum of 34 square feet in area and four feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree.

Revise the site, grading and landscape plans as necessary.



2) TSM 5-01.3.1 Planter Area
A. The measurement must always be within the planter area and may not include any material that defines the outer edge of the unpaved area.
B. The unpaved area may be covered with a permeable material or with grillwork, but air and moisture must be able to penetrate the soil.
C. Inert or vegetative ground cover must be used in planter areas not otherwise occupied by trees, shrubs, or grillwork.

Revise the plans to add a code compliant detail for the diamond planters.


3) UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. Street landscape borders must be a minimum of ten feet wide as measured from the street property line.

Revise the site and landscape plans to provide the minimum width along Wetmore Road.


4) UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border must be measured from the future MS&R right-of-way line.

Revise the MS&R Site Plan include the future street landscape border.


5) UDC 5.4.5.C.3 PERMITTED USE OF MS&R RIGHT-OF-WAY AREA
The screening and landscaping required by Section 7.6, Landscaping and Screening Standards, for vehicular use areas , street landscape borders , and Gateway Routes may be located temporarily in the MS&R right-of-way area until such time as this area is used for right-of-way purposes. Upon elimination of the parking area , all parking-related improvements , such as required screening and landscaping , as specified on the site plan required by Section 5.4.5.F, shall be moved to the location specified on the site plan at no cost to the City ; (See Figure 5.4-B.)

Identify and provide dimensions for the required screening and landscaping on the MS&R site plan.

6) UDC 5.4.5.F An approved site plan is required indicating how the project will comply with UDC standards when the MS&R right-of-way can no longer be used as part of the site. Such plan shall be an exhibit to an executed covenant for recordation stating the responsibility of the property owner, successor, or assignee as to the removal of improvements and compliance with the UDC at no cost to the City.

Provide the required approved site plan and recording documentation. Note the sequence number on the plans.

7) UDC 7.6.5.E Sight Visibility Triangle
The maximum permitted height of a screen is 30 inches within a sight visibility triangle (see Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual).

Revise the landscape plans to ensure that the screen plantings within the site triangles do not exceed thirty inches.

7) UDC 7.6.5.C.2. Whether or not required by this section, screens along a streetfrontage must be located on the development side of the street landscape border so that they do not obstruct the view of the street landscape border from the street.

The existing walls along Wetmore Rd do not comply with the requirement. We recommend that the applicant pursue a DDO per 3.11.1. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT OPTION to address this issue and landscape border width issue.
11/07/2013 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/20/2013 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed