Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP13-0147
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/08/2013 | CPIERCE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/08/2013 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Passed | |
| 08/08/2013 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Passed | Per Addressing Form |
| 08/08/2013 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/12/2013 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. The location and size of sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. b. The points of connection to existing public sewers. c. The first floor elevation for the building Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual No. 2-06.0.0, Section 4.8 and Section 107.2.13, IBC 2012. |
| 08/13/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | No objections/adverse comments. See attached. ____________________________ Eric W. Kramer, Ph.D., AICP Senior Land-Use Modeler PAG40MPOhoriz3.png 177 N. Church Ave, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 792-1093 x506 (tel) (520) 620-6981 (fax) www.pagnet.org <mailto:ekramer@pagnet.org> ekramer@pagnet.org Here are my comments - DATE: 8/13/2013 CASE: DP13-0147 WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GROUP COMMENT: Daily PM Peak Vehicle Trip Generation: 43 6 Thanks, -Eric Additional notes: See additional documents in SIRE |
| 08/14/2013 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP13-0147 Watershed Management Group Living Lab and Learning Center 1137 & 1143-1145 N. Dodge Blvd. Development Package - Private Cultural Use TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 14, 2013 DUE DATE: September 6, 2013 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above. 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 8, 2014. 2. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE SITE PLANS Section 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIRMENTS Section 2-06.4.1 The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 1. COMMENT: List the email address of the registrant on sheet one under the registrants text block. 2-06.3.4 - Format requirement: A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. 2. COMMENT: The title block shall be placed in the lower right corner of all plan sheets and include the information as required by section 2-06.4.2.A - .D. Revise the location of the title block and include the required information as listed below. (It is acknowledged that some of the information required is on the plan sheet, just not in the location as required by this standard. Revise as required.) 4.2 The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: A. The proposed name of the project or subdivision, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name; B. A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; C. The number of proposed lots and common areas are to be noted. If the subdivision is a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), a condominium, or a similar type of residential subdivision utilizing special provisions of the UDC, it shall be so noted; D. The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). 2-06.4.7. General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. A. Zoning and Land Use Notes 4. Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 3. COMMENT: Revise the Subject to section number in General Note 2 to state UDC Section 4.9.3.C.2 - .8. 6. If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, special exceptions; a. List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 4. COMMENT: As of this review there is no activity number associated with the Special Exception application. Once the SE application has been started or applied for an activity number will be assigned. List the activity number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets. b. If there is more than one lot within the site, the note should specify which lots are affected by the additional applications or overlay zones. 5. COMMENT: The Special Exception affects both lots but as a condition of approval of the development package Zoning is requiring that a Pima County Tax Parcel be processed and through the Pima County Assessor's Office and the signed or recorded Tax Parcel combo form provided with the next submittal. B. Drainage Notes List the following notes as appropriate: 1. List the following notes on all plans/plats: "The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall." 6. COMMENT: Correct the typo for the word "CLAIMS" in General Note 4. 4.8 Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. B. All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 7. COMMENT: If applicable draw, label, dimension, and describe any existing utility easements on the two parcels. Include any recordation information for each easement. It has been noted on the plan that there will be an easement along the south boundary of the site that is to provide access to the proposed parking spaces. Include in the next submittal the recordation information for the easement on the site plan and include a copy of the recorded easement document for review. Additional comments may be forthcoming on the issue based on the easement document. C. The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 8.COMMENT: Add a note on the site plan that describes the type of use (Drive or PAAL) for the area that provides access to the proposed parking spaces for the Cultural Use. Clarify if it is designated as a PAAL or Drive. Label the type of surfacing material currently existing or to be provided. 4.9 Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. H. Proposed traffic circulation: 5. If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. d. Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 9. COMMENT: Provide dimensioned details drawing specific to the bicycle parking facilities and locations on this site. It is not clear what type of facility is proposed for long and short term facilities. Until the type of facilities can be reviewed the number of spaces provided cannot be verified. The parking calculations for the vehicle and bicycle parking should be broken down and listed separately including any reduction used. Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next review of the DP as it relates to this standard. L. All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 10. COMMENT: See related comment number 7. M. Grading Plan 1. A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan. 2. Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently. 11. COMMENT: The Grading plan sheet has been concurrently reviewed by Zoning. Once the DP has been approved the grading plan sheet is also considered approved for zoning review purview. If changes are needed zoning will have to review any revisions tot eh grading plan to ensure compliance with the approved DP Site Plan Sheet. O. All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 12. COMMENT: It is acknowledged that all buildings are existing on the site with the exception of the new storage structure. Label the building setbacks from all structures to the property lines. Dodge Blvd. is considered a developed area for purposes of street setbacks. Revise the setbacks notes to state that the street setback from Dodge is based on the greatest of 20 feet or one and one-half the height of the structure wall facing the street perimeter property line. R. Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 13. COMMENT: Dimension all onsite pedestrian sidewalks. The minimum width is 4 feet. U. Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of the special exception. 14. COMMENT: This project must be approved through a Special Exception review process. This process is similar to a rezoning where conditions of development are possible. The revised development package site plan must demonstrate compliance with all required code(s) related items as well as any conditions that may be generated through the Special Exception review process. W. Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 15. COMMENT: If applicable to this project, indicate on the site plan any proposed freestanding monument signage. The type and size of the monument sign must be labeled. X. Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 16. COMMENT: See the landscape plans reviewer comments related to landscape buffers and screening requirements. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. |
| 08/14/2013 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approv-Cond | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#267248 August 14, 2013 Oracle Engineering Group 199 E Fort Lowell Tucson, Arizona 85705 Dear Oracle Engineering Group: SUBJECT: Watershed Management Group DP13-0147 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted August 6, 2013. It appears that there are conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. " Anchors and down guys in colift with parking spaces Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 08/19/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | See letter in SIRE |
| 08/22/2013 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | The Development Package cannot be approved until the special exception has been approved. Once the special exception process is complete additional comments may be forthcoming. The following comments must be addressed: 1. Provide recordation for the easement used for access to the parking spaces. 2. Label the transitions from curb to header or to grade on site and grading plans. 3. Check the prints to ensure the lines are legible. Sheet two of the submitted set has lines that are too light to scan. 4. Additional comments might be forthcoming on the next review since the current sheet is not legible. |
| 08/30/2013 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP13-0147 Watershed Management Group - Dodge Blvd. (X) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: SE-13-92 Watershed Management Group- Dodge Blvd. NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Grant-Alvernon Area Plan (GAAP) and General Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: Sept.4, 2013 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: (X) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER:msp 791-5505 DATE: 08/26/13 Planning and Development Services Department Community Planning Section DP13 0147 - Watershed Management Group - Dodge Blvd. August 26, 2013 Based on the applicant's request; a concurrent review is under way for both Development Plan 13-0147, conversion of residential use to non-residential for a Cultural Use in the R-2 zone (Special Exception) and Special Exception Case SE-13-92, a request to allow a Cultural Use in the R-2 residential zone. Prior to the approval of the proposed development plan DP13-0147; Special Exception (rezoning) case SE-13-92 must be approved by Mayor and Council. Development plan DP13-0147 shall be required to be in full compliance with all of SE-13-92 special exception conditions. Staff offers the following comments: 1. Prior to development plan resubmittal, the proposed development plan shall be in full compliance with Special Exception case SE-13-92, as approved by Mayor and Council. 2. Prior to development plan approval, add to the general notes all special exception conditions, verbatim, as approved by Mayor and Council. |
| 09/03/2013 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The one accessible parking space must be "Van Accessible" and 11'-0" wide. 2. Provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking signage and show it's location on the site plan. Show the "Van Accessible sign. 3. Provide a note clarifing that the asphaltic paving is flush with the concrete sidewalk at the front end of the parking spaces. 4. The concrete walk between the two bicycle parking pads is indicated as having an 8.33% slope. This is a ramp and needs handrails and landings as per ICC A117.1, Section 405. a. Provide a large scale detail of both the sidewalk ramps showing all accessible requirements. 5. Provide width dimensions for all accessible routes. 6. Insure slopes of all accessible routes comply with ICC A117.1, Section 403.3, 5% max running slope and 2% max cross slope. 7. Provide an 18' depth dimension of the accessible parking space. END OF REVIEW. |
| 09/04/2013 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | From Zeln Canchola TDOT Traffic Engineering September 4, 2013 No objection or adverse comments. |
| 09/04/2013 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 09/04/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this request. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept 837-7428 |
| 09/06/2013 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Landscape borders proposed in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. UDC 7.6.4.C Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements. Revise the landscape plans to include the following standard notes for landscaping in the public right-of-way, if approved: All planting and irrigation that is proposed within the ROW must receive a permit prior to construction. Plans should be submitted to the City of Tucson Permits and Code section at 201 N. Stone, 4th floor. Once the permit has been approved, the applicant must call for a "Blue Stake " prior to the required pre-construction meeting with the City Landscape Architect, and prior to starting any work. It is the property owner's responsibility to keep the Sight Visibility Triangles (SVT), and the pedestrian access area clear of vegetation at all times, per Land Use Code (LUC) section 3.7.2.9. Final plant locations must be in compliance with all utility setback requirements. The owner understands that if the City of Tucson Transportation Department or any utility company needs to work within the ROW in the landscaped area, plants and irrigation may be destroyed without replacement or repair. The property owner assumes full liability for this landscape and irrigation, and any damage to roadway, sidewalk and utilities within the public right-of-way. The only private irrigation equipment that is allowed within the ROW is polyethylene type tubing and emitters that are not under constant pressure. All other equipment except for the water meter must be on site. Standard Notes for Planting in ROW 2) Provide a screen wall constructed of masonry materials to screen the parking lot from the adjacent residentially zoned property. UDC TABLE 7.6.4-1 3) Fences or walls constructed in a single continuous line shall extend into a street landscape border no more than the actual width of the fence or wall. UDC 7.6.5.C 4) Submit a Native Plant Preservation Plan. UDC 7.7.3.A |
| 09/06/2013 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | |
| 09/09/2013 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) One disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve this plan. |
| 09/09/2013 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 09/09/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 09/09/2013 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/09/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Denied | Project denied. Site needs commercial enclosure for solid waste and recycle service. Jeff Drumm, P.E. Environmental Manager City of Tucson Environmental Services 520-837-3713 |
| 09/09/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 09/09/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approv-Cond | See letter and information in SIRE |
| 09/09/2013 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Passed | |
| 09/09/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 09/09/2013 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/11/2014 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |