Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP13-0147
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/11/2014 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/11/2014 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | First review was informational only |
| 07/11/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | First review was informational only. |
| 07/28/2014 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/30/2014 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/01/2014 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 08/01/2014 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PREVIOUS COMMENT 4: "The concrete walk between the two bicycle parking pads is indicated as having an 8.33% slope. This is a ramp and needs handrails and landings as per ICC A117.1, Section 405. a. Provide a large scale detail of both the sidewalk ramps showing all accessible requirements." RESUBMITTAL COMMENT The ramp between the two bike racks has be adjusted to a 5% slope and is no longer considered a ramp. The ramp to the education center needs to be addressed. There is no large scale detail on sheet DP2.0 as per your response. END OF REVIEW |
| 08/04/2014 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The DP has been reviewed on behalf of Environmental Services and the following comments need to be addressed on the resubmittal: 1. Per TSM 8-01.4.B, add the general note specifying anticipated method of collection and frequency based on the calculated tonnage from Table 1 for the intended use. 2. TSM 8-01.5.1.B states all containers require enclosures with gates. There are no details on the proposed enclosure. Provide information on the enclosure walls and gates to show how the containers are screened from public view and from adjacent developments. Enclosure walls are to be masonry or other materials based upon approval by the Environmental Services Dept. per TSM 8-01.5.2.A. 3. It appears drainage is directed into and out of the enclosure. TSM 8-01.5.4.C prohibits containers and enclosures from obstructing or blocking drainage. Show that the proposed enclosure will not obstruct drainage. It would be preferred to have drainage flow away from the enclosure and not through it. If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net |
| 08/06/2014 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP13-0147 Watershed Management Group - Dodge Blvd. (X) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: SE-13-92 Watershed Management Group- Dodge Blvd. NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Grant-Alvernon Area Plan (GAAP) and General Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: August 7, 2014 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (X) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 8/26/13 () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER:msp 791-5505 DATE: 08/06/14 |
| 08/07/2014 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/08/2014 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2481.99') is higher than the first floor elevation of the new storage building (2478.85'-), the existing education center (2478.85'), and the existing office building (2480.76'). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of backwater valves when future plumbing activities take place for any of the buildings. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 08/11/2014 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted in paper 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve the plans. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/11/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |