Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP13-0149
Review Name: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/17/2014 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site Canopy Trees in Vehicular Use Areas General Standard Within a vehicular use area, one canopy tree is required for each four motor vehicle parking spaces or fraction thereof. The canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space must be located within 40 feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk). Remove references to older requirements within notes on sheet 3 of 7. Note: Refuse Dumpsters and Loading Spaces Trees must be planted an appropriate distance from refuse dumpster locations and loading spaces so that the tree canopy, at maturity, does not obstruct service. Stormwater Runoff Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans must be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. Show by detail or spot elevations how landscape areas will accommodate water harvesting. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed/ Additional comments may apply |
| 03/19/2014 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 03/20/2014, SUBJECT: Lee Village Square DP13-00149, T14S, R13E, SECTION 1 RECEIVED: Development Package and Drainage Report on March 06, 2014 The subject submittal has been reviewed and it can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the Drainage Report and on the Development Package where the revisions were made: Drainage Report: 1. Provide a geotechnical report that determines the required building setback from the ponding water in the retention and water harvesting basins. Verify that the building is set back in accordance with the geotechnical report recommendations. 2. The geotechnical report shall also address retention basins percolation rates and determine if bleed pipes are needed. Additionally, the report shall address slope treatment and stabilization requirements if applicable. Development Package: 1. Show required retention and waterharvesting basins setback lines based on the geotechnical report recommendations. Ensure that all existing and proposed buildings are outside the ponding setback lines (A.M. 2-06.4.9.O). 2. The use of the existing block wall, to retain onsite runoff, is not acceptable. The grout in the block wall is not water tight, and the wall may not be designed to hold the water weight. Propose modifications to the wall to ensure that the wall is water tight and it will have the structural strength for water retention. SWPPP: SWPPP is acceptable. Ensure that all required SWPPP documents are available during the pre-construction meeting. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4933 or Laith.Alshami@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan Package and drainage report and a Geotechnical Report |
| 03/24/2014 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP13-0149 1611 N 3rd Avenue Multi- Family Residential Development TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 24, 2014 DUE DATE: April 3, 2014 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-01 of the City of Tucson Development Standards. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Land Use Code (LUC). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Development Standard Section number and the following paragraph is the actual "COMMENT" related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/Development_Stds.pdf This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The LUC requirements can be found at the following link: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/Complete_LUC_Sept2012.pdf DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE 2-01.1.0 GENERAL 2-01.2.0 FORMAT 2-01.3.0 CONTENT 2-01.1.1 - Purpose. This Standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This Standard does not waive any applicable City regulations or codes. 2-01.1.2 - Definitions. Other than as provided below, definitions used in this Standard are found in the Development Standards Glossary or Sec. 6.2.0 of the LUC. 2-01.1.2.A. Development package documents. Development package documents as referred to in this standard are graphic representations of proposed development submitted in support of an application for a building permit, subdivision plat, or to demonstrate compliance with rezoning or other conditions. 2-01.1.3 Applicability. A development package may be submitted in lieu of an otherwise required site plan, tentative plat, or development plan. 2-01.2.0 FORMAT. 1. Follow-up Comment: The digital stamp has been added to sheets 6 and 7. Add the digital stamp to sheets 1 -5. 2-01.2.5 - A three (3) inch by five (5) inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. PREVIOUS COMMENT: Add the bock as noted above or add the digital stamp to all plan sheets. Use the following link to download the digital http://pdsd.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/cdrc/acad-cot_stamp_model_1_0.pdf 2-01.3.0 CONTENT. 2. Follow-up Comment: The email addresses of the professionals listed on sheet one must be listed. 2-01.3.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. PREVIOUS COMMENT: Provide the required information as listed by this standard. The owner's information will also be listed on the cover sheet. 3. Follow-up Comment: The sheet index on sheet one must include the sheet number i.e. sheet 1 - A.0.0, 2 -A.0.1 etc. 2-01.3.2.E - Page number and number of pages. PREVIOUS COMMENT: The page numbers should be listed as 1 of 7, 2 of 7 etc. Sheet index should be revised to list the sheet numbers as requested. The index may include specific annotation such A-01 after the 1 of 7, 2 of 7 etc. 2-01.3.7 General Notes. The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-01.3.7.A. Zoning and Land Use Notes. 4. Follow-up Comment: The Pima County Assessor's tax parcel combo must be completed before approval of the Development Package. 2-01.3.7.A.8 - If the property is part of a subdivision plat that is being reviewed or has been recorded, provide the subdivision name and file number (S[YR]-___), in the lower right corner of each sheet. Indicate whether the project is part of a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), condominium, or another similar type project. If this plan is a separate drawing from the plat, indicate the subdivision plat file number (S[YR]-___) in the lower right corner of each sheet. COMMENT: It is acknowledged that this site is comprised of several lots in block 27. Provide documentation from Pima County indicating that a Tax Parcel Combo has been filed to combine all lots in block 27 into one single lot. 2-01.3.7.A.9 - For development package documents provide: 5. Follow-up Comment: It is not clear what your response to comment 2-01.3.7.A.9.b means. Did the director provide you with an email or written response? If so provide a copy of the document with the next submittal. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage. COMMENT: Clarify if the square footage of the existing garages were calculated in the lot coverage. If so the calculation may have to be adjusted for the next submittal. The existing dwelling at 417 E. Lee Street that was approved prior includes vehicles backing out onto the street (using the street to maneuver into and out of the onsite parking spaces). This Parcel is now considered part of the overall site and the maneuvering into and out of the parking spaces must be made completely onsite. Based on the existing site design it does not appear that maneuverability can be provided on site. A Board of Adjustment variance will be required to allow backing out (maneuvering) into and out of an onsite parking space(s). Clarify if a B of A variance is to be requested otherwise the site plan must be revised to demonstrate how the onsite maneuverability will occur or if the garage will be converted to habitable space and the existing curb cut closed. Additional comments may be forthcoming on this item. |
| 03/26/2014 | RONALD BROWN | HC SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | SHEET A0.1 1. Show detectable warnings at both ends of all marked crossings within the boundary lines. SHEET C2.0 2. At detail 2: Show the detectable warning strip required by ICC A117.1, Sections 406.12, 13 and 14 as applicable. 3. At detail 5: Show the detectable warning strip required by ICC A117.1, Sections 406.12, 13 and 14 as applicable. 4. At detail 7: Show the detectable warning strips at both ends of the marked crossing as required by ICC A117.1, Sections 406.12, 13 and 14 as applicable. 5. At detail 8: Show the detectable warning strips at both ends of the marked crossing as required by ICC A117.1, Sections 406.12, 13 and 14 as applicable. END OF REVIEW |
| 03/28/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide backwater valves for building G. [Initial comment: The finished floor elevations for all of the proposed buildings are below or less than 12 inches above the elevation of the next upstream manholes in the public sewer. A backwater valve shall be installed in the building drain or branch of the building drain serving the first floor for each new building. Floors discharging from above the finished floor elevations (i.e. the 2nd floor) shall not discharge through a backwater valve. The sewer connection points for the two existing buildings are not shown. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.] |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/09/2014 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/09/2014 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | REJECT SHELF | Completed |